Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Authors: Nicola Farrar, Daisy Elliott, Catherine Houghton, Marcus Jepson, Nicola Mills, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Lucy Plumb, Julia Wade, Bridget Young, Jenny L. Donovan, Leila Rooshenas

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recruiting patients to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often reported to be challenging, and the evidence base for effective interventions that could be used by staff (recruiters) undertaking recruitment is lacking. Although the experiences and perspectives of recruiters have been widely reported, an evidence synthesis is required in order to inform the development of future interventions. This paper aims to address this by systematically searching and synthesising the evidence on recruiters’ perspectives and experiences of recruiting patients into RCTs. 

Methods

A qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) following Thomas and Harden’s approach to thematic synthesis was conducted. The Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ORRCA and Web of Science electronic databases were searched. Studies were sampled to ensure that the focus of the research was aligned with the phenomena of interest of the QES, their methodological relevance to the QES question, and to include variation across the clinical areas of the studies. The GRADE CERQual framework was used to assess confidence in the review findings.

Results

In total, 9316 studies were identified for screening, which resulted in 128 eligible papers. The application of the QES sampling strategy resulted in 30 papers being included in the final analysis. Five overlapping themes were identified which highlighted the complex manner in which recruiters experience RCT recruitment: (1) recruiting to RCTs in a clinical environment, (2) enthusiasm for the RCT, (3) making judgements about whether to approach a patient, (4) communication challenges, (5) interplay between recruiter and professional roles.

Conclusions

This QES identified factors which contribute to the complexities that recruiters can face in day-to-day clinical settings, and the influence recruiters and non-recruiting healthcare professionals have on opportunities afforded to patients for RCT participation. It has reinforced the importance of considering the clinical setting in its entirety when planning future RCTs and indicated the need to better normalise and support research if it is to become part of day-to-day practice.

Trial registration

PROSPERO CRD42020141297 (registered 11/02/2020).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tudur-Smith C, Hickey H, Clarke M, Blazeby J, Williamson P. The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. Trials. 2014;15:32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tudur-Smith C, Hickey H, Clarke M, Blazeby J, Williamson P. The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. Trials. 2014;15:32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sully BGO, Julious SA, Nicholl J. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2013;14(1):166.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sully BGO, Julious SA, Nicholl J. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2013;14(1):166.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Walters SJ, Henriques-Cadby IBDA, Bortolami O, Flight L, Hind D, Jacques RM, et al. Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme. Bmj Open. 2017;7(3):e015276.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Walters SJ, Henriques-Cadby IBDA, Bortolami O, Flight L, Hind D, Jacques RM, et al. Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme. Bmj Open. 2017;7(3):e015276.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Briel M, Olu KK, von Elm E, Kasenda B, Alturki R, Agarwal A, et al. A systematic review of discontinued trials suggested that most reasons for recruitment failure were preventable. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;80:8–15.PubMedCrossRef Briel M, Olu KK, von Elm E, Kasenda B, Alturki R, Agarwal A, et al. A systematic review of discontinued trials suggested that most reasons for recruitment failure were preventable. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;80:8–15.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bracken K, Askie L, Keech AC, Hague W, Wittert G. Recruitment strategies in randomised controlled trials of men aged 50 years and older: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e025580.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bracken K, Askie L, Keech AC, Hague W, Wittert G. Recruitment strategies in randomised controlled trials of men aged 50 years and older: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e025580.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J, Fraser C, Mitchell E, Sullivan F, et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2018;2(2). Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J, Fraser C, Mitchell E, Sullivan F, et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2018;2(2).
7.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Healy P, Galvin S, Williamson PR, Treweek S, Whiting C, Maeso B, et al. Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership - the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study. Trials. 2018;19(1):147.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Healy P, Galvin S, Williamson PR, Treweek S, Whiting C, Maeso B, et al. Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership - the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study. Trials. 2018;19(1):147.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hennessy M, Hunter A, Healy P, Galvin S, Houghton C. Improving trial recruitment processes: how qualitative methodologies can be used to address the top 10 research priorities identified within the PRioRiTy study. Trials. 2018;19(1):584.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hennessy M, Hunter A, Healy P, Galvin S, Houghton C. Improving trial recruitment processes: how qualitative methodologies can be used to address the top 10 research priorities identified within the PRioRiTy study. Trials. 2018;19(1):584.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rooshenas L, Elliott D, Wade J, Jepson M, Paramasivan S, Strong S, et al. Conveying equipoise during recruitment for clinical trials: qualitative synthesis of clinicians’ practices across six randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002147.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rooshenas L, Elliott D, Wade J, Jepson M, Paramasivan S, Strong S, et al. Conveying equipoise during recruitment for clinical trials: qualitative synthesis of clinicians’ practices across six randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002147.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Houghton C, Dowling M, Meskell P, Hunter A, Gardner H, Conway A, et al. Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2020;10(10):MR000045. Houghton C, Dowling M, Meskell P, Hunter A, Gardner H, Conway A, et al. Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2020;10(10):MR000045.
12.
go back to reference Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, Wilson S, Damery S. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000496.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, Wilson S, Damery S. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000496.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Farrar N, Elliott D, Jepson M, Houghton C, Young B, Donovan J, et al. Recruiters’ perspectives and experiences of trial recruitment processes: a qualitative evidence synthesis protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10):e045233.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Farrar N, Elliott D, Jepson M, Houghton C, Young B, Donovan J, et al. Recruiters’ perspectives and experiences of trial recruitment processes: a qualitative evidence synthesis protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10):e045233.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. Bmc Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):181.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. Bmc Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):181.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Glenton C, Carlsen B, Lewin S, Munthe-Kaas H, Colvin CJ, Tuncalp O, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Glenton C, Carlsen B, Lewin S, Munthe-Kaas H, Colvin CJ, Tuncalp O, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–43.PubMedCrossRef Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–43.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ames H, Glenton C, Lewin S. Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication. Bmc Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ames H, Glenton C, Lewin S. Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication. Bmc Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Suri H. Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qual Res J. 2011;11(2):63–75.CrossRef Suri H. Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qual Res J. 2011;11(2):63–75.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1990. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1990.
23.
go back to reference Long HA, French DP, Brooks JM. Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Res Methods Med Health Sci. 2020;1(1):31–42. Long HA, French DP, Brooks JM. Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Res Methods Med Health Sci. 2020;1(1):31–42.
24.
go back to reference Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, Gerhardus A, Wahlster P, Van Der Wilt GJ, et al. Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions. 2016. Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, Gerhardus A, Wahlster P, Van Der Wilt GJ, et al. Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions. 2016.
25.
go back to reference Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, Gerhardus A, Wahlster P, van der Wilt GJ, et al. Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;99:41–52.PubMedCrossRef Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, Gerhardus A, Wahlster P, van der Wilt GJ, et al. Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;99:41–52.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Rashidian A, Wainwright M, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Rashidian A, Wainwright M, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lewin S, Bohren M, Rashidian A, Munthe-Kaas H, Glenton C, Colvin CJ, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lewin S, Bohren M, Rashidian A, Munthe-Kaas H, Glenton C, Colvin CJ, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Munthe-Kaas H, Bohren MA, Glenton C, Lewin S, Noyes J, Tuncalp O, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Munthe-Kaas H, Bohren MA, Glenton C, Lewin S, Noyes J, Tuncalp O, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Colvin CJ, Garside R, Wainwright M, Munthe-Kaas H, Glenton C, Bohren MA, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 4: how to assess coherence. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Colvin CJ, Garside R, Wainwright M, Munthe-Kaas H, Glenton C, Bohren MA, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 4: how to assess coherence. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Noyes J, Booth A, Lewin S, Carlsen B, Glenton C, Colvin CJ, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Noyes J, Booth A, Lewin S, Carlsen B, Glenton C, Colvin CJ, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Campbell MK, Snowdon C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald AM, Knight R, et al. Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrolment and participation study. The STEPS study Health Technol Asses. 2007;11(48):113. Campbell MK, Snowdon C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald AM, Knight R, et al. Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrolment and participation study. The STEPS study Health Technol Asses. 2007;11(48):113.
32.
go back to reference Clement C, Selman LE, Kehoe PG, Howden B, Lane JA, Horwood J. Challenges to and facilitators of recruitment to an Alzheimer’s disease clinical trial: a qualitative interview study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;69(4):1067–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Clement C, Selman LE, Kehoe PG, Howden B, Lane JA, Horwood J. Challenges to and facilitators of recruitment to an Alzheimer’s disease clinical trial: a qualitative interview study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;69(4):1067–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Donovan JL, de Salis I, Toerien M, Paramasivan S, Hamdy FC, Blazeby JM. The intellectual challenges and emotional consequences of equipoise contributed to the fragility of recruitment in six randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(8):912–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Donovan JL, de Salis I, Toerien M, Paramasivan S, Hamdy FC, Blazeby JM. The intellectual challenges and emotional consequences of equipoise contributed to the fragility of recruitment in six randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(8):912–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Donovan JL, Paramasivan S, de Salis I, Toerien M. Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2014;15:5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Donovan JL, Paramasivan S, de Salis I, Toerien M. Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2014;15:5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Griffin D, Wall P, Realpe A, Adams A, Parsons N, Hobson R, et al. UK FASHIoN: feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for hip impingement compared with best conservative care. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). 2016;20(32):1–172.PubMedCentralCrossRef Griffin D, Wall P, Realpe A, Adams A, Parsons N, Hobson R, et al. UK FASHIoN: feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for hip impingement compared with best conservative care. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). 2016;20(32):1–172.PubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hallowell N, Snowdon C, Morrow S, Norman JE, Denison FC, Lawton J. The role of therapeutic optimism in recruitment to a clinical trial in a peripartum setting: balancing hope and uncertainty. Trials. 2016;17:13.CrossRef Hallowell N, Snowdon C, Morrow S, Norman JE, Denison FC, Lawton J. The role of therapeutic optimism in recruitment to a clinical trial in a peripartum setting: balancing hope and uncertainty. Trials. 2016;17:13.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hamdy FC, Elliott D, Le Conte S, Davies LC, Burns RM, Thomson C, et al. Partial ablation versus radical prostatectomy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: the PART feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018;22(52):1–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hamdy FC, Elliott D, Le Conte S, Davies LC, Burns RM, Thomson C, et al. Partial ablation versus radical prostatectomy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: the PART feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018;22(52):1–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hamilton DW, De Salis I, Donovan JL, Birchall M. The recruitment of patients to trials in head and neck cancer: a qualitative study of the EaStER trial of treatments for early laryngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(8):2333–7.PubMedCrossRef Hamilton DW, De Salis I, Donovan JL, Birchall M. The recruitment of patients to trials in head and neck cancer: a qualitative study of the EaStER trial of treatments for early laryngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(8):2333–7.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Hamlet C, Williamson H, Harcourt D. Recruiting young people with a visible difference to the YP Face IT feasibility trial: a qualitative exploration of primary care staff experiences. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;18(6):541–8.PubMedCrossRef Hamlet C, Williamson H, Harcourt D. Recruiting young people with a visible difference to the YP Face IT feasibility trial: a qualitative exploration of primary care staff experiences. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;18(6):541–8.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Howard L, de Salis I, Tomlin Z, Thornicroft G, Donovan J. Why is recruitment to trials difficult? An investigation into recruitment difficulties in an RCT of supported employment in patients with severe mental illness. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30(1):40–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Howard L, de Salis I, Tomlin Z, Thornicroft G, Donovan J. Why is recruitment to trials difficult? An investigation into recruitment difficulties in an RCT of supported employment in patients with severe mental illness. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30(1):40–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Sin J, Henderson C, Spain D, Gamble C, Norman I. What factors influence successful recruitment of siblings of individuals with first episode psychosis to e-health interventions? A qualitative study. Health Expect. 2017;20(4):696–704. Sin J, Henderson C, Spain D, Gamble C, Norman I. What factors influence successful recruitment of siblings of individuals with first episode psychosis to e-health interventions? A qualitative study. Health Expect. 2017;20(4):696–704.
42.
go back to reference Langley C, Gray S, Selley S, Bowie C, Price C. Clinicians’ attitudes to recruitment to randomised trials in cancer care: a qualitative study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000;5(3):164–9.PubMedCrossRef Langley C, Gray S, Selley S, Bowie C, Price C. Clinicians’ attitudes to recruitment to randomised trials in cancer care: a qualitative study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000;5(3):164–9.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Mason VL, Shaw A, Wiles NJ, Mulligan J, Peters TJ, Sharp D, et al. GPs’ experiences of primary care mental health research: a qualitative study of the barriers to recruitment. Fam Pract. 2007;24(5):518–25.PubMedCrossRef Mason VL, Shaw A, Wiles NJ, Mulligan J, Peters TJ, Sharp D, et al. GPs’ experiences of primary care mental health research: a qualitative study of the barriers to recruitment. Fam Pract. 2007;24(5):518–25.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Paleri V, Patterson J, Rousseau N, Moloney E, Craig D, Tzelis D, et al. Gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for chemoradiation patients with head and neck cancer: The tube pilot RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018;22(16):1–144.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Paleri V, Patterson J, Rousseau N, Moloney E, Craig D, Tzelis D, et al. Gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for chemoradiation patients with head and neck cancer: The tube pilot RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018;22(16):1–144.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Paramasivan S, Huddart R, Hall E, Lewis R, Birtle A, Donovan JL. Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011). Trials. 2011;12:15.CrossRef Paramasivan S, Huddart R, Hall E, Lewis R, Birtle A, Donovan JL. Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011). Trials. 2011;12:15.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Phelps EE, Tutton E, Griffin X, Baird J, Costa ML, Parsons N, et al. Facilitating trial recruitment: a qualitative study of patient and staff experiences of an orthopaedic trauma trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):492.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Phelps EE, Tutton E, Griffin X, Baird J, Costa ML, Parsons N, et al. Facilitating trial recruitment: a qualitative study of patient and staff experiences of an orthopaedic trauma trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):492.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Potter R, Dale J, Caramlau I. A qualitative study exploring practice nurses’ experience of participating in a primary care-based randomised controlled trial. J Res Nurs. 2009;14(5):439–47.CrossRef Potter R, Dale J, Caramlau I. A qualitative study exploring practice nurses’ experience of participating in a primary care-based randomised controlled trial. J Res Nurs. 2009;14(5):439–47.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Skea ZC, Treweek S, Gillies K. It’s trying to manage the work’: a qualitative evaluation of recruitment processes within a UK multicentre trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016475.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Skea ZC, Treweek S, Gillies K. It’s trying to manage the work’: a qualitative evaluation of recruitment processes within a UK multicentre trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016475.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Stein RC, Dunn JA, Bartlett JMS, Campbell AF, Marshall A, Hall P, et al. OPTIMA prelim: a randomised feasibility study of personalised care in the treatment of women with early breast cancer. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England). 2016;20(10):xxiii–201. Stein RC, Dunn JA, Bartlett JMS, Campbell AF, Marshall A, Hall P, et al. OPTIMA prelim: a randomised feasibility study of personalised care in the treatment of women with early breast cancer. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England). 2016;20(10):xxiii–201.
50.
go back to reference Strong S, Paramasivan S, Mills N, Wilson C, Donovan JL, Blazeby JM. “The trial is owned by the team, not by an individual”: a qualitative study exploring the role of teamwork in recruitment to randomised controlled trials in surgical oncology. Trials. 2016;17:1–9.CrossRef Strong S, Paramasivan S, Mills N, Wilson C, Donovan JL, Blazeby JM. “The trial is owned by the team, not by an individual”: a qualitative study exploring the role of teamwork in recruitment to randomised controlled trials in surgical oncology. Trials. 2016;17:1–9.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Team V, Bugeja L, Weller CD. Barriers and facilitators to participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials: a qualitative perspective. Int Wound J. 2018;15(6):929–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Team V, Bugeja L, Weller CD. Barriers and facilitators to participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials: a qualitative perspective. Int Wound J. 2018;15(6):929–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Tomlin Z, deSalis I, Toerien M, Donovan JL. Patient advocacy and patient centredness in participant recruitment to randomized-controlled trials: implications for informed consent. Health Expect. 2014;17(5):670–82.PubMedCrossRef Tomlin Z, deSalis I, Toerien M, Donovan JL. Patient advocacy and patient centredness in participant recruitment to randomized-controlled trials: implications for informed consent. Health Expect. 2014;17(5):670–82.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Ziebland S, Featherstone K, Snowdon C, Barker K, Frost H, Fairbank J. Does it matter if clinicians recruiting for a trial don’t understand what the trial is really about? Qualitative study of surgeons’ experiences of participation in a pragmatic multi-centre RCT. Trials. 2007;8:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ziebland S, Featherstone K, Snowdon C, Barker K, Frost H, Fairbank J. Does it matter if clinicians recruiting for a trial don’t understand what the trial is really about? Qualitative study of surgeons’ experiences of participation in a pragmatic multi-centre RCT. Trials. 2007;8:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Wright JR, Crooks D, Ellis PM, Mings D, Whelan TJ. Factors that influence the recruitment of patients to phase III studies in oncology - the perspective of the clinical research associate. Cancer. 2002;95(7):1584–91.PubMedCrossRef Wright JR, Crooks D, Ellis PM, Mings D, Whelan TJ. Factors that influence the recruitment of patients to phase III studies in oncology - the perspective of the clinical research associate. Cancer. 2002;95(7):1584–91.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Ekambareshwar M, Mihrshahi S, Wen LM, Taki S, Bennett G, Baur LA, et al. Facilitators and challenges in recruiting pregnant women to an infant obesity prevention programme delivered via telephone calls or text messages. Trials. 2018;19:9.CrossRef Ekambareshwar M, Mihrshahi S, Wen LM, Taki S, Bennett G, Baur LA, et al. Facilitators and challenges in recruiting pregnant women to an infant obesity prevention programme delivered via telephone calls or text messages. Trials. 2018;19:9.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Shaheed CA, Maher CG, Williams KA, McLachlan AJ. Participation of pharmacists in clinical trial recruitment for low back pain. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(5):986–94.PubMedCrossRef Shaheed CA, Maher CG, Williams KA, McLachlan AJ. Participation of pharmacists in clinical trial recruitment for low back pain. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(5):986–94.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Hange D, Bjorkelund C, Svenningsson I, Kivi M, Eriksson MC, Petersson EL. Experiences of staff members participating in primary care research activities: a qualitative study. Int J Gen Med. 2015;8:143–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hange D, Bjorkelund C, Svenningsson I, Kivi M, Eriksson MC, Petersson EL. Experiences of staff members participating in primary care research activities: a qualitative study. Int J Gen Med. 2015;8:143–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Holm M, Alvariza A, Fürst C-J, Wengström Y, Årestedt K, Öhlen J, et al. Recruiting participants to a randomized controlled trial testing an intervention in palliative cancer care – The perspectives of health care professionals. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017;31:6–11.PubMedCrossRef Holm M, Alvariza A, Fürst C-J, Wengström Y, Årestedt K, Öhlen J, et al. Recruiting participants to a randomized controlled trial testing an intervention in palliative cancer care – The perspectives of health care professionals. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017;31:6–11.PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Frayne SM, Mancuso M, Prout MN, Freund KM. Attitudes of primary care physicians toward cancer-prevention trials: a focus group analysis. J Natl Med Assoc. 2001;93(11):450–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Frayne SM, Mancuso M, Prout MN, Freund KM. Attitudes of primary care physicians toward cancer-prevention trials: a focus group analysis. J Natl Med Assoc. 2001;93(11):450–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
60.
go back to reference Hanson LC, Bull J, Wessell K, Massie L, Bennett RE, Kutner JS, et al. Strategies to support recruitment of patients with life-limiting illness for research: the palliative care research cooperative group. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;48(6):1021–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hanson LC, Bull J, Wessell K, Massie L, Bennett RE, Kutner JS, et al. Strategies to support recruitment of patients with life-limiting illness for research: the palliative care research cooperative group. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;48(6):1021–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Marjanovic S, Ball S, Harshfield A, Dimova S, Prideaux R, Carpenter A, et al. Involving NHS staff in research. 2019. Marjanovic S, Ball S, Harshfield A, Dimova S, Prideaux R, Carpenter A, et al. Involving NHS staff in research. 2019.
62.
go back to reference Newington L, Metcalfe A. Researchers’ and clinicians’ perceptions of recruiting participants to clinical research: a thematic meta-synthesis. J Clin Med Res. 2014;6(3):162–72.PubMedPubMedCentral Newington L, Metcalfe A. Researchers’ and clinicians’ perceptions of recruiting participants to clinical research: a thematic meta-synthesis. J Clin Med Res. 2014;6(3):162–72.PubMedPubMedCentral
63.
go back to reference Department of Health & Social Care. Saving and improving lives: the future of UK clinical research delivery. 2021. Department of Health & Social Care. Saving and improving lives: the future of UK clinical research delivery. 2021.
64.
go back to reference French C, Stavropoulou C. Specialist nurses’ perceptions of inviting patients to participate in clinical research studies: a qualitative descriptive study of barriers and facilitators. Bmc Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef French C, Stavropoulou C. Specialist nurses’ perceptions of inviting patients to participate in clinical research studies: a qualitative descriptive study of barriers and facilitators. Bmc Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Mills N, Blazeby JM, Hamdy FC, Neal DE, Campbell B, Wilson C, et al. Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients’ treatment preferences. Trials. 2014;15:323.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mills N, Blazeby JM, Hamdy FC, Neal DE, Campbell B, Wilson C, et al. Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients’ treatment preferences. Trials. 2014;15:323.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Fallowfield LJ, Solis-Trapala I, Jenkins VA. Evaluation of an educational program to improve communication with patients about early-phase trial participation. Oncologist. 2012;17(3):377–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fallowfield LJ, Solis-Trapala I, Jenkins VA. Evaluation of an educational program to improve communication with patients about early-phase trial participation. Oncologist. 2012;17(3):377–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Hanrahan V, Gillies K, Biesty L. Recruiters’ perspectives of recruiting women during pregnancy and childbirth to clinical trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0234783.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hanrahan V, Gillies K, Biesty L. Recruiters’ perspectives of recruiting women during pregnancy and childbirth to clinical trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0234783.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Sharkey K, Savulescu J, Aranda S, Schofield P. Clinician gate-keeping in clinical research is not ethically defensible: an analysis. J Med Ethics. 2010;36(6):363.PubMedCrossRef Sharkey K, Savulescu J, Aranda S, Schofield P. Clinician gate-keeping in clinical research is not ethically defensible: an analysis. J Med Ethics. 2010;36(6):363.PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Treweek S, Banister K, Bower P, Cotton S, Devane D, Gardner HR, et al. Developing the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework—a tool to help trialists design trials that better reflect the communities they serve. Trials. 2021;22(1):337.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Treweek S, Banister K, Bower P, Cotton S, Devane D, Gardner HR, et al. Developing the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework—a tool to help trialists design trials that better reflect the communities they serve. Trials. 2021;22(1):337.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Murphy E, Burns A, Murtagh FEM, Rooshenas L, Caskey FJ. The Prepare for Kidney Care Study: prepare for renal dialysis versus responsive management in advanced chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36(6):975–82. Murphy E, Burns A, Murtagh FEM, Rooshenas L, Caskey FJ. The Prepare for Kidney Care Study: prepare for renal dialysis versus responsive management in advanced chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36(6):975–82.
71.
go back to reference Lawton J, Kirkham J, White D, Rankin D, Cooper C, Heller S. Uncovering the emotional aspects of working on a clinical trial: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of staff involved in a type 1 diabetes trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lawton J, Kirkham J, White D, Rankin D, Cooper C, Heller S. Uncovering the emotional aspects of working on a clinical trial: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of staff involved in a type 1 diabetes trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Hay-Smith EJC, Brown M, Anderson L, Treharne GJ. Once a clinician, always a clinician: a systematic review to develop a typology of clinician-researcher dual-role experiences in health research with patient-participants. Bmc Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hay-Smith EJC, Brown M, Anderson L, Treharne GJ. Once a clinician, always a clinician: a systematic review to develop a typology of clinician-researcher dual-role experiences in health research with patient-participants. Bmc Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Tinkler L, Smith V, Yiannakou Y, Robinson L. Professional identity and the Clinical Research Nurse: a qualitative study exploring issues having an impact on participant recruitment in research. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(2):318–28.PubMedCrossRef Tinkler L, Smith V, Yiannakou Y, Robinson L. Professional identity and the Clinical Research Nurse: a qualitative study exploring issues having an impact on participant recruitment in research. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(2):318–28.PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Mills N, Gaunt D, Blazeby JM, Elliott D, Husbands S, Holding P, et al. Training health professionals to recruit into challenging randomized controlled trials improved confidence: the development of the QuinteT randomized controlled trial recruitment training intervention. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;95:34–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mills N, Gaunt D, Blazeby JM, Elliott D, Husbands S, Holding P, et al. Training health professionals to recruit into challenging randomized controlled trials improved confidence: the development of the QuinteT randomized controlled trial recruitment training intervention. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;95:34–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Byrne-Davis LM, Salmon P, Gravenhorst K, Eden TO, Young B. Balancing high accrual and ethical recruitment in paediatric oncology: a qualitative study of the “look and feel” of clinical trial discussions. Bmc Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:101.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Byrne-Davis LM, Salmon P, Gravenhorst K, Eden TO, Young B. Balancing high accrual and ethical recruitment in paediatric oncology: a qualitative study of the “look and feel” of clinical trial discussions. Bmc Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:101.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Hanrahan V, Biesty L, Lawrie L, Duncan E, Gillies K. Theory-guided interviews identified behavioral barriers and enablers to healthcare professionals recruiting participants to maternity trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;145:81–91.PubMedCrossRef Hanrahan V, Biesty L, Lawrie L, Duncan E, Gillies K. Theory-guided interviews identified behavioral barriers and enablers to healthcare professionals recruiting participants to maternity trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;145:81–91.PubMedCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Czoli C, Da Silva M, Zlotnik Shaul R, d’Agincourt-Canning L, Simpson C, Boydell K, et al. Accountability and pediatric physician-researchers: are theoretical models compatible with Canadian lived experience? Philosophy. Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. 2011;6(1):15.CrossRef Czoli C, Da Silva M, Zlotnik Shaul R, d’Agincourt-Canning L, Simpson C, Boydell K, et al. Accountability and pediatric physician-researchers: are theoretical models compatible with Canadian lived experience? Philosophy. Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. 2011;6(1):15.CrossRef
78.
go back to reference Jefferson L, Fairhurst C, Brealey S, Coleman E, Cook L, Hewitt C, et al. Remote or on-site visits were feasible for the initial setup meetings with hospitals in a multicenter surgical trial: an embedded randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;100:13–21.PubMedCrossRef Jefferson L, Fairhurst C, Brealey S, Coleman E, Cook L, Hewitt C, et al. Remote or on-site visits were feasible for the initial setup meetings with hospitals in a multicenter surgical trial: an embedded randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;100:13–21.PubMedCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Witham MD, Anderson E, Carroll C, Dark PM, Down K, Hall AS, et al. Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: results from a UK multi-stakeholder process. Trials. 2020;21(1):694.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Witham MD, Anderson E, Carroll C, Dark PM, Down K, Hall AS, et al. Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: results from a UK multi-stakeholder process. Trials. 2020;21(1):694.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
80.
go back to reference Donovan JL, Rooshenas L, Jepson M, Elliott D, Wade J, Avery K, et al. Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI). Trials. 2016;17(1):283.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Donovan JL, Rooshenas L, Jepson M, Elliott D, Wade J, Avery K, et al. Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI). Trials. 2016;17(1):283.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
81.
go back to reference Donovan JL, Jepson M, Rooshenas L, Paramasivan S, Mills N, Elliott D, et al. Development of a new adapted QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI-Two) for rapid application to RCTs underway with enrolment shortfalls—to identify previously hidden barriers and improve recruitment. Trials. 2022;23(1):258.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Donovan JL, Jepson M, Rooshenas L, Paramasivan S, Mills N, Elliott D, et al. Development of a new adapted QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI-Two) for rapid application to RCTs underway with enrolment shortfalls—to identify previously hidden barriers and improve recruitment. Trials. 2022;23(1):258.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Whitaker R, Hendry M, Aslam R, Booth A, Carter B, Charles JM, et al. Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(16):1–214.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Whitaker R, Hendry M, Aslam R, Booth A, Carter B, Charles JM, et al. Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(16):1–214.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Authors
Nicola Farrar
Daisy Elliott
Catherine Houghton
Marcus Jepson
Nicola Mills
Sangeetha Paramasivan
Lucy Plumb
Julia Wade
Bridget Young
Jenny L. Donovan
Leila Rooshenas
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06818-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue