Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Correspondence

Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ

Authors: Allison Tong, Kate Flemming, Elizabeth McInnes, Sandy Oliver, Jonathan Craig

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The syntheses of multiple qualitative studies can pull together data across different contexts, generate new theoretical or conceptual models, identify research gaps, and provide evidence for the development, implementation and evaluation of health interventions. This study aims to develop a framework for reporting the synthesis of qualitative health research.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search for guidance and reviews relevant to the synthesis of qualitative research, methodology papers, and published syntheses of qualitative health research in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and relevant organisational websites to May 2011. Initial items were generated inductively from guides to synthesizing qualitative health research. The preliminary checklist was piloted against forty published syntheses of qualitative research, purposively selected to capture a range of year of publication, methods and methodologies, and health topics. We removed items that were duplicated, impractical to assess, and rephrased items for clarity.

Results

The Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ) statement consists of 21 items grouped into five main domains: introduction, methods and methodology, literature search and selection, appraisal, and synthesis of findings.

Conclusions

The ENTREQ statement can help researchers to report the stages most commonly associated with the synthesis of qualitative health research: searching and selecting qualitative research, quality appraisal, and methods for synthesising qualitative findings. The synthesis of qualitative research is an expanding and evolving methodological area and we would value feedback from all stakeholders for the continued development and extension of the ENTREQ statement.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barnett-Page E, Thomas J: Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. 2009, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London, 01/09 Barnett-Page E, Thomas J: Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. 2009, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London, 01/09
2.
go back to reference Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R: Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002, 7 (4): 209-215.CrossRefPubMed Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R: Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002, 7 (4): 209-215.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, Donovan J: Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experience of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 56 (4): 671-684.CrossRefPubMed Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, Donovan J: Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experience of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 56 (4): 671-684.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, Hsu R, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, et al: Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006, 6: 35-47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, Hsu R, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, et al: Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006, 6: 35-47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Pound P, Britten N, Morgan M, Yardley L, Pope C, Daker-White G, Campbell R: Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Soc Sci Med. 2005, 61 (1): 133-155.CrossRefPubMed Pound P, Britten N, Morgan M, Yardley L, Pope C, Daker-White G, Campbell R: Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Soc Sci Med. 2005, 61 (1): 133-155.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Smith LK, Pope C, Botha JL: Patients' help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet. 2005, 366: 825-831.CrossRefPubMed Smith LK, Pope C, Botha JL: Patients' help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet. 2005, 366: 825-831.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tong A, Morton RL, Howard K, Craig JC: Adolescent experiences following organ transplantation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. J Pediatr. 2010, 155 (4): 542-549.CrossRef Tong A, Morton RL, Howard K, Craig JC: Adolescent experiences following organ transplantation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. J Pediatr. 2010, 155 (4): 542-549.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference McInnes RJ, Chambers JA: Supporting breastfeeding mothers: qualitative synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2008, 62 (4): 407-427.CrossRefPubMed McInnes RJ, Chambers JA: Supporting breastfeeding mothers: qualitative synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2008, 62 (4): 407-427.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Flemming K: The use of morphine to treat cancer-related pain: a synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010, 39 (1): 139-154.CrossRef Flemming K: The use of morphine to treat cancer-related pain: a synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010, 39 (1): 139-154.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Noblit GW, Hare HD: Meta-ethnography: synthesising qualitative studies. 1988, Thousand Oaks: SageCrossRef Noblit GW, Hare HD: Meta-ethnography: synthesising qualitative studies. 1988, Thousand Oaks: SageCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Arai L, Britten N, Popay J, Roberts H, Petticrew M, Rodgers M, Sowden A: Testing methodological developments in the conduct of narrative synthesis: a demonstration review of research on the implementation of smoke alarm interventions. Evid Policy. 2007, 3 (3): 361-383.CrossRef Arai L, Britten N, Popay J, Roberts H, Petticrew M, Rodgers M, Sowden A: Testing methodological developments in the conduct of narrative synthesis: a demonstration review of research on the implementation of smoke alarm interventions. Evid Policy. 2007, 3 (3): 361-383.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Thorne S, Paterson B, Acorn S, Canam C, Joachim G, Jillings C: Chronic illness experience: insights from a meta-study. Qual Health Res. 2002, 12: 437-452.CrossRefPubMed Thorne S, Paterson B, Acorn S, Canam C, Joachim G, Jillings C: Chronic illness experience: insights from a meta-study. Qual Health Res. 2002, 12: 437-452.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Edwards M, Davies M, Edwards A: What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decision-making in healthcare consultations: a meta-synthesis of the literature. Patient Educ Counsel. 2009, 75: 37-52.CrossRef Edwards M, Davies M, Edwards A: What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decision-making in healthcare consultations: a meta-synthesis of the literature. Patient Educ Counsel. 2009, 75: 37-52.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Timminen KA, Holt NL: A meta-study of qualitative research examining stressor appraisals and coping among adolescents in sport. J Sports Sci. 2010, 28 (14): 1563-1580.CrossRef Timminen KA, Holt NL: A meta-study of qualitative research examining stressor appraisals and coping among adolescents in sport. J Sports Sci. 2010, 28 (14): 1563-1580.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volminck J: Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008, 8: 21-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volminck J: Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008, 8: 21-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig JC: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007, 19 (6): 349-357.CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig JC: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007, 19 (6): 349-357.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, The PRISMA Group: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Med. 2009, 6 (7): e1000097-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, The PRISMA Group: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Med. 2009, 6 (7): e1000097-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman D: Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLOS Med. 2010, 7 (2): e1000217-1000210.1001371/journal.pmed.1000217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman D: Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLOS Med. 2010, 7 (2): e1000217-1000210.1001371/journal.pmed.1000217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Eaves YD: A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2001, 35 (5): 654-663.CrossRefPubMed Eaves YD: A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2001, 35 (5): 654-663.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kearney MH: Enduring love: a grounded formal theory of women's experience of domestic violence. Res Nurs Health. 2001, 24: 270-282.CrossRefPubMed Kearney MH: Enduring love: a grounded formal theory of women's experience of domestic violence. Res Nurs Health. 2001, 24: 270-282.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Paterson BL, Thorne SE, Canam C, Jillings C: Meta-study of qualitative health research. A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. 2001, Thousand Oaks: SageCrossRef Paterson BL, Thorne SE, Canam C, Jillings C: Meta-study of qualitative health research. A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. 2001, Thousand Oaks: SageCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. Br Med J. 2000, 320: 50-52.CrossRef Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. Br Med J. 2000, 320: 50-52.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Flemming K: The use of morphine to treat cancer-related pain: a synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010, 39 (1): 139-154.CrossRefPubMed Flemming K: The use of morphine to treat cancer-related pain: a synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010, 39 (1): 139-154.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hubbard G, McLachlan K, Forbat L, Munday D: Recognition by family members that relatives with neurodegenerative disease are likely to die within a year: A meta-ethnography. Palliat Med. 2011, Online first Hubbard G, McLachlan K, Forbat L, Munday D: Recognition by family members that relatives with neurodegenerative disease are likely to die within a year: A meta-ethnography. Palliat Med. 2011, Online first
28.
go back to reference Morton RL, Tong A, Howard K, Snelling P, Webster AC: The views of patients and carers in treatment decision-making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Br Med J. 2010, 340: c112-CrossRef Morton RL, Tong A, Howard K, Snelling P, Webster AC: The views of patients and carers in treatment decision-making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Br Med J. 2010, 340: c112-CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lipworth WL, Davey H, Carter S, Hooker C: Beliefs and beyond: what can we learn from qualitative studies of lay people's understanding of cancer risk. Health Expect. 2010, 13 (2): 113-124.CrossRefPubMed Lipworth WL, Davey H, Carter S, Hooker C: Beliefs and beyond: what can we learn from qualitative studies of lay people's understanding of cancer risk. Health Expect. 2010, 13 (2): 113-124.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ridd M, Shaw A, Lewis G, Salisbury C: The patient-doctor relationship: a synthesis of the qualitative literature on patients' perspectives. Br J Gen Prac. 2009, 29 (561): e116-e133.CrossRef Ridd M, Shaw A, Lewis G, Salisbury C: The patient-doctor relationship: a synthesis of the qualitative literature on patients' perspectives. Br J Gen Prac. 2009, 29 (561): e116-e133.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L: Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence. 2003, London: Government Chief Social Researcher's Office Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L: Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence. 2003, London: Government Chief Social Researcher's Office
32.
go back to reference Flemming K, Briggs M: Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. J Adv Nurs. 2007, 57 (1): 95-100.CrossRefPubMed Flemming K, Briggs M: Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. J Adv Nurs. 2007, 57 (1): 95-100.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Booth A, Sutton AJ: Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports. Qual Res. 2007, 7 (3): 375-422.CrossRef Dixon-Woods M, Booth A, Sutton AJ: Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports. Qual Res. 2007, 7 (3): 375-422.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Barbour R: Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. Br Med J. 2001, 332: 1115-1117.CrossRef Barbour R: Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. Br Med J. 2001, 332: 1115-1117.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Sutton A, Shaw R, Miller T, Smith J, Young B, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones D: Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007, 12 (1): 42-47.CrossRefPubMed Dixon-Woods M, Sutton A, Shaw R, Miller T, Smith J, Young B, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones D: Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007, 12 (1): 42-47.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Harden A, Gough D: Quality and relevance appraisal. An introduction to systematic reviews. Edited by: Gouhg D, Oliver S, Thomas J. 2012, London: Sage Harden A, Gough D: Quality and relevance appraisal. An introduction to systematic reviews. Edited by: Gouhg D, Oliver S, Thomas J. 2012, London: Sage
38.
go back to reference The Joanna Briggs Institute: Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers. 2008, The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2008 The Joanna Briggs Institute: Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers. 2008, The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2008
40.
go back to reference Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358: 483-488.CrossRefPubMed Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358: 483-488.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G: Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1998, 8: 341-351.CrossRefPubMed Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G: Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1998, 8: 341-351.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Brunton G, Harden A, Rees R, Kavanagh J, Oliver S, Oakley A: Children and physical activity: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. 2003, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London Brunton G, Harden A, Rees R, Kavanagh J, Oliver S, Oakley A: Children and physical activity: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. 2003, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London
Metadata
Title
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
Authors
Allison Tong
Kate Flemming
Elizabeth McInnes
Sandy Oliver
Jonathan Craig
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2012 Go to the issue