Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2007

01-10-2007 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Anatomically Shaped Breast Prosthesis in Vivo: A Change of Dimension?

Authors: Martine D. Nipshagen, Werner H. Beekman, Danielle L. Esmé, Jan de Becker

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In addition to the already existing round cohesive gel-filled breast prostheses, anatomically shaped breast prostheses were introduced in 1990 to provide a more natural shape to the augmented or reconstructed breast. To date, however, it is unclear whether the anatomic configuration of the prostheses is maintained after subpectoral implantation. Recently, a three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique became available, offering a precise visualization of the prosthesis in vivo. Using this 3D MRI technique, this study aimed to compare the shape of commercially available round and anatomically shaped silicone gel-filled breast prostheses before and after implantation.

Methods

Using 3D MRI, 6 conventionally round and 12 symmetrically shaped silicone gel-filled prostheses were scanned in vitro. Scans were made in vivo 6 weeks after subpectoral implantation of these prostheses in nine patients. The in vivo 3D images were compared with the in vitro 3D images.

Results

Overall, a 3.5% decrease in projection was found on the in vivo images, as compared with the in vitro images. On the craniocaudally oriented images, a slight lateral shift of the cohesive gel was observed in the majority of the prostheses. Inamed Style 510 prostheses showed the best in vivo preservation of their configuration.

Conclusions

The results show that both the round and the anatomically shaped silicone prostheses in vivo largely maintain their original in vitro configuration after subpectoral implantation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baker JL (1979) Augmentation mammaplasty. In: WC Grabb (ed) Plastic surgery. 3rd ed. Little Brown: Boston, pp. 179–182 Baker JL (1979) Augmentation mammaplasty. In: WC Grabb (ed) Plastic surgery. 3rd ed. Little Brown: Boston, pp. 179–182
2.
go back to reference Beekman WH, Hage JJ, Taets van Amerongen AH, et al. (1999) Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting failure of breast implants filled with silicone gel. Scand J Plas Reconstr Hand Surg 33:415–418CrossRef Beekman WH, Hage JJ, Taets van Amerongen AH, et al. (1999) Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting failure of breast implants filled with silicone gel. Scand J Plas Reconstr Hand Surg 33:415–418CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Beekman WH, Scot MG, Taets van Amerongen AH, et al. (1996) Silicone breast implant bleed and rupture: Clinical diagnosis and predictive value of mammography and ultrasound. Ann Plast Surg 36:345–347CrossRefPubMed Beekman WH, Scot MG, Taets van Amerongen AH, et al. (1996) Silicone breast implant bleed and rupture: Clinical diagnosis and predictive value of mammography and ultrasound. Ann Plast Surg 36:345–347CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cronin TD, Gerow FJ (1964) Augmentation mammaplasty: A new “natural feel” prosthesis. ransactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amsterdam. Excerpta Medical 41–49 Cronin TD, Gerow FJ (1964) Augmentation mammaplasty: A new “natural feel” prosthesis. ransactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amsterdam. Excerpta Medical 41–49
5.
go back to reference De Becker J, Rozijn T, Visser F, Jones A, Beekman WH (2005) Siliconeonly breast MRI using an inversion recovery TSE sequence with a B1 independentspectral selective water suppression prepulse (SPAIR). Proceedings Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 13:1858 De Becker J, Rozijn T, Visser F, Jones A, Beekman WH (2005) Siliconeonly breast MRI using an inversion recovery TSE sequence with a B1 independentspectral selective water suppression prepulse (SPAIR). Proceedings Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 13:1858
6.
go back to reference Fagrell D, Berggren A, Tarpila E (2001) Capsular contracture around saline-filled, fine-textured, and smooth mammary implants: A prospective 7.5-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:2108–2112CrossRefPubMed Fagrell D, Berggren A, Tarpila E (2001) Capsular contracture around saline-filled, fine-textured, and smooth mammary implants: A prospective 7.5-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:2108–2112CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fruhstorfer BH, Hodgson EL, Malata CM (2004) Early experience with an anatomical soft cohesive silicone gel prosthesis in cosmetic and reconstructive breast implant surgery. Ann Plast Surg 53:536–542CrossRefPubMed Fruhstorfer BH, Hodgson EL, Malata CM (2004) Early experience with an anatomical soft cohesive silicone gel prosthesis in cosmetic and reconstructive breast implant surgery. Ann Plast Surg 53:536–542CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hamas RS (2000) The comparative dimensions of round and anatomical saline-filled breast implants. Aesth Surg J 20:281–290CrossRef Hamas RS (2000) The comparative dimensions of round and anatomical saline-filled breast implants. Aesth Surg J 20:281–290CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hamas RS (1994) The postoperative shape of round and teardrop saline-filled breast implants. Aesth Surg J 19:369–374CrossRef Hamas RS (1994) The postoperative shape of round and teardrop saline-filled breast implants. Aesth Surg J 19:369–374CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Heden P, Jembeck J, Hober M (2001) Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: The world’s largest current experience. Clin Plast Surg 28:531–552PubMed Heden P, Jembeck J, Hober M (2001) Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: The world’s largest current experience. Clin Plast Surg 28:531–552PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hidalgo DA (2000) Breast augmentation: Choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2202–2216CrossRefPubMed Hidalgo DA (2000) Breast augmentation: Choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2202–2216CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hobar PC, Gutowski K (2001) Experience with anatomic breast implants. Clin Plast Surg 28:553–558PubMed Hobar PC, Gutowski K (2001) Experience with anatomic breast implants. Clin Plast Surg 28:553–558PubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Spear SL, Mardini S (2001) Alternative filler materials and new implant designs: What’s available and what’s on the horizon? Clin Plast Surg 28:435–443PubMed Spear SL, Mardini S (2001) Alternative filler materials and new implant designs: What’s available and what’s on the horizon? Clin Plast Surg 28:435–443PubMed
15.
go back to reference Tebbets JB (1998) Use of anatomic breast implants: Ten essentials. Aesth Surg J 18:377–384CrossRef Tebbets JB (1998) Use of anatomic breast implants: Ten essentials. Aesth Surg J 18:377–384CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tebbets JB (1996) What is adequate fill? Implications in breast implant surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:1451–1454CrossRef Tebbets JB (1996) What is adequate fill? Implications in breast implant surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:1451–1454CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Anatomically Shaped Breast Prosthesis in Vivo: A Change of Dimension?
Authors
Martine D. Nipshagen
Werner H. Beekman
Danielle L. Esmé
Jan de Becker
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
Springer New York
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-0025-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2007 Go to the issue