Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Mammography | Research

Mammographically detected breast clustered microcalcifications localized by chest thin-section computed tomography

Authors: Xinjie Liu, Yuhan Bao, Laijian Sui, Jianqiao Cao, Yidan Wang, Chao Yu, Guangdong Qiao, Yizi Cong

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To explore the capability and clinical significance of chest thin-section computed tomography (CT) for localization of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications.

Methods

A total of 69 patients with 71 mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications received surgical biopsy under the guidance of mammography (MG), CT was used to localize calcifications combined with MG if calcifications can be seen on CT. Intraoperative mammography of the specimens were performed in all cases for identification of the resected microcalcifications. The clinical, imaging and pathological information of these patients were analyzed.

Results

A total of 42 (59.15%) cases of calcifications were localized by CT + MG, 29 (40.85%) cases were guided only by the mammography. All suspicious calcifications on the mammography were successfully removed. Pathological results showed 42 cases were cancer, 23 cases were benign, and 6 cases were atypical hyperplasia. The mean age in the CT + MG group was older than that of the MG group (54.12 vs. 49.27 years; P = 0.014). The maximum diameter of clusters of microcalcifications on mammography in the CT + MG group was larger than that of the MG group [(cranio-caudal view, 1.52 vs. 0.61 mm, P = 0.000; mediolateral oblique (MLO) view, 1.53 vs. 0.62 mm, P = 0.000)]. The gray value ratio (calcified area / paraglandular; MLO, P = 0.004) and the gray value difference (calcified area - paraglandular; MLO, P = 0.005) in the CT + MG group was higher than that of the MG group. Multivariate analysis showed that the max diameter of clusters of microcalcifications (MLO view) was a significant predictive factor of localization by CT in total patients (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

About half of the mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications could be localized by thin-section CT. Maximum diameter of clusters of microcalcifications (MLO view) was a predictor of visibility of calcifications by CT. Chest thin-section CT may be useful for localization of calcifications in some patients, especially for calcifications that are only visible in one view on the mammography.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.CrossRefPubMed Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wang B, Yang D, Zhang X, Gong X, Xu T, Han J, Ren Y, Zou S, Li L, Wang Y. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in breast ductal abnormalities. Cancer Imaging. 2023;23:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang B, Yang D, Zhang X, Gong X, Xu T, Han J, Ren Y, Zou S, Li L, Wang Y. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in breast ductal abnormalities. Cancer Imaging. 2023;23:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Poschke P, Wenkel E, Hack CC, Beckmann MW, Uder M, Ohlmeyer S. Low-risk women with suspicious microcalcifications in mammography-can an additional breast MRI reduce the biopsy rate? Diagnostics (Basel), 2023;13. Poschke P, Wenkel E, Hack CC, Beckmann MW, Uder M, Ohlmeyer S. Low-risk women with suspicious microcalcifications in mammography-can an additional breast MRI reduce the biopsy rate? Diagnostics (Basel), 2023;13.
4.
go back to reference Azam S, Eriksson M, Sjolander A, Gabrielson M, Hellgren R, Czene K, Hall P. Mammographic microcalcifications and risk of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021;125:759–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Azam S, Eriksson M, Sjolander A, Gabrielson M, Hellgren R, Czene K, Hall P. Mammographic microcalcifications and risk of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021;125:759–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Krekel N, Zonderhuis B, Muller S, Bril H, van Slooten HJ, de Lange de Klerk E, van den Tol P, Meijer S. Excessive resections in breast-conserving surgery: a retrospective multicentre study. Breast J. 2011;17:602–609. Krekel N, Zonderhuis B, Muller S, Bril H, van Slooten HJ, de Lange de Klerk E, van den Tol P, Meijer S. Excessive resections in breast-conserving surgery: a retrospective multicentre study. Breast J. 2011;17:602–609.
6.
go back to reference Li Y, Li M, Zhang Y. A single-institution retrospective evaluation of noninvasive localization for non-palpable breast microcalcification. Asian J Surg. 2023. Li Y, Li M, Zhang Y. A single-institution retrospective evaluation of noninvasive localization for non-palpable breast microcalcification. Asian J Surg. 2023.
7.
go back to reference Stowell JT, Grage RA, Cortopassi IO, Little BP. Maimone St: breast findings at chest CT. Radiographics. 2023;43:e220095.CrossRefPubMed Stowell JT, Grage RA, Cortopassi IO, Little BP. Maimone St: breast findings at chest CT. Radiographics. 2023;43:e220095.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hussain A, Gordon-Dixon A, Almusawy H, Sinha P, Desai A. The incidence and outcome of incidental breast lesions detected by computed tomography. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:124–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hussain A, Gordon-Dixon A, Almusawy H, Sinha P, Desai A. The incidence and outcome of incidental breast lesions detected by computed tomography. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:124–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Lin WC, Hsu HH, Li CS, Yu JC, Hsu GC, Yu CP, Chang TH, Huang GS. Incidentally detected enhancing breast lesions on chest computed tomography. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12:44–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin WC, Hsu HH, Li CS, Yu JC, Hsu GC, Yu CP, Chang TH, Huang GS. Incidentally detected enhancing breast lesions on chest computed tomography. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12:44–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Dixon GD. Preoperative computed-tomographic localization of breast calcifications. Radiology. 1983;146:836.CrossRefPubMed Dixon GD. Preoperative computed-tomographic localization of breast calcifications. Radiology. 1983;146:836.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Oynes M, Strom B, Tveito B, Hafslund B. Digital zoom of the full-field digital mammogram versus magnification mammography: a systematic review. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:4223–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oynes M, Strom B, Tveito B, Hafslund B. Digital zoom of the full-field digital mammogram versus magnification mammography: a systematic review. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:4223–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Haka AS, Shafer-Peltier KE, Fitzmaurice M, Crowe J, Dasari RR, Feld MS. Identifying microcalcifications in benign and malignant breast lesions by probing differences in their chemical composition using Raman spectroscopy. Cancer Res. 2002;62:5375–80.PubMed Haka AS, Shafer-Peltier KE, Fitzmaurice M, Crowe J, Dasari RR, Feld MS. Identifying microcalcifications in benign and malignant breast lesions by probing differences in their chemical composition using Raman spectroscopy. Cancer Res. 2002;62:5375–80.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ahmed M, Rubio IT, Klaase JM, Douek M. Surgical treatment of nonpalpable primary invasive and in situ breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015;12:645–63.CrossRefPubMed Ahmed M, Rubio IT, Klaase JM, Douek M. Surgical treatment of nonpalpable primary invasive and in situ breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015;12:645–63.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Isaacs AJ, Gemignani ML, Pusic A, Sedrakyan A. Association of breast conservation surgery for cancer with 90-day reoperation rates in New York State. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:648–55.CrossRefPubMed Isaacs AJ, Gemignani ML, Pusic A, Sedrakyan A. Association of breast conservation surgery for cancer with 90-day reoperation rates in New York State. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:648–55.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Corsi F, Bossi D, Sartani A, Papadopoulou O, Amadori R, Scoccia E, Trifiro G, Albasini S, Truffi M, Bonizzi A, Sorrentino L. Radio-guided and clip-guided preoperative localization for malignant microcalcifications offer similar performances in breast-conserving surgery. Breast J. 2019;25:865–73.CrossRefPubMed Corsi F, Bossi D, Sartani A, Papadopoulou O, Amadori R, Scoccia E, Trifiro G, Albasini S, Truffi M, Bonizzi A, Sorrentino L. Radio-guided and clip-guided preoperative localization for malignant microcalcifications offer similar performances in breast-conserving surgery. Breast J. 2019;25:865–73.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Niinikoski L, Hukkinen K, Leidenius MHK, Vaara P, Voynov A, Heikkila P, Mattson J, Meretoja TJ. Resection margins and local recurrences of impalpable breast cancer: comparison between radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL). Breast. 2019;47:93–101.CrossRefPubMed Niinikoski L, Hukkinen K, Leidenius MHK, Vaara P, Voynov A, Heikkila P, Mattson J, Meretoja TJ. Resection margins and local recurrences of impalpable breast cancer: comparison between radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL). Breast. 2019;47:93–101.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Corsi F, Sorrentino L, Sartani A, Bossi D, Amadori R, Nebuloni M, Truffi M, Bonzini M, Foschi D. Localization of nonpalpable breast lesions with sonographically visible clip: optimizing tailored resection and clear margins. Am J Surg. 2015;209:950–8.CrossRefPubMed Corsi F, Sorrentino L, Sartani A, Bossi D, Amadori R, Nebuloni M, Truffi M, Bonzini M, Foschi D. Localization of nonpalpable breast lesions with sonographically visible clip: optimizing tailored resection and clear margins. Am J Surg. 2015;209:950–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Jackman RJ, Rodriguez-Soto J. Breast microcalcifications: retrieval failure at prone stereotactic core and vacuum breast biopsy–frequency, causes, and outcome. Radiology. 2006;239:61–70.CrossRefPubMed Jackman RJ, Rodriguez-Soto J. Breast microcalcifications: retrieval failure at prone stereotactic core and vacuum breast biopsy–frequency, causes, and outcome. Radiology. 2006;239:61–70.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Choo KS, Kwak HS, Tae Bae Y, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Seo HI, Nam SB. The value of a combination of wire localization and ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for clustered microcalcifications. Breast. 2008;17:611–6.CrossRefPubMed Choo KS, Kwak HS, Tae Bae Y, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Seo HI, Nam SB. The value of a combination of wire localization and ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for clustered microcalcifications. Breast. 2008;17:611–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Moschetta M, Scardapane A, Lorusso V, Rella L, Telegrafo M, Serio G, Angelelli G, Ianora AA. Role of multidetector computed tomography in evaluating incidentally detected breast lesions. Tumori. 2015;101:455–60.CrossRefPubMed Moschetta M, Scardapane A, Lorusso V, Rella L, Telegrafo M, Serio G, Angelelli G, Ianora AA. Role of multidetector computed tomography in evaluating incidentally detected breast lesions. Tumori. 2015;101:455–60.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Taba ST, Gureyev TE, Alakhras M, Lewis S, Lockie D, Brennan PC. X-Ray phase-contrast technology in breast imaging: principles, options, and clinical application. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211:133–45.CrossRefPubMed Taba ST, Gureyev TE, Alakhras M, Lewis S, Lockie D, Brennan PC. X-Ray phase-contrast technology in breast imaging: principles, options, and clinical application. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211:133–45.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sztrokay A, Herzen J, Auweter SD, Liebhardt S, Mayr D, Willner M, Hahn D, Zanette I, Weitkamp T, Hellerhoff K, et al. Assessment of grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT for differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in an experimental ex vivo set-up. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:381–7.CrossRefPubMed Sztrokay A, Herzen J, Auweter SD, Liebhardt S, Mayr D, Willner M, Hahn D, Zanette I, Weitkamp T, Hellerhoff K, et al. Assessment of grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT for differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in an experimental ex vivo set-up. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:381–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Arana Pena LM, Donato S, Bonazza D, Brombal L, Martellani F, Arfelli F, Tromba G, Longo R. Multiscale X-ray phase-contrast tomography: from breast CT to micro-CT for virtual histology. Phys Med. 2023;112:102640.CrossRefPubMed Arana Pena LM, Donato S, Bonazza D, Brombal L, Martellani F, Arfelli F, Tromba G, Longo R. Multiscale X-ray phase-contrast tomography: from breast CT to micro-CT for virtual histology. Phys Med. 2023;112:102640.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wang Y, Zhao M, Ma Y, Liu A, Zhu Y, Yin L, Liang Z, Qu Z, Lu H, Ma Y, Ye Z. Accuracy of preoperative contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT in assessment of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a comparative study with breast MRI. Acad Radiol. 2023;30:1805–15.CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Zhao M, Ma Y, Liu A, Zhu Y, Yin L, Liang Z, Qu Z, Lu H, Ma Y, Ye Z. Accuracy of preoperative contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT in assessment of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a comparative study with breast MRI. Acad Radiol. 2023;30:1805–15.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hellerhoff K, Birnbacher L, Sztrokay-Gaul A, Grandl S, Auweter S, Willner M, Marschner M, Mayr D, Reiser MF, Pfeiffer F, Herzen J. Assessment of intraductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT at conventional X-ray sources: an experimental ex-vivo study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0210291.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hellerhoff K, Birnbacher L, Sztrokay-Gaul A, Grandl S, Auweter S, Willner M, Marschner M, Mayr D, Reiser MF, Pfeiffer F, Herzen J. Assessment of intraductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT at conventional X-ray sources: an experimental ex-vivo study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0210291.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Li X, Gao H, Chen Z, Zhang L, Zhu X, Wang S, Peng W. Diagnosis of breast cancer based on microcalcifications using grating-based phase contrast CT. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:3742–50.CrossRefPubMed Li X, Gao H, Chen Z, Zhang L, Zhu X, Wang S, Peng W. Diagnosis of breast cancer based on microcalcifications using grating-based phase contrast CT. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:3742–50.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ma Y, Liu A, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Zhao M, Liang Z, Qu Z, Yin L, Lu H, Ye Z. Comparison of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:5773–82.CrossRefPubMed Ma Y, Liu A, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Zhao M, Liang Z, Qu Z, Yin L, Lu H, Ye Z. Comparison of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:5773–82.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Wienbeck S, Fischer U, Luftner-Nagel S, Lotz J, Uhlig J. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:3731–41.CrossRefPubMed Wienbeck S, Fischer U, Luftner-Nagel S, Lotz J, Uhlig J. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:3731–41.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Liu A, Ma Y, Yin L, Zhu Y, Lu H, Li H, Ye Z. Comparison of malignant calcification identification between breast cone-beam computed tomography and digital mammography. Acta Radiol. 2023;64:962–70.CrossRefPubMed Liu A, Ma Y, Yin L, Zhu Y, Lu H, Li H, Ye Z. Comparison of malignant calcification identification between breast cone-beam computed tomography and digital mammography. Acta Radiol. 2023;64:962–70.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Wienbeck S, Andrijevska V, Kuck F, Perske C, Unterberg-Buchwald C, Fischer U, Lotz J, Kunze M. Comparison between cone-beam breast-CT and full-field digital mammography for microcalcification detection depending on breast density. Med (Baltim). 2023;102:e33900.CrossRef Wienbeck S, Andrijevska V, Kuck F, Perske C, Unterberg-Buchwald C, Fischer U, Lotz J, Kunze M. Comparison between cone-beam breast-CT and full-field digital mammography for microcalcification detection depending on breast density. Med (Baltim). 2023;102:e33900.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Moffa G, Galati F, Maroncelli R, Rizzo V, Cicciarelli F, Pasculli M, Pediconi F. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography versus conventional imaging in women with dense breasts. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13. Moffa G, Galati F, Maroncelli R, Rizzo V, Cicciarelli F, Pasculli M, Pediconi F. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography versus conventional imaging in women with dense breasts. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13.
Metadata
Title
Mammographically detected breast clustered microcalcifications localized by chest thin-section computed tomography
Authors
Xinjie Liu
Yuhan Bao
Laijian Sui
Jianqiao Cao
Yidan Wang
Chao Yu
Guangdong Qiao
Yizi Cong
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03354-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2024 Go to the issue