Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2008

01-05-2008 | Original Article

Advantages and Outcomes in Subfascial Breast Augmentation: A Two-Year Review of Experience

Authors: Horia R. Siclovan, Jamal A. Jomah

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

One of the most popular surgical cosmetic procedures, breast augmentation, has enjoyed large acceptance in the last few decades. One of the most important factors in the dynamics established between the implants and the soft tissues after breast augmentation is the pocket plane. Surgeons have been seeking the proper plane into which the implant might be placed. The subglandular approach resulted in implant edge visibility and was thought to result in a higher incidence of fibrous capsular contractures. Despite the advantage of concealing the implant edges using the subpectoral approach, implant displacement occurred with contraction of the pectoralis muscle. The use of the retrofascial plane seems to yield the benefits of both planes without the deficits.

Methods

Since 2006, 45 patients with hypomastia have undergone subfascial breast augmentation using anatomical contour profile gel cohesive III textured implants.

Results

Pleasing long-term results have been obtained by using subfascial breast augmentation, with maintenance of a natural breast shape and a smooth transition between the soft tissue and implant in the upper pole. There were no capsular contractures and no complaints regarding displacement of the implants with contraction of the pectoralis major muscle.

Conclusions

The subfascial breast augmentation technique offers improved long-term aesthetic results because the dynamics between the implant and soft tissues have been optimized. This technique is extremely versatile and may also be used in patients requiring removal and replacement of breast implants.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, Araujo LRR, Costa Damasio RC, Auersvald A (2003) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908PubMedCrossRef Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, Araujo LRR, Costa Damasio RC, Auersvald A (2003) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sampaio Goes JC, Landecker A (2003) Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years experience with the subfascial plane. Aesth Plast Surg 27:178–184CrossRef Sampaio Goes JC, Landecker A (2003) Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years experience with the subfascial plane. Aesth Plast Surg 27:178–184CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Barbato C, Pena M, Triana C, Zambrano MA (2004) Augmentation mammoplasty using the retrofascia approach. Aesth Plast Surg 28:148–152CrossRef Barbato C, Pena M, Triana C, Zambrano MA (2004) Augmentation mammoplasty using the retrofascia approach. Aesth Plast Surg 28:148–152CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jinde L, Jianliang S, Xiaoping C, Xiaoyan T, Jiaqing L, Qun M, Bo L (2006) Anatomy and clinical significance of pectoral fascia. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1557–1560PubMedCrossRef Jinde L, Jianliang S, Xiaoping C, Xiaoyan T, Jiaqing L, Qun M, Bo L (2006) Anatomy and clinical significance of pectoral fascia. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1557–1560PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB, Adams W (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(Suppl):35S–45SPubMedCrossRef Tebbetts JB, Adams W (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(Suppl):35S–45SPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Adams WP Jr, Rios JL, Smith SJ (2006) Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(Suppl):46S–52SPubMedCrossRef Adams WP Jr, Rios JL, Smith SJ (2006) Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(Suppl):46S–52SPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Savaci N, Tosun Z, Hosnuter M (2004) A simple method for breast implant placement using a drainage tube. Aesth Plast Surg 28:231–232CrossRef Savaci N, Tosun Z, Hosnuter M (2004) A simple method for breast implant placement using a drainage tube. Aesth Plast Surg 28:231–232CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Advantages and Outcomes in Subfascial Breast Augmentation: A Two-Year Review of Experience
Authors
Horia R. Siclovan
Jamal A. Jomah
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9141-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2008 Go to the issue