Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2020

01-02-2020 | Breast Augmentation | Original Article

The Breast Implant ARC: An Algorithm for Determining the Position of the IMF in Breast Augmentation Planning

Authors: Werner H. Beekman, Vivian K. Beekman

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

In breast augmentation surgery, many techniques have been developed and advocated to achieve the best possible results in incision planning. The standard dimensions on which most algorithms are based are width, height and the projection of the silicone gel-filled implants. The ARC is introduced as a new dimension instead of the currently used anatomical silicone gel-filled implants parameters. The algorithm presented in this article is based on the amount of breast parenchyma (P) and the ARC of an anatomical silicone gel-filled implant to obtain an exact positioning of the incision at the new inframammary fold. A patient case is presented to demonstrate the use of the algorithm. To date, this technique has been used in over 1200 patients with reproducible and consistent results.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Spear SL, Bulan EJ, Venturi ML (2006) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:188SCrossRef Spear SL, Bulan EJ, Venturi ML (2006) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:188SCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cronin TD, Gerow RM (1964) Augmentation mammaplasty: a new ‘natural feel’ prosthesis. In: Translations of the third international congress of plastic surgery. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 41–49. Cronin TD, Gerow RM (1964) Augmentation mammaplasty: a new ‘natural feel’ prosthesis. In: Translations of the third international congress of plastic surgery. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 41–49.
3.
go back to reference Tebbets J (1984) Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammoplasty: follow-up and refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:636–649CrossRef Tebbets J (1984) Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammoplasty: follow-up and refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:636–649CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hendricks H (2007) Complete submuscular breast augmentation: 650 cases managed using an alternative surgical technique. Aesth Plast Surg 31:147–153CrossRef Hendricks H (2007) Complete submuscular breast augmentation: 650 cases managed using an alternative surgical technique. Aesth Plast Surg 31:147–153CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dempsey WC, Latham WD (1968) Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammaplasty: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:515–521CrossRef Dempsey WC, Latham WD (1968) Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammaplasty: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:515–521CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Regnault P (1977) Partially submuscular breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:72–76CrossRef Regnault P (1977) Partially submuscular breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:72–76CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Candiani P, Campiglio GL (1997) Augmentation mammaplasty: personal evolution of the concepts looking for an ideal technique. Aesth Plast Surg 21:417–423CrossRef Candiani P, Campiglio GL (1997) Augmentation mammaplasty: personal evolution of the concepts looking for an ideal technique. Aesth Plast Surg 21:417–423CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant- soft tissue relationship in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272CrossRef Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant- soft tissue relationship in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bosch G, Jacobo O (2002) The double pocket technique: aesthetic breast augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 26:461–464CrossRef Bosch G, Jacobo O (2002) The double pocket technique: aesthetic breast augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 26:461–464CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Khan UD (2007) Muscle splitting breast augmentation: a new pocket in a different plane. Aesth Plast Surg 31:553–558CrossRef Khan UD (2007) Muscle splitting breast augmentation: a new pocket in a different plane. Aesth Plast Surg 31:553–558CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stumpfle RL (2012) Transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation. Experience with 160 cases. Aesth Plast Surg 36:343–348CrossRef Stumpfle RL (2012) Transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation. Experience with 160 cases. Aesth Plast Surg 36:343–348CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, Araujo LRR, Damasio RCC, Auersvald A (2004) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908CrossRef Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, Araujo LRR, Damasio RCC, Auersvald A (2004) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sampaio Goes JC, Landecker A (2003) Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years experience with the subfascial plane. Aesth Plast Surg 27:178–184CrossRef Sampaio Goes JC, Landecker A (2003) Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years experience with the subfascial plane. Aesth Plast Surg 27:178–184CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Siclovan HR, Jamal AJ (2008) Advantages and outcomes in subfascial breast augmentation: a two-year review of experience. Aesth Plast Surg 32:426–431CrossRef Siclovan HR, Jamal AJ (2008) Advantages and outcomes in subfascial breast augmentation: a two-year review of experience. Aesth Plast Surg 32:426–431CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB (2002) Breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and dynamics: the TEPID approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 190:1396–1409CrossRef Tebbetts JB (2002) Breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and dynamics: the TEPID approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 190:1396–1409CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Takayanagi S, Nakagawa R, Sugimoto Y (2004) Augmentation mammaplasty: Where should the implant be placed? Aesth Plast Surg 28:83–88CrossRef Takayanagi S, Nakagawa R, Sugimoto Y (2004) Augmentation mammaplasty: Where should the implant be placed? Aesth Plast Surg 28:83–88CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stan C (2009) The bio dimensional planning system in multiplane breast augmentation. In: Proceedings of the 5th international aesthetic symposium, Stockholm, June 11–13 Stan C (2009) The bio dimensional planning system in multiplane breast augmentation. In: Proceedings of the 5th international aesthetic symposium, Stockholm, June 11–13
18.
go back to reference Heden P (2009) Anatomical form stable implants. Breast augmentation, preoperative marking, implant selection and surgical technique. In: Proceedings of the 5th international Stockholm, June 11–13 Heden P (2009) Anatomical form stable implants. Breast augmentation, preoperative marking, implant selection and surgical technique. In: Proceedings of the 5th international Stockholm, June 11–13
19.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in five minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005–2016PubMed Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in five minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005–2016PubMed
20.
go back to reference Nipshagen MD, Beekman WH, Esmé DL, de Becker J (2007) Anatomically shaped breast prosthesis in vivo: a change of dimension? Aesth Plast Surg 31:540–543CrossRef Nipshagen MD, Beekman WH, Esmé DL, de Becker J (2007) Anatomically shaped breast prosthesis in vivo: a change of dimension? Aesth Plast Surg 31:540–543CrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Maxwell GP, Scheflan M, Spear S, Nava MB, Heden P (2014) Benefits and limitations of macrotextured breast implants and consensus recommendations for optimizing their effectiveness. Aesth Surg J 34(6):876–881CrossRef Maxwell GP, Scheflan M, Spear S, Nava MB, Heden P (2014) Benefits and limitations of macrotextured breast implants and consensus recommendations for optimizing their effectiveness. Aesth Surg J 34(6):876–881CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mateu LP, Chamorro Hernandez JJ (1996) Partial myotomy of the pectoralis major in submuscular breast implants. Aesth Plast Surg 22:228–230CrossRef Mateu LP, Chamorro Hernandez JJ (1996) Partial myotomy of the pectoralis major in submuscular breast implants. Aesth Plast Surg 22:228–230CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Baxter RA (2005) Subfascial breast augmentation: theme and variations. Aesth Surg J 25:447–453CrossRef Baxter RA (2005) Subfascial breast augmentation: theme and variations. Aesth Surg J 25:447–453CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Baxter RA (2011) Update on the split-muscle technique for breast augmentation: prevention and correction of animation distortion and double-bubble deformity. Aesth Plast Surg 35:426–429CrossRef Baxter RA (2011) Update on the split-muscle technique for breast augmentation: prevention and correction of animation distortion and double-bubble deformity. Aesth Plast Surg 35:426–429CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Spear SL, Schwarz J, Dayan JH, Clemens MW (2009) Outcome Assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 33:44–48CrossRef Spear SL, Schwarz J, Dayan JH, Clemens MW (2009) Outcome Assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 33:44–48CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ramirez OM (2002) Dual plane breast augmentation: avoiding pectoralis minor displacement. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(4):1198CrossRef Ramirez OM (2002) Dual plane breast augmentation: avoiding pectoralis minor displacement. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(4):1198CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Spear SL, Bogue DP, Thomassen JM (2006) Synmastia after breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:168S–171SCrossRef Spear SL, Bogue DP, Thomassen JM (2006) Synmastia after breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:168S–171SCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Breast Implant ARC: An Algorithm for Determining the Position of the IMF in Breast Augmentation Planning
Authors
Werner H. Beekman
Vivian K. Beekman
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01446-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2020 Go to the issue