Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 1/2006

01-09-2006 | Original Article

Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005

Authors: Joshua Broder, David M. Warshauer

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aims to characterize changes in computed tomography (CT) utilization in the adult emergency department (ED) over a 5-year period. CT scans ordered on adult ED patients from July 2000 to July 2005 were analyzed in five groups: head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and miscellaneous. ED patient volume and triage acuity scores were determined. Triage acuity scores are used to determine the severity of a patient’s illness or injury and the need for immediate evaluation and treatment. There were 46,553 CT scans performed on 27,625 adult patients in the ED during the study period. During this same period, 194,622 adult patients were evaluated in the ED. From 2000 to 2005, the adult emergency department patient volume increased by 13% while triage acuity remained stable. During this same period, head CT increased by 51%, cervical spine CT by 463%, chest CT by 226%, abdominal CT by 72%, and miscellaneous CT by 132%. Although increases were generally greater for patients over age 40, the increase in those less than 40 years was also substantial. Of the 4,320 individual patients who underwent chest CT, 83 (2%) had chest CT on three or more separate ED visits. Of 10,960 patients undergoing abdominal CT, 406 (4%) had abdominal CT on three or more separate ED visits. ED CT utilization has increased at a rate far exceeding the growth in ED patient volume. This presumably reflects the improved utility of CT in diagnosing serious pathology, its increased availability, and a desire on the part of physicians for diagnostic certainty. Whether this increase in utilization results in improved patient outcomes is at present unclear and deserves additional study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Margulis AR, Bhargavan M, Feldman D, Sunshine JH (2005) Should the ordering of medical imaging examinations be reexamined? J Am Coll Rad 2:809–811CrossRef Margulis AR, Bhargavan M, Feldman D, Sunshine JH (2005) Should the ordering of medical imaging examinations be reexamined? J Am Coll Rad 2:809–811CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, Asaad J (2004) CT pulmonary angiography: a comparative analysis of the utilization patterns in emergency department and hospitalized patients between 1998 and 2003. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1093–1096PubMed Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, Asaad J (2004) CT pulmonary angiography: a comparative analysis of the utilization patterns in emergency department and hospitalized patients between 1998 and 2003. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1093–1096PubMed
3.
go back to reference Oguz KK, Yousem DM, Deluca T, Herskovits EH, Beauchamp NJ (2002) Effect of emergency department CT on neuroimaging case volume and positive scan rates. Acad Radiol 9:1018–1024PubMedCrossRef Oguz KK, Yousem DM, Deluca T, Herskovits EH, Beauchamp NJ (2002) Effect of emergency department CT on neuroimaging case volume and positive scan rates. Acad Radiol 9:1018–1024PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Donnelly LF (2005) Reducing radiation dose associated with pediatric CT by decreasing unnecessary examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:655–657PubMed Donnelly LF (2005) Reducing radiation dose associated with pediatric CT by decreasing unnecessary examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:655–657PubMed
5.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMed Brenner DJ, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hall E (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706PubMedCrossRef Hall E (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tanabe P, Gimbel R, Yarnold PR, Kyriacou DN, Adams JG (2004) Reliability and validity of scores on the emergency severity index version 3. Acad Emerg Med 11:59–65PubMed Tanabe P, Gimbel R, Yarnold PR, Kyriacou DN, Adams JG (2004) Reliability and validity of scores on the emergency severity index version 3. Acad Emerg Med 11:59–65PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kalra M, Maher M, Saini S (2003) CT radiation exposure: rationale for concern and strategies for dose reduction. Proceedings from the SCBT/MR. Appl Radiol 7:45–54 Kalra M, Maher M, Saini S (2003) CT radiation exposure: rationale for concern and strategies for dose reduction. Proceedings from the SCBT/MR. Appl Radiol 7:45–54
9.
go back to reference Mettler FA, Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA, Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Elliston C (2004) Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 232:735–738PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Elliston C (2004) Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 232:735–738PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mulkens T, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M et al (2005) Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multidetector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 237:213–223PubMedCrossRef Mulkens T, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M et al (2005) Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multidetector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 237:213–223PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wall BF, Hart D (1997) Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Br J Radiol 70:437–439PubMed Wall BF, Hart D (1997) Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Br J Radiol 70:437–439PubMed
13.
go back to reference Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council (2005) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. National Academies, Washington, DC Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council (2005) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. National Academies, Washington, DC
14.
go back to reference Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, Chung JK, Broga DW, Sethi NN (2005) Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1228–1233PubMedCrossRef Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, Chung JK, Broga DW, Sethi NN (2005) Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1228–1233PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fefferman N, Bomsztyk E, Yim A et al (2005) Appendicitis in children: low-dose CT with a phantom-based simulation technique—initial observations. Radiology 237:641–646PubMedCrossRef Fefferman N, Bomsztyk E, Yim A et al (2005) Appendicitis in children: low-dose CT with a phantom-based simulation technique—initial observations. Radiology 237:641–646PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y et al (2005) Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology 237:945–951PubMedCrossRef Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y et al (2005) Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology 237:945–951PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nickoloff E, Alderson P (2001) Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:85–287 Nickoloff E, Alderson P (2001) Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:85–287
19.
go back to reference Feigal DW Jr (2001) FDA public health notification: reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patients. Int J Trauma Nurs 8:1–2CrossRef Feigal DW Jr (2001) FDA public health notification: reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patients. Int J Trauma Nurs 8:1–2CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Booz AH (2003) Medical technology cost management strategy. Report prepared for the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. Chicago Booz AH (2003) Medical technology cost management strategy. Report prepared for the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. Chicago
21.
go back to reference McCaig LF, Burt CW (2005) National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2003 emergency department summary. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland, pp 1–40 McCaig LF, Burt CW (2005) National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2003 emergency department summary. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland, pp 1–40
22.
go back to reference Gottlieb RH, La TC, Erturk EN et al (2002) CT in detecting urinary tract calculi: influence on patient imaging and clinical outcomes. Radiology 225:441–449PubMedCrossRef Gottlieb RH, La TC, Erturk EN et al (2002) CT in detecting urinary tract calculi: influence on patient imaging and clinical outcomes. Radiology 225:441–449PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chen MYM, Zagoria RJ, Saunders HS, Dyer RB (1999) Trends in the use of unenhanced helical CT for acute urinary colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1447–1450PubMed Chen MYM, Zagoria RJ, Saunders HS, Dyer RB (1999) Trends in the use of unenhanced helical CT for acute urinary colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1447–1450PubMed
24.
go back to reference Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M, Galland R, Lewis M, Gower-Thomas K (2003) Doctor’s knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 327:371–372PubMedCrossRef Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M, Galland R, Lewis M, Gower-Thomas K (2003) Doctor’s knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 327:371–372PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398PubMedCrossRef Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL et al (2001) The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 286:1841–1848PubMedCrossRef Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL et al (2001) The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 286:1841–1848PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD et al (2003) The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. NEJM 349:2510–2518PubMedCrossRef Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD et al (2003) The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. NEJM 349:2510–2518PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Runyon MS, Webb WB, Jones AE, Kline JA (2005) Comparison of the unstructured clinician estimate of pretest probability for pulmonary embolism to the Canadian score and the Charlotte rule: a prospective observational study. Acad Emerg Med 12:587–593PubMedCrossRef Runyon MS, Webb WB, Jones AE, Kline JA (2005) Comparison of the unstructured clinician estimate of pretest probability for pulmonary embolism to the Canadian score and the Charlotte rule: a prospective observational study. Acad Emerg Med 12:587–593PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Investigators WGftCS (2006) Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing and computed tomography. JAMA 295:172–179CrossRef Investigators WGftCS (2006) Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing and computed tomography. JAMA 295:172–179CrossRef
30.
go back to reference White CS, Kuo D, Kelemen M et al (2005) Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:533–540PubMed White CS, Kuo D, Kelemen M et al (2005) Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:533–540PubMed
Metadata
Title
Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005
Authors
Joshua Broder
David M. Warshauer
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-006-0493-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

Emergency Radiology 1/2006 Go to the issue