Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2007

01-12-2007 | Original Papers

The Predictive Value of Ductography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Nipple Discharge

Authors: Mary Morrogh, M.D., Elizabeth A. Morris, M.D., Laura Liberman, M.D., Patrick I. Borgen, M.D., Tari A. King, M.D.

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Standard evaluation (physical examination, mammography, sonography) often fails to identify an underlying lesion in patients with suspicious nipple discharge. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of ductography (DG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in this setting.

Methods

Using ICD-9 codes, we retrospectively identified 376 patients who presented with suspicious nipple discharge (ND) (1995–2005); 306 patients (68%) had negative standard evaluation.

Results

Among 306 patients, 186 (61%) underwent further evaluation with DG (n = 163) and/or MRI (n = 52), 35 (11%) underwent major duct excision alone (MDE), and 85 (28%) were followed clinically. Ultimately, 182/306 (59%) patients underwent surgery and/or biopsy. Overall incidence of malignant or high-risk pathology was 15% (46/306). DG was completed in 139/163 (85%) studies and detected 12 cancers and seven high-risk lesions (HRL), but failed to identify four cancers and 2 HRL (PPV 19%, NPV 63%). MRI detected seven cancers and three HRL, but failed to identify one cancer and one HRL (PPV 56%, NPV 87%). MDE alone (n = 35) detected five cancers and three HRL. Of all patients not having surgery, (142/306, 41%), one (0.01%) presented with an invasive cancer at 102 months (median follow-up, 6.3 months; range, 0–124 months).

Conclusions

An underlying malignancy was identified in 30/306 (10%) patients with ND and negative standard evaluation. Ductography is a poor predictor of underlying pathology and cannot exclude malignancy. MRI’s higher predictive values may allow for improved patient selection and treatment planning; however, MRI should not replace MDE as the gold standard to exclude malignancy in patients with ND and negative standard evaluation.
Literature
1.
2.
Newman HF, Klein M, Northrup JD, Ray BF, Drucker M. Nipple discharge: frequency and pathogenesis in an ambulatory population. NY State J Med 1983; 83:928
3.
Hughes L, Mansel R, Webster D, Gravelle I. Benign disorders and diseases of the breast. London: WB Saunders, 2000
4.
Kilgore AR, Fleming R, Ramos MM. The incidence of cancer with nipple discharge and the risk of cancer in the presence of papillary disease of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1953;96:649–660PubMed
5.
Murad TM, Contesso G, Mouriesse H. Nipple discharge from the breast. Ann Surg 1982; 195(3):259–64PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
Bland KI, Copeland EM. The Breast – Comprehensive management of benign and malignant disorders, Third Edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2004
8.
King TA, Carter KM, Bolton JS, Fuhrman GM. A simple approach to nipple discharge. Am Surg 2000; 66(10):960–5; discussion 965–6PubMed
9.
Van Zee KJ, Ortega Perez G, Minnard E, Cohen MA. Preoperative galactography increases the diagnostic yield of major duct excision for nipple discharge. Cancer 1998; 82(10):1874–80PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
Florio MG, Manganaro T, Pollicino A, Scarfo P, Micali B. Surgical approach to nipple discharge: a ten-year experience. J Surg Oncol 1999; 71(4):235–8PubMedCrossRef
12.
Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Singletary SE, et al. Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196(3):354–64PubMedCrossRef
13.
Adepoju LJ, Chun J, El-Tamer M, Ditkoff BA, Schnabel F, Joseph KA. The value of clinical characteristics and breast-imaging studies in predicting a histopathologic diagnosis of cancer or high-risk lesion in patients with spontaneous nipple discharge. Am J Surg 2005; 190(4):644–6PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
Goksel HA, Yagmurdur MC, Demirhan B, Isiklar I, Karakayali H, Bilgin N, Haberal M. Management strategies for patients with nipple discharge Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005; 390(1):52–8CrossRef
16.
Lau S, Kuchenmeister I, Stachs A, Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T. Pathologic nipple discharge: surgery is imperative in postmenopausal women. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12(7):546–51PubMedCrossRef
17.
Seltzer MH. Breast complaints, biopsies, and cancer correlated with age in 10,000 consecutive new surgical referrals. Breast J 2004; 10(2):111–7PubMedCrossRef
18.
Seltzer MH. The significance of age in patients with nipple discharge. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970; 131(3):519–22PubMed
19.
Vargas HI, Romero L, Chlebowski RT. Management of bloody nipple discharge. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2002; 3(2):157–61PubMedCrossRef
20.
Sauter ER, Schlatter L, Lininger J, Hewett JE. The association of bloody nipple discharge with breast pathology. Surgery 2004; 136(4):780–5PubMedCrossRef
21.
Dillon MF, Mohd Nazri SR, Nasir S, et al. The role of major duct excision and microdochectomy in the detection of breast carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2006; 6:164PubMedCrossRef
22.
LaFreniere R. Bloody nipple discharge during pregnancy: a rationale for conservative treatment. J Surg Oncol 1990; 43(4):228–30PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
McLaughlin CW, Coe JD. A study of nipple discharge in the nonlactating breast. Ann Surg 1963; 157:810–6PubMedCrossRef
25.
Dawes LG, Bowen C, Venta LA, Morrow M. Ductography for nipple discharge: no replacement for ductal excision. Surgery 1998; 124(4):685–91PubMedCrossRef
26.
Tjalma WA, Verslegers IO. Suspicious nipple discharge and breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 2004; 10(1):65–6PubMedCrossRef
27.
Funovics MA, Philipp MO, Lackner B, Fuchsjaeger M, Funovics PT, Metz V. Galactography: method of choice in pathologic nipple discharge? Eur Radiol 2003; 13(1):94–9PubMed
28.
Lamont JP, Dultz RP, Kuhn JA, Grant MD, Jones RC. Galactography in patients with nipple discharge. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2000; 13(3):214–6
29.
Hou MF, Huang TJ, Liu GC. The diagnostic value of galactography in patients with nipple discharge. Clin Imaging 2001; 25(2):75–81PubMedCrossRef
30.
Dietz JR, Crowe JP, Grundfest S, et al. Directed duct excision by using mammary ductoscopy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Surgery 2002; 132:582–7PubMedCrossRef
31.
Funovics MA, Philipp MO, Lackner B, Fuchsjaeger M, Funovics PT, Metz V. Galactography: method of choice in pathologic nipple discharge? Eur Radiol 2003; 13(1):94–9PubMed
32.
Morris EM, Libermann L. Breast MRI Diagnosis and Intervention. New York: Springer, 2005
33.
Orel SG, Dougherty CS, Reynolds C, Czerniecki BJ, Siegelman ES, Schnall MD. Imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology 2000; 216(1):248–54PubMed
34.
Nakahara H, Namba K, Watanabe R, et al. A comparison of MR imaging, galactography and ultrasonography in patients with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer 2003; 10(4):320–9PubMedCrossRef
35.
Wahner-Roedler DL, Reynolds C, Morton MJ. Spontaneous unilateral nipple discharge: when screening tests are negative–a case report and review of current diagnostic management of a pathologic nipple discharge. Breast J 2003; 9(1):49–52PubMedCrossRef
36.
Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999; 213:881–888PubMed
37.
West KE. Correlation of nipple aspiration and ductal lavage cytology with histopathologic findings for patients before scheduled breast biopsy examination. Am J Surg 2006;191(1):57–60PubMedCrossRef
38.
Simmons R, Thevarajah S, Brennan MB, Christos P, Osborne P. Methylene blue dye as an alternative to isosulfan blue dye for sentinel lymph node localization. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10(3):242–7PubMedCrossRef
39.
Das DK, Al-Ayadhy B, Ajrawi MT, et al. Cytodiagnosis of nipple discharge: a study of 602 samples from 484 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2001; 25:25–37PubMedCrossRef
40.
Greene T. A single institution review of new breast malignancies identified solely by sonography. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203(6):894–8PubMedCrossRef
41.
Louie D. Identification of breast cancer in patients with pathologic nipple discharge: does ductoscopy predict malignancy. Am J Surg 2006; 192(4):530–3PubMedCrossRef
42.
Moore SW, Pearce J, Ring E. Intraductal papilloma of the breast. Suvr Med (Sofiia) 1961; 112:153–158
43.
Nelson RS, Hoehn JL. Twenty-year outcome following central duct resection for bloody nipple discharge. Ann Surg 2006; 243(4):522–4PubMedCrossRef
44.
Dietz JR, Kim JA, Malycky JL, et al. Feasibility and Technical Considerations of Mammary Ductoscopy in Human Mastectomy Specimens. Breast J 2000; 6(3):161–165PubMedCrossRef
45.
Sharma R. Comparative analysis of minimally invasive microductectomy versus major duct excision in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Surgery 2005; 138(4):591–6; discussion 596–7PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Predictive Value of Ductography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Nipple Discharge
Authors
Mary Morrogh, M.D.
Elizabeth A. Morris, M.D.
Laura Liberman, M.D.
Patrick I. Borgen, M.D.
Tari A. King, M.D.
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2007
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9530-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2007

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2007 Go to the issue

Gastrointestinal Oncology

Reduced Expression of Apaf-1 in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Correlates with Tumor Progression and Aggressive Phenotype

Pediatric Oncology

L1 Is Associated With Favorable Outcome in Neuroblastomas in Contrast to Adult Tumors

Head and Neck Oncology

Strong Immunohistochemical Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Predicts Overall Survival in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Thoracic Oncology

Combined Prognostic Value of Both RelA and IκB-α Expression in Human Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Breast Oncology

Prophylactic Mastectomy in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers and Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer: Long-Term Experiences at the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic

Breast Oncology

Quantification and Phenotypic Characterization of Circulating Tumor Cells for Monitoring Response to a Preventive HER2/neu Vaccine-Based Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study