Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Immunology 6/2019

Open Access 01-08-2019 | Primary Immunodeficiency | Original Article

Diagnostic Yield of Next Generation Sequencing in Genetically Undiagnosed Patients with Primary Immunodeficiencies: a Systematic Review

Authors: Hemmo A. F. Yska, Kim Elsink, Taco W. Kuijpers, Geert W. J. Frederix, Mariëlle E. van Gijn, Joris M. van Montfrans

Published in: Journal of Clinical Immunology | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As the application of next generation sequencing (NGS) is moving to earlier stages in the diagnostic pipeline for primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), re-evaluation of its effectiveness is required. The aim of this study is to systematically review the diagnostic yield of NGS in PIDs.

Methods

PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies. Studies were eligible when describing the use of NGS in patients that had previously been diagnosed with PID on clinical and/or laboratory findings. Relevant data on study characteristics, technological performance and diagnostic yield were extracted.

Results

Fourteen studies were eligible for data extraction. Six studies described patient populations from specific PID subcategories. The remaining studies included patients with unsorted PIDs. The studies were based on populations from Italy, Iran, Turkey, Thailand, the Netherlands, Norway, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, the UK, and the USA. Eight studies used an array-based targeted gene panel, four used WES in combination with a PID filter, and two used both techniques. The mean reported reading depth ranged from 98 to 1337 times. Five studies described the sensitivity of the applied techniques, ranging from 83 to 100%, whereas specificity ranged from 45 to 99.9%. The percentage of patients who were genetically diagnosed ranged from 15 to 79%. Several studies described clinical implications of the genetic findings.

Discussion

NGS has the ability to contribute significantly to the identification of molecular mechanisms in PID patients. The diagnostic yield highly depends on population and on the technical circumstances under which NGS is employed. Further research is needed to determine the exact diagnostic yield and clinical implications of NGS in patients with PID.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
13.
go back to reference Picard C, Bobby Gaspar H, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, Casanova JL, Chatila T, et al. International Union of Immunological Societies: 2017 primary immunodeficiency diseases committee report on inborn errors of immunity. J Clin Immunol. 2018;38(1):96–128.CrossRefPubMed Picard C, Bobby Gaspar H, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, Casanova JL, Chatila T, et al. International Union of Immunological Societies: 2017 primary immunodeficiency diseases committee report on inborn errors of immunity. J Clin Immunol. 2018;38(1):96–128.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chem. 2003 Jan;49(1):1–6. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12507953. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chem. 2003 Jan;49(1):1–6. Available from http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​12507953.
22.
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic Yield of Next Generation Sequencing in Genetically Undiagnosed Patients with Primary Immunodeficiencies: a Systematic Review
Authors
Hemmo A. F. Yska
Kim Elsink
Taco W. Kuijpers
Geert W. J. Frederix
Mariëlle E. van Gijn
Joris M. van Montfrans
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Clinical Immunology / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0271-9142
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2592
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-019-00656-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Journal of Clinical Immunology 6/2019 Go to the issue