Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 6/2010

01-11-2010 | Original Article

Influence of body habitus and use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using 64 MDCT

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how body habitus affects reader confidence in diagnosing acute appendicitis and appendiceal visualization using 64 MDCT technology with and without oral contrast. We conducted a HIPAA compliant, IRB approved study of adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department with nontraumatic abdominal pain. Subjects were randomized to two groups: 64 MDCT scans performed with oral and intravenous contrast or scans performed solely with intravenous contrast. Three radiologists established their confidence about the presence of appendicitis as well as recording whether the appendix was visualized. Reader confidence in diagnosing acute appendicitis was compared between the two groups for the three readers. The impact of patient BMI and estimated intra-abdominal fat on reader confidence in diagnosing appendicitis was determined. Finally, a comparison of the effect of BMI and intra-abdominal fat on appendiceal visualization between the two groups was carried out. Three hundred three patients were enrolled in this study. There was a statistically significant difference in confidence based on BMI for reader 2, group 1 in diagnosing appendicitis. No further statistically significant differences in reader confidence for diagnosing appendicitis based on BMI or intra-abdominal fat were identified. There was no influence of BMI or intra-abdominal fat on appendiceal visualization. Increasing BMI was seen to improve reader confidence for one of three readers in patients that received both oral and intravenous contrast. No further effects of BMI or intra-abdominal fat on confidence in diagnosing or excluding appendicitis were seen. Neither BMI nor intra-abdominal fat were seen to influence appendiceal visualization.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahn SH, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy BL, Reinert SE, Cronan JJ (2002) Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology 225:159–164CrossRefPubMed Ahn SH, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy BL, Reinert SE, Cronan JJ (2002) Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology 225:159–164CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE 3rd, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1391–1396PubMed Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE 3rd, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1391–1396PubMed
3.
go back to reference Marincek B (2002) Nontraumatic abdominal emergencies: acute abdominal pain: diagnostic strategies. Eur Radiol 12:2136–2150PubMed Marincek B (2002) Nontraumatic abdominal emergencies: acute abdominal pain: diagnostic strategies. Eur Radiol 12:2136–2150PubMed
4.
go back to reference Lee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM, Polino J, Blank FS, Smithline HA (2006) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult Emergency Department patients. Emerg Radiol 12:150–157CrossRefPubMed Lee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM, Polino J, Blank FS, Smithline HA (2006) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult Emergency Department patients. Emerg Radiol 12:150–157CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ (2006) Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol 12:99–102CrossRefPubMed Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ (2006) Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol 12:99–102CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kim HC, Yang DM, Jin W, Park SJ (2008) Added diagnostic value of multiplanar reformation of multidetector CT data in patients with suspected appendicitis. Radiographics 28:393–405CrossRefPubMed Kim HC, Yang DM, Jin W, Park SJ (2008) Added diagnostic value of multiplanar reformation of multidetector CT data in patients with suspected appendicitis. Radiographics 28:393–405CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wolfe JM, Smithline H, Lee S, Coughlin B, Polino J, Blank F (2006) The impact of body mass index on concordance in the interpretation of matched noncontrast and contrast abdominal pelvic computed tomographic scans in ED patients with nontraumatic abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 24:144–148CrossRefPubMed Wolfe JM, Smithline H, Lee S, Coughlin B, Polino J, Blank F (2006) The impact of body mass index on concordance in the interpretation of matched noncontrast and contrast abdominal pelvic computed tomographic scans in ED patients with nontraumatic abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 24:144–148CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Zangos S, Steenburg SD, Phillips KD et al (2007) Acute abdomen: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations with 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography. Acad Radiol 14:19–27CrossRefPubMed Zangos S, Steenburg SD, Phillips KD et al (2007) Acute abdomen: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations with 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography. Acad Radiol 14:19–27CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucey BC et al (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(5):1282–1288 Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucey BC et al (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(5):1282–1288
10.
go back to reference Miller KD, Jones E, Yanovski JA, Shankar R, Feuerstein I, Falloon J (1998) Visceral abdominal-fat accumulation associated with use of indinavir. Lancet 351:871–875CrossRefPubMed Miller KD, Jones E, Yanovski JA, Shankar R, Feuerstein I, Falloon J (1998) Visceral abdominal-fat accumulation associated with use of indinavir. Lancet 351:871–875CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hodel J, Zins M, Desmottes L et al (2009) Location of the transition zone in CT of small-bowel obstruction: added value of multiplanar reformations. Abdom Imaging 34:35–41CrossRefPubMed Hodel J, Zins M, Desmottes L et al (2009) Location of the transition zone in CT of small-bowel obstruction: added value of multiplanar reformations. Abdom Imaging 34:35–41CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference MacKenzie JD, Nazario-Larrieu J, Cai T et al (2007) Reduced-dose CT: effect on reader evaluation in detection of pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1371–1379CrossRefPubMed MacKenzie JD, Nazario-Larrieu J, Cai T et al (2007) Reduced-dose CT: effect on reader evaluation in detection of pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1371–1379CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A et al (2006) Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology 239:759–767CrossRefPubMed Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A et al (2006) Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology 239:759–767CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Giuliano V, Giuliano C, Pinto F, Scaglione M (2005) CT method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate—clinical experience in 525 cases. Emerg Radiol 11:281–285CrossRefPubMed Giuliano V, Giuliano C, Pinto F, Scaglione M (2005) CT method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate—clinical experience in 525 cases. Emerg Radiol 11:281–285CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Paulson EK, Harris JP, Jaffe TA, Haugan PA, Nelson RC (2005) Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at multi-detector row CT. Radiology 235:879–885CrossRefPubMed Paulson EK, Harris JP, Jaffe TA, Haugan PA, Nelson RC (2005) Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at multi-detector row CT. Radiology 235:879–885CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zamboni M, Turcato E, Armellini F et al (1998) Sagittal abdominal diameter as a practical predictor of visceral fat. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22:655–660CrossRefPubMed Zamboni M, Turcato E, Armellini F et al (1998) Sagittal abdominal diameter as a practical predictor of visceral fat. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22:655–660CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kharbanda AB, Taylor GA, Bachur RG (2007) Suspected appendicitis in children: rectal and intravenous contrast-enhanced versus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 243:520–526CrossRefPubMed Kharbanda AB, Taylor GA, Bachur RG (2007) Suspected appendicitis in children: rectal and intravenous contrast-enhanced versus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 243:520–526CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M et al (2001) Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 220:683–690CrossRefPubMed Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M et al (2001) Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 220:683–690CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Keyzer C, Pargov S, Tack D, Créteur V, Bohy P, De Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA (2008) Normal appendix in adults: reproducibility of detection with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(2):507–514CrossRefPubMed Keyzer C, Pargov S, Tack D, Créteur V, Bohy P, De Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA (2008) Normal appendix in adults: reproducibility of detection with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(2):507–514CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Karabulut N, Boyaci N, Yagci B, Herek D, Kiroglu Y (2007) Computed tomography evaluation of the normal appendix: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:732–740CrossRefPubMed Karabulut N, Boyaci N, Yagci B, Herek D, Kiroglu Y (2007) Computed tomography evaluation of the normal appendix: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:732–740CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ganguli S, Raptopoulos V, Komlos F, Siewert B, Kruskal JB (2006) Right lower quadrant pain: value of the nonvisualized appendix in patients at multidetector CT. Radiology 241:175–180CrossRefPubMed Ganguli S, Raptopoulos V, Komlos F, Siewert B, Kruskal JB (2006) Right lower quadrant pain: value of the nonvisualized appendix in patients at multidetector CT. Radiology 241:175–180CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Influence of body habitus and use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using 64 MDCT
Publication date
01-11-2010
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0875-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Emergency Radiology 6/2010 Go to the issue