Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2007

01-10-2007 | Original Article

Muscle-Splitting Breast Augmentation: A New Pocket in a Different Plane

Author: Umar D. Khan, M.B., F.R.C.S.

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Breast augmentation usually is performed in subglandular, subfascial, or partial submuscular pockets, including the dual plane. A new pocket has been described and used by the author. The initial pocket was made in the subglandular plane up to the lower level of the nipple–areolar complex, and the submuscular plane was reached by splitting the pectoralis major muscle without its release from the costal margin. The implant lies in this plane simultaneously behind and in front of the pectoralis.

Methods

From October 2005 to November 2006, 125 patients underwent bilateral breast augmentation using the new technique. Soft cohesive gel microtextured round implants ranging in size from 230 to 440 ml were used.

Results

All the patients experienced a quick recovery with three-dimensional enhancement and having the benefits of both subglandular and submuscular planes. No rippling, lateral displacement, double-bubble deformity, or muscle contraction–associated deformities were seen. All the patients had aesthetically natural cleavage, with the nipple at the most projected part of the breast. Postoperative analgesia requirements were reduced because of dissection in natural planes.

Conclusion

For adequate cover of the prosthesis, only the upper part of the pectoralis major muscle is required. This can be achieved by using the pectoralis muscle-splitting technique. The pectoralis major was split in the direction of its fibers, avoiding extensive muscle release. Surgical morbidity was reduced, resulting in a quick postoperative recovery and a more natural three-dimensional appearance of the breast.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Biggs TM, Cukier JM, Worthing LF: Augmentation mammoplasty: A review of 18 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:445, 1982CrossRefPubMed Biggs TM, Cukier JM, Worthing LF: Augmentation mammoplasty: A review of 18 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:445, 1982CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Biggs TM, Yarish RS: Augmentation mammoplasty: A comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:368, 1990CrossRefPubMed Biggs TM, Yarish RS: Augmentation mammoplasty: A comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:368, 1990CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cronin TD, Gerow RM: Augmentation mammoplasty: New “natural feel” prosthesis. In the translation of the Third International Congress of the Plastic Surgery. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, no. 66. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp. 41–49 1964 Cronin TD, Gerow RM: Augmentation mammoplasty: New “natural feel” prosthesis. In the translation of the Third International Congress of the Plastic Surgery. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, no. 66. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp. 41–49 1964
4.
go back to reference Dempsey WC, Latham WD: Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammoplasty: A preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:515, 1968CrossRefPubMed Dempsey WC, Latham WD: Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammoplasty: A preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:515, 1968CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ganong WF: Review of medical physiology. 13th ed. Appleton & Lange, San Mateo, California, 1987 Ganong WF: Review of medical physiology. 13th ed. Appleton & Lange, San Mateo, California, 1987
6.
go back to reference Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, Araujo LRR, Damasio RCC, Auersvald A: Subfascial breast implant: A new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904, 2003CrossRefPubMed Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, Araujo LRR, Damasio RCC, Auersvald A: Subfascial breast implant: A new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904, 2003CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Keramidas E, Rodopoulou S, Khan UD: The ballooning manoeuvre in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1795, 2005CrossRefPubMed Keramidas E, Rodopoulou S, Khan UD: The ballooning manoeuvre in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1795, 2005CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Khan UD: Lower pole enhancement in breast augmentation. 6th Croatian Congress of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Optija–Rijeka, Croatia, 6–11 October, 2006 Khan UD: Lower pole enhancement in breast augmentation. 6th Croatian Congress of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Optija–Rijeka, Croatia, 6–11 October, 2006
9.
go back to reference Mathes SJ, Nahai F: Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: Experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:177, 1981CrossRefPubMed Mathes SJ, Nahai F: Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: Experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:177, 1981CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Strasser EJ: Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time: One surgeon’s observations. Aesth Surg J 26:45–50, 2006CrossRef Strasser EJ: Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time: One surgeon’s observations. Aesth Surg J 26:45–50, 2006CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB: Dual-plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant–soft tissue relationship in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255, 2001CrossRefPubMed Tebbetts JB: Dual-plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant–soft tissue relationship in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255, 2001CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Muscle-Splitting Breast Augmentation: A New Pocket in a Different Plane
Author
Umar D. Khan, M.B., F.R.C.S.
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
Springer New York
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0242-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2007 Go to the issue