Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Obesity Surgery
Published in: Obesity Surgery 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Contributions

LSG vs OAGB—1 Year Follow-up Data—a Randomized Control Trial

Authors: Shivakumar Seetharamaiah, Om Tantia, Ghanshyam Goyal, Tamonas Chaudhuri, Shashi Khanna, Jagat Pal Singh, Anmol Ahuja

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most popular bariatric procedure. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is rapidly emerging as a safe and effective metabolic procedure. This study aims at comparing the 1-year follow-up results of OAGB and LSG in terms of excess weight loss, complications, resolution of comorbidities, and quality of life.

Methods

A prospective randomized study of results between 100 LSG and 101 OAGB patients was done from 2012 to 2015. The results were compared regarding operative outcomes, percentage of excess weight loss, complications, resolution of comorbidities, and quality of life (BAROS score).

Results

The mean BMI for the OAGB and LSG group was 44.31 and 43.75 kg/m2, respectively. Percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) for OAGB vs LSG was 66.87 ± 10.87 vs 63.97 ± 13.24 at 1 year (p > 0.05), respectively. Diabetes remission was 83.63 % in OAGB patients and 76.58 % in LSG patients. Remission of hypertension is 64.15 % in OAGB patients and 66.07 % in LSG patients. Bariatric Analysis Reporting and Outcome System (BAROS) was 3.71 in LSG and 3.96 in OAGB.

Conclusions

In our study, there was no significant difference between LSG and OAGB in outcome at 1 year follow-up in % excess weight loss, remission of HTN, and quality of life. OAGB has marginally better outcome in T2 DM remission. However, a longer follow-up is required to establish a correct comparative result.
Literature
1.
2.
Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic roux-en-Y vs. minigastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1827–34.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive minigastric bypass: short and long term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22:697–703.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Musella M, Sousa A, Greco F, et al. The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multi-center review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:156–63.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses—first study from Indian subcontinent. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1430–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Baltasar A, Serra C, Perez N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15(8):1124–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Eid GM, Brethauer S, Mattar SG, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for super obese patients: forty-eight percent excess weight loss after 6 to 8 years with 93 % follow-up. Ann Surg. 2012;256(2):262–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Sanchez-Santos R, Masdevall C, Baltasar A, et al. Short- and midterm outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: the experience of the Spanish National Registry. Obes Surg. 2009;19(9):1203–10.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Rown J, et al. “mini” gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure. Obesity Surg. 2013;23(11):1890–8.CrossRef
11.
Wang HH, Wei PL, Lee YC, et al. Short-term results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15:648–54.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Noun R, Zeidan S. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: an effective option for the treatment of morbid obesity. J Chir (Paris). 2007;144:301–4.CrossRef
13.
Quan Y, Huang A, Ye M, et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015:152852.
14.
Kim Z, Hur KY. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes: the preliminary report. World J Surg. 2011;35:631–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Lee WJ, Wang W, Lee YC, et al. Effects of laparoscopic minigastric bypass for type 2 diabetes mellitus: comparison of BMI > 35 and <35 kg/m2. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:945–52.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Horatio E. Oria, Melodie K. Moorehead. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS. Obes Surg. 1998;8:487–99.CrossRef
17.
Lakdawala M, Bhasker A, Report: Asian Consensus Meeting on Metabolic Surgery. Recommendations for the use of Bariatric and Gastrointestinal Metabolic Surgery for Treatment of Obesity and Type II Diabetes Mellitus in the Asian Population Obesity Surgery. 2010;20(7):929–936
18.
Lee W-J, Chong K, Chen J-C, et al. Predictors of diabetes remission after bariatric surgery in Asia. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2012;35:67e73.CrossRef
19.
Li J, Lai D, Wu D. Laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to treat morbid obesity-related comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26:429–42.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Boza C, Gamboa C, Salinas J, et al. Laparoscopic roux–en–Y gastric bypass vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case control study and 3 years of follow up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:243–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. Analysis of the five-year outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and mini gastric bypass: a report from the Indian sub-continent. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1724–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, roux-en-y gastric bypass and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-015-1869-2.
23.
Yehoshua RT, Eidelman LA, Stein M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy—volume and pressure assessment. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1083–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Sacks BC, Mattar SG, Qureshi FG, et al. Incidence of marginal ulcers and the use of absorbable anastomotic sutures in laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2(1):11–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Gumbs AA, Duffy AJ, Bell RL. Incidence and management of marginal ulceration after laparoscopic roux-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2(4):460–3.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Dallal RM, Bailey LA. Ulcer disease after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2(4):455–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive minigastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):697–703.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Gagner M, Deitel M, Erickson AL, et al. Survey on laparoscopic sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) at the Fourth International Consensus Summit on Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2013.
30.
Musella M, Apers J, Rheinwalt K, et al. Efficacy of bariatric surgery in type 2 diabetes mellitus remission: the role of mini gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy at 1 Year of follow-up. A European survey. Obes Surg. 2015. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-015-1865-6.
31.
Lee W-J, Chong K, Lin Y-H, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus single anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: 5-year results of a randomized trial and study of Incretin effect. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1552–62.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Lee WJ, Chong K, Ser KH, et al. Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2011;146:143–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Milone M, Di Minno MND, Leongito M, et al. Bariatric surgery and diabetes remission: sleeve gastrectomy or mini-gastric bypass. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(39):6590–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:321–6.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Navez J, Dardamanis D, Thissen J-P, et al. Laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: comparison of primary versus Revisional bypass by using the BAROS score. Obes Surg. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-014-1473-x.
36.
Wolf AM, Falcone AR, Kortner B, et al. BAROS: an effective system to evaluate the results of patients after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2000;10(5):445–50.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Suter M, Paroz A, Calmes JM, et al. European experience with laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass in 466 obese patients. Br J Surg. 2006;93(6):726–32.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Gould JC, Garren MJ, Boll V, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass: risks vs. benefits up to two years following surgery in supersuper obese patients. Surgery. 2006;140(4):524–9.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Myers JA, Clifford JC, Sarker S, et al. Quality of life after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using the Baros and Moorehead-Ardelt quality of life questionnaire II. JSLS. 2006;10(4):414–20.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
LSG vs OAGB—1 Year Follow-up Data—a Randomized Control Trial
Authors
Shivakumar Seetharamaiah
Om Tantia
Ghanshyam Goyal
Tamonas Chaudhuri
Shashi Khanna
Jagat Pal Singh
Anmol Ahuja
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2403-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Obesity Surgery 4/2017 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

What Is a Favourable Risk-Benefit Profile Concerning Metabolic Surgery for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes?

Erratum

Erratum to: Initial Approach to Childhood Obesity in Spain. A Multisociety Expert Panel Assessment

Original Contributions

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 5-Year Results of two Different Bands in 103 Patients

Brief Communication

Long-Term Evaluation of Biliary Reflux After Experimental One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Rats

Original Contributions

Impact of Intragastric Balloon Before Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass on Patients with Super Obesity: a Randomized Multicenter Study

Original Contributions

Long-Term Outcomes of the Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Weight Loss and Removal Rate. A Single Center Experience on 301 Patients with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 years