Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Original Article

Outcome Assessment of Breast Distortion Following Submuscular Breast Augmentation

Authors: Scott L. Spear, Jaime Schwartz, Joseph H. Dayan, Mark W. Clemens

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Animation deformity or breast distortion during pectoralis muscle contraction following subpectoral breast augmentation is a known entity, but its prevalence and significance remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence and severity of animation deformity as well as its effect on patient satisfaction and interference with certain activities.

Methods

All procedures were performed by the senior author using a variation of a previously described dual-plane technique. The first part of this study was an evaluation of breast distortion by a group of independent observers in a series of 40 consecutive patients who underwent primary subpectoral breast augmentation. The second part of the study was a questionnaire sent to 195 consecutive patients asking about overall satisfaction, degree of animation deformity, and whether there was interference with any activities.

Results

Of the 40 patients’ photographs that were evaluated, 9 (22.5%) had no distortion, 25 (62.5%) had minimal distortion, 4 (10%) had moderate distortion, and 2 (5%) had severe distortion. Of the 195 questionnaires, there were 69 responses, a 35% response rate. Fifty-six (82%) described mild to no distortion, 7 (10%) were moderate, and 5 (7%) were severe. According to the survey, the most common activities that were problematic were lifting weights and exercising (24 and 19%, respectively). Only one (1%) patient stated that she would not recommend subpectoral positioning.

Conclusion

Although animation deformities do exist, nearly all patients in this study would still choose subpectoral positioning. Patients who may be better candidates for subglandular placement are those for whom exercise is central to their daily living. As a result of this study, surgeons and patients should have more accurate and reliable information regarding the significance of animation deformity after subpectoral breast augmentation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pelle-Ceravolo M, Del Vescovo A, Bertozzi E (2004) A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:288–294PubMedCrossRef Pelle-Ceravolo M, Del Vescovo A, Bertozzi E (2004) A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:288–294PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Maxwell GP (1988) Management of mammary subpectoral breast distortion. Clin Plast Surg 15:601–611PubMed Maxwell GP (1988) Management of mammary subpectoral breast distortion. Clin Plast Surg 15:601–611PubMed
3.
go back to reference Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R (2003) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908PubMedCrossRef Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R (2003) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Spear SL, Carter ME, Ganz J (2006) The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to ‘dual-plane’ positioning: Technique and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:103S–113SPubMedCrossRef Spear SL, Carter ME, Ganz J (2006) The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to ‘dual-plane’ positioning: Technique and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:103S–113SPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272PubMedCrossRef Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Spear SL (2006) Advances in breast augmentation: update. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:197SCrossRef Spear SL (2006) Advances in breast augmentation: update. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:197SCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Adams WP, Teitelbaum S, Bengston BP (2006) Breast augmentation roundtable. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:175S–187SPubMedCrossRef Adams WP, Teitelbaum S, Bengston BP (2006) Breast augmentation roundtable. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:175S–187SPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Cody HS, Mehrara B (2007) Breast cancer in the previously augmented breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:49–58PubMedCrossRef McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Cody HS, Mehrara B (2007) Breast cancer in the previously augmented breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:49–58PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcome Assessment of Breast Distortion Following Submuscular Breast Augmentation
Authors
Scott L. Spear
Jaime Schwartz
Joseph H. Dayan
Mark W. Clemens
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9275-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2009 Go to the issue