Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2020

01-02-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Free DICOM-Viewers for Veterinary Medicine

Survey and Comparison of Functionality and User-Friendliness of Medical Imaging PACS-DICOM-Viewer Freeware for Specific Use in Veterinary Medicine Practices

Authors: Andreas Brühschwein, Julius Klever, Anne-Sophie Hoffmann, Denise Huber, Elisabeth Kaufmann, Sven Reese, Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

There is increasing prevalence of digital diagnostic imaging in veterinary medicine with a progressive need to use medical imaging software. As Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)-viewers for veterinary use do not require medical device approval in many countries, freeware viewers might be a practical alternative. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate free DICOM-viewer software for veterinary purposes. The functionality and user-friendliness of various DICOM-viewers from the internet were analyzed and compared. Inclusion criteria for the evaluation were free availability, PACS (picture archiving and communication system)-connectivity, and stand-alone and client-based software. Based on this, eight viewers were found: Ginkgo CADx, Horos, K-PACS, MAYAM, MITO, OsiriX Lite, RadiAnt, Synedra personal. In these DICOM-viewers, 14 core tools were tested and rated on a score from 1 to 10 by multiple observers with different levels of training, using studies of four imaging modalities. Criteria were functionality and user-friendliness. For each viewer, the total number of a predefined set of 47 important tools was counted. The ranking based on functionality and user-friendliness of 14 core tools (mean score in brackets) was as follows: 1. Horos/OsiriX Lite (8.96), 2. RadiAnt (8.90), 3. K-PACS (8.02), 4. Synedra (7.43), 5. MAYAM (6.05), 6. Ginkgo CADx (5.53), 7. MITO (3.74). The DICOM-viewers offered between 20 and 44 tools of the predefined important tool set and are sufficient for most veterinary purposes. An increasing number of tools did not necessarily impair user-friendliness, if the user interface is well designed. Based on the results of this study, veterinarians will find suitable free DICOM-viewers for their individual needs. In combination with PACS-freeware, this allows veterinary practices to run a low-budget digital imaging environment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hosch RE, Rivard AL: Evaluation of self-contained PACS viewers on CD-ROM. J Digit Imaging 27(4):470–473, 2014CrossRef Hosch RE, Rivard AL: Evaluation of self-contained PACS viewers on CD-ROM. J Digit Imaging 27(4):470–473, 2014CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wright MA, Ballance D, Robertson ID, Poteet B: Introduction to DICOM for the practicing veterinarian. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49(s1):S14–SS8, 2008CrossRef Wright MA, Ballance D, Robertson ID, Poteet B: Introduction to DICOM for the practicing veterinarian. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49(s1):S14–SS8, 2008CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Widmer WR: Acquisition hardware for digital imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49(s1):S2–S8, 2008CrossRef Widmer WR: Acquisition hardware for digital imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49(s1):S2–S8, 2008CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wallack S: Digital image storage. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49(s1):S37–S41, 2008CrossRef Wallack S: Digital image storage. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49(s1):S37–S41, 2008CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Committee DS. Veterinary Identification Tags (PS 3.3, 3.5, 3.6, 3.16 2006): DICOM Corretion item (CP-643). USA: DICOM Standards Committee, 2006 Committee DS. Veterinary Identification Tags (PS 3.3, 3.5, 3.6, 3.16 2006): DICOM Corretion item (CP-643). USA: DICOM Standards Committee, 2006
6.
go back to reference Committee DS. NEMA PS3 / ISO 12052, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard, National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA, USA. Rosslyn, VA, USA DICOM Standards Committee Committee DS. NEMA PS3 / ISO 12052, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard, National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA, USA. Rosslyn, VA, USA DICOM Standards Committee
7.
go back to reference Bidgood, Jr WD, Horii SC, Prior FW, Van Syckle DE: Understanding and using DICOM, the data interchange standard for biomedical imaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc 4(3):199–212, 1997CrossRef Bidgood, Jr WD, Horii SC, Prior FW, Van Syckle DE: Understanding and using DICOM, the data interchange standard for biomedical imaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc 4(3):199–212, 1997CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bidgood, Jr WD, Horii SC: Introduction to the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard. Radiographics 12(2):345–355, 1992CrossRef Bidgood, Jr WD, Horii SC: Introduction to the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard. Radiographics 12(2):345–355, 1992CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Valeri G, Mazza FA, Maggi S, Aramini D, La Riccia L, Mazzoni G et al.: Open source software in a practical approach for post processing of radiologic images. Radiol Med 120(3):309–323, 2015CrossRef Valeri G, Mazza FA, Maggi S, Aramini D, La Riccia L, Mazzoni G et al.: Open source software in a practical approach for post processing of radiologic images. Radiol Med 120(3):309–323, 2015CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Solomon RW: Free and open source software for the manipulation of digital images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(6):W330–W334, 2009CrossRef Solomon RW: Free and open source software for the manipulation of digital images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(6):W330–W334, 2009CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Scarsbrook AF: Open-source software for radiologists: a primer. Clin Radiol 62(2):120–130, 2007CrossRef Scarsbrook AF: Open-source software for radiologists: a primer. Clin Radiol 62(2):120–130, 2007CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Puech PA, Boussel L, Belfkih S, Lemaitre L, Douek P, Beuscart R: DicomWorks: Software for reviewing DICOM studies and promoting low-cost teleradiology. J Digit Imaging 20(2):122–130, 2007CrossRef Puech PA, Boussel L, Belfkih S, Lemaitre L, Douek P, Beuscart R: DicomWorks: Software for reviewing DICOM studies and promoting low-cost teleradiology. J Digit Imaging 20(2):122–130, 2007CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Haak D, Page C-E, Deserno TM: A survey of DICOM viewer software to integrate clinical research and medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 29(2):206–215, 2016CrossRef Haak D, Page C-E, Deserno TM: A survey of DICOM viewer software to integrate clinical research and medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 29(2):206–215, 2016CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Escott EJ, Rubinstein D: Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): free DICOM image viewing and processing software for the Macintosh computer: what’s available and what it can do for you. Radiographics 24(6):1763–1777, 2004CrossRef Escott EJ, Rubinstein D: Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): free DICOM image viewing and processing software for the Macintosh computer: what’s available and what it can do for you. Radiographics 24(6):1763–1777, 2004CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Escott EJ, Rubinstein D: Free DICOM image viewing and processing software for your desktop computer: what’s available and what it can do for you. Radiographics 23(5):1341–1357, 2003CrossRef Escott EJ, Rubinstein D: Free DICOM image viewing and processing software for your desktop computer: what’s available and what it can do for you. Radiographics 23(5):1341–1357, 2003CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ariani A, Carotti M, Gutierrez M, Bichisecchi E, Grassi W, Giuseppetti GM, Salaffi F: Utility of an open-source DICOM viewer software (OsiriX) to assess pulmonary fibrosis in systemic sclerosis: preliminary results. Rheumatol Int 34(4):511–516, 2014CrossRef Ariani A, Carotti M, Gutierrez M, Bichisecchi E, Grassi W, Giuseppetti GM, Salaffi F: Utility of an open-source DICOM viewer software (OsiriX) to assess pulmonary fibrosis in systemic sclerosis: preliminary results. Rheumatol Int 34(4):511–516, 2014CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Presti GL, Carbone M, Ciriaci D, Aramini D, Ferrari M, Ferrari V: Assessment of DICOM viewers capable of loading patient-specific 3D models obtained by different segmentation platforms in the operating room. J Digit Imaging 28(5):518–527, 2015CrossRef Presti GL, Carbone M, Ciriaci D, Aramini D, Ferrari M, Ferrari V: Assessment of DICOM viewers capable of loading patient-specific 3D models obtained by different segmentation platforms in the operating room. J Digit Imaging 28(5):518–527, 2015CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lee JT, Munch KR, Carlis JV, Pardo JV: Internet image viewer (iiV). BMC Med Imaging 8:10, 2008CrossRef Lee JT, Munch KR, Carlis JV, Pardo JV: Internet image viewer (iiV). BMC Med Imaging 8:10, 2008CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Iotti B, Valazza A: A reliable, low-cost picture archiving and communications system for small and medium veterinary practices built using open-source technology. J Digit Imaging 27(5):563–570, 2014CrossRef Iotti B, Valazza A: A reliable, low-cost picture archiving and communications system for small and medium veterinary practices built using open-source technology. J Digit Imaging 27(5):563–570, 2014CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Poteet BA: Veterinary teleradiology. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49(s1):S33–SS6, 2008CrossRef Poteet BA: Veterinary teleradiology. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49(s1):S33–SS6, 2008CrossRef
35.
36.
go back to reference Robertson ID, Saveraid T: Hospital, radiology, and picture archiving and communication systems. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49(s1):S19–S28, 2008CrossRef Robertson ID, Saveraid T: Hospital, radiology, and picture archiving and communication systems. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49(s1):S19–S28, 2008CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Honea R, McCluggage CW, Parker B, O’Neall D, Shook KA: Evaluation of commercial PC-based DICOM image viewer. J Digit Imaging 11(3 Suppl 1):151–155, 1998CrossRef Honea R, McCluggage CW, Parker B, O’Neall D, Shook KA: Evaluation of commercial PC-based DICOM image viewer. J Digit Imaging 11(3 Suppl 1):151–155, 1998CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Langer S, Wang J: An evaluation of ten digital image review workstations. J Digit Imaging 10(2):65–78, 1997CrossRef Langer S, Wang J: An evaluation of ten digital image review workstations. J Digit Imaging 10(2):65–78, 1997CrossRef
39.
40.
go back to reference Armbrust LJ: PACS and image storage. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 39(4):711–718, 2009CrossRef Armbrust LJ: PACS and image storage. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 39(4):711–718, 2009CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Robertson I: Image dissemination and archiving. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 22(3):138–144, 2007CrossRef Robertson I: Image dissemination and archiving. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 22(3):138–144, 2007CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Varma DR: Managing DICOM images: tips and tricks for the radiologist. Indian J Radiol Imaging 22(1):4–13, 2012CrossRef Varma DR: Managing DICOM images: tips and tricks for the radiologist. Indian J Radiol Imaging 22(1):4–13, 2012CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Free DICOM-Viewers for Veterinary Medicine
Survey and Comparison of Functionality and User-Friendliness of Medical Imaging PACS-DICOM-Viewer Freeware for Specific Use in Veterinary Medicine Practices
Authors
Andreas Brühschwein
Julius Klever
Anne-Sophie Hoffmann
Denise Huber
Elisabeth Kaufmann
Sven Reese
Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00194-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2020 Go to the issue