Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2020

01-02-2020 | Original Paper

Determining Follow-Up Imaging Study Using Radiology Reports

Authors: Sandeep Dalal, Vadiraj Hombal, Wei-Hung Weng, Gabe Mankovich, Thusitha Mabotuwana, Christopher S. Hall, Joseph Fuller III, Bruce E. Lehnert, Martin L. Gunn

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Radiology reports often contain follow-up imaging recommendations. Failure to comply with these recommendations in a timely manner can lead to delayed treatment, poor patient outcomes, complications, unnecessary testing, lost revenue, and legal liability. The objective of this study was to develop a scalable approach to automatically identify the completion of a follow-up imaging study recommended by a radiologist in a preceding report. We selected imaging-reports containing 559 follow-up imaging recommendations and all subsequent reports from a multi-hospital academic practice. Three radiologists identified appropriate follow-up examinations among the subsequent reports for the same patient, if any, to establish a ground-truth dataset. We then trained an Extremely Randomized Trees that uses recommendation attributes, study meta-data and text similarity of the radiology reports to determine the most likely follow-up examination for a preceding recommendation. Pairwise inter-annotator F-score ranged from 0.853 to 0.868; the corresponding F-score of the classifier in identifying follow-up exams was 0.807. Our study describes a methodology to automatically determine the most likely follow-up exam after a follow-up imaging recommendation. The accuracy of the algorithm suggests that automated methods can be integrated into a follow-up management application to improve adherence to follow-up imaging recommendations. Radiology administrators could use such a system to monitor follow-up compliance rates and proactively send reminders to primary care providers and/or patients to improve adherence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sistrom CL, Dreyer KJ, Dang PP, Weilburg JB, Boland GW, Rosenthal DI, Thrall JH: Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations. Radiology 253(2):453–461, 2009CrossRef Sistrom CL, Dreyer KJ, Dang PP, Weilburg JB, Boland GW, Rosenthal DI, Thrall JH: Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations. Radiology 253(2):453–461, 2009CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Larson PA, Berland LL, Griffith B, et al. Actionable findings and the role of IT support: report of the ACR actionable reporting work group Larson PA, Berland LL, Griffith B, et al. Actionable findings and the role of IT support: report of the ACR actionable reporting work group
3.
go back to reference Kadom N, Doherty G, Close M et al.: Safety-net academic hospital experience in following up noncritical yet potentially significant radiologist recommendations. Am J Roentgenol 209(5):982–986, 2017CrossRef Kadom N, Doherty G, Close M et al.: Safety-net academic hospital experience in following up noncritical yet potentially significant radiologist recommendations. Am J Roentgenol 209(5):982–986, 2017CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Blagev DP, Lloyd JF, Conner K, Dickerson J, Adams D, Stevens SM, Woller SC, Evans RS, Elliott CG: Follow-up of incidental pulmonary nodules and the radiology report. J Am Coll Radiol 11(4):378–383, 2014CrossRef Blagev DP, Lloyd JF, Conner K, Dickerson J, Adams D, Stevens SM, Woller SC, Evans RS, Elliott CG: Follow-up of incidental pulmonary nodules and the radiology report. J Am Coll Radiol 11(4):378–383, 2014CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kulon M, “Lost to Follow-Up: automated Detection of Patients Who Missed Follow-Ups Which Were Recommended on Radiology Reports”, SIIM Conference Proceedings 2016. Kulon M, “Lost to Follow-Up: automated Detection of Patients Who Missed Follow-Ups Which Were Recommended on Radiology Reports”, SIIM Conference Proceedings 2016.
6.
go back to reference Sloan CE, Chadalavada SC, Cook TS et al.: Assessment of follow-up completeness and notification preferences for imaging findings of possible cancer: what happens after radiologists submit their reports? Acad Radiol 21(12):1579–1586, 2014CrossRef Sloan CE, Chadalavada SC, Cook TS et al.: Assessment of follow-up completeness and notification preferences for imaging findings of possible cancer: what happens after radiologists submit their reports? Acad Radiol 21(12):1579–1586, 2014CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cook TS, Lalevic D, Sloan C, Chadalavada SC, Langlotz CP, Schnall MD, Zafar HM: Implementation of an Automated Radiology Recommendation-Tracking Engine for Abdominal Imaging Findings of Possible cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 14(5):629–636, 2017CrossRef Cook TS, Lalevic D, Sloan C, Chadalavada SC, Langlotz CP, Schnall MD, Zafar HM: Implementation of an Automated Radiology Recommendation-Tracking Engine for Abdominal Imaging Findings of Possible cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 14(5):629–636, 2017CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dang PA, Kalra MK, Blake MA, Schultz TJ, Halpern EF, Dreyer KJ: Extraction of Recommendation Features in Radiology with Natural Language Processing: Exploratory Study. AJR 191:313–320, 2008CrossRef Dang PA, Kalra MK, Blake MA, Schultz TJ, Halpern EF, Dreyer KJ: Extraction of Recommendation Features in Radiology with Natural Language Processing: Exploratory Study. AJR 191:313–320, 2008CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yetisgen-Yildiz M, Gunn ML, Xia F, Payne TH: Automatic identification of critical follow-up recommendation sentences in radiology reports. AMIA Annual Symp Proc 2011:1593–1602 Yetisgen-Yildiz M, Gunn ML, Xia F, Payne TH: Automatic identification of critical follow-up recommendation sentences in radiology reports. AMIA Annual Symp Proc 2011:1593–1602
10.
go back to reference Dutta S, Long WJ, Brown DF, Reisner AT: Automated detection using natural language processing of radiologists recommendations for additional imaging of incidental findings. Ann Emerg Med 62(2):162–169, 2013CrossRef Dutta S, Long WJ, Brown DF, Reisner AT: Automated detection using natural language processing of radiologists recommendations for additional imaging of incidental findings. Ann Emerg Med 62(2):162–169, 2013CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Oliveira L, Tellis R, Qian Y et al., Follow-up Recommendation Detection on Radiology, Reports with Incidental Pulmonary Nodules. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:1028. Oliveira L, Tellis R, Qian Y et al., Follow-up Recommendation Detection on Radiology, Reports with Incidental Pulmonary Nodules. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:1028.
12.
go back to reference Gunn M.L., Yetisgen M, Lehnert B.E. et al., Automating Radiology Quality and Efficiency Measures with Natural Language Processing, Radiological Society of North America 2015 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting. Gunn M.L., Yetisgen M, Lehnert B.E. et al., Automating Radiology Quality and Efficiency Measures with Natural Language Processing, Radiological Society of North America 2015 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting.
13.
go back to reference Gunn M.L., Lehnert B.E., Hall C et al., Impact of Patient Location and Radiology Subspecialty on Imaging Follow-up Recommendation Rate, Radiological Society of North America 2015 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting. Gunn M.L., Lehnert B.E., Hall C et al., Impact of Patient Location and Radiology Subspecialty on Imaging Follow-up Recommendation Rate, Radiological Society of North America 2015 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting.
14.
go back to reference Mabotuwana T, Hall C, Dalal S, Tieder J, Gunn M. Extracting follow-up recommendations and associated anatomy from Radiology Reports. in 16th World Congress on Medical and Health Informatics (MedInfo2017). Aug 2017. Hangzhou. Mabotuwana T, Hall C, Dalal S, Tieder J, Gunn M. Extracting follow-up recommendations and associated anatomy from Radiology Reports. in 16th World Congress on Medical and Health Informatics (MedInfo2017). Aug 2017. Hangzhou.
15.
go back to reference Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L: Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning 63(1):3–42, 2006CrossRef Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L: Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning 63(1):3–42, 2006CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rosse C, Mejino JLV: A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 36(6):478–500, 2003CrossRef Rosse C, Mejino JLV: A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 36(6):478–500, 2003CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K et al., (2013) Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26 (NIPS 2013), p. 3111–3119 Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K et al., (2013) Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26 (NIPS 2013), p. 3111–3119
18.
go back to reference Blacoe W, Lapata M, A Comparison of Vector-based Representations for Semantic Composition, Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, p. 546–556. Blacoe W, Lapata M, A Comparison of Vector-based Representations for Semantic Composition, Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, p. 546–556.
19.
go back to reference Al-Mutairi A, Meyer AND, Chang P et al.: Lack of Timely Follow-Up of Abnormal Imaging Results and Radiologists’ Recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol 12(4):385–389, 2015CrossRef Al-Mutairi A, Meyer AND, Chang P et al.: Lack of Timely Follow-Up of Abnormal Imaging Results and Radiologists’ Recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol 12(4):385–389, 2015CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wandtke B, Gallagher S: “Closing the Loop: A Radiology Follow-up Recommendation Tracking System,” RSNA Quality Storyboards 2016. Wandtke B, Gallagher S: “Closing the Loop: A Radiology Follow-up Recommendation Tracking System,” RSNA Quality Storyboards 2016.
21.
go back to reference Mabotuwana T, Hombal V, Dalal S, Hall C, Gunn M. Determining Adherence to Follow-up Imaging Recommendations. Journal of American College of Radiology 2018 Mar; p. 422–428 Mabotuwana T, Hombal V, Dalal S, Hall C, Gunn M. Determining Adherence to Follow-up Imaging Recommendations. Journal of American College of Radiology 2018 Mar; p. 422–428
22.
go back to reference Gunn ML, Lehnert BE, Hall CS, et al. Use of conditional statements in radiology follow-recommendation sentences: relationship to follow up compliance. Radiological Society of North America 101st Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; Chicago. 2015. Gunn ML, Lehnert BE, Hall CS, et al. Use of conditional statements in radiology follow-recommendation sentences: relationship to follow up compliance. Radiological Society of North America 101st Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; Chicago. 2015.
Metadata
Title
Determining Follow-Up Imaging Study Using Radiology Reports
Authors
Sandeep Dalal
Vadiraj Hombal
Wei-Hung Weng
Gabe Mankovich
Thusitha Mabotuwana
Christopher S. Hall
Joseph Fuller III
Bruce E. Lehnert
Martin L. Gunn
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00260-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2020 Go to the issue

Editorial

Editorial