Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Paper

Multiplane technique for simultaneous submuscular breast augmentation and internal glandulopexy using inframammary crease incision in selected patients with early ptosis

Author: Umar Daraz Khan

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Augmentation mammoplasty is a procedure with a high satisfaction rate. On the other hand, augmentation in a ptotic breast requires conventional mastopexy which has a high surgical morbidity. In selected cases, the multiplane technique, a simultaneous submuscular augmentation with internal glandulopexy, is a procedure which avoids the external scarring of mastopexy. Between June 2005 and October 2008, the author operated on 44 patients (12 unilateral for nipple level asymmetry not exceeding 1.5 cm and 32 bilateral procedures in patients with nipple-areolar complexes (NAC) below the inframammary crease (IMC) but not exceeding 1.5 cm). The procedure is performed under general anesthesia through an IMC incision. The average age of the patient was 33.5 years (range 19–50), and in all but one patient, a round, high-profile cohesive gel silicone implants with an average size of 354 cm3 (range 260–440) in bilateral and 350 cm3 (range 300–440) in unilateral procedures, were used. The average preoperative suprasternal notch to NAC measurement in unilateral (n = 12) and bilateral (n = 32) procedures was 22.2 cm (range19–24) and 23.2 cm (range 20–26) respectively. The preoperative average NAC distance to IMC distance in bilateral and unilateral cases was 8.03 cm (range 6–12) and 7.2 (range 4–9) cm respectively. The measured postoperative supra-sternal notch to NAC distance, 22.0 cm (range 19.5–23) in unilateral (n = 12) and 22.4 cm (range 20–26) in bilateral procedures (n = 32) respectively, shows the reduction in suprasternal notch to NAC distance. Postoperative NAC to IMC distance in bilateral and unilateral breasts was 9.3 cm (range 7–11) and 9.1 cm (range 7–10) respectively. When a unilateral procedure is performed, the contra lateral breast is used as a control to compare the results. One patient had an infection and of the 12 unilateral and 32 bilateral procedures, nipple sensation was present in 8 unilateral and 28 bilateral cases. Only one patient with bilateral procedure reported a bilateral loss of nipple sensation in the early part of her recovery. Two patients did have residual ptosis and one requested a bilateral vertical scar mastopexy. The multiplane procedure for submuscular augmentation with internal subglandular mastopexy is an option in selected patients with early ptosis or patients presenting with minor NAC asymmetry in the vertical axis. If necessary, conventional external mastopexy remains a possibility in patients with inadequate results.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:259–267CrossRef Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:259–267CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wise RL (1956) Preliminary report on a method of planning the mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 17:367CrossRef Wise RL (1956) Preliminary report on a method of planning the mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 17:367CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammoplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:100–114PubMedCrossRef Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammoplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:100–114PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bartels RJ, Strickland DM, Douglas WM (1976) A new mastopexy operation for mild or moderate breast ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 57:687PubMedCrossRef Bartels RJ, Strickland DM, Douglas WM (1976) A new mastopexy operation for mild or moderate breast ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 57:687PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Binelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammoplasty, “The Round Block” technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14:93CrossRef Binelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammoplasty, “The Round Block” technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14:93CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Khan UD (2007) Muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation. a new pocket in a different plane. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:353–358 Khan UD (2007) Muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation. a new pocket in a different plane. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:353–358
7.
go back to reference Khan UD. Augmentation mastopexy in muscle splitting biplane: an outcome of first 44 consecutive cases of mastopexies in a new pocket. Aesthet Plast Surg. Online First Khan UD. Augmentation mastopexy in muscle splitting biplane: an outcome of first 44 consecutive cases of mastopexies in a new pocket. Aesthet Plast Surg. Online First
8.
9.
go back to reference Becker H, Storm van Leeuwen JB (1990) The correction of breast ptosis with expander mammary prosthesis. Ann Plast Surg 24:489–497PubMedCrossRef Becker H, Storm van Leeuwen JB (1990) The correction of breast ptosis with expander mammary prosthesis. Ann Plast Surg 24:489–497PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Keramidas E, Rodopoulou S, Khan UD (2005) The ballooning manoeuvre in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1795PubMedCrossRef Keramidas E, Rodopoulou S, Khan UD (2005) The ballooning manoeuvre in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1795PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cronin TD, Gerow RM (1964) Augmentation mammoplasty: new “natural feel” prosthesis. In: Translation of the third International Congress of the Plastic Surgery, Amsterdam, pp 41–49. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, No. 66 Cronin TD, Gerow RM (1964) Augmentation mammoplasty: new “natural feel” prosthesis. In: Translation of the third International Congress of the Plastic Surgery, Amsterdam, pp 41–49. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, No. 66
12.
go back to reference Gonzales-Ulloa M (1960) Correction of hypotrophy of the breast by exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg 25:15CrossRef Gonzales-Ulloa M (1960) Correction of hypotrophy of the breast by exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg 25:15CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:31PubMedCrossRef Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:31PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:259–267CrossRef Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:259–267CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Spear SL, Low M, Ducic I (2003) Revision augmentation mastopexy: indications, operations, and outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 51:540–546PubMedCrossRef Spear SL, Low M, Ducic I (2003) Revision augmentation mastopexy: indications, operations, and outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 51:540–546PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Stevens WG, Stoker DA, Freeman ME, Quardt SM, Hircsh EM, Cohen R (2006) Is one-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? A review of 186 primary cases. Aesthet Surg J 26:674–680PubMedCrossRef Stevens WG, Stoker DA, Freeman ME, Quardt SM, Hircsh EM, Cohen R (2006) Is one-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? A review of 186 primary cases. Aesthet Surg J 26:674–680PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Persoff MM (2003) Vertical mastopexy with expansion augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:13–19CrossRef Persoff MM (2003) Vertical mastopexy with expansion augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:13–19CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Becker H, Hartog J (2006) Augmentation mastopexy using adjustable implants with external injection dome. Aesthet Surg J 26:736–740PubMedCrossRef Becker H, Hartog J (2006) Augmentation mastopexy using adjustable implants with external injection dome. Aesthet Surg J 26:736–740PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Khan UD (2006) Lower pole enhancement in breast augmentation. 6th Croatian Congress of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Opatja-Rijeka, Croatia Khan UD (2006) Lower pole enhancement in breast augmentation. 6th Croatian Congress of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Opatja-Rijeka, Croatia
21.
go back to reference Khan UD (2009) Dynamic breasts: a common complication following partial submuscular augmentation and its correction using muscle splitting biplane technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:353–360CrossRef Khan UD (2009) Dynamic breasts: a common complication following partial submuscular augmentation and its correction using muscle splitting biplane technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:353–360CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Khan UD (2009) Selection of breast pocket using pinch test in augmentation mammoplasty: can it be relied in long term? Aesthet Plast Surg 33:780–781CrossRef Khan UD (2009) Selection of breast pocket using pinch test in augmentation mammoplasty: can it be relied in long term? Aesthet Plast Surg 33:780–781CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multiplane technique for simultaneous submuscular breast augmentation and internal glandulopexy using inframammary crease incision in selected patients with early ptosis
Author
Umar Daraz Khan
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-010-0521-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2011 Go to the issue