Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2020

01-06-2020 | Rhinoplasty | Original Article

The Selfie View: Perioperative Photography in the Digital Age

Authors: Michael Eggerstedt, Jane Schumacher, Matthew J. Urban, Ryan M. Smith, Peter C. Revenaugh

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aesthetics of social media have become increasingly important to cosmetic surgery patients in recent years; however, aesthetic treatments have not kept pace with the desires of modern patients. The current study investigates the most common angles employed by various user cohorts when posting a selfie on social media platforms and proposes that aesthetic surgeons consider utilizing a selfie angle alongside standard pre- and postoperative photographic views.

Methods

Full face photographs published on the social media platform Instagram™ with the tag #selfie were divided into three cohorts: female models/influencers, amateur females, and amateur males. Each cohort contained 100 photographs. The photographs were analyzed using cloud-based facial analysis software for facial pan, roll, and tilt relative to the camera.

Results

One hundred photographs from each cohort were analyzed and demonstrated that amateur females (AF) take photographs from higher angles than amateur males (AM) or model females (MF). Roll-off-midline was significantly greater for AF and MF as compared to AM. The MF group had significantly a greater pan-off-midline as compared to AF and AM, while AF had significantly a greater pan-off-midline than AM.

Conclusions

Common photography practices employed within selfie photographs utilize angles not captured in standard perioperative photographs. This study supports the implementation of a selfie photograph into the standard set of pre- and postoperative photographs taken by aesthetic surgeons to evaluate the effects of interventions in the context of selfie photography. The angle employed can vary depending upon the demographic profile of the patient.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Pew Research Center (2018) Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC Pew Research Center (2018) Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC
3.
go back to reference Chen J, Ishii M, Bater KL et al (2019) Association between the use of social media and photograph editing applications, self-esteem, and cosmetic surgery acceptance. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 21(5):361–367CrossRef Chen J, Ishii M, Bater KL et al (2019) Association between the use of social media and photograph editing applications, self-esteem, and cosmetic surgery acceptance. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 21(5):361–367CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Frederick DA, Haselton MG (2007) Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33(8):1167–1183CrossRef Frederick DA, Haselton MG (2007) Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33(8):1167–1183CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ellenbogen R, Jankauskas S, Collini F (1990) Achieving standardized photographs in aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconst Surg 86(5):955–961CrossRef Ellenbogen R, Jankauskas S, Collini F (1990) Achieving standardized photographs in aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconst Surg 86(5):955–961CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zarem H (1984) Standards of photography. Plast Reconst Surg 74(137):137–144CrossRef Zarem H (1984) Standards of photography. Plast Reconst Surg 74(137):137–144CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Galdino GM, Dasilva And D, Gunter JP (2002) Digital photography for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(4):1421–1434CrossRef Galdino GM, Dasilva And D, Gunter JP (2002) Digital photography for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(4):1421–1434CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Manovich L, Ferrari V, Bruno N (2017) Selfie-takers prefer left cheeks: converging evidence from the (extended) database. Front Psychol 8:1460CrossRef Manovich L, Ferrari V, Bruno N (2017) Selfie-takers prefer left cheeks: converging evidence from the (extended) database. Front Psychol 8:1460CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Zaidel DW, Chen AC, German C (1995) She is not a beauty even when she smiles: possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia 33(5):649–655CrossRef Zaidel DW, Chen AC, German C (1995) She is not a beauty even when she smiles: possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia 33(5):649–655CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Burt DM, Perrett DI (1997) Perceptual asymmetries in judgements of facial attractiveness, age, gender, speech and expression. Neuropsychologia 35(5):685–693CrossRef Burt DM, Perrett DI (1997) Perceptual asymmetries in judgements of facial attractiveness, age, gender, speech and expression. Neuropsychologia 35(5):685–693CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ward B, Ward M, Fried O, Paskhover B (2018) Nasal distortion in short-distance photographs: the selfie effect. JAMA Fac Plast Surg 20(4):333–335CrossRef Ward B, Ward M, Fried O, Paskhover B (2018) Nasal distortion in short-distance photographs: the selfie effect. JAMA Fac Plast Surg 20(4):333–335CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Selfie View: Perioperative Photography in the Digital Age
Authors
Michael Eggerstedt
Jane Schumacher
Matthew J. Urban
Ryan M. Smith
Peter C. Revenaugh
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01593-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2020 Go to the issue