Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2020

01-06-2020 | Breast Augmentation | Original Article

Modified Internal Mastopexy Technique in Muscle Splitting Biplane Breast Augmentation

Authors: Horia R. Şiclovan, Paul Nistor

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The technique of muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation associated with internal mastopexy to correct breast hypoplasia, ptosis and asymmetry was reported in 2014. The purpose of this article is to present recent modifications and results of this technique.

Methods

Since 2016, 30 patients with breast hypoplasia associated with excessive or loose skin envelope or breast ptosis grade I have benefited from a new and improved technique of internal suture mastopexy combined with the muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation (muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation with internal mastopexy type II or MSBBA-IM2).

Results

Excellent long-term results have been obtained by using the muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation with internal mastopexy type II, which maintains a natural breast shape and a smooth transition between the soft tissue and implant in the upper pole by redraping the breast parenchyma both at the level of the upper pole and at the level of the lower pole of the breast.

Conclusions

The new technique of muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation with internal mastopexy type II or MSBBA-IM2 offers improved long-term aesthetic results and is an effective alternative in selected patients requiring correction of breast hypoplasia associated with excessive or loose skin envelope or breast ptosis grade I.

Level of Evidence IV

Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Cronic TD, Gerow RM (1964) Augmentation mammoplasty: new “natural feel” prosthesis. In the translation of the third international congress of the plastic surgery. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, no 66, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 41–49 Cronic TD, Gerow RM (1964) Augmentation mammoplasty: new “natural feel” prosthesis. In the translation of the third international congress of the plastic surgery. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, no 66, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 41–49
3.
go back to reference Dempsey WC, Latham WD (1968) Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammoplasty: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:515–521CrossRef Dempsey WC, Latham WD (1968) Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammoplasty: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:515–521CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Regnault P (1977) Partially submuscular breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:72–76CrossRef Regnault P (1977) Partially submuscular breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:72–76CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft tissue relationship in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272CrossRef Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft tissue relationship in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R et al (2003) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908CrossRef Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R et al (2003) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sampaio Goes JC, Landecker A (2003) Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years experience with the subfascial plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27:178–184CrossRef Sampaio Goes JC, Landecker A (2003) Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years experience with the subfascial plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27:178–184CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Barbato C, Pena M, Triana C et al (2004) Augmentation mammoplasty using the retrofascia approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:148–152CrossRef Barbato C, Pena M, Triana C et al (2004) Augmentation mammoplasty using the retrofascia approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:148–152CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Baxter RA (2005) Subfascial breast augmentation: theme and variations. Aesthetic Surg J 25:447–453CrossRef Baxter RA (2005) Subfascial breast augmentation: theme and variations. Aesthetic Surg J 25:447–453CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Siclovan HR, Jomah JA (2008) Advantages and outcomes in subfascial breast augmentation: a two-year review of experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:426–431CrossRef Siclovan HR, Jomah JA (2008) Advantages and outcomes in subfascial breast augmentation: a two-year review of experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:426–431CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tijerina VNE, Saenz RAE, Garcia-Guerrero J (2010) Experience of 1000 cases on subfascial breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:16–22CrossRef Tijerina VNE, Saenz RAE, Garcia-Guerrero J (2010) Experience of 1000 cases on subfascial breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:16–22CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Khan UD (2007) Muscle-splitting breast augmentation: a new pocket in a different plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:553–558CrossRef Khan UD (2007) Muscle-splitting breast augmentation: a new pocket in a different plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:553–558CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Khan UD (2009) Dynamic breasts: a common complication following partial submuscular augmentation and its correction using the muscle-splitting biplane technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:353–360CrossRef Khan UD (2009) Dynamic breasts: a common complication following partial submuscular augmentation and its correction using the muscle-splitting biplane technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:353–360CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lang Stümpfle R, Pereira-Lima LF, Alves Valiati A et al (2012) Transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation: experience with 160 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:343–348CrossRef Lang Stümpfle R, Pereira-Lima LF, Alves Valiati A et al (2012) Transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation: experience with 160 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:343–348CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Siclovan HR (2015) Versatility of muscle splitting biplane technique associated with internal mastopexy in breast hypoplasia, ptosis and asymmetry. Eur J Plast Surg 38:37–42CrossRef Siclovan HR (2015) Versatility of muscle splitting biplane technique associated with internal mastopexy in breast hypoplasia, ptosis and asymmetry. Eur J Plast Surg 38:37–42CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mahabir RC, Zamboni WA (2008) A new technique of internal suture mastopexy for mild to moderate breast ptosis. Can J Plast Surg 16(1):11–13CrossRef Mahabir RC, Zamboni WA (2008) A new technique of internal suture mastopexy for mild to moderate breast ptosis. Can J Plast Surg 16(1):11–13CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Khan UD (2011) Multiplane technique for simultaneous submuscular breast augmentation and internal glandulopexy using inframammary crease incision in selected patients with early ptosis. Eur J Plast Surg 34:337–343CrossRef Khan UD (2011) Multiplane technique for simultaneous submuscular breast augmentation and internal glandulopexy using inframammary crease incision in selected patients with early ptosis. Eur J Plast Surg 34:337–343CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mallucci P, Branford OA (2016) Design for natural breast augmentation: the ICE principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1728–1737CrossRef Mallucci P, Branford OA (2016) Design for natural breast augmentation: the ICE principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1728–1737CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB, Adams W (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(Suppl):35S–45SCrossRef Tebbetts JB, Adams W (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(Suppl):35S–45SCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tebbets JB (2002) Breast implants selection based on patient tissue characteristics and dynamics: the TEPID approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 190:1396–1409CrossRef Tebbets JB (2002) Breast implants selection based on patient tissue characteristics and dynamics: the TEPID approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 190:1396–1409CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Adams WP, Culbertson EJ, Deva AK et al (2017) Macrotextured breast implants with defined steps to minimize bacterial contamination around the device: experience in 42,000 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:427–431CrossRef Adams WP, Culbertson EJ, Deva AK et al (2017) Macrotextured breast implants with defined steps to minimize bacterial contamination around the device: experience in 42,000 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:427–431CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Modified Internal Mastopexy Technique in Muscle Splitting Biplane Breast Augmentation
Authors
Horia R. Şiclovan
Paul Nistor
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01597-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2020 Go to the issue