Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019

01-04-2019 | Galactography | Clinical trial

Is microductectomy still necessary to diagnose breast cancer: a 10-year study on the effectiveness of duct excision and galactography

Authors: Daniel Ben Lustig, Rebecca Warburton, Carol K. Dingee, Urve Kuusk, Jin-Si Pao, Elaine C. McKevitt

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with spontaneous nipple discharge (SND) who have neither clinically palpable masses nor evidence of disease on imaging with mammogram and/or ultrasound are traditionally investigated with galactogram and duct excision. As breast imaging improves, it has raised the question whether galactography and microductectomy are necessary to diagnose breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of malignancy in patients presenting with SND who underwent microductectomy and to evaluate the utility of duct excision and galactography in patients whose initial clinical and radiological evaluation were negative.

Methods

A 10-year retrospective study was conducted in British Columbia’s largest tertiary breast referral center examining the clinical, radiological and pathological results for all patients who underwent a microductectomy procedure for SND between 2008 and 2017.

Results

A total of 231 microductectomies were performed and the overall incidence of malignancy was 13% (n = 32). Following initial work up, 155 patients (67%) had only discharge on exam and no radiologically suspicious findings of malignant disease. Of these patients, 14% (n = 21) were diagnosed with cancer by duct excision. Galactography yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 63% and 36%, respectively (PPV 15% and NPV 85%). Lastly, we found that 3% of patients (n = 8) initially diagnosed with benign disease later developed breast cancer.

Conclusions

Patients with SND should continue to be evaluated with microductectomy to prevent missing a breast cancer. Moreover, we do not recommend performing galactography for diagnosing breast cancer due to poor sensitivity and specificity though it may assist in preoperative planning.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mansel RE, Webster D, Sweetl HM (2009) Hughes, Mansel & Webster’s benign disorders and diseases of the breast. Saunders Ltd, London Mansel RE, Webster D, Sweetl HM (2009) Hughes, Mansel & Webster’s benign disorders and diseases of the breast. Saunders Ltd, London
2.
go back to reference Van Zee K, Ortega P, Minnard E, Cohen M (1998) Preoperative galactography increases the diagnostic yield of major duct excision for nipple discharge. Cancer 82:1874–1880CrossRefPubMed Van Zee K, Ortega P, Minnard E, Cohen M (1998) Preoperative galactography increases the diagnostic yield of major duct excision for nipple discharge. Cancer 82:1874–1880CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Morrogh M, Morris E, Liberman L et al (2007) The predictive value of ductography and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3369–3377CrossRefPubMed Morrogh M, Morris E, Liberman L et al (2007) The predictive value of ductography and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3369–3377CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Berger N, Luparia A, Di Leo G, Carbonaro L et al (2017) Diagnostic performa athologic nipple discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol 209(2):465–471CrossRef Berger N, Luparia A, Di Leo G, Carbonaro L et al (2017) Diagnostic performa athologic nipple discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol 209(2):465–471CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Patel B, Falcon S, Drukteinis J (2015) Management of nipple discharge and the associated imaging findings. Am J Med 128:353–360CrossRefPubMed Patel B, Falcon S, Drukteinis J (2015) Management of nipple discharge and the associated imaging findings. Am J Med 128:353–360CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Foulkes R, Heard G, Boyce T, Skyrme R et al (2011) Duct Excision is still necessary to rule out breast cancer in patients presenting with spontaneous bloodstained nipple discharge. Int J Breast Cancer 495315–495321 Foulkes R, Heard G, Boyce T, Skyrme R et al (2011) Duct Excision is still necessary to rule out breast cancer in patients presenting with spontaneous bloodstained nipple discharge. Int J Breast Cancer 495315–495321
7.
go back to reference Lanitis S, Filippakis G, Thomas J, Christofides T et al (2008) Microdochectomy for single-duct pathological nipple discharge and normal or benign imaging and cytology. Breast 17:309–313CrossRefPubMed Lanitis S, Filippakis G, Thomas J, Christofides T et al (2008) Microdochectomy for single-duct pathological nipple discharge and normal or benign imaging and cytology. Breast 17:309–313CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gray R, Pockaj B, Karstaedt P (2007) Navigating murky waters: modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge. Am J Surg 194:850–854CrossRefPubMed Gray R, Pockaj B, Karstaedt P (2007) Navigating murky waters: modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge. Am J Surg 194:850–854CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sable M, Helvie M, Breslin T et al (2012) Is duct excision still necessary for all cases of suspicious nipple discharge? Breast J 18:157–162CrossRef Sable M, Helvie M, Breslin T et al (2012) Is duct excision still necessary for all cases of suspicious nipple discharge? Breast J 18:157–162CrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Li G, Wong S, Lester S, Nakhlis F (2018) Evaluating the risk of underlying malignancy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Breast J 24:624–627CrossRefPubMed Li G, Wong S, Lester S, Nakhlis F (2018) Evaluating the risk of underlying malignancy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Breast J 24:624–627CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lubina N, Schedelbeck U, Roth A et al (2015) 3.0 T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail. Eur Radiol 25:1285–1293CrossRefPubMed Lubina N, Schedelbeck U, Roth A et al (2015) 3.0 T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail. Eur Radiol 25:1285–1293CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Is microductectomy still necessary to diagnose breast cancer: a 10-year study on the effectiveness of duct excision and galactography
Authors
Daniel Ben Lustig
Rebecca Warburton
Carol K. Dingee
Urve Kuusk
Jin-Si Pao
Elaine C. McKevitt
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-05109-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine