Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Letter to the Editor

IFSO Position Statement on New Technologies for Treatment of Obesity

The International Federation for Surgery of Obesity (IFSO) and Its New Technologies Committee. Endorsed by the Ethical Committee of IFSO, Approved by the IFSO Executive Council on May, 3, 2017

Authors: Jerome Dargent, Ramon Vilallonga, Leon Katz, Dana Portenier, Erik Wilson, Alex Esacalona, Jacques Himpens, Natan Zundel, Kelvin Higa

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

1.
Following upon the steps of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery position statement on emerging endosurgical interventions for treatment of obesity (2009), IFSO has provided a framework for examining novel technologies and procedures in the field of bariatric surgery.
 
2.
Rapid changes in technology require the physician to be flexible, yet we must always maintain a balance between the necessities of innovation and a comprehensive evaluation of the safety and merit of such endeavors. Ideally, the new technology should represent a less invasive approach compared to the currently accepted methods, be clinically effective, and most importantly provide equally good results with decreased risk of complications.
 
3.
While traditional metabolic and bariatric surgery is an accepted option for a broad range of patients (see IFSO statement on class I obesity), endoscopic bariatric techniques may fill a crucial void for the patients deemed not eligible or simply not interested in the traditional surgical interventions.
 
4.
Traditionally, individual medical and surgical societies would release their own consensus statements. The modern approach to this dilemma is that the multitude of societies should refer to the available body of work and evidence-based literature that has been published by similarly oriented societies. By issuing a joint consensus statement, it will be possible to establish algorithms that are based on solid fundamentals for the development of new technologies.
 
5.
Some of the newer less invasive technologies have not demonstrated the ability to achieve long-standing effective weight loss and comorbidity resolution goals and could subsequently result in increased use of revisional surgical interventions in order to ameliorate the results of the originally performed technology.
 
6.
Bariatric and metabolic surgery has been available for more than five decades and yet it still remains in evolution. It is difficult to fully imagine and foresee what future techniques and devices are going to be available to the bariatric and endoscopic surgeon. While the treatment modalities continue to advance, certain basic principles such as respect for evidence, ethical commitment, use of accepted methodology for data analysis, and inclusion of patients in proper protocols remain a fundamental requirement. IFSO is engaged in implementing the vision for developing new technologies according to these standards.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery position statement on emerging endosurgical interventions for treatment of obesity [reference], SOARD. 2009; 5: 297. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery position statement on emerging endosurgical interventions for treatment of obesity [reference], SOARD. 2009; 5: 297.
2.
go back to reference Bariatric surgery in class I obesity. A position statement from the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO). Obes Surg. 2014; 24(4): 487–519. Bariatric surgery in class I obesity. A position statement from the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO). Obes Surg. 2014; 24(4): 487–519.
3.
go back to reference Kumar N. Endoscopic therapy for weight loss: gastroplasty, duodenal sleeve, intragastric balloons, and aspiration. World J Endosc. 2015;7(9):847–59. Kumar N. Endoscopic therapy for weight loss: gastroplasty, duodenal sleeve, intragastric balloons, and aspiration. World J Endosc. 2015;7(9):847–59.
4.
go back to reference ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force and ASGE Technology Committee, Abu Dayyeh BK, Kumar N, et al. ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(3):425–38.CrossRef ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force and ASGE Technology Committee, Abu Dayyeh BK, Kumar N, et al. ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(3):425–38.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dixon JB, Logue J, Komesaroff PA. Promises and ethical pitfalls of surgical innovation: the case of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23(10):1698–702.CrossRefPubMed Dixon JB, Logue J, Komesaroff PA. Promises and ethical pitfalls of surgical innovation: the case of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23(10):1698–702.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Acosta A, Camilleri M, Shin A, et al. Quantitative gastrointestinal and psychological traits associated with obesity and response to weight-loss therapy. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(3):258–62.CrossRef Acosta A, Camilleri M, Shin A, et al. Quantitative gastrointestinal and psychological traits associated with obesity and response to weight-loss therapy. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(3):258–62.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
IFSO Position Statement on New Technologies for Treatment of Obesity
The International Federation for Surgery of Obesity (IFSO) and Its New Technologies Committee. Endorsed by the Ethical Committee of IFSO, Approved by the IFSO Executive Council on May, 3, 2017
Authors
Jerome Dargent
Ramon Vilallonga
Leon Katz
Dana Portenier
Erik Wilson
Alex Esacalona
Jacques Himpens
Natan Zundel
Kelvin Higa
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2780-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Obesity Surgery 9/2017 Go to the issue