Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Obesity Surgery
Published in: Obesity Surgery 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Review Article

One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Authors: Dimitrios E. Magouliotis, Vasiliki S. Tasiopoulou, Alexis A. Svokos, Konstantina A. Svokos, Eleni Sioka, Dimitrios Zacharoulis

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

We aim to review the available literature on obese patients treated with one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), in order to compare the clinical outcomes and intraoperative parameters of the two methods. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 6761 patients. This study reveals increased weight loss, remission of comorbidities, shorter mean hospital stay, and lower mortality in the OAGB group. The incidence of leaks and intra-abdominal bleeding was similar between the two approaches. Well-designed, randomized controlled studies, comparing LSG to OAGB, are necessary to further assess their clinical outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Colquit JL, Picot J, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD003641.
2.
Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Sioka E, et al. Impact of bariatric surgery on metabolic and gut microbiota profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2017; doi:10.​1007/​s11695-017-2595-8.
3.
Kueper MA, Kramer KM, Kirschniak A, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: standardized technique of a potential standalone bariatric procedure in morbidly obese patients. World J Surg. 2008;32(7):1462–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1822–32.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Rown J, et al. “Mini” gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1890–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Wang HH, Wei PL, Lee YC, et al. Short-term results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15:648–54.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Noun R, Zeidan S. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: an effective option for the treatment of morbid obesity. J Chir (Paris). 2007;144:301–4.CrossRef
10.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. Available from www.​cochrane-handbook.​org.
12.
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:603–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
GSE HJ. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. 2011.
14.
15.
Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. 2015; doi:10.​1007/​s11695-015-1869-2.
16.
17.
Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. Analysis of the five-year outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and mini gastric bypass: a report from the indian sub-continent. Obes Surg. 2014; doi:10.​1007/​s11695-014-1264-4.
18.
Lee WJ, Chong K, Lin YH, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus single anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: 5-year results of a randomized trial and study of incretin effect. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1552–62. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-014-1344-5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Madhok B, Mahawar KK, Boyle M, et al. Management of super-super obese patients: comparison between mini (one anastomosis) gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2016; doi:10.​1007/​s11695-016-2181-5.
20.
21.
Musella M, Apers J, Rheinwalt K, et al. Efficacy of bariatric surgery in type 2 diabetes mellitus remission: the role of mini gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy at 1 year of follow-up. A European survey. Obes Surg. 2015; doi:10.​1007/​s11695-015-1865-6.
22.
Plamper A, Lingohr P, Nadal J, et al. Comparison of mini-gastric bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in a mainly super-obese patient group: first results. Surg Endosc. 2016; doi:10.​1007/​s00464-016-5085-5.
23.
24.
25.
Alexandrou A, Michalinos A, Athanasiou A, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity with intra-operative endoscopy: lessons we learned after 100 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1223–8. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-014-1524-3.CrossRef
26.
Carbajo MA, Fong-Hirales A, Luque-de-Leon E, et al. Weight loss and improvement of lipid profiles in morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: 2-year follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2016; doi:10.​1007/​s00464-016-4990-y.
27.
Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015; doi:10.​1007/​s11695-014-1552-z.
28.
Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Kefurt R, et al. Weight loss, weight regain and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass—10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016; doi:10.​1016/​j.​soard.​2016.​02.​021.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Bruzzi M, Duboc H, Gronnier C, et al. Long-term evaluation of biliary reflux after experimental one-anastomosis gastric bypass in rats. Obes Surg. 2017; doi:10.​1007/​s11695-017-2577-x.
33.
Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:321–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Authors
Dimitrios E. Magouliotis
Vasiliki S. Tasiopoulou
Alexis A. Svokos
Konstantina A. Svokos
Eleni Sioka
Dimitrios Zacharoulis
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2807-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Obesity Surgery 9/2017 Go to the issue

Original Contributions

Early Weight Loss Independent Effects of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Diet-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction in Obese, Wistar Rats

Original Contributions

Mortality Following Bariatric Surgery Compared to Other Common Operations in Finland During a 5-Year Period (2009–2013). A Nationwide Registry Study

Original Contributions

Diabetes Resolution and Work Absenteeism After Gastric Bypass: a 6-Year Study

Letter to the Editor

IFSO Position Statement on New Technologies for Treatment of Obesity

Review Article

What Is Known About the Correlates and Impact of Excess Skin After Bariatric Surgery: a Scoping Review

Letter to the Editor

Barrett’s Oesophagus and Oesophageal Carcinogenesis Following Obesity Surgery: Helicobacter Pylori Must Be Eradicated?