Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Effects of adenosine and regadenoson on hemodynamics measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Authors: Dustin M. Thomas, Matthew R. Minor, James K. Aden, Christopher J. Lisanti, Kevin E. Steel

Published in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Adenosine or regadenoson vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an effective non-invasive strategy for evaluating symptomatic coronary artery disease. Vasodilator injection typically precedes ventricular functional sequences to efficiently reduce overall scanning times, though the effects of vasodilators on CMR-derived ventricular volumes and function are unknown.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 25 healthy subjects to undergo consecutive adenosine and regadenoson administration. Short axis CINE datasets were obtained on a 1.5 T scanner following adenosine (140mcg/kg/min IV for 6 min) and regadenoson (0.4 mg IV over 10 s) at baseline, immediately following administration, at 5 min intervals up to 15 min. Hemodynamic response, bi-ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were determined at each time point.

Results

Peak heart rate was observed early following administration of both adenosine and regadenoson. Heart rate returned to baseline by 10 min post-adenosine while remaining elevated at 15 min post-regadenoson (p = 0.0015). Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) increased immediately following both vasodilators (p < 0.0001 for both) and returned to baseline following adenosine by 10 min (p = 0.8397). Conversely, LVEF following regadenoson remained increased at 10 min (p = 0.003) and 15 min (p = 0.0015) with a mean LVEF increase at 15 min of 4.2 ± 1.3%. Regadenoson resulted in a similar magnitude reduction in both LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) at 15 min whereas LVESVi resolved at 15 min following adenosine and LVEDVi remained below baseline values (p = 0.52).

Conclusions

Regadenoson and adenosine have significant and prolonged impact on ventricular volumes and LVEF. In patients undergoing vasodilator stress CMR where ventricular volumes and LVEF are critical components to patient care, ventricular functional sequences should be performed prior to vasodilator use or consider the use of aminophylline in the setting of regadenoson. Additionally, heart rate resolution itself is not an effective surrogate for return of ventricular volumes and LVEF to baseline.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, Gebker R, Neuss M, Fleck E, Nagel E. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation. 2004;110(7):835–42.CrossRefPubMed Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, Gebker R, Neuss M, Fleck E, Nagel E. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation. 2004;110(7):835–42.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Abbasi SA, Heydari B, Shah RV, Murthy VL, Zhang YY, Blankstein R, Steigner M, Jerosch-Herold M, Kwong RY. Risk stratification by regadenoson stress magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(8):1198–203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abbasi SA, Heydari B, Shah RV, Murthy VL, Zhang YY, Blankstein R, Steigner M, Jerosch-Herold M, Kwong RY. Risk stratification by regadenoson stress magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(8):1198–203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Vasu S, Bandettini WP, Hsu LY, Kellman P, Leung S, Mancini C, Shanbhag SM, Wilson J, Booker OJ, Arai AE. Regadenoson and adenosine are equivalent vasodilators and are superior than dipyridamole- a study of first pass quantitative perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2013;15:85.CrossRef Vasu S, Bandettini WP, Hsu LY, Kellman P, Leung S, Mancini C, Shanbhag SM, Wilson J, Booker OJ, Arai AE. Regadenoson and adenosine are equivalent vasodilators and are superior than dipyridamole- a study of first pass quantitative perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2013;15:85.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hamon M, Fau G, Nee G, Ehtisham J, Morello R, Hamon M. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2010;12:29.CrossRef Hamon M, Fau G, Nee G, Ehtisham J, Morello R, Hamon M. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2010;12:29.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, Lahiri A, Coats AJ, Cleland JG, Pennell DJ. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J. 2000;21(16):1387–96.CrossRefPubMed Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, Lahiri A, Coats AJ, Cleland JG, Pennell DJ. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J. 2000;21(16):1387–96.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shimada YJ, Shiota T. A meta-analysis and investigation for the source of bias of left ventricular volumes and function by three-dimensional echocardiography in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(1):126–38.CrossRefPubMed Shimada YJ, Shiota T. A meta-analysis and investigation for the source of bias of left ventricular volumes and function by three-dimensional echocardiography in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(1):126–38.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rigolli M, Anandabaskaran S, Christiansen JP, Whalley GA. Bias associated with left ventricular quantification by multimodality imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart. 2016;3(1):e000388.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rigolli M, Anandabaskaran S, Christiansen JP, Whalley GA. Bias associated with left ventricular quantification by multimodality imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart. 2016;3(1):e000388.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Bettencourt N, Ferreira N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Sampaio F, Santos L, Melica B, Rodrigues A, Braga P, Teixeira M, et al. Additive value of magnetic resonance coronary angiography in a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance stress-rest protocol for detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease: a pilot study. Circulation Cardiovascular imaging. 2013;6(5):730–8.CrossRefPubMed Bettencourt N, Ferreira N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Sampaio F, Santos L, Melica B, Rodrigues A, Braga P, Teixeira M, et al. Additive value of magnetic resonance coronary angiography in a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance stress-rest protocol for detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease: a pilot study. Circulation Cardiovascular imaging. 2013;6(5):730–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of trustees task force on standardized P: standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic. Resonance. 2013;15:91. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of trustees task force on standardized P: standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic. Resonance. 2013;15:91.
10.
go back to reference Mekkaoui C, Jadbabaie F, Dione DP, Meoli DF, Purushothaman K, Belardinelli L, Sinusas AJ. Effects of adenosine and a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist on hemodynamic and thallium-201 and technetium-99m-sestaMIBI biodistribution and kinetics. JACC Cardiovascular imaging. 2009;2(10):1198–208.CrossRefPubMed Mekkaoui C, Jadbabaie F, Dione DP, Meoli DF, Purushothaman K, Belardinelli L, Sinusas AJ. Effects of adenosine and a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist on hemodynamic and thallium-201 and technetium-99m-sestaMIBI biodistribution and kinetics. JACC Cardiovascular imaging. 2009;2(10):1198–208.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lieu HD, Shryock JC, von Mering GO, Gordi T, Blackburn B, Olmsted AW, Belardinelli L, Kerensky RA. Regadenoson, a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist, causes dose-dependent increases in coronary blood flow velocity in humans. Journal of nuclear cardiology: official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. 2007;14(4):514–20.CrossRef Lieu HD, Shryock JC, von Mering GO, Gordi T, Blackburn B, Olmsted AW, Belardinelli L, Kerensky RA. Regadenoson, a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist, causes dose-dependent increases in coronary blood flow velocity in humans. Journal of nuclear cardiology: official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. 2007;14(4):514–20.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dandekar VK, Bauml MA, Ertel AW, Dickens C, Gonzalez R, Farzaneh-Far A. Assessment of global myocardial perfusion reserve using cardiovascular magnetic resonance of coronary sinus flow at 3 tesla. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic. Resonance. 2014;16:24. Dandekar VK, Bauml MA, Ertel AW, Dickens C, Gonzalez R, Farzaneh-Far A. Assessment of global myocardial perfusion reserve using cardiovascular magnetic resonance of coronary sinus flow at 3 tesla. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic. Resonance. 2014;16:24.
13.
go back to reference Karamitsos TD, Arnold JR, Pegg TJ, Cheng AS, van Gaal WJ, Francis JM, Banning AP, Neubauer S, Selvanayagam JB. Tolerance and safety of adenosine stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe coronary artery disease. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2009;25(3):277–83.CrossRefPubMed Karamitsos TD, Arnold JR, Pegg TJ, Cheng AS, van Gaal WJ, Francis JM, Banning AP, Neubauer S, Selvanayagam JB. Tolerance and safety of adenosine stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe coronary artery disease. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2009;25(3):277–83.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nguyen KL, Bandettini WP, Shanbhag S, Leung SW, Wilson JR, Arai AE. Safety and tolerability of regadenoson CMR. European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging. 2014;15(7):753–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nguyen KL, Bandettini WP, Shanbhag S, Leung SW, Wilson JR, Arai AE. Safety and tolerability of regadenoson CMR. European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging. 2014;15(7):753–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Ohtaki Y, Chikamori T, Igarashi Y, Hida S, Tanaka H, Hatano T, Usui Y, Miyagi M, Yamashina A. Differential effects comparing exercise and pharmacologic stress on left ventricular function using gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22(3):185–90.CrossRefPubMed Ohtaki Y, Chikamori T, Igarashi Y, Hida S, Tanaka H, Hatano T, Usui Y, Miyagi M, Yamashina A. Differential effects comparing exercise and pharmacologic stress on left ventricular function using gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22(3):185–90.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Medicare National Coverage Determination: Implantable Automatic Defibrillators. In: 100–3. Edited by (CMS) CfMMS; 2005. Medicare National Coverage Determination: Implantable Automatic Defibrillators. In: 100–3. Edited by (CMS) CfMMS; 2005.
17.
go back to reference Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA 3rd, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hammill SC, Hayes DL et al: 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013, 61(3):e6–75. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA 3rd, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hammill SC, Hayes DL et al: 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013, 61(3):e6–75.
18.
go back to reference Adenosine (Adenoscan) [Package insert]. In: Astellas Pharma. Northbrook, IL; 2014. Adenosine (Adenoscan) [Package insert]. In: Astellas Pharma. Northbrook, IL; 2014.
19.
go back to reference Regadenoson (Lexiscan) [Package insert]. In: Astellas Pharma. Northbrook, IL; 2014. Regadenoson (Lexiscan) [Package insert]. In: Astellas Pharma. Northbrook, IL; 2014.
Metadata
Title
Effects of adenosine and regadenoson on hemodynamics measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Authors
Dustin M. Thomas
Matthew R. Minor
James K. Aden
Christopher J. Lisanti
Kevin E. Steel
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1532-429X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0409-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2017 Go to the issue