Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Published in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Review

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017

Author: Warren J. Manning

Published in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

There were 106 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2017, including 92 original research papers, 3 reviews, 9 technical notes, and 1 Position paper, 1 erratum and 1 correction. The volume was similar to 2016 despite an increase in manuscript submissions to 405 and thus reflects a slight decrease in the acceptance rate to 26.7%. The quality of the submissions continues to be high. The 2017 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2018) was minimally lower at 5.46 (vs. 5.71 for 2016; as published in June 2017), which is the second highest impact factor ever recorded for JCMR. The 2017 impact factor means that an average, each JCMR paper that were published in 2015 and 2016 was cited 5.46 times in 2017.
In accordance with Open-Access publishing of Biomed Central, the JCMR articles are published on-line in continuus fashion and in the chronologic order of acceptance, with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, over the years, the Editors have felt that it is useful to annually summarize the publications into broad areas of interest or theme, so that readers can view areas of interest in a single article in relation to each other and other contemporary JCMR articles. In this publication, the manuscripts are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought within the journal. In addition, I have elected to use this format to convey information regarding the editorial process to the readership.
I hope that you find the open-access system increases wider reading and citation of your papers, and that you will continue to send your very best, high quality manuscripts to JCMR for consideration. I thank our very dedicated Associate Editors, Guest Editors, and Reviewers for their efforts to ensure that the review process occurs in a timely and responsible manner and that the JCMR continues to be recognized as the forefront journal of our field. And finally, I thank you for entrusting me with the editorship of the JCMR as I begin my 3rd year as your editor-in-chief. It has been a tremendous learning experience for me and the opportunity to review manuscripts that reflect the best in our field remains a great joy and highlight of my week!
Literature
1.
Engblom H, Tufvesson J, Joblonowski R, et al. A new automatic algorithm for quantification of myocardial infarction imaged by late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: experimental validation and comparison to expert delineations in multi-center, multi-vendor patient data. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Zhou Z, Nguyen C, Chen Y, et al. Optimized CEST cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessment of metabolic activity in the heart. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Dall’Armellina E, et al. Native T1-mapping detects the location, extent and patterns of acute myocarditis without the need for gadolinium contrast agents. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
Dabir D, Child N, Kalra A, et al. Reference values for healthy human myocardium using a T1 mapping methodology: results from the International T1 Multicenter Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:69.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Villa ADM, Sammut E, Zarinabad N, et al. Microvascular ischemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: new insights from high-resolution combined quantification of perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Tarkiainen M, Sipola P, Jalanko M, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of mitral valve length in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
Deva DP, Hanneman K, Li Q, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance demonstration of the spectrum of morphological phenotypes and patterns of myocardial scarring in Anderson-Fabry disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Li R, Yang Z, Wen L, et al. Regional myocardial microvascular dysfunction in cardiac amyloid light-chain amyloidosis: assessment with 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Taylor RJ, Umarn F, Lin ELS, et al. Mechanical effects of left ventricular midwall fibrosis in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Chitiboi T, Schnell S, Collins J, et al. Analyzing myocardial torsion based on tissue phase mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Kato S, Nakamori S, Roujol S, et al. Relationship between native papillary muscle T1 time and severity of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:79.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Mikami Y, Cornhill A, Heydari B, et al. Objective criteria for septal fibrosis in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: validation for the prediction of future cardiovascular events. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Soslow JH, Damon SM, Crum K, et al. Increased myocardial native T1 and extracellular volume in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Becker S, Florian A, Patrascu A, et al. Identification of cardiomyopathy associated circulating miRNA biomarkers in patients with muscular dystrophy using a complementary cardiovascular magnetic resonance and plasma profiling approach. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Wexberg P, Avanzini M, Mascherbauer J, et al. Myocardial late gadolinium enhancement is associated with clinical presentation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
Olivieri LJ, Kellman P, McCarter RJ, et al. Native T1 values identify myocardial changes and disease severity in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Choi Y, Kim SM, Lee SC, et al. Quantification of left ventricular trabeculae using cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction: evaluation of trabecular volume and refined semi-quantitative criteria. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Assuncao AN, Jerosch-Herold M, Melo RL, et al. Chagas’ heart disease: gender differences in myocardial damage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Boentert M, Florian A, Drager B, et al. Pattern and prognostic value of cardiac involvement in patients with late-onset Pompe Disease: a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Jing L, Binklehy CM, Suever JD. Cardiac remodeling and dysfunction in childhood obesity: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Mayr A, Kitterer D, Latus J, et al. Evaluation of myocardial involvement in patients with connective tissue disorders: a multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Krumm P, Mueller KAL, Klingel K, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance patterns of biopsy proven cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
24.
Mygind ND, Michelsen MM, Pena A, et al. Coronary microvascular function and myocardial fibrosis in women with angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary artery disease: the iPOWER study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Kirk P, Sheppard M, Carpenter JP, et al. Post-partem study of the association between cardiac iron and fibrosis in transfusion dependent anaemia. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Ide S, Riesenkempff E, Chiasson DA, et al. Histological validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping markers of myocardial fibrosis in pediatric heart transplant recipients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Greulich S, Mayr A, Kitterer D, et al. T1 and T2 mapping for evaluation of myocardial involvement in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitides. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Bourfiss M, Vigneault DM, Ghasebeh MA, et al. Feature tracking CMR reveals abnormal strain in preclinical arrhythmic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: a multisoftware feasibility and clinical implementation study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Williams LK, Forero JF, Popovic ZB, et al. Patterns of CMR measured longitudinal strain and its association with late gadolinium enhancement in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and its mimics. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Swoboda PP, McDiamid AK, Erhayiem B, et al. Effect of cellular and extracellular pathology assessed by T1 mapping on regional contractile function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Jolly MP, Jordan JH, Melendez G, et al. Automated assessment of circumferential strain from cine CMR correlate with LVEF declines in cancer patients early after receipt of cardio-toxic chemotherapy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Barthur A, Brezdfern-Masley C, Connelly KA, et al. Longitudinal assessment of right ventricular structure and function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab: a prospective observational study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Chan AT, Plodkowski AJ, Pun SC, et al. Prognostic utiiity of differential tissue characterization of cardiac neoplasm and thrombus via late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance among patients with advanced systemic cancer. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Huang H, Nijjar PS, Misialek JR, et al. Accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction by contemporary multiple gated acquisition scanning in patients with cancer: comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Moschetti K, Petersen SE, Pilz G, et al. Cost-minimization analysis of three decision strategies for cardiac revascularization: results of the “suspected CAD” cohort of the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Registry. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Schulz-Menger J. Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:6.CrossRef
37.
Rangarajan V, Chacko SJ, Romano S, et al. Left ventricular long axis function assessed during cine-cardiovascular magnetic resonance is an independent predictor of adverse cardiac events. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Riffel JH, Keller MGP, Rost F, et al. Left ventricular long axis strain: a new prognosticator in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
De Siqueira MEM, Pozo E, Fernandes VR, et al. Characterization and clinical significance of right ventricular mechanics in pulmonary hypertension evaluated with cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Keller EJ, Vogelzang RL, Freed BH, Carr JC, Collins JD. Physician’s professional identities: a roadmap to understanding “value” in cardiovascular imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:52.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Spieker M, Haberkorn S, Gastl M, et al. Abnormal T2 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance correlates with adverse clinical outcome in patients with suspected acute myocarditis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Baillie TJ, Sidharta S, Steele PM, et al. The predictive capabilities of a novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived marker of cardiopulmonary reserve on established prognostic surrogate markers in patients with pulmonary vascular disease: results of a longitudinal pilot study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Nakamori S, Ismail H, Ngo LH, Manning WJ, Nezafat R. Left ventricular geometry predicts ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:79.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Ochs MM, Fritz T, Arenja N, et al. Regional differences in prognostic value of cardiac valve plane displacement in systemic light-chain amyloidosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
46.
Burman ED, Keegan HJ, Kilner PJ. Pulmonary artery diameters, cross sectional areas and area changes measured by cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance in healthy volunteers. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Eikendal ALM, Blomberg BA, Haaring C, et al. 3D black blood VISTA vessel wall cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the thoracic aorta in young, healthy adults: reproducibility and implications for efficacy trial sample sizes: a cross-sectional study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Le TT, Tan RS, Deyn AD, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance reference ranges for the heart and aorta in Chinese at 3T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Wehrum T, Hagenlocher P, Lodrmann T, et al. Age dependence of pulmonary artery blood flow measured by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance: results of a population-based study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Corden B, de Marvao A, Dawes TJ, et al. Relationship between body composition and left ventricular geometry using three dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Swoboda PP, Erhayiem B, McDiarmid AK, et al. Relationship between cardiac deformation parameters measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and aerobic fitness in endurance athletes. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
Maciera AM, Cosin-Sales J, Prasad SK, et al. Characterization of left and right atrial function in healthy volunteers by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:64.CrossRef
53.
Teixeira T, Hafyane T, Stikov N, et al. Comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequences for native myocardial T1 mapping at 3T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
Weingartner S, Messner NM, Budjan J, et al. Myocardial T1-mapping at 3T using saturation-recovery: reference values, precision and comparison with MOLLI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:84.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Diao K, Yang Z, Xu H, et al. Histologic validation of myocardial fibrosis measured by T1 mapping: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Liu JM, Liu A, Leal J, et al. Measurement of myocardial native T1 in cardiovascular disease and norm in 1291 subjects. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Petersen SE, Aung N, Sanghvi MM, et al. Reference ranges for cardiac structure and function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Caucasians from the UK Biobank population cohort. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
Graham-Brown MP, Rutherford E, Levelt E, et al. Native T1 mapping: inter-study, inter-observer and inter-center reproducibility in hemodialysis patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
Cai J, Bryant JA, Lee TT, et al. Fractal analysis of left ventricular trabeculations is associated with impaired myocardial deformation in healthy Chinese. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:102.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Hamshere S, Jones DA, Pellaton C, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial oedema following acute myocardial infarction: is whole heart coverage necessary? J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
61.
Barbier CE, Themudo R, Bjerner T, et al. Long-term prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction detected with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in an elderly population. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Kancharla K, Weissman G, Elagha AA, et al. Scar quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance as an independent predictor of long-term survival in patients with ischemic heart failure treated by coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Reinstadler SJ, Stiermaier T, Eitel C, et al. Antecedent hypertension and myocardial injury in patients with reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Khan JN, Nazir SA, Greenwood JP, et al. Infarct size following complete revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: a comparison of immediate and staged in-hospital non-infarct related artery PCI subgroups in the CvLPRIT Study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
65.
Hussain ST, Chiribiri A, Morton G, et al. Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance and fractional flow reserve in patients with angiographic multi-vessel coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
Papanastasiou G, Williams MC, Dweck MR, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
Cardona M, Martin V, Prat-Gonzalez S, et al. Benefits of chronic total coronary occlusion percutaneous intervention in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: insights from a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Thomas DM, Minor MR, Aden JK, Lisanti CJ, Steel KE. Effects of adenosine and regadenoson on hemodynamics measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
Liu A, Wijesurendra RS, Ariga R, et al. Splenic T1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Levelt E, Piechnik SK, Liu A, et al. Adenosine stress CMR T1-mapping detects early microvascular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without obstructive coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
Levelt E, Piechnik SK. Liu et al. Correction to: Adenosine stress CMR T1-mapping detects early microvascular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without obstructive coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
72.
Le TT, Bryant JA, Ting AE, et al. Assessing exercise cardiac reserve using real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
73.
Greulich S, Kaesemann P, Seitz A, et al. Effects of caffeine on the detection of ischemia in patients undergoing adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:103.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
Foley JR, Kidambi A, Biglands JD, et al. A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:84.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
75.
Van Dijk R, van Assen M, Vliegenthart AR, et al. Diagnostic performance of semi-quantitqative and quantitative stress CMR perfusion analysis: a meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
Hennigsson M, Shome J, Bratis K, et al. Diagnostic performance of image navigated coronary CMR angiography in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:68.CrossRef
77.
Bullock H, Hammond-Haley M, Fontana M, et al. Quantification of both the area-at-risk and acute myocardial infarct size in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using T1-mapping. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:57.CrossRef
78.
De Palma R, Sorensson P, Verouhis D, Pernow J, Saleh N. Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiography jeopardy scores. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
Nordlund D, Kanski M, Jablonowski R, et al. Experimental validation of contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CM R for quantication of myocardium at risk in acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
80.
Klem I, Heiberg E, Van Assche L, et al. Sources of variability in quantification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance infarct size – reproducibility among three core laboratories. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
81.
Bullock H, Go YY, Crimi G, et al. Defining left ventricular remodeling following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:26.CrossRef
82.
Huttin O, Mandry D, Eschaller R, et al. Cardiac remodeling following reperfused acute myocardial infarction is linked to the concomitant evolution of vascular function as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
83.
Garg P, Broadbent DA, Swoboda PP, et al. Extra-cellular expansion in the normal, non-infarcted myocardium is associated with worsening of regional myocardial function after acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
84.
Elias J, van Dongen IM, Hoebers LP, et al. Improved recovery of regional left ventricular function after PCI of chronic total occlusion in STEMI patients: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of the randomized controlled EXPLORE trial. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
85.
Cross R, Olivieri L, O’Brien K, et al. Improved workflow for quantification of left ventricular volumes and mass using free-breathing motion corrected cine imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
86.
Zhao L, Li S, Ma X, et al. Systolic MOLLI T1 mapping with heart-rate dependent pulse sequence sampling scheme is feasible in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
87.
Jacobs M, Benovoy M, Chang LC, et al. Evaluation of an automated method for arterial input function detection for first pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
88.
89.
Kuetting DL, Dabir D, Homsi DR, et al. The effects of extracellular contrast agent (gadobutrol) on the precision and reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
90.
Stirrat CG, Alam SR, MacGiollivray TJ, et al. Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging methodology and normal values at 1.5T and 3T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
91.
Tandon A, James L, Henningsson M, et al. A clinical combined gadobutrol bolus and slow infusion protocol enabling angiography, inversion recovery whole heart, and late gadolinium enhancement imaging in a single study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
92.
Chen X, Yang Y, Cai X, et al. Accelerated two-dimensional cine DENSE cardiovascular magnetic resonance using compressed sensing and parallel imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
93.
Kido T, Kido T, Nakamura M, et al. Compressed sensing real-time cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance: accurate assessment of left ventricular function in a single breath-hold. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
94.
95.
Guensch DP, Nadeshalingam G, Fischer K, et al. The impact of hematocrit on oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
96.
97.
Captur G, Gatehouse P, Keenan KE, et al. A medical device-grade T1 and ECV phantom for global T1 mapping quality assurance – the T1 mapping and ECV Standardization in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (T1MES) program. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
98.
Vassilou VS, GHeng EL, Gatehouse PD, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging phantoms for quality-control of myocardial T1 and ECV mapping: specific formulation, long-term stability and variation with heart rate and temperature. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:62.CrossRef
99.
Hamlet SM, Haggerty CM, Suever JD, et al. An interactive videogame designed to improve respiratory navigator efficiency in children undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
100.
Bertelsen L, Svendsen JH, Lober L, et al. Flow measurement at the aortic root – impact of location of through-plane phase contrast velocity mapping. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
101.
Jarvis K, Vonder M, Barker AJ, et al. Hemodynamic evaluation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation: 4D flow and 2D phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
102.
D’Errico L, Lamacie MM, Juan LJ, et al. Effects of slice orientation on reproducibility of sequential assessment of right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: short-axis vs. transverse SSFP cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
103.
Edelman RR, Botelho M, Pursnani A, et al. Improved dark blood imaging of the heart using radial balanced steady state free precession. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:69.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
104.
105.
Raphael CE, Keegan J, Parker KH, et al. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived coronary wave intensity analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
106.
McGill LA, Ferreira PF, Scott AD, et al. Relationship between cardiac diffusion tensor imaging parameters and anthropometrics in healthy volunteers. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
107.
Opriessnig P, Mangge H, Stollberger R, et al. In vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance of 2D vessel wall diffusion anisotropy in carotid arteries. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
108.
Kellman P, Hansen MS, Nielles-Vallespin S, et al. Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
109.
Wissmann L, Gorschy A, Santelli C, et al. Analysis of spatiotemporal fidelity in quantitative 3D first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
110.
Nickander J, Lundin M, Abdula G, et al. Blood corre3ction reduces variability and gender differences in native mhyocardial T1 values at 1.5 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance – a derivation/validation approach. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
111.
Raucci FJ Jr, Parra DA, Christensen JT, et al. Synthetic hematocrit derived from the longitudinal relaxation of blood can lead to clinically significant errors in measurement of extracellular volume fraction in pediatric and young adult patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
112.
Hu C, Sinusas AJ, Huber S, et al. T1-refBlochi: high resolution 3D post-contrast T1 myocardial mapping based on a single 3D late gadolinium enhancement volume Bloch equations, and a reference T1. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
113.
Spinner GR, von Deuster C, Tezcan KC, Stoeck CT, Kozerke S. Bayesian intravoxel incoherent motion parameter mapping in the human heart. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
114.
Wang G, Zhang Y, Hegde SS, Bottomley PA. High-resolution and accelerated multi-parametric mapping with automated characterization of vessel disease using intravascular MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
115.
Kramer M, Motaal AG, Herrmann KH, et al. Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
116.
Sun A, Zhao B, Li Y, et al. Real-time phase-contrast flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance with low-rank modeling and parallel imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:19.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
117.
Bustamante M, Gupta V, Carlhall CJ, Ebbers T. Improving visualization of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance with four-dimensional angiographic data: generation of a 4D phase-contrast magnetic resonance CardioAngiography (4D PC-MRCA). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
118.
van Engelen A, Vieira MS, Rafiz I, et al. Aortic length measurements for pulse wave velocity calculation: manual 2D vs. automated 3D centerline extraction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
119.
Hamlet SM, Haggerty CM, Suever JD, et al. Using a respiratory navigator significantly reduces variability when quantifying left ventricular torsion with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
120.
Varghese J, Potter LC, LaFountain R, et al. CMR-based blood oximetry via multiparametric estimation using multiple T2 measurements. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
121.
Fuetterer M, Busch J, Peereboom SM, et al. Hyperpolarized 13C urea myocardial first-pass perfusion imaging using velocity-selective excitation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
122.
Morais P, Marchi A, Bogaert JA, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking using a non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm: assessment of variability in a real-life clinical setting. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
123.
Baebler B, Treutlein M, Schaarschmidt F, et al. A novel multiparametric imaging approach to acute myocardiitis using T2-mapping and CMR feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:71.CrossRef
124.
Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: a JACC White Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1475–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
125.
D’Angelo T, Grigoratos D, Mazziotti S, et al. High-throughput gadobutrol-enhanced CMR: a time and dose optimization study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
126.
Bratis K, Henningsson M, Griogoratos C, et al. Image-navigated 3-dimensional late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and initial clinical results. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
127.
Francis R, Kellmam P, Kotecha T, et al. Prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancemenmt with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
128.
Holtackers RJ, Chiribiri A, Schneider T, Higgins DM, Botnar RM. Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement without additional magnetization preparation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
129.
Ginami G, Neji R, Rashid I, et al. 3D whole-heart phase sensitive inversion recovery CMR for simultaneous black-blood late gadolinium enhancement and bright-blood coronary CMR angiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
130.
Saam T, Habs M, Buchholz M, et al. Expansive arterial remodeling of the carotid arteries and its effect on atherosclerotic plaque composition and vulnerability: an in-vivo black-blood 3T CMR study in symptomatic stroke patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
131.
Kokzoglou I, Walker MT, Meyer JR, et al. Nonenhanced hybridized arterial spin labeled magnetic resonance angiography of the extracranial carotid arteries using a fast low angle shot readout at 3 Tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:18.CrossRef
132.
Al Musa T, Uddin A, Fairbairn TA, et al. Assessment of aortic stiffness by cardiovascular magnetic resonance following the treatment of severe aortic stenosis by TAVI and surgical AVR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
133.
Voges I, Kees J, Jerosch-Herold M, et al. Aortic stiffness and its impact on left atrial volumes and function in patients after successful coarctation repair: a multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
134.
Xu Y, Yuan C, Zhou Z, et al. Co-existing intracranial and extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis plaques and recurrent stroke risk: a three-dimensional multicontrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
135.
Liu J, Balu N, Hippe DS, et al. Semi-automatic carotid intraplaque hemorrhage detection and quantification on Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient-Echo (MP-RAGE) with optimized threshold selection. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
136.
Wu G, Yang J, Zhang T, et al. The diagnostic value of non-contrast enhanced quiescent interval single shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography at 3T for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease, in comparison to CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
137.
Tandon A, Hashemi S, Parks WJ, et al. Improved high-resolution pediatric vascular cardiovascular magnetic resonance with gadofosveset-enhanced 3D respiratory navigated, inversion recovery prepared gradient echo readout imaging compared to 3D balanced steady-state free precession readout imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
138.
Xie G, Chen H, He X, et al. Black-blood thrombus imaging (BTI): a contrast-free cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
139.
Mujaj B, Lorza AMA, van Engelen A, et al. Comparison of CT and CMR for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the Rotterdam Study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
140.
Nguyen KL, Park EA, Yoshida T, Hu P, Finn P. Ferumoxytol enhanced black-0blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
141.
Hays AG, Iantorno M, Schar M, et al. Local coronary wall eccentricity and endothelial function are closely related in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
142.
Edelman RR, Silvers RI, Thakrar KH, et al. Nonenhanced MR angiography of the pulmonary arteries using single-shjot radial quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS): a technical feasibility study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
143.
Wehrum T, Dragonu I, Strecker C, et al. Aortic atheroma as a source of stroke – assessment of embolization risk using 3D CMR in stroke patients and controls. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
144.
Veldhoen S, Behzadi C, Lenz A, et al. Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
145.
Subramaniam DR, Stoddard WA, Mortensen KH, et al. Continuous measurement of aortic dimensions in Turner syndrome: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
146.
Kato A, Drolet C, Yoo SJ, et al. Vicious circle between progressive right ventricular dilation and pulmonary regurgitation in patients after tetralogy of Fallow Repair. Right heart enlargement promotes flow reversal in the left pulmonary artery. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
147.
Jing L, Wehner GJ, Suever JD, et al. Left and right ventricular dyssynchrony and strains from cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking do not predict deterioration of ventricular function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
148.
Riesenkampff E, Luining W, Seed M, et al. Increased left ventricular myocardial extracellular volume is associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass times, biventricular enlargement and reduced exercise tolerance in children after repair of Tetralogy of Fallot. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
149.
Nguyen KL, Han F, Zhou Z, et al. 4D MUSIC CMR: value-based imaging of neonates and infants with congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
150.
Jing L, Pulenthiran A, Nevius CD, et al. Impaired right ventricular ontractile function in childhood obesity and is association with right and left ventricular changes: a cine DENSE cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
151.
Jing L, Nevius CD, Friday CM, et al. Ambulatory systolic blood pressure and obesity are independently associated with left ventricular hypertrophy remodeling in children. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:86.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
152.
Roy CW, Seed M, Kingdom JC, Macgowan CK. Motioon compensated cine CCMRT of the fetal heart usiong radial undersampling and compressed sensing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
153.
Haggerty CM, Suever JD, Pulenthiran A, et al. Association between left ventricular mechanics and diffuse myocardial fibrosis in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: a cross-sectional study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
154.
Steinmetz M, Usenbenz S, Kowallick T, et al. Left ventricular synchrony, torsion, and recoil mechanics in Ebstein’s anomaly: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:101.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
155.
Andre F, Robbers-Visser D, Helling-Bakki A, et al. Quantification of myocardial deformation in children by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking: determination of reference values for left ventricular strain and strain rate. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:8.CrossRef
156.
Maes F, Peirard S, de Meester C, et al. Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
157.
Cavalcante JL, Rijal S, Abdelkarim I, et al. Cardiac amyloidosis is prevalent in older patients with aortic stenosis and carries worse prognosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:98.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
158.
Da Silveira JS, Smyke M, Rich AV, et al. Quantification of aortic stenosis diagnostic parameters: comparison of fast 3 direction and 1 direction phase contrast CMR and transthoracic echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
159.
Hwang J, Kim SM, Park SJ, et al. Assessment of reverse remodeling predicted by myocardial deformation on tissue tracking in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
160.
Dobson LE, Musa TA, Uddin A. The impact of trans-catheter aortic valve replacement induced left-bundle branch block on cardiac reverse remodeling. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
161.
Al Musa T, Uddin A, Swoboda PP, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: association of circumferential myocardial strain and mortality. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
162.
Richau J, Dieringer MA, Traber J, et al. Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrtast flow measurements in cardiovascular magnetic resonance – a phantom study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
163.
Vincenti G, Masci PG, Rutz T, et al. Impact of bileaflet mitral valve prolapse on quantification of mitral regurgitation with cardiac magnetic resonance: a single-center study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
164.
Spiewak M, Klopotowski M, Gawor M, et al. Quantification of mitral regurgitation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using aortic and pulmonary flow data: impacts of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and different left ventricular segmentation methods. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:105.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
165.
Geiger J, Hirtler D, Gottfried K, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of aortic hemodynamics in Marfan Syndrome: New insights from a 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance multi-year follow-up study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
166.
Van der Palen RLF, Barker AJ, Bollache E, et al. Altered aortic 3D hemodynamics and geometry in pediatric Marfan Syndrome patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
167.
Devos DGH, De Groote K, Babin D, et al. Proximal aortic stiffening in Turner patients may be present before dilation can be detected: a segmental functional MRI study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
168.
169.
170.
Farhad H, Seidelmann SB, Vigneault D, et al. Left atrial structure and function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy sarcomere mutation carriers with and without left ventricular hypertrophy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:107.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
171.
172.
Rogers T, Ragnayaka K, Khan JM, et al. CMR fluoroscopy right heart catheterization for cardiac output and pulmonary vascular resistance: results in 102 patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
173.
Forte MNV, Pushparajah K, Schaeffter T, et al. Improved passive catheter tracking with positive contrast for CMR-guided cardiac catheterization using partial saturation (pSAT). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:60.CrossRef
174.
Unterberg-Buchwald C, Ritter CO, Reupke V, et al. Targeted endomyocardial biopsy guided by real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
175.
Toupin S, Bour P, Lepetit-Coiffe M, et al. Feasibility of real-time MR thermal dose mapping for predicting radiofrequency ablation outcome in the myocardium in vivo. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
176.
Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Pilz G, Schulz-Menger J. Representation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in AHA/ACC guidelines. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:70.CrossRef
177.
The Global Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Registry (GCMR) Investigators. The global cardiovascular magnetic resonance registry (GCMR) of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): its goals, rationale, data infrastructure, and current developments. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:23.CrossRef
178.
Yoneyama K, Venkatesh BA, Bluemke DA, McClelland RL, Lima JAC. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in an adult human population: serial observations from the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:52.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
179.
Roy C, Slimani A, de Meester C, et al. Age and sex corrected normal reference values of T1, T2, T2* and ECV in healthy subjects at 3T CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
180.
Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM, et al. Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: a consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
181.
Manning WJ. Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) 2015-2016 and transition of the JCMR office to Boston. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:108.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
182.
Jeuthe S, Wassilew AK, Oh-Ici DO, et al. Myocardial T1 maps reflect histological findings in acute and chronic stages of myocarditis in a rat model. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:19.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
183.
Naresh NK, Butcher JT, Lye RJ, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance detectgs the progression of impaired myocardial perfusion reserve and increased left-ventricular mass in mice fed a high-fat diet. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
184.
Reiter U, Reiter G, Manninger M, et al. Early-stage heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the pig: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
185.
Herold V, Herz S, Weinter P, et al. Assessment of local pulse wave velocity distribution in mice using k-t BLAST PC-CMR with semi-automatic area segmentation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
186.
Nordlund D, Kanski M, Jablonowski R, et al. Experimental validation of contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CM R for quantification of myocardium at risk in acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
187.
Duan AQ, Lock MC, Perumal SR, et al. Feasibility of detecting myocardial infarction in sheep fetus using late gadolinium enhancement CMR imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:69.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
188.
Ghugre NR, Pop M, Thomas R, et al. Hemorrhage promotes inflammation and myocardial damage following acute myocardial infarction: insights from a novel preclinical model and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
189.
Stoffers RH, Madden M, Shahid M, et al. Assessment of myocardial injury after reperfused infarction by T1p cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
190.
Stoffers RH, Madden M, Shahid M, et al. Erratum to: Assessment of myocardial injury after reperfused infarction by T1p cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
191.
Teh I, McClymont D, Zdora MC, et al. Validation of diffusion tensor MRI measurements of cardiac microstructure with structure tensor synchrotron radiation imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
192.
Pashakhanloo F, Herzka DA, Mori S, et al. Submillimeter diffusion tensor imaging and late Gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance of chronic myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
193.
McClymont D, Teh I, Schneider JE. The impact of signal-to-noise ratio, diffusion-weighted directions and image resolution in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging – insights from the ex-vivo rat heart. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
194.
Agger P, Llkjaer C, Laustsen C, et al. Changes in overall ventricular myocardial architecture in the setting of a porcine animal model of right ventricular dilation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
195.
Haaf P, Garg P, Messroghli DR, et al. Cardiac T1 mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) in clinical practice: a comprehensive review. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
196.
Pedrizzetti G, Claus P, Killner PJ, Nagel E. Principles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking and echocardiographic speckle tracking for informed clinical use. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
197.
Rodrigues JCL, Lyen SM, Loughborough W, et al. Extra-cardiac findings in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: what the imaging cardiologist needs to know. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
198.
Placido R, Lopes BC, Almeida AG, Rochitte CE. The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Takotsubo syndrome. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
199.
200.
Khan MS, Ullah W, Riaz IB, et al. Top 100 cited articles in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a bibliometric analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
201.
Liao PA, Lin G, Tsai SY, et al. Myocardial triglyceride content at 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance and left ventricular systolic function: a cross-sectional study in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
202.
Abdel-Gadir A, Berber R, Porter JB, et al. Detection of metallic cobalt and chromium liver deposition followed failed hip replacement using T2* and R2 magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017
Author
Warren J. Manning
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1532-429X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0518-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2018 Go to the issue

Guidelines

Guidelines for training in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)

Research

Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance image analysis with fully convolutional networks

Correction

Correction to: Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI)

Research

Comparison of left ventricular strains and torsion derived from feature tracking and DENSE CMR

Research

The reproducibility of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of post-ablation atrial scar: a cross-over study

Research

Impaired aortic distensibility and elevated central blood pressure in Turner Syndrome: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study