Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Computed Tomography | Original Scientific Report

Geometry of Sleeve Gastrectomy Measured by 3D CT Versus Weight Loss: Preliminary Analysis

Authors: Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Yuki Tomozawa, Satoshi Ugi, Sachiko Kaida, Toru Miyake, Katsutaro Morino, Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Hiroshi Maegawa, Masaji Tani

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The size of the remnant stomach with respect to weight loss failure after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the actual size and volume of the remnant stomach, as measured by three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) volumetry, on weight loss after LSG.

Methods

The clinical outcomes of 52 patients who underwent LSG between October 2008 and February 2019 were assessed. Weight metrics were recorded at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. 3D-CT volumetry was performed 1 year postoperatively, and the total remnant stomach volume (TSV), proximal stomach volume (PSV), antral stomach volume (ASV), and the distance between the pylorus and the distal edge of staple line (DPS) were measured. The relationship between the weight metrics and aforementioned factors was analyzed.

Results

Of the 52 patients who underwent LSG, 40 patients participated in this study. The average body mass index preoperatively was 38.3 ± 5.1 kg/m2, and the average percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) 1 year after LSG was 26.6 ± 9.3%. The average TSV, PSV, ASV, and DPS were 123.2 ± 60.3 ml, 73.4 ± 37.2 ml, 49.8 ± 30.3 ml, and 59.9 ± 18.5 mm, respectively. The DPS (r = − 0.394, p = 0.012) and ASV (r = − 0.356, p = 0.024) were correlated with %TWL 1 year postoperatively.

Conclusions

The actual DPS and ASV measured by 3D-CT affected weight loss after LSG. 3D-CT may be useful for the immediate identification of factors affecting insufficient weight loss in patients; this may, in turn, aid in the implementation of early intervention treatments.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P et al (2018) IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg 12:3783–3794CrossRef Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P et al (2018) IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg 12:3783–3794CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gagner M, Hutchinson C, Rosenthal R (2016) Fifth International Consensus Conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:750–756CrossRef Gagner M, Hutchinson C, Rosenthal R (2016) Fifth International Consensus Conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:750–756CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP et al (2017) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes-5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 376:641–651CrossRef Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP et al (2017) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes-5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 376:641–651CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rosenthal R, Li X, Samuel S et al (2009) Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on patients with diabetes mellitus. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:429–434CrossRef Rosenthal R, Li X, Samuel S et al (2009) Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on patients with diabetes mellitus. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:429–434CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee WJ, Chong K, Ser KH et al (2011) Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 146:143–148CrossRef Lee WJ, Chong K, Ser KH et al (2011) Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 146:143–148CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cho JM, Kim HJ, Lo Menzo E et al (2015) Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes as an alternative treatment modality to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:1273–1280CrossRef Cho JM, Kim HJ, Lo Menzo E et al (2015) Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes as an alternative treatment modality to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:1273–1280CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Juodeikis Ž, Brimas G (2017) Long-term results after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:693–699CrossRef Juodeikis Ž, Brimas G (2017) Long-term results after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:693–699CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wang Y, Yi X, Li Q et al (2016) The effectiveness and safety of sleeve gastrectomy in the obese elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 26:3023–3030CrossRef Wang Y, Yi X, Li Q et al (2016) The effectiveness and safety of sleeve gastrectomy in the obese elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 26:3023–3030CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Saul D, Stephens D, Hofstätter Rde C et al (2012) Preliminary outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a Veterans affairs medical center. Am J Surg 204:e1–6CrossRef Saul D, Stephens D, Hofstätter Rde C et al (2012) Preliminary outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a Veterans affairs medical center. Am J Surg 204:e1–6CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Obeidat F, Shanti H (2016) Early weight loss as a predictor of 2-year weight loss and resolution of comorbidities after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 26:1173–1177CrossRef Obeidat F, Shanti H (2016) Early weight loss as a predictor of 2-year weight loss and resolution of comorbidities after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 26:1173–1177CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cottam A, Billing J, Cottam D et al (2017) Long-term success and failure with SG is predictable by 3 months: a multivariate model using simple office markers. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:1266–1270CrossRef Cottam A, Billing J, Cottam D et al (2017) Long-term success and failure with SG is predictable by 3 months: a multivariate model using simple office markers. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:1266–1270CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Saiki A, Yamaguchi T, Tanaka S et al (2019) Background characteristics and postoperative outcomes of insufficient weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Japanese patients. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 26:638–647CrossRef Saiki A, Yamaguchi T, Tanaka S et al (2019) Background characteristics and postoperative outcomes of insufficient weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Japanese patients. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 26:638–647CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Kefurt R et al (2016) Weight loss, weight regain, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1655–1662CrossRef Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Kefurt R et al (2016) Weight loss, weight regain, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1655–1662CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J et al (2016) Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1778–1786CrossRef Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J et al (2016) Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1778–1786CrossRef
15.
go back to reference McNickle AG, Bonomo SR (2017) Predictability of first-year weight loss in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 31:4145–4149CrossRef McNickle AG, Bonomo SR (2017) Predictability of first-year weight loss in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 31:4145–4149CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Abdallah E, El Nakeeb A, Youssef T et al (2014) Impact of extent of antral resection on surgical outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity (a prospective randomized study). Obes Surg 24:1587–1594CrossRef Abdallah E, El Nakeeb A, Youssef T et al (2014) Impact of extent of antral resection on surgical outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity (a prospective randomized study). Obes Surg 24:1587–1594CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Omarov T, Samadov E, Coskun AK et al (2020) Comparison of weight loss in sleeve gastrectomy patients with and without antrectomy: a prospective randomized study. Obes Surg 30:446–450CrossRef Omarov T, Samadov E, Coskun AK et al (2020) Comparison of weight loss in sleeve gastrectomy patients with and without antrectomy: a prospective randomized study. Obes Surg 30:446–450CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yamamoto H, Kaida S, Yamaguchi T et al (2016) Potential mechanisms mediating improved glycemic control after bariatric/metabolic surgery. Surg Today 46:268–274CrossRef Yamamoto H, Kaida S, Yamaguchi T et al (2016) Potential mechanisms mediating improved glycemic control after bariatric/metabolic surgery. Surg Today 46:268–274CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sabench Pereferrer F, Molina López A, Vives Espelta M et al (2017) Weight loss analysis according to different formulas after sleeve gastrectomy with or without antral preservation: a randomised study. Obes Surg 27:1254–1260CrossRef Sabench Pereferrer F, Molina López A, Vives Espelta M et al (2017) Weight loss analysis according to different formulas after sleeve gastrectomy with or without antral preservation: a randomised study. Obes Surg 27:1254–1260CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Khalifa IG, Tobar WL, Hegazy TO et al (2019) Food tolerance after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with total antral resection. Obes Surg 29:2263–2269CrossRef Khalifa IG, Tobar WL, Hegazy TO et al (2019) Food tolerance after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with total antral resection. Obes Surg 29:2263–2269CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Garay M, Balagué C, Rodríguez-Otero C et al (2018) Influence of antrum size on gastric emptying and weight-loss outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (preliminary analysis of a randomized trial). Surg Endosc 32:2739–2745CrossRef Garay M, Balagué C, Rodríguez-Otero C et al (2018) Influence of antrum size on gastric emptying and weight-loss outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (preliminary analysis of a randomized trial). Surg Endosc 32:2739–2745CrossRef
22.
go back to reference McGlone ER, Gupta AK, Reddy M et al (2018) Antral resection versus antral preservation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:857–864CrossRef McGlone ER, Gupta AK, Reddy M et al (2018) Antral resection versus antral preservation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:857–864CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Robert M, Pasquer A, Pelascini E et al (2016) Impact of sleeve gastrectomy volumes on weight loss results: a prospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1286–1291CrossRef Robert M, Pasquer A, Pelascini E et al (2016) Impact of sleeve gastrectomy volumes on weight loss results: a prospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1286–1291CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Braghetto I, Davanzo C, Korn O et al (2009) Scintigraphic evaluation of gastric emptying in obese patients submitted to sleeve gastrectomy compared to normal subjects. Obes Surg 19:1515–1521CrossRef Braghetto I, Davanzo C, Korn O et al (2009) Scintigraphic evaluation of gastric emptying in obese patients submitted to sleeve gastrectomy compared to normal subjects. Obes Surg 19:1515–1521CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Vives M, Molina A, Danús M et al (2017) Analysis of gastric physiology after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with or without antral preservation in relation to metabolic response: a randomised study. Obes Surg 27:2836–2844CrossRef Vives M, Molina A, Danús M et al (2017) Analysis of gastric physiology after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with or without antral preservation in relation to metabolic response: a randomised study. Obes Surg 27:2836–2844CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Berger ER, Clements RH, Morton JM et al (2016) The impact of different surgical techniques on outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: the first report from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg 264:464–473CrossRef Berger ER, Clements RH, Morton JM et al (2016) The impact of different surgical techniques on outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: the first report from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg 264:464–473CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bekheit M, Abdel-Baki TN, Gamal M et al (2016) Influence of the resected gastric volume on the weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 26:1505–1510CrossRef Bekheit M, Abdel-Baki TN, Gamal M et al (2016) Influence of the resected gastric volume on the weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 26:1505–1510CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Sista F, Abruzzese V, Clementi M et al (2016) Effect of resected gastric volume on ghrelin and glp-1 plasma levels: a prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1931–1941CrossRef Sista F, Abruzzese V, Clementi M et al (2016) Effect of resected gastric volume on ghrelin and glp-1 plasma levels: a prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1931–1941CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Noel P et al (2011) Re-sleeve gastrectomy for failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a feasibility study. Obes Surg 21:832–835CrossRef Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Noel P et al (2011) Re-sleeve gastrectomy for failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a feasibility study. Obes Surg 21:832–835CrossRef
31.
go back to reference De Angelis F, Avallone M, Albanese A et al (2018) Re-sleeve gastrectomy 4 years later: is it still an effective revisional option? Obes Surg 28:3714–3716CrossRef De Angelis F, Avallone M, Albanese A et al (2018) Re-sleeve gastrectomy 4 years later: is it still an effective revisional option? Obes Surg 28:3714–3716CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Geometry of Sleeve Gastrectomy Measured by 3D CT Versus Weight Loss: Preliminary Analysis
Authors
Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi
Hiroshi Yamamoto
Yuki Tomozawa
Satoshi Ugi
Sachiko Kaida
Toru Miyake
Katsutaro Morino
Yoshiyuki Watanabe
Hiroshi Maegawa
Masaji Tani
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05807-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

World Journal of Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue