Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 6/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

The impact of introducing a no oral contrast abdominopelvic CT examination (NOCAPE) pathway on radiology turn around times, emergency department length of stay, and patient safety

Authors: Seyed Amirhossein Razavi, Jamlik-Omari Johnson, Michael T. Kassin, Kimberly E. Applegate

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

This investigation evaluates the impact of the no oral contrast abdominopelvic CT examination (NOCAPE) on radiology turn around time (TAT), emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), and patient safety metrics. During a 12-month period at two urban teaching hospitals, 6,409 ED abdominopelvic (AP) CTs were performed to evaluate acute abdominal pain. NOCAPE represented 70.9 % of all ED AP CT examinations with intravenous contrast. Data collection included patient demographics, use of intravenous (IV) and/or oral contrast, order to complete and order to final interpretation TAT, ED LOS, admission, recall and bounce back rates, and comparison and characterization of impressions. The NOCAPE pathway reduced median order to complete TAT by 32 min (22.9 %) compared to IV and oral contrast AP CT examinations (traditional pathway) (P < 0.001). Median order to final TAT was 2.9 h in NOCAPE patients and 3.5 h in the traditional pathway, a 36-min (17.1 %) reduction (P < 0.001). Overall, the NOCAPE pathway reduced ED LOS by a median of 43 min (8.8 %) compared to the traditional pathway (8.2 vs 7.5 h) (P = 0.003). Recall and bounce back rates were 3.2 %, and only one patient had change in impression after oral contrast CT was repeated. The NOCAPE pathway is associated with decreased radiology TAT and ED LOS metrics. The authors suggest that NOCAPE implementation in the ED setting is safe and positively impacts both radiology and emergency medicine workflow.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE 3rd et al (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(5):1391–1396PubMedCrossRef Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE 3rd et al (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(5):1391–1396PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lee SI, Chew FS (1998) 1998 ARRS Executive Council Award. Radiology in the emergency department: technique for quantitative description of use and results. American Roentgen Ray Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171(3):559–564PubMedCrossRef Lee SI, Chew FS (1998) 1998 ARRS Executive Council Award. Radiology in the emergency department: technique for quantitative description of use and results. American Roentgen Ray Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171(3):559–564PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000-2005. Emerg Radiol 13(1):25–30PubMedCrossRef Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000-2005. Emerg Radiol 13(1):25–30PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Joyce WP, Delaney PV, Gorey TF et al (1992) The value of water-soluble contrast radiology in the management of acute small bowel obstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74(6):422–425PubMedCentralPubMed Joyce WP, Delaney PV, Gorey TF et al (1992) The value of water-soluble contrast radiology in the management of acute small bowel obstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74(6):422–425PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lonnemark M, Magnusson A, Ahlstrom H (1993) Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol. Acta Radiol 34(5):517–519PubMedCrossRef Lonnemark M, Magnusson A, Ahlstrom H (1993) Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol. Acta Radiol 34(5):517–519PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS et al (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(4):763–766PubMedCrossRef Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS et al (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(4):763–766PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR (2005) A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am J Surg 190(3):474–478PubMedCrossRef Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR (2005) A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am J Surg 190(3):474–478PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM et al (2006) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult Emergency Department patients. Emerg Radiol 12(4):150–157PubMedCrossRef Lee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM et al (2006) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult Emergency Department patients. Emerg Radiol 12(4):150–157PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M et al (2007) Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings. Eur Radiol 17(8):2055–2061PubMedCrossRef Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M et al (2007) Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings. Eur Radiol 17(8):2055–2061PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD et al (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213(2):341–346PubMedCrossRef Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD et al (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213(2):341–346PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Peck J, Peck A, Peck C et al (2000) The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 180(2):133–136PubMedCrossRef Peck J, Peck A, Peck C et al (2000) The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 180(2):133–136PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hill BC, Johnson SC, Owens EK et al (2010) CT scan for suspected acute abdominal process: impact of combinations of IV, oral, and rectal contrast. World J Surg 34(4):699–703PubMedCrossRef Hill BC, Johnson SC, Owens EK et al (2010) CT scan for suspected acute abdominal process: impact of combinations of IV, oral, and rectal contrast. World J Surg 34(4):699–703PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee CH, Haaland B, Earnest A et al (2013) Use of positive oral contrast agents in abdominopelvic computed tomography for blunt abdominal injury: meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur Radiol 23(9):2513–2521PubMedCrossRef Lee CH, Haaland B, Earnest A et al (2013) Use of positive oral contrast agents in abdominopelvic computed tomography for blunt abdominal injury: meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur Radiol 23(9):2513–2521PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Levenson RB, Camacho MA, Horn E et al (2012) Eliminating routine oral contrast use for CT in the emergency department: impact on patient throughput and diagnosis. Emerg Radiol 19(6):513–517PubMedCrossRef Levenson RB, Camacho MA, Horn E et al (2012) Eliminating routine oral contrast use for CT in the emergency department: impact on patient throughput and diagnosis. Emerg Radiol 19(6):513–517PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Laituri CA, Fraser JD, Aguayo P et al (2011) The lack of efficacy for oral contrast in the diagnosis of appendicitis by computed tomography. J Surg Res 170(1):100–103PubMedCrossRef Laituri CA, Fraser JD, Aguayo P et al (2011) The lack of efficacy for oral contrast in the diagnosis of appendicitis by computed tomography. J Surg Res 170(1):100–103PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kepner AM, Bacasnot JV, Stahlman BA (2012) Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med 30(9):1765–1773PubMedCrossRef Kepner AM, Bacasnot JV, Stahlman BA (2012) Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med 30(9):1765–1773PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucey BC et al (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(5):1282–1288PubMedCrossRef Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucey BC et al (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(5):1282–1288PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Anderson SW, Rhea JT, Milch HN et al (2010) Influence of body habitus and use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using 64 MDCT. Emerg Radiol 17(6):445–453PubMedCrossRef Anderson SW, Rhea JT, Milch HN et al (2010) Influence of body habitus and use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using 64 MDCT. Emerg Radiol 17(6):445–453PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA et al (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(2):405–409PubMedCrossRef Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA et al (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(2):405–409PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schuur JD, Chu G, Sucov A (2010) Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay. Emerg Radiol 17(4):267–273PubMedCrossRef Schuur JD, Chu G, Sucov A (2010) Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay. Emerg Radiol 17(4):267–273PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Guillerman RP, Brody AS, Kraus SJ (2002) Evidence-based guidelines for pediatric imaging: the example of the child with possible appendicitis. Pediatr Ann 31(10):629–640PubMedCrossRef Guillerman RP, Brody AS, Kraus SJ (2002) Evidence-based guidelines for pediatric imaging: the example of the child with possible appendicitis. Pediatr Ann 31(10):629–640PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Peterson CM, Lin M, Pilgram T et al (2011) Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35(2):202–205PubMedCrossRef Peterson CM, Lin M, Pilgram T et al (2011) Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35(2):202–205PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Huynh LN, Coughlin BF, Wolfe J et al (2004) Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast. Emerg Radiol 10(6):310–313PubMed Huynh LN, Coughlin BF, Wolfe J et al (2004) Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast. Emerg Radiol 10(6):310–313PubMed
24.
go back to reference Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS (2001) Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 136(5):556–562PubMedCrossRef Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS (2001) Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 136(5):556–562PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Giuliano V, Giuliano C, Pinto F et al (2005) CT method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate—clinical experience in 525 cases. Emerg Radiol 11(5):281–285PubMedCrossRef Giuliano V, Giuliano C, Pinto F et al (2005) CT method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate—clinical experience in 525 cases. Emerg Radiol 11(5):281–285PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mitchell DG, Parker L, Sunshine JH et al (2002) Body MR imaging and CT volume: variations and trends based on an analysis of medicare and fee-for-service health insurance databases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(1):27–31PubMedCrossRef Mitchell DG, Parker L, Sunshine JH et al (2002) Body MR imaging and CT volume: variations and trends based on an analysis of medicare and fee-for-service health insurance databases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(1):27–31PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Trzeciak S, Rivers EP (2003) Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat to patient safety and public health. Emerg Med J 20(5):402–405PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Trzeciak S, Rivers EP (2003) Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat to patient safety and public health. Emerg Med J 20(5):402–405PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Schull MJ, Szalai JP, Schwartz B et al (2001) Emergency department overcrowding following systematic hospital restructuring: trends at twenty hospitals over ten years. Acad Emerg Med 8(11):1037–1043PubMedCrossRef Schull MJ, Szalai JP, Schwartz B et al (2001) Emergency department overcrowding following systematic hospital restructuring: trends at twenty hospitals over ten years. Acad Emerg Med 8(11):1037–1043PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Horton KM, Fishman EK, Gayler B (2008) The use of iohexol as oral contrast for computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(2):207–209PubMedCrossRef Horton KM, Fishman EK, Gayler B (2008) The use of iohexol as oral contrast for computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(2):207–209PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of introducing a no oral contrast abdominopelvic CT examination (NOCAPE) pathway on radiology turn around times, emergency department length of stay, and patient safety
Authors
Seyed Amirhossein Razavi
Jamlik-Omari Johnson
Michael T. Kassin
Kimberly E. Applegate
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1240-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Emergency Radiology 6/2014 Go to the issue