Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Research article

Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

Authors: James Thomas, Angela Harden

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a growing recognition of the value of synthesising qualitative research in the evidence base in order to facilitate effective and appropriate health care. In response to this, methods for undertaking these syntheses are currently being developed. Thematic analysis is a method that is often used to analyse data in primary qualitative research. This paper reports on the use of this type of analysis in systematic reviews to bring together and integrate the findings of multiple qualitative studies.

Methods

We describe thematic synthesis, outline several steps for its conduct and illustrate the process and outcome of this approach using a completed review of health promotion research. Thematic synthesis has three stages: the coding of text 'line-by-line'; the development of 'descriptive themes'; and the generation of 'analytical themes'. While the development of descriptive themes remains 'close' to the primary studies, the analytical themes represent a stage of interpretation whereby the reviewers 'go beyond' the primary studies and generate new interpretive constructs, explanations or hypotheses. The use of computer software can facilitate this method of synthesis; detailed guidance is given on how this can be achieved.

Results

We used thematic synthesis to combine the studies of children's views and identified key themes to explore in the intervention studies. Most interventions were based in school and often combined learning about health benefits with 'hands-on' experience. The studies of children's views suggested that fruit and vegetables should be treated in different ways, and that messages should not focus on health warnings. Interventions that were in line with these suggestions tended to be more effective. Thematic synthesis enabled us to stay 'close' to the results of the primary studies, synthesising them in a transparent way, and facilitating the explicit production of new concepts and hypotheses.

Conclusion

We compare thematic synthesis to other methods for the synthesis of qualitative research, discussing issues of context and rigour. Thematic synthesis is presented as a tried and tested method that preserves an explicit and transparent link between conclusions and the text of primary studies; as such it preserves principles that have traditionally been important to systematic reviewing.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chalmers I: Trying to do more good than harm in policy and practice: the role of rigorous, transparent and up-to-date evaluations. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2003, 589: 22-40. 10.1177/0002716203254762.CrossRef Chalmers I: Trying to do more good than harm in policy and practice: the role of rigorous, transparent and up-to-date evaluations. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2003, 589: 22-40. 10.1177/0002716203254762.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Oakley A: Social science and evidence-based everything: the case of education. Educ Rev. 2002, 54: 277-286. 10.1080/0013191022000016329.CrossRef Oakley A: Social science and evidence-based everything: the case of education. Educ Rev. 2002, 54: 277-286. 10.1080/0013191022000016329.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cooper H, Hedges L: The Handbook of Research Synthesis. 1994, New York: Russell Sage Foundation Cooper H, Hedges L: The Handbook of Research Synthesis. 1994, New York: Russell Sage Foundation
6.
go back to reference Petticrew M, Roberts H: Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A practical guide. 2006, Oxford: Blackwell PublishingCrossRef Petticrew M, Roberts H: Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A practical guide. 2006, Oxford: Blackwell PublishingCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chalmers I, Hedges L, Cooper H: A brief history of research synthesis. Eval Health Prof. 2002, 25: 12-37. 10.1177/0163278702025001003.CrossRefPubMed Chalmers I, Hedges L, Cooper H: A brief history of research synthesis. Eval Health Prof. 2002, 25: 12-37. 10.1177/0163278702025001003.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference White H: Scientific communication and literature retrieval. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Edited by: Cooper H, Hedges L. 1994, New York: Russell Sage Foundation White H: Scientific communication and literature retrieval. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Edited by: Cooper H, Hedges L. 1994, New York: Russell Sage Foundation
11.
go back to reference Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, Donovan J: Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 56: 671-684. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00064-3.CrossRefPubMed Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, Donovan J: Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 56: 671-684. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00064-3.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, Shaw RL, Smith JA, Young B: How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qual Res. 2006, 6: 27-44. 10.1177/1468794106058867.CrossRef Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, Shaw RL, Smith JA, Young B: How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qual Res. 2006, 6: 27-44. 10.1177/1468794106058867.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sandelowski M, Barroso J: Handbook for Synthesising Qualitative Research. 2007, New York: Springer Sandelowski M, Barroso J: Handbook for Synthesising Qualitative Research. 2007, New York: Springer
14.
go back to reference Thorne S, Jensen L, Kearney MH, Noblit G, Sandelowski M: Qualitative meta-synthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qual Health Res. 2004, 14: 1342-1365. 10.1177/1049732304269888.CrossRefPubMed Thorne S, Jensen L, Kearney MH, Noblit G, Sandelowski M: Qualitative meta-synthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qual Health Res. 2004, 14: 1342-1365. 10.1177/1049732304269888.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oakley A: Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 794-800. 10.1136/jech.2003.014829.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oakley A: Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 794-800. 10.1136/jech.2003.014829.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Harden A, Brunton G, Fletcher A, Oakley A: Young People, Pregnancy and Social Exclusion: A systematic synthesis of research evidence to identify effective, appropriate and promising approaches for prevention and support. 2006, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, [http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=674] Harden A, Brunton G, Fletcher A, Oakley A: Young People, Pregnancy and Social Exclusion: A systematic synthesis of research evidence to identify effective, appropriate and promising approaches for prevention and support. 2006, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, [http://​eppi.​ioe.​ac.​uk/​cms/​Default.​aspx?​tabid=​674]
17.
go back to reference Thomas J, Sutcliffe K, Harden A, Oakley A, Oliver S, Rees R, Brunton G, Kavanagh J: Children and Healthy Eating: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators. 2003, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, accessed 4th July 2008, [http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=246] Thomas J, Sutcliffe K, Harden A, Oakley A, Oliver S, Rees R, Brunton G, Kavanagh J: Children and Healthy Eating: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators. 2003, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, accessed 4th July 2008, [http://​eppi.​ioe.​ac.​uk/​cms/​Default.​aspx?​tabid=​246]
18.
19.
go back to reference Bryman A: Quantity and Quality in Social Research. 1998, London: Unwin Bryman A: Quantity and Quality in Social Research. 1998, London: Unwin
20.
go back to reference Hammersley M: What's Wrong with Ethnography?. 1992, London: Routledge Hammersley M: What's Wrong with Ethnography?. 1992, London: Routledge
21.
go back to reference Harden A, Thomas J: Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2005, 8: 257-271. 10.1080/13645570500155078.CrossRef Harden A, Thomas J: Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2005, 8: 257-271. 10.1080/13645570500155078.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Oakley A: Experiments in Knowing: Gender and methods in the social sciences. 2000, Cambridge: Polity Press Oakley A: Experiments in Knowing: Gender and methods in the social sciences. 2000, Cambridge: Polity Press
23.
go back to reference Harden A, Oakley A, Oliver S: Peer-delivered health promotion for young people: a systematic review of different study designs. Health Educ J. 2001, 60: 339-353. 10.1177/001789690106000406.CrossRef Harden A, Oakley A, Oliver S: Peer-delivered health promotion for young people: a systematic review of different study designs. Health Educ J. 2001, 60: 339-353. 10.1177/001789690106000406.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Thomas J, Harden A, Oakley A, Oliver S, Sutcliffe K, Rees R, Brunton G, Kavanagh J: Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews: an example from public health. BMJ. 2004, 328: 1010-1012. 10.1136/bmj.328.7446.1010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thomas J, Harden A, Oakley A, Oliver S, Sutcliffe K, Rees R, Brunton G, Kavanagh J: Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews: an example from public health. BMJ. 2004, 328: 1010-1012. 10.1136/bmj.328.7446.1010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Davies P: What is evidence-based education?. Br J Educ Stud. 1999, 47: 108-121. 10.1111/1467-8527.00106.CrossRef Davies P: What is evidence-based education?. Br J Educ Stud. 1999, 47: 108-121. 10.1111/1467-8527.00106.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Newman M, Thompson C, Roberts AP: Helping practitioners understand the contribution of qualitative research to evidence-based practice. Evid Based Nurs. 2006, 9: 4-7. 10.1136/ebn.9.1.4.CrossRefPubMed Newman M, Thompson C, Roberts AP: Helping practitioners understand the contribution of qualitative research to evidence-based practice. Evid Based Nurs. 2006, 9: 4-7. 10.1136/ebn.9.1.4.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Popay J: Moving Beyond Effectiveness in Evidence Synthesis. 2006, London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Popay J: Moving Beyond Effectiveness in Evidence Synthesis. 2006, London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
31.
go back to reference Noblit GW, Hare RD: Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. 1988, Newbury Park: SageCrossRef Noblit GW, Hare RD: Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. 1988, Newbury Park: SageCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R: Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002, 7: 209-215. 10.1258/135581902320432732.CrossRefPubMed Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R: Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002, 7: 209-215. 10.1258/135581902320432732.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Paterson B, Thorne S, Canam C, Jillings C: Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research. 2001, Thousand Oaks, California: SageCrossRef Paterson B, Thorne S, Canam C, Jillings C: Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research. 2001, Thousand Oaks, California: SageCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, Riley R, Sutton AJ: Conducting a critical interpretative synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006, 6: 35-10.1186/1471-2288-6-35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, Riley R, Sutton AJ: Conducting a critical interpretative synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006, 6: 35-10.1186/1471-2288-6-35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A: Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005, 10: 45-53. 10.1258/1355819052801804.CrossRefPubMed Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A: Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005, 10: 45-53. 10.1258/1355819052801804.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Boyatzis RE: Transforming Qualitative Information. 1998, Sage: Cleveland Boyatzis RE: Transforming Qualitative Information. 1998, Sage: Cleveland
38.
go back to reference Silverman D, Ed: Qualitative Research: Theory, method and practice. 1997, London: Sage Silverman D, Ed: Qualitative Research: Theory, method and practice. 1997, London: Sage
39.
go back to reference Doyle LH: Synthesis through meta-ethnography: paradoxes, enhancements, and possibilities. Qual Res. 2003, 3: 321-344. 10.1177/1468794103033003.CrossRef Doyle LH: Synthesis through meta-ethnography: paradoxes, enhancements, and possibilities. Qual Res. 2003, 3: 321-344. 10.1177/1468794103033003.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Barroso J, Gollop C, Sandelowski M, Meynell J, Pearce PF, Collins LJ: The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western J Nurs Res. 2003, 25: 153-178. 10.1177/0193945902250034.CrossRef Barroso J, Gollop C, Sandelowski M, Meynell J, Pearce PF, Collins LJ: The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western J Nurs Res. 2003, 25: 153-178. 10.1177/0193945902250034.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Walters LA, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, Hedges Team: Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving clinically relevant qualitative studies in EMBASE. Qual Health Res. 2006, 16: 162-8. 10.1177/1049732305284027.CrossRefPubMed Walters LA, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, Hedges Team: Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving clinically relevant qualitative studies in EMBASE. Qual Health Res. 2006, 16: 162-8. 10.1177/1049732305284027.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Wong SSL, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB: Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in Medline. Medinfo. 2004, 11: 311-314. Wong SSL, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB: Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in Medline. Medinfo. 2004, 11: 311-314.
43.
go back to reference Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P: Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998, 2 (16): Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P: Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998, 2 (16):
44.
45.
go back to reference Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L: Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. 2003, London: Cabinet Office Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L: Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. 2003, London: Cabinet Office
46.
go back to reference Boulton M, Fitzpatrick R, Swinburn C: Qualitative research in healthcare II: a structured review and evaluation of studies. J Eval Clin Pract. 1996, 2: 171-179. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00041.x.CrossRefPubMed Boulton M, Fitzpatrick R, Swinburn C: Qualitative research in healthcare II: a structured review and evaluation of studies. J Eval Clin Pract. 1996, 2: 171-179. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00041.x.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Cobb A, Hagemaster J: Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative research proposals. J Nurs Educ. 1987, 26: 138-143.PubMed Cobb A, Hagemaster J: Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative research proposals. J Nurs Educ. 1987, 26: 138-143.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Medical Sociology Group: Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. Med Sociol News. 1996, 22: 68-71. Medical Sociology Group: Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. Med Sociol News. 1996, 22: 68-71.
50.
go back to reference Alderson P: Listening to Children. 1995, London: Barnardo's Alderson P: Listening to Children. 1995, London: Barnardo's
51.
go back to reference Egger M, Davey-Smith G, Altman D: Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in context. 2001, London: BMJ PublishingCrossRef Egger M, Davey-Smith G, Altman D: Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in context. 2001, London: BMJ PublishingCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Sandelowski M, Barroso J: Finding the findings in qualitative studies. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002, 34: 213-219. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00213.x.CrossRefPubMed Sandelowski M, Barroso J: Finding the findings in qualitative studies. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002, 34: 213-219. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00213.x.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Sandelowski M: Using qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2004, 14: 1366-1386. 10.1177/1049732304269672.CrossRefPubMed Sandelowski M: Using qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2004, 14: 1366-1386. 10.1177/1049732304269672.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Thomas J, Brunton J: EPPI-Reviewer 3.0: Analysis and management of data for research synthesis. EPPI-Centre software. 2006, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education Thomas J, Brunton J: EPPI-Reviewer 3.0: Analysis and management of data for research synthesis. EPPI-Centre software. 2006, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education
55.
go back to reference Fisher M, Qureshi H, Hardyman W, Homewood J: Using Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews: Older people's views of hospital discharge. 2006, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence Fisher M, Qureshi H, Hardyman W, Homewood J: Using Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews: Older people's views of hospital discharge. 2006, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence
56.
go back to reference Dixey R, Sahota P, Atwal S, Turner A: Children talking about healthy eating: data from focus groups with 300 9–11-year-olds. Nutr Bull. 2001, 26: 71-79. 10.1046/j.1467-3010.2001.00078.x.CrossRef Dixey R, Sahota P, Atwal S, Turner A: Children talking about healthy eating: data from focus groups with 300 9–11-year-olds. Nutr Bull. 2001, 26: 71-79. 10.1046/j.1467-3010.2001.00078.x.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Daly A, Willis K, Small R, Green J, Welch N, Kealy M, Hughes E: Hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60: 43-49. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.014.CrossRefPubMed Daly A, Willis K, Small R, Green J, Welch N, Kealy M, Hughes E: Hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60: 43-49. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.014.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Popay J: Moving beyond floccinaucinihilipilification: enhancing the utility of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005, 58: 1079-80. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.004.CrossRefPubMed Popay J: Moving beyond floccinaucinihilipilification: enhancing the utility of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005, 58: 1079-80. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.004.CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Strike K, Posner G: Types of synthesis and their criteria. Knowledge Structure and Use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation. Edited by: Ward S, Reed L. 1983, Philadelphia: Temple University Press Strike K, Posner G: Types of synthesis and their criteria. Knowledge Structure and Use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation. Edited by: Ward S, Reed L. 1983, Philadelphia: Temple University Press
60.
go back to reference Marston C, King E: Factors that shape young people's sexual behaviour: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2006, 368: 1581-86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69662-1.CrossRef Marston C, King E: Factors that shape young people's sexual behaviour: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2006, 368: 1581-86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69662-1.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Authors
James Thomas
Angela Harden
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2008 Go to the issue