Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2016

01-04-2016

A Survey of DICOM Viewer Software to Integrate Clinical Research and Medical Imaging

Authors: Daniel Haak, Charles-E. Page, Thomas M. Deserno

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) protocol is the leading standard for image data management in healthcare. Imaging biomarkers and image-based surrogate endpoints in clinical trials and medical registries require DICOM viewer software with advanced functionality for visualization and interfaces for integration. In this paper, a comprehensive evaluation of 28 DICOM viewers is performed. The evaluation criteria are obtained from application scenarios in clinical research rather than patient care. They include (i) platform, (ii) interface, (iii) support, (iv) two-dimensional (2D), and (v) three-dimensional (3D) viewing. On the average, 4.48 and 1.43 of overall 8 2D and 5 3D image viewing criteria are satisfied, respectively. Suitable DICOM interfaces for central viewing in hospitals are provided by GingkoCADx, MIPAV, and OsiriX Lite. The viewers ImageJ, MicroView, MIPAV, and OsiriX Lite offer all included 3D-rendering features for advanced viewing. Interfaces needed for decentral viewing in web-based systems are offered by Oviyam, Weasis, and Xero. Focusing on open source components, MIPAV is the best candidate for 3D imaging as well as DICOM communication. Weasis is superior for workflow optimization in clinical trials. Our evaluation shows that advanced visualization and suitable interfaces can also be found in the open source field and not only in commercial products.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mildenberger P, Eichelberg M, Martin E: Introduction to the DICOM standard. Eur Radiol 12(4):920–7, 2002CrossRefPubMed Mildenberger P, Eichelberg M, Martin E: Introduction to the DICOM standard. Eur Radiol 12(4):920–7, 2002CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sung NS, Crowley WF, Genel M, Salber P, Sandy L, Sherwood LM, et al: Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA 289(10):1278–87, 2003CrossRefPubMed Sung NS, Crowley WF, Genel M, Salber P, Sandy L, Sherwood LM, et al: Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA 289(10):1278–87, 2003CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ghosh S, Matsuoka Y, Asai Y, Hsin K, Kitano H: Software for systems biology: from tools to integrated platforms. Nat Rev Genet 12:821–32, 2011PubMed Ghosh S, Matsuoka Y, Asai Y, Hsin K, Kitano H: Software for systems biology: from tools to integrated platforms. Nat Rev Genet 12:821–32, 2011PubMed
4.
go back to reference Wang X, Liu BJ, Martinez C, Zhang X, Winstein CJ: Development of a novel imaging informatics-based system with an intelligent workflow engine (IWEIS) to support imaging-based clinical trials. Comput Biol Med 2015. Epub ahead of print. Wang X, Liu BJ, Martinez C, Zhang X, Winstein CJ: Development of a novel imaging informatics-based system with an intelligent workflow engine (IWEIS) to support imaging-based clinical trials. Comput Biol Med 2015. Epub ahead of print.
5.
go back to reference Haak D, Page C, Reinartz S, Krüger T, Deserno TM: DICOM for clinical research: PACS-integrated electronic data capture in multi-center trials. J Digit Imaging 28(5):558–66, 2015 Haak D, Page C, Reinartz S, Krüger T, Deserno TM: DICOM for clinical research: PACS-integrated electronic data capture in multi-center trials. J Digit Imaging 28(5):558–66, 2015
6.
go back to reference Deserno TM, Haak D, Brandenburg V, Deserno V, Classen C, Specht P: Integrated image data and medical record management for rare disease registries. A general framework and its instantiation to the German Calciphylaxis Registry. J Digit Imaging 27(6):702–13, 2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Deserno TM, Haak D, Brandenburg V, Deserno V, Classen C, Specht P: Integrated image data and medical record management for rare disease registries. A general framework and its instantiation to the German Calciphylaxis Registry. J Digit Imaging 27(6):702–13, 2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
8.
go back to reference Horii C: DICOM image viewers: a survey. In: Medical Imaging 2003: SPIE; 2003. (SPIE Proceedings) p 251–9 Horii C: DICOM image viewers: a survey. In: Medical Imaging 2003: SPIE; 2003. (SPIE Proceedings) p 251–9
10.
go back to reference Liao W, Deserno TM, Spitzer K. Evaluation of free non-diagnostic DICOM software tools. In: Medical Imaging: SPIE; 2008. (SPIE Proceedings) p. 691903–12 Liao W, Deserno TM, Spitzer K. Evaluation of free non-diagnostic DICOM software tools. In: Medical Imaging: SPIE; 2008. (SPIE Proceedings) p. 691903–12
11.
go back to reference Bernarding J, Thiel A, Grzesik A: A JAVA-based DICOM server with integration of clinical findings and DICOM-conform data encryption. Int J Med Inform 64(2-3):429–38, 2001CrossRefPubMed Bernarding J, Thiel A, Grzesik A: A JAVA-based DICOM server with integration of clinical findings and DICOM-conform data encryption. Int J Med Inform 64(2-3):429–38, 2001CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hernandez JA, Acuna CJ, de Castro M, Marcos E, Lopez M, Malpica N: Web-PACS for multicenter clinical trials. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 11(1):87–93, 2007CrossRefPubMed Hernandez JA, Acuna CJ, de Castro M, Marcos E, Lopez M, Malpica N: Web-PACS for multicenter clinical trials. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 11(1):87–93, 2007CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Luccichenti G, Cademartiri F, Pichiecchio A, Bontempi E, Sabatini U, Bastianello S: User Interface of a teleradiology system for the MR assessment of multiple sclerosis. J Digit Imaging 23(5):632–8, 2010CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luccichenti G, Cademartiri F, Pichiecchio A, Bontempi E, Sabatini U, Bastianello S: User Interface of a teleradiology system for the MR assessment of multiple sclerosis. J Digit Imaging 23(5):632–8, 2010CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Haak D, Page CE, Kabino K, Deserno TM. Evaluation of DICOM viewer software for workflow integration in clinical trials. In: Medical Imaging: SPIE; 2015. p. 94180 (SPIE Proceedings). Haak D, Page CE, Kabino K, Deserno TM. Evaluation of DICOM viewer software for workflow integration in clinical trials. In: Medical Imaging: SPIE; 2015. p. 94180 (SPIE Proceedings).
15.
go back to reference Deserno TM, Deserno V, Haak D, Kabino K. Digital imaging and electronic data capture in multi-center clinical trials. Stud Health Technol Inform 216:930, 2015 Deserno TM, Deserno V, Haak D, Kabino K. Digital imaging and electronic data capture in multi-center clinical trials. Stud Health Technol Inform 216:930, 2015
16.
go back to reference Bidgood WD, Horii SC, Prior FW, Syckle DE: Understanding and using DICOM, the data interchange standard for biomedical imaging. In: Wong STC Ed. Medical image databases. Springer US, Boston, 1998, pp 25–52CrossRef Bidgood WD, Horii SC, Prior FW, Syckle DE: Understanding and using DICOM, the data interchange standard for biomedical imaging. In: Wong STC Ed. Medical image databases. Springer US, Boston, 1998, pp 25–52CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Koutelakis GV, Lymperopoulos DK: PACS through web compatible with DICOM Standard and WADO Service: advantages and implementation. In: 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. p. 2601-5 Koutelakis GV, Lymperopoulos DK: PACS through web compatible with DICOM Standard and WADO Service: advantages and implementation. In: 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. p. 2601-5
18.
go back to reference DeLano WL: The case for open-source software in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 10(3):213–7, 2005 DeLano WL: The case for open-source software in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 10(3):213–7, 2005
19.
go back to reference Leroux H, McBride S, Gibson S: On selecting a clinical trial management system for large scale, multi-centre, multi-modal clinical research study. Stud Health Technol Inform 168:89–95, 2011 Leroux H, McBride S, Gibson S: On selecting a clinical trial management system for large scale, multi-centre, multi-modal clinical research study. Stud Health Technol Inform 168:89–95, 2011
20.
go back to reference Franklin JD, Guidry A, Brinkley JF: A partnership approach for electronic data capture in small-scale clinical trials. J Biomed Inform 44:103–108, 2011 Franklin JD, Guidry A, Brinkley JF: A partnership approach for electronic data capture in small-scale clinical trials. J Biomed Inform 44:103–108, 2011
21.
go back to reference Lo Presti G, Carbone M, Ciriaci D, Aramini D, Ferrari M, Ferrari V: Assessment of DICOM viewers capable of loading patient-specific 3D models obtained by different segmentation platforms in the operating room. J Digit Imaging 28(5):518–527, 2015 Lo Presti G, Carbone M, Ciriaci D, Aramini D, Ferrari M, Ferrari V: Assessment of DICOM viewers capable of loading patient-specific 3D models obtained by different segmentation platforms in the operating room. J Digit Imaging 28(5):518–527, 2015
22.
go back to reference Le Maitre A, Fernando J, Morvan Y, Mevel G, Cordonnier E: Comparative performance investigation of DICOM C-STORE and DICOM HTTP-based requests. In: 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). p. 1350–1353 Le Maitre A, Fernando J, Morvan Y, Mevel G, Cordonnier E: Comparative performance investigation of DICOM C-STORE and DICOM HTTP-based requests. In: 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). p. 1350–1353
Metadata
Title
A Survey of DICOM Viewer Software to Integrate Clinical Research and Medical Imaging
Authors
Daniel Haak
Charles-E. Page
Thomas M. Deserno
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9833-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2016 Go to the issue