Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Facilitators and challenges in recruiting pregnant women to an infant obesity prevention programme delivered via telephone calls or text messages

Authors: Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar, Seema Mihrshahi, Li Ming Wen, Sarah Taki, Greer Bennett, Louise A. Baur, Chris Rissel

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recruitment of pregnant women into trials is a challenge exacerbated by a number of factors, including strict eligibility criteria. There has been little in-depth examination of the recruitment process to trials involving pregnant women. This paper presents the findings of a study conducted to identify facilitators and challenges in recruiting pregnant women to the Communicating Healthy Beginnings Advice by Telephone (CHAT) randomised controlled trial, which aims to reduce the prevalence of infant and childhood obesity.

Methods

Data were collected from (1) administration of a short questionnaire to women at the time of recruitment exploring women’s reasons for consent and non-consent; (2) interviews with recruiters to capture recruiters’ experiences of the recruitment process; and (3) analysis of field notes taken by recruiters on the number of women approached/recruited and reasons as to why they did not consent to participate. Data obtained were triangulated to gain insights into the process of recruiting pregnant women.

Results

A total of 1155 pregnant women (mean gestational age 31.5 weeks) were enrolled over 5 months. The main reasons for women consenting to participate in the study were convenience in programme delivery mode via telephone calls or text messages, altruism and because the programme was free of charge. The main reasons for women not consenting were lack of interest, language challenges/difficulty speaking English and some felt they did not need information and support due to prior experience as a mother. Facilitators included organisational support, rapport with recruiters and some women with no other children who needed advice. Despite the challenges, the mode of delivery of intervention via telephone calls or text messages, the minimal effort required of women to participate, organisational support from the lead site and recruiters’ knowledge of and commitment towards the trial contributed towards successful recruitment.

Conclusion

Despite some challenges in recruiting pregnant women to an infant obesity prevention programme, some of the facilitators in recruitment included mode of delivery of the intervention programme via telephone calls or text messages, the minimal effort required for women to participate, organisational support from the lead site, and recruiters’ knowledge of and commitment towards the trial.

Trial registration

The CHAT RCT is registered with the Australian Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12616001470​482p); Ethics Review Committee of Sydney Local Health District (Protocol No. X16–0360 & LNR/16/RPAH/495).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Maghera A, et al. You are how you recruit: a cohort and randomized controlled trial of recruitment strategies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):111.CrossRef Maghera A, et al. You are how you recruit: a cohort and randomized controlled trial of recruitment strategies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):111.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nguyen B, et al. Recruitment challenges and recommendations for adolescent obesity trials. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48(1):38–43.CrossRef Nguyen B, et al. Recruitment challenges and recommendations for adolescent obesity trials. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48(1):38–43.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ross S, et al. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(12):1143–56.CrossRef Ross S, et al. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(12):1143–56.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sharp L, et al. Reasons for participation and non-participation in a randomized controlled trial: postal questionnaire surveys of women eligible for TOMBOLA (trial of Management of Borderline and Other low-Grade Abnormal smears). Clin Trials. 2006;3(5):431–42.CrossRef Sharp L, et al. Reasons for participation and non-participation in a randomized controlled trial: postal questionnaire surveys of women eligible for TOMBOLA (trial of Management of Borderline and Other low-Grade Abnormal smears). Clin Trials. 2006;3(5):431–42.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Frew PM, et al. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: an overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(Suppl_7):S400–7.CrossRef Frew PM, et al. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: an overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(Suppl_7):S400–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Evans WD, Wallace JL, Snider J. Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health program. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1031.CrossRef Evans WD, Wallace JL, Snider J. Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health program. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1031.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wardle KM, Ireland L, Holbeck C, Davidson C, Rissel C, Li MW. What we learnt - recruiting prenatal mothers to an RCT addressing the prevention of overweight in early childhood? Aust J Adv Nurs. 2011;28(2):41–5. Wardle KM, Ireland L, Holbeck C, Davidson C, Rissel C, Li MW. What we learnt - recruiting prenatal mothers to an RCT addressing the prevention of overweight in early childhood? Aust J Adv Nurs. 2011;28(2):41–5.
8.
go back to reference Oude Rengerink K, et al. IMproving PArticipation of patients in clinical trials - rationale and design of IMPACT. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:85.CrossRef Oude Rengerink K, et al. IMproving PArticipation of patients in clinical trials - rationale and design of IMPACT. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:85.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tooher RL, Middleton PF, Crowther CA. A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8(1):36.CrossRef Tooher RL, Middleton PF, Crowther CA. A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8(1):36.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Carpenter RE, et al. Recruitment of pregnant women to an exercise-intervention study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36(2):200–7.CrossRef Carpenter RE, et al. Recruitment of pregnant women to an exercise-intervention study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36(2):200–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Coleman-Phox K, et al. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women for a behavioral intervention: lessons from the maternal adiposity, metabolism, and stress (MAMAS) study. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E31.CrossRef Coleman-Phox K, et al. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women for a behavioral intervention: lessons from the maternal adiposity, metabolism, and stress (MAMAS) study. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E31.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference van Delft K, et al. Recruitment of pregnant women in research. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(5):442–6.CrossRef van Delft K, et al. Recruitment of pregnant women in research. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(5):442–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Meshaka R, et al. Why do pregnant women participate in research? A patient participation investigation using Q-methodology. Health Expect. 2017;20(2):188–97.CrossRef Meshaka R, et al. Why do pregnant women participate in research? A patient participation investigation using Q-methodology. Health Expect. 2017;20(2):188–97.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Daniels LA, et al. Recruiting and engaging new mothers in nutrition research studies: lessons from the Australian NOURISH randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):129.CrossRef Daniels LA, et al. Recruiting and engaging new mothers in nutrition research studies: lessons from the Australian NOURISH randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):129.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mohanna K, Tuna K. Withholding consent to participate in clinical trials: decisions of pregnant women. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106(9):892–7.CrossRef Mohanna K, Tuna K. Withholding consent to participate in clinical trials: decisions of pregnant women. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106(9):892–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Li Ming W, et al. A 3-arm randomised controlled trial of communicating healthy beginnings advice by telephone (CHAT) to mothers with infants to prevent childhood obesity. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):79.CrossRef Li Ming W, et al. A 3-arm randomised controlled trial of communicating healthy beginnings advice by telephone (CHAT) to mothers with infants to prevent childhood obesity. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):79.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;2009(2):377–81.CrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;2009(2):377–81.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2015. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2015.
19.
go back to reference Denzin NK. Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978. Denzin NK. Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
20.
go back to reference Manca DP, et al. The most effective strategy for recruiting a pregnancy cohort: a tale of two cities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):75.CrossRef Manca DP, et al. The most effective strategy for recruiting a pregnancy cohort: a tale of two cities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):75.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Infanti JJ, et al. Reasons for participation and non-participation in a diabetes prevention trial among women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):13.CrossRef Infanti JJ, et al. Reasons for participation and non-participation in a diabetes prevention trial among women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):13.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Laws RA, et al. A comparison of recruitment methods for an mHealth intervention targeting mothers: lessons from the growing healthy program. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(9):e248.CrossRef Laws RA, et al. A comparison of recruitment methods for an mHealth intervention targeting mothers: lessons from the growing healthy program. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(9):e248.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Baker L, Lavender T, Tincello D. Factors that influence Women's decisions about whether to participate in research: an exploratory study. Birth. 2005;32:60–6.CrossRef Baker L, Lavender T, Tincello D. Factors that influence Women's decisions about whether to participate in research: an exploratory study. Birth. 2005;32:60–6.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference El-Khorazaty MN, et al. Recruitment and retention of low-income minority women in a behavioral intervention to reduce smoking, depression, and intimate partner violence during pregnancy. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:233.CrossRef El-Khorazaty MN, et al. Recruitment and retention of low-income minority women in a behavioral intervention to reduce smoking, depression, and intimate partner violence during pregnancy. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:233.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shere M, Zhao XY, Koren G. The role of social media in recruiting for clinical trials in pregnancy. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92744.CrossRef Shere M, Zhao XY, Koren G. The role of social media in recruiting for clinical trials in pregnancy. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92744.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bauman A, Nutbeam D. Evaluation in a Nutshell. North Ryde: McGraw-Hill Education Australia; 2013. Bauman A, Nutbeam D. Evaluation in a Nutshell. North Ryde: McGraw-Hill Education Australia; 2013.
Metadata
Title
Facilitators and challenges in recruiting pregnant women to an infant obesity prevention programme delivered via telephone calls or text messages
Authors
Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar
Seema Mihrshahi
Li Ming Wen
Sarah Taki
Greer Bennett
Louise A. Baur
Chris Rissel
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2871-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Trials 1/2018 Go to the issue