Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

The role of therapeutic optimism in recruitment to a clinical trial in a peripartum setting: balancing hope and uncertainty

Authors: Nina Hallowell, Claire Snowdon, Susan Morrow, Jane E. Norman, Fiona C. Denison, Julia Lawton

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hope has therapeutic value because it enables people to cope with uncertainty about their future health. Indeed, hope, or therapeutic optimism (TO), is seen as an essential aspect of the provision and experience of medical care. The role of TO in clinical research has been briefly discussed, but the concept, and whether it can be transferred from care to research and from patients to clinicians, has not been fully investigated. The role played by TO in research emerged during interviews with staff involved in a peripartum trial. This paper unpacks the concept of TO in this setting and considers the role it may play in the wider delivery of clinical trials.

Methods

The Got-it trial is a UK-based, randomised placebo-controlled trial that investigates the use of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) spray to treat retained placenta. Qualitative data were collected in open-ended interviews with obstetricians, research and clinical midwives (n =27) involved in trial recruitment. Data were analysed using the method of constant comparison.

Results

TO influenced staff engagement with Got-it at different points in the trial and in different ways. Prior knowledge of, and familiarity with, GTN meant that from the outset staff perceived the trial as low risk. TO facilitated staff involvement in the trial; staff who already understood GTN’s effects were optimistic that it would work, and staff collaborated because they hoped that the trial would address what they identified as an important clinical need. TO could fluctuate over the course of the trial, and was sustained or undermined by unofficial observation of clinical outcomes and speculations about treatment allocation. Thus, TO appeared to be influenced by key situational factors: prior knowledge and experience, clinical need and observed participant outcomes.

Conclusions

Situational TO plays a role in facilitating staff engagement with clinical research. TO may affect trial recruitment by enabling staff to sustain the levels of uncertainty, or individual equipoise, necessary to collaborate with research while also responding to patients’ clinical needs. Staff may benefit from training to deal with fluctuations in TO.

Trial registration

ISCRTN88609453. Registered on 26 March 2014.
Footnotes
1
Although some authors argue that “hope” and “optimism” are different concepts (Bruhn [1]), they will be used interchangeably in this paper (cf. [2, 6, 12]).
 
3
In arguing that clinical equipoise is based upon objective facts we are explicitly disregarding arguments about the social construction of knowledge, for example, Berger and Luckmann [25].
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Woods S, Hagger LE, McCormack P. Therapeutic misconception: hope, trust and misconception in paediatric research. Health Care Anal. 2014;22:3–21.CrossRefPubMed Woods S, Hagger LE, McCormack P. Therapeutic misconception: hope, trust and misconception in paediatric research. Health Care Anal. 2014;22:3–21.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Miller M. Phase I, cancer trials: a collusion of misunderstanding. Hastings Cent Rep. 2000;30:34–43.CrossRefPubMed Miller M. Phase I, cancer trials: a collusion of misunderstanding. Hastings Cent Rep. 2000;30:34–43.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Horng S, Grady C. Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation and therapeutic optimism. IRB. 2003;25:11–6.CrossRefPubMed Horng S, Grady C. Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation and therapeutic optimism. IRB. 2003;25:11–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Appelbaum PS, Roth LH. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1982;5:319–29.CrossRefPubMed Appelbaum PS, Roth LH. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1982;5:319–29.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, et al. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987;17:20–4.CrossRefPubMed Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, et al. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987;17:20–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Gisso T, et al. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risk in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:1689–97.CrossRefPubMed Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Gisso T, et al. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risk in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:1689–97.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference de Melo-Martın I, Ho A. Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:202–5.CrossRefPubMed de Melo-Martın I, Ho A. Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:202–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sulsmasy DP, Astrow AB, He MK, Seils DM, Meropol NJ, Micco E, Weinfurt KP. The culture of faith and hope: patients’ justifications for their high estimations of expected therapeutic benefit when enrolling in early phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2010;116:3702–11. Sulsmasy DP, Astrow AB, He MK, Seils DM, Meropol NJ, Micco E, Weinfurt KP. The culture of faith and hope: patients’ justifications for their high estimations of expected therapeutic benefit when enrolling in early phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2010;116:3702–11.
13.
go back to reference Crites J, Kodish E. Unrealistic optimism and the ethics of phase I cancer research. J Med Ethics. 2013;39:403–6.CrossRefPubMed Crites J, Kodish E. Unrealistic optimism and the ethics of phase I cancer research. J Med Ethics. 2013;39:403–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ziebland S, Featherstone K, Snowdon C, Barker K, Frost H, Fairbank J. Does it matter if clinicians recruiting for a trial don’t understand what the trial is really about? Qualitative study of surgeons’ experiences of participation in a pragmatic multi-centre RCT. Trials. 2007;8:4–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ziebland S, Featherstone K, Snowdon C, Barker K, Frost H, Fairbank J. Does it matter if clinicians recruiting for a trial don’t understand what the trial is really about? Qualitative study of surgeons’ experiences of participation in a pragmatic multi-centre RCT. Trials. 2007;8:4–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Kimmelman J, Palmour N. Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:209–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kimmelman J, Palmour N. Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:209–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Freeman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:141–5.CrossRef Freeman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:141–5.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lawton J, Snowdon C, Morrow S, Norman JE, Denison FC, Hallowell N. The challenges of consenting into a perinatal trial: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals. Trials. 2016. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1323-3. Lawton J, Snowdon C, Morrow S, Norman JE, Denison FC, Hallowell N. The challenges of consenting into a perinatal trial: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals. Trials. 2016. doi:10.​1186/​s13063-016-1323-3.
18.
go back to reference Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine; 1967. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine; 1967.
19.
go back to reference Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage; 1990. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage; 1990.
20.
go back to reference Snowdon C. Collaboration, participation and non-participation: decisions about involvement in randomised controlled trials for clinicians and parents in two neonatal trials. Unpublished PH D thesis. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2005. Snowdon C. Collaboration, participation and non-participation: decisions about involvement in randomised controlled trials for clinicians and parents in two neonatal trials. Unpublished PH D thesis. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2005.
21.
go back to reference Garcia J, Snowdon C, Elbourne D. Equipoise: a case study of the views of clinicians involved in two neonatal trials. Clin Trials. 2004;1:170–8.CrossRefPubMed Garcia J, Snowdon C, Elbourne D. Equipoise: a case study of the views of clinicians involved in two neonatal trials. Clin Trials. 2004;1:170–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lumley J, Lester A, Renou P, Wood C. A failed RCT to determine the best method of delivery for very low birth weight infants. Control Clin Trials. 1985;6:120–7.CrossRefPubMed Lumley J, Lester A, Renou P, Wood C. A failed RCT to determine the best method of delivery for very low birth weight infants. Control Clin Trials. 1985;6:120–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Donovan JL, Paramasivan S, Salis IOC, Toerien MG. Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2014;15:5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Donovan JL, Paramasivan S, Salis IOC, Toerien MG. Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2014;15:5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Eborall HC, Dallosso HM, Daly H, Martin-Stacey L, Heller SR. The face of equipoise — delivering a structured education programme within a randomized controlled trial: qualitative study. Trials. 2014;15:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eborall HC, Dallosso HM, Daly H, Martin-Stacey L, Heller SR. The face of equipoise — delivering a structured education programme within a randomized controlled trial: qualitative study. Trials. 2014;15:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Berger PL, Luckmann T. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1966. Berger PL, Luckmann T. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1966.
26.
go back to reference NICE clinical guideline 55. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. London: NICE; 2012. NICE clinical guideline 55. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. London: NICE; 2012.
Metadata
Title
The role of therapeutic optimism in recruitment to a clinical trial in a peripartum setting: balancing hope and uncertainty
Authors
Nina Hallowell
Claire Snowdon
Susan Morrow
Jane E. Norman
Fiona C. Denison
Julia Lawton
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1394-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Trials 1/2016 Go to the issue