Top

Obesity Surgery

Published in:

01-12-2018 | Original Contributions

IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: Primary, Endoluminal, and Revisional Procedures

Authors: Luigi Angrisani, A. Santonicola, P. Iovino, A. Vitiello, K. Higa, J. Himpens, H. Buchwald, N. Scopinaro

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 12/2018

Abstract

Background and Aim

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO), being a Federation of 62 national societies, is the ideal network to monitor the number and type of procedures at a global level. The IFSO survey, enriched with a special section on revisional procedures, aims to report the number and types of bariatric procedures performed worldwide in 2016 and analyzes the surgical trends from 2008 to 2016.

Methods

The 2016 IFSO Survey form was emailed to all IFSO societies. Each Society was requested to indicate the number and type of bariatric procedures performed in the country. Trend analyses from 2008 to 2016 were also performed.

Results

The total number of bariatric/metabolic procedures performed in 2016 was 685,874; 634,897 (92.6%) of which were primary and 50,977 were revisional (7.4%). Among the primary interventions, 609,897 (96%) were surgical and 25,359 (4%) were endoluminal. The most performed primary surgical bariatric/metabolic procedure was sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (N = 340,550; 53.6%), followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (N = 191,326; 30.1%), and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (N = 30,563; 4.8%).

Conclusions

In 2016, there was an increase in the total number both of surgical and endoluminal bariatric/metabolic procedures. Revisional procedures represent about 7% of the total bariatric interventions. SG remains the most performed surgical procedure in the world.

Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014(8): CD003641. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4

Lee PC, Dixon J. Medical devices for the treatment of obesity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(9):553–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.80.CrossRefPubMed

Favretti F, Cadiere GB, Segato G, et al. Laparoscopic placement of adjustable silicone gastric banding: early experience. Obes Surg. 1995;5(1):71–3.CrossRefPubMed

Favretti F, Cadiere GB, Segato G, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding: technique and results. Obes Surg. 1995;5(4):364–71.CrossRefPubMed

Himpens J, Cadiere GB, Bazi M, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill : 1960). 2011;146(7):802–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.45.CrossRef

Suter M, Calmes JM, Paroz A, et al. A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates. Obes Surg. 2006;16(7):829–35. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089206777822359.CrossRefPubMed

Bueter M, Thalheimer A, Wierlemann A, et al. Reoperations after gastric banding: replacement or alternative procedures? Surg Endosc. 2009;23(2):334–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9926-8.CrossRefPubMed

Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009;19(12):1605–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-0014-5.CrossRefPubMed

Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8(3):267–82. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089298765554476.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10(6):514–23; discussion 524. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089200321593715.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, et al. Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003;13(6):861–4. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089203322618669.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Cottam D, Qureshi FG, Mattar SG, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial weight-loss procedure for high-risk patients with morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(6):859–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0134-5.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Gumbs AA, Gagner M, Dakin G, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2007;17(7):962–9.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Deitel M, Crosby RD, Gagner M. The first international consensus summit for sleeve gastrectomy (SG), New York City, October 25-27, 2007. Obes Surg. 2008;18(5):487–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9471-5.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2010;6(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.11.004.

16.

Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery and endoluminal procedures: IFSO worldwide survey 2014. Obes Surg. 2017;27:2279–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2666-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Angrisani L. 2014: the year of the sleeve supremacy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(6):1626–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2681-y.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. 2016;26(5):926–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1869-2.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Kefurt R, et al. Weight loss, weight regain, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2016;12(9):1655–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.021.CrossRef

20.

Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J, et al. Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2016;12(10):1778–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.013.CrossRef

21.

Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 1967;47(6):1345–51.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4(4):353–7. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089294765558331.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000217592.04061.d5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1188–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3182-3.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Fisher BL, Buchwald H, Clark W, et al. Mini-gastric bypass controversy. Obes Surg. 2001;11(6):773–7.PubMed

26.

Lee WJ, Lin YH. Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB): appraisal of clinical evidence. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1749–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1369-9.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Scozzari G, Trapani R, Toppino M, et al. Esophagogastric cancer after bariatric surgery: systematic review of the literature. Surg Obes Relat Dis : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2013;9(1):133–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2012.10.002.CrossRef

28.

Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2015;11(2):321–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.004.CrossRef

29.

Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Alkhalifah N, Lee WJ, Hai TC, et al. 15-year experience of laparoscopic single anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass: comparison with other bariatric procedures. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:3024–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-6011-1.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Scopinaro N, Gianetta E, Civalleri D, et al. Bilio-pancreatic bypass for obesity: II. Initial experience in man. Br J Surg. 1979;66(9):618–20.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Marceau P, Hould FS, Simard S, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. World J Surg. 1998;22(9):947–54.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):427–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Gagner M, Matteotti R. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85(1):141–9, x-xi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2004.10.003.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Roslin MS, Gagner M, Goriparthi R, et al. The rationale for a duodenal switch as the primary surgical treatment of advanced type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic disease. Surg Obes Relat Dis : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2015;11(3):704–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.11.017.CrossRef

36.

Skogar ML, Sundbom M. Duodenal switch is superior to gastric bypass in patients with super obesity when evaluated with the bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2308–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2680-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Perez-Aguirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17(12):1614–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9287-8.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Perez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2013;9(5):731–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2012.07.018.CrossRef

39.

Mahdy T, Al Wahedi A, Schou C. Efficacy of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass for type-2 diabetic morbid obese patients: gastric bipartition, a novel metabolic surgery procedure: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg (London, England). 2016;34:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.018.CrossRef

40.

Machytka E, Gaur S, Chuttani R, et al. Elipse, the first procedureless gastric balloon for weight loss: a prospective, observational, open-label, multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2017;49(2):154–60. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-119296.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Vitiello A, et al. Elipse balloon: the pitfalls of excessive simplicity. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1419–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3148-5.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Scopinaro N. The IFSO and obesity surgery throughout the world. International Federation for the Surgery of obesity. Obes Surg. 1998;8(1):3–8.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Buchwald H, Williams SE. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003. Obes Surg. 2004;14(9):1157–64. https://doi.org/10.1381/0960892042387057.CrossRefPubMed

Title: IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: Primary, Endoluminal, and Revisional Procedures
Authors: Luigi Angrisani
A. Santonicola
P. Iovino
A. Vitiello
K. Higa
J. Himpens
H. Buchwald
N. Scopinaro
Publication date: 01-12-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Obesity Surgery / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: Primary, Endoluminal, and Revisional Procedures

Abstract

Background and Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background and Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

Laparoscopic Conversion of a Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to a Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Morbidly Obese Patient with a Complicated Medical History

Small Intestinal Length Associates with Serum Triglycerides Before and After LRYGB

Comparison between Enteroscopy-Based and Laparoscopy-Assisted ERCP for Accessing the Biliary Tree in Patients with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Helicobacter Pylori in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: the SOON Cohort

Predicting Symptom Relief After Reoperation for Suspected Internal Herniation After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

The Impact of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass on Comorbidities and Quality of Life in the Older Obese Patients (Age > 60): Our UK Experience