Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 6/2012

01-12-2012 | Original Article

Eliminating routine oral contrast use for CT in the emergency department: impact on patient throughput and diagnosis

Authors: Robin B. Levenson, Marc A. Camacho, Erin Horn, Amina Saghir, Daniel McGillicuddy, Leon D. Sanchez

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effect of eliminating routine oral contrast use for abdominopelvic (AP) computed tomography (CT) on emergency department (ED) patient throughput and diagnosis. Retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing AP CT during 2-month periods prior to and following oral contrast protocol change in an urban, tertiary care ED. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, prior gastrointestinal tract-altering surgery, or lean body habitus continued to receive oral contrast. Oral contrast was otherwise eliminated from the AP CT protocol. Patients were excluded if they would not have typically received oral contrast, regardless of the intervention. Data recorded include patient demographics, ED length of stay (LOS), time from order to CT, 72-h ED return, and repeat imaging. Two thousand and one ED patients (1,014 before and 987 after protocol change) underwent AP CT during the study period. Six hundred seven pre-intervention and 611 post-intervention were eligible for oral contrast and included. Of these, 95 % received oral contrast prior to the intervention and 42 % thereafter. After the intervention, mean ED LOS among oral contrast eligible patients decreased by 97 min, P < 0.001. Mean time from order to CT decreased by 66 min, P < 0.001. No patient with CT negative for acute findings had additional subsequent AP imaging within 72 h at our institution that led to a change in diagnosis. Eliminating routine oral contrast use for AP CT in the ED may be successful in decreasing LOS and time from order to CT without demonstrated compromise in acute patient diagnosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol 13:25–30PubMedCrossRef Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol 13:25–30PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lee SI, Chew FS (1998) Radiology in the emergency department: technique for quantitative description of use and results. AJR 171:559–564PubMed Lee SI, Chew FS (1998) Radiology in the emergency department: technique for quantitative description of use and results. AJR 171:559–564PubMed
3.
go back to reference Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR 174:1391–1396PubMed Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR 174:1391–1396PubMed
4.
go back to reference Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR (2005) A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am J Surg 190:474–478PubMedCrossRef Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR (2005) A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am J Surg 190:474–478PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucy BC, Ozonoff A, Jordan JD, Ratevosian J, Ulrich AS, Rathley NK, Mitchell PM, Rebholz C, Feldman JA, Rhea JT (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. AJR 193:1282–1288PubMedCrossRef Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucy BC, Ozonoff A, Jordan JD, Ratevosian J, Ulrich AS, Rathley NK, Mitchell PM, Rebholz C, Feldman JA, Rhea JT (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. AJR 193:1282–1288PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Anderson SW, Rhea JT, Milch HN, Ozonoff A, Lucey BC, Soto JA (2010) Influence of body habitus on use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 17:445–453PubMedCrossRef Anderson SW, Rhea JT, Milch HN, Ozonoff A, Lucey BC, Soto JA (2010) Influence of body habitus on use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 17:445–453PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gamanagatti S, Vashisht S, Kapoor A, Chumber S, Bal S (2007) Comparison of graded compression ultrasonography and unenhanced spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 48:80–87PubMed Gamanagatti S, Vashisht S, Kapoor A, Chumber S, Bal S (2007) Comparison of graded compression ultrasonography and unenhanced spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 48:80–87PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hill BC, Johnson SC, Owens EK, Gerber JL, Senagore AJ (2010) CT scan for suspected acute abdominal process: impact of combinations of IV, oral, and rectal contrast. World J Surg 34:699–703PubMedCrossRef Hill BC, Johnson SC, Owens EK, Gerber JL, Senagore AJ (2010) CT scan for suspected acute abdominal process: impact of combinations of IV, oral, and rectal contrast. World J Surg 34:699–703PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lane MJ, Lui DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213:341–346PubMed Lane MJ, Lui DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213:341–346PubMed
10.
go back to reference Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB Jr (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR 168:405–409PubMed Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB Jr (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR 168:405–409PubMed
11.
go back to reference Malone AJ, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR 160:763–766PubMed Malone AJ, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR 160:763–766PubMed
12.
go back to reference Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for evaluating acute abdominal pain: a little more cost, a lot more information. Radiology 205:43–47PubMed Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for evaluating acute abdominal pain: a little more cost, a lot more information. Radiology 205:43–47PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ (2006) Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol 12:99–102PubMedCrossRef Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ (2006) Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol 12:99–102PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Peck J, Peck A, Peck C, Peck J (2000) The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 180:133–136PubMedCrossRef Peck J, Peck A, Peck C, Peck J (2000) The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 180:133–136PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM, Polino J, Blank FS, Smithline HA (2006) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult emergency department patients. Emerg Radiol 2006:150–157 Yee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM, Polino J, Blank FS, Smithline HA (2006) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult emergency department patients. Emerg Radiol 2006:150–157
16.
go back to reference Hyunh LN, Coughlin BF, Wolfe J, Blank F, Lee SY, Smithline HA (2004) Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast. Emerg Radiol 10:310–313 Hyunh LN, Coughlin BF, Wolfe J, Blank F, Lee SY, Smithline HA (2004) Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast. Emerg Radiol 10:310–313
17.
go back to reference Schuur JD, Chu G, Sucov A (2010) Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay. Emerg Radiol 17:267–273PubMedCrossRef Schuur JD, Chu G, Sucov A (2010) Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay. Emerg Radiol 17:267–273PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Eliminating routine oral contrast use for CT in the emergency department: impact on patient throughput and diagnosis
Authors
Robin B. Levenson
Marc A. Camacho
Erin Horn
Amina Saghir
Daniel McGillicuddy
Leon D. Sanchez
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1059-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

Emergency Radiology 6/2012 Go to the issue