Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dermatology and Therapy 5/2022

Open Access 01-05-2022 | Systemic Therapy | Original Research

Comparative Efficacy of Targeted Systemic Therapies for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis without Topical Corticosteroids: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Authors: Jonathan I. Silverberg, H. Chih-ho Hong, Jacob P. Thyssen, Brian M. Calimlim, Avani Joshi, Henrique D. Teixeira, Eric B. Collins, Marjorie M. Crowell, Scott J. Johnson, April W. Armstrong

Published in: Dermatology and Therapy | Issue 5/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has not been systematically assessed using recent phase 3 data. This network meta-analysis assesses the comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies without the addition of topical corticosteroids (TCS) and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) in adults with moderate to severe AD.

Methods

The systematic literature review searched through 17 May 2021 for phase 3/4 trials with upadacitinib, interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-13 (IL-13), or JAK inhibitors compared with placebo or active intervention for adults and adolescents with moderate to severe AD with inadequate response to TCS/TCI or for whom TCS/TCI was medically inadvisable, without restrictions on year or region. Researchers assessed data using PRISMA guidelines. The proportion of patients achieving trial co-primary endpoints [Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) and reduction of ≥ 2 points from baseline; proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement ≥ 75% from baseline (EASI-75)]; EASI improvement ≥ 90% from baseline (EASI-90); and ≥ 4-point improvement on Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline (ΔNRS ≥ 4) were evaluated using Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Results

Of 3415 initially identified records, network meta-analysis (NMA) ultimately included 6 records representing 9 unique studies. Two upadacitinib trials were also included. Eleven clinical trials including 6254 patients were analyzed. Upadacitinib 30 mg daily was the most efficacious therapy across all endpoints at the primary endpoint (week 12 or 16) and at earlier timepoints, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg daily and abrocitinib 200 mg daily.

Discussion

Many factors need to be considered for treatment selection for AD. These findings can help healthcare providers when personalizing a patient’s treatment.

Conclusion

Upadacitinib 30 mg daily, upadacitinib 15 mg daily, and abrocitinib 200 mg daily may be the most efficacious targeted systemic therapies over 12–16 weeks of therapy in AD.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sánchez-Pérez J, Daudén-Tello E, Mora AM, et al. Impact of atopic dermatitis on health-related quality of life in Spanish children and adults: the PSEDA study. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013;104(1):44–52.PubMedCrossRef Sánchez-Pérez J, Daudén-Tello E, Mora AM, et al. Impact of atopic dermatitis on health-related quality of life in Spanish children and adults: the PSEDA study. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013;104(1):44–52.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Silverberg JI, Garg NK, Paller AS, et al. Sleep disturbances in adults with eczema are associated with impaired overall health: a US population-based study. J Invest Derm. 2015;135(1):56–66.PubMedCrossRef Silverberg JI, Garg NK, Paller AS, et al. Sleep disturbances in adults with eczema are associated with impaired overall health: a US population-based study. J Invest Derm. 2015;135(1):56–66.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Simpson EL, Bieber T, Eckert L, et al. Patient burden of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD): insights from a phase 2b clinical trial of dupilumab in adults. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(3):491–8.PubMedCrossRef Simpson EL, Bieber T, Eckert L, et al. Patient burden of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD): insights from a phase 2b clinical trial of dupilumab in adults. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(3):491–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Drucker AM, Wang AR, Qureshi AA. Research gaps in quality of life and economic burden of atopic dermatitis: the National Eczema Association Burden of Disease Audit. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(8):873–4.PubMedCrossRef Drucker AM, Wang AR, Qureshi AA. Research gaps in quality of life and economic burden of atopic dermatitis: the National Eczema Association Burden of Disease Audit. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(8):873–4.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Von Kobyletzki LB, Thomas KS, Schmitt J, et al. What factors are important to patients when assessing treatment response: an international crosssectional survey. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97(1):86–90.CrossRef Von Kobyletzki LB, Thomas KS, Schmitt J, et al. What factors are important to patients when assessing treatment response: an international crosssectional survey. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97(1):86–90.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(1):116–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(1):116–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference McCollum AD, Paik A, Eichenfield LF. The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2010;27(5):425–36.PubMedCrossRef McCollum AD, Paik A, Eichenfield LF. The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2010;27(5):425–36.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, et al. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(5):832–6.PubMedCrossRef Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, et al. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(5):832–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Odhiambo JA, Williams HC, Clayton TO, et al. Global variations in prevalence of eczema symptoms in children from ISAAC Phase Three. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(6):1251–8.PubMedCrossRef Odhiambo JA, Williams HC, Clayton TO, et al. Global variations in prevalence of eczema symptoms in children from ISAAC Phase Three. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(6):1251–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Catalá-López F, Tobías A, Cameron C, et al. Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(11):1489–96.PubMedCrossRef Catalá-López F, Tobías A, Cameron C, et al. Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(11):1489–96.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD). Systematic reviews: guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: CRD, University of York; 2009. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD). Systematic reviews: guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: CRD, University of York; 2009.
16.
go back to reference Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2151–68.PubMedCrossRef Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2151–68.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Simpson E, Bissonnette R, Eichenfield LF, et al. The Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD): the development and reliability testing of a novel clinical outcome measurement instrument for the severity of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(3):839–46.PubMedCrossRef Simpson E, Bissonnette R, Eichenfield LF, et al. The Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD): the development and reliability testing of a novel clinical outcome measurement instrument for the severity of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(3):839–46.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Leshem YA, Hajar T, Simpson EL. What the Eczema Area and Severity Index score tells us about the severity of atopic dermatitis: an interpretability study. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(5):1353–7.PubMedCrossRef Leshem YA, Hajar T, Simpson EL. What the Eczema Area and Severity Index score tells us about the severity of atopic dermatitis: an interpretability study. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(5):1353–7.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yosipovitch G, Reaney M, Mastery V, et al. Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: psychometric validation and responder definition for assessing itch in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(4):761–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yosipovitch G, Reaney M, Mastery V, et al. Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: psychometric validation and responder definition for assessing itch in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(4):761–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cope S, Zhang J, Saletan S, et al. A process for assessing the feasibility of a network meta-analysis: a case study of everolimus in combination with hormonal therapy versus chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cope S, Zhang J, Saletan S, et al. A process for assessing the feasibility of a network meta-analysis: a case study of everolimus in combination with hormonal therapy versus chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chou JS, LeBovidge J, Timmons K, et al. Predictors of clinical success in a multidisciplinary model of atopic dermatitis treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(5):377–83.PubMedCrossRef Chou JS, LeBovidge J, Timmons K, et al. Predictors of clinical success in a multidisciplinary model of atopic dermatitis treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(5):377–83.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bosma AL, Spuls PI, Garcia-Doval I, et al. TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce: protocol for a European safety study of dupilumab and other systemic therapies in patients with atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(6):1423–9.PubMedCrossRef Bosma AL, Spuls PI, Garcia-Doval I, et al. TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce: protocol for a European safety study of dupilumab and other systemic therapies in patients with atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(6):1423–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bosma AL, de Wijs LE, Hof MH, et al. Long-term effectiveness and safety of treatment with dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: results of the TREAT NL (TREatment of ATopic eczema, the Netherlands) registry. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(5):1375–84.PubMedCrossRef Bosma AL, de Wijs LE, Hof MH, et al. Long-term effectiveness and safety of treatment with dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: results of the TREAT NL (TREatment of ATopic eczema, the Netherlands) registry. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(5):1375–84.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, et al. NICE DSU technical support document 2: a generalised linear modelling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Technical support document in evidence synthesis. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2011. Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, et al. NICE DSU technical support document 2: a generalised linear modelling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Technical support document in evidence synthesis. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2011.
29.
go back to reference Dias SA, Ades AE, Welton NJ, et al. Network meta-analysis for decision-making. In: Statistics in practice. 1st ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2018. Dias SA, Ades AE, Welton NJ, et al. Network meta-analysis for decision-making. In: Statistics in practice. 1st ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2018.
30.
go back to reference Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Thyssen JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(8):863–73.PubMedCrossRef Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Thyssen JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(8):863–73.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Simpson EL, Akinlade B, Ardeleanu M. Two phase 3 trials of dupilumab versus placebo in atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(11):1090–1.PubMedCrossRef Simpson EL, Akinlade B, Ardeleanu M. Two phase 3 trials of dupilumab versus placebo in atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(11):1090–1.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Simpson EL, Lacour JP, Spelman L, et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids: results from two randomized monotherapy phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):242–55.PubMedCrossRef Simpson EL, Lacour JP, Spelman L, et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids: results from two randomized monotherapy phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):242–55.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Simpson EL, Sinclair R, Forman S, et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (JADE MONO-1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10246):255–66.PubMedCrossRef Simpson EL, Sinclair R, Forman S, et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (JADE MONO-1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10246):255–66.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Simpson EL, Forman S, Silverberg JI, Zirwas M, Maverakis E, Han G, Guttman-Yassky E, Marnell D, Bissonnette R, Waibel J, Nunes FP, DeLozier AM, Angle R, Gamalo M, Holzwarth K, Goldblum O, Zhong J, Janes J, Papp K. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from a randomized monotherapy phase 3 trial in the United States and Canada (BREEZE-AD5). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(1):62–70.PubMedCrossRef Simpson EL, Forman S, Silverberg JI, Zirwas M, Maverakis E, Han G, Guttman-Yassky E, Marnell D, Bissonnette R, Waibel J, Nunes FP, DeLozier AM, Angle R, Gamalo M, Holzwarth K, Goldblum O, Zhong J, Janes J, Papp K. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from a randomized monotherapy phase 3 trial in the United States and Canada (BREEZE-AD5). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(1):62–70.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Wollenberg A, Blauvelt A, Guttman-Yassky E, et al. Tralokinumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase III trials (ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2). Br J Dermatol. 2020;180:437–49. Wollenberg A, Blauvelt A, Guttman-Yassky E, et al. Tralokinumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase III trials (ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2). Br J Dermatol. 2020;180:437–49.
36.
go back to reference Simpson E, Forman S, Silverberg J, et al. Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial (BREEZE-AD5). Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(4):3–4. Simpson E, Forman S, Silverberg J, et al. Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial (BREEZE-AD5). Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(4):3–4.
39.
go back to reference Thaçi D, Simpson EL, Deleuran M, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab monotherapy in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 randomized trials (LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 and LIBERTY AD SOLO 2). J Dermatol Sci. 2019;94:266–75.PubMedCrossRef Thaçi D, Simpson EL, Deleuran M, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab monotherapy in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 randomized trials (LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 and LIBERTY AD SOLO 2). J Dermatol Sci. 2019;94:266–75.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23(20):3105–24.PubMedCrossRef Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23(20):3105–24.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Watt J, Tricco AC, Straus S, et al. Research techniques made simple: network meta-analysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139(1):4-12.e11.PubMedCrossRef Watt J, Tricco AC, Straus S, et al. Research techniques made simple: network meta-analysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139(1):4-12.e11.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Mills EJ, Thorlund K, Ioannidis JP. Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;14:346. Mills EJ, Thorlund K, Ioannidis JP. Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;14:346.
43.
go back to reference Drucker AM, Ellis A, Jabbar-Lopez Z, et al. Systemic immunomodulatory treatments for atopic dermatitis: protocol for a systematic review with network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e023061.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Drucker AM, Ellis A, Jabbar-Lopez Z, et al. Systemic immunomodulatory treatments for atopic dermatitis: protocol for a systematic review with network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e023061.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Drucker AM, Ellis AG, Bohdanowicz M, et al. Systemic immunomodulatory treatments for patients with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(6):659–67.PubMedCrossRef Drucker AM, Ellis AG, Bohdanowicz M, et al. Systemic immunomodulatory treatments for patients with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(6):659–67.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Siegels D, Heratizadeh A, Abraham S, et al. Systemic treatments in the management of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 2020;76:1053–76.PubMedCrossRef Siegels D, Heratizadeh A, Abraham S, et al. Systemic treatments in the management of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 2020;76:1053–76.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Silverberg JI, Thyssen JP, Fahrbach K, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:1797–810.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Silverberg JI, Thyssen JP, Fahrbach K, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:1797–810.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Thyssen JP, Thomsen SF. Treatment of atopic dermatitis with biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2126–8.PubMedCrossRef Thyssen JP, Thomsen SF. Treatment of atopic dermatitis with biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2126–8.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Thyssen J, Vestergaard C, Deleuran M, et al. European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD): treatment targets and treatable traits in atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(12):e839–42.PubMedCrossRef Thyssen J, Vestergaard C, Deleuran M, et al. European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD): treatment targets and treatable traits in atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(12):e839–42.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Cipriani A, Higgins JP, Geddes JR, et al. Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(2):130–7.PubMedCrossRef Cipriani A, Higgins JP, Geddes JR, et al. Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(2):130–7.PubMedCrossRef
50.
51.
go back to reference A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PF-04965842 monotherapy in subjects aged 12 years and older, with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Identifier NCT03575871. In: Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Thyssen JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(8):863–873. A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PF-04965842 monotherapy in subjects aged 12 years and older, with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Identifier NCT03575871. In: Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Thyssen JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(8):863–873.
52.
go back to reference A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate upadacitinib in adolescent and adult subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Identifier NCT03569293. In: Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021 ;397(10290):2151–2168. A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate upadacitinib in adolescent and adult subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Identifier NCT03569293. In: Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021 ;397(10290):2151–2168.
53.
go back to reference A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate upadacitinib in adolescent and adult subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Identifier NCT03607422. In: Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2151–2168. A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate upadacitinib in adolescent and adult subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Identifier NCT03607422. In: Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2151–2168.
Metadata
Title
Comparative Efficacy of Targeted Systemic Therapies for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis without Topical Corticosteroids: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
Authors
Jonathan I. Silverberg
H. Chih-ho Hong
Jacob P. Thyssen
Brian M. Calimlim
Avani Joshi
Henrique D. Teixeira
Eric B. Collins
Marjorie M. Crowell
Scott J. Johnson
April W. Armstrong
Publication date
01-05-2022
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Dermatology and Therapy / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 2193-8210
Electronic ISSN: 2190-9172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00721-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

Dermatology and Therapy 5/2022 Go to the issue