Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 4/2010

01-07-2010 | Original Article

Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay

Authors: Jeremiah D. Schuur, Grant Chu, Andrew Sucov

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Computed tomography of the abdomen and/or pelvis (CTAP) is frequently used in the emergency department (ED) allowing diagnosis of a variety of conditions, but requiring a prolonged period of preparation. To determine whether not requiring oral contrast for CTAP reduces ED length of stay (LOS). Retrospective cohort of adult patients visiting an academic ED over 13 weeks around a radiology protocol change. Before the change, many CTAPs required oral contrast; thereafter, oral contrast was not required. LOS was compared before and after the change among all adult ED patients. Among patients undergoing CTAP, adjusted LOS and time to CTAP were compared using multivariate linear regression. 20,464 adult ED visits occurred over the study period, including 1,806 where a CTAP was performed. Oral contrast usage decreased from 42.5% of CTAP to 12.2% (difference 30.3%, 95% confidence interval 38.7% to 46.3%). There was no change in LOS among all ED visits. Among ED visits where a CTAP was performed, median time to CTAP decreased by 27 min and median LOS decreased by 30 min. Adjusted LOS decreased from 324 min (312–337) to 297 min (285–309). Not routinely requiring oral contrast for CTAP in the ED is associated with a half-hour reduction in LOS among all patients undergoing CTAP.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McCaig LF, Nawar EN (2006) National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Advance data from vital and health statistics; no 372. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD McCaig LF, Nawar EN (2006) National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Advance data from vital and health statistics; no 372. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD
2.
go back to reference Torbati SS, Guss DA (2003) Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 10:823–829CrossRefPubMed Torbati SS, Guss DA (2003) Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 10:823–829CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ahn SH, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy BL et al (2002) Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology 225:159–164CrossRefPubMed Ahn SH, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy BL et al (2002) Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology 225:159–164CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA et al (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338:141–146CrossRefPubMed Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA et al (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338:141–146CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE III et al (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. Am J Roentgenol 174:1391–1396 Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE III et al (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. Am J Roentgenol 174:1391–1396
6.
go back to reference Brown J, Shesser R (2005) Computed tomography scan use in the emergency department evaluation of patients with nonspecific abdominal pain is increasing despite decreased patient acuity. Acad Emerg Med 12(5 supp):75CrossRef Brown J, Shesser R (2005) Computed tomography scan use in the emergency department evaluation of patients with nonspecific abdominal pain is increasing despite decreased patient acuity. Acad Emerg Med 12(5 supp):75CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hustey FM, Meldon SW, Banet GA et al (2005) The use of abdominal computed tomography in older ED patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 23:259–265CrossRefPubMed Hustey FM, Meldon SW, Banet GA et al (2005) The use of abdominal computed tomography in older ED patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 23:259–265CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Nagurney JT, Brown DFM, Chang Y et al (2003) Use of diagnostic testing in the emergency department for patients presenting with non-traumatic abdominal pain. J Emerg Med 25:363–371CrossRefPubMed Nagurney JT, Brown DFM, Chang Y et al (2003) Use of diagnostic testing in the emergency department for patients presenting with non-traumatic abdominal pain. J Emerg Med 25:363–371CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lee SI, Chew FS (1998) Radiology in the emergency department: technique for quantitative description of use and results. Am J Roentgenol 171:559–564 Lee SI, Chew FS (1998) Radiology in the emergency department: technique for quantitative description of use and results. Am J Roentgenol 171:559–564
10.
go back to reference Rodi SW, Grau MV, Orsini CM (2006) Evaluation of a fast track unit: alignment of resources and demand results in improved satisfaction and decreased length of stay for emergency department patients. Qual Manage Health Care 15:163–170 Rodi SW, Grau MV, Orsini CM (2006) Evaluation of a fast track unit: alignment of resources and demand results in improved satisfaction and decreased length of stay for emergency department patients. Qual Manage Health Care 15:163–170
12.
go back to reference Magid DJ, Asplin BR, Wears RL (2004) The quality gap: searching for the consequences of emergency department crowding. Ann Emerg Med 44:586–588CrossRefPubMed Magid DJ, Asplin BR, Wears RL (2004) The quality gap: searching for the consequences of emergency department crowding. Ann Emerg Med 44:586–588CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schull MJ, Vermeulen M, Slaughter G et al (2004) Emergency department crowding and thrombolysis delays in acute myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 44(6):577–585CrossRefPubMed Schull MJ, Vermeulen M, Slaughter G et al (2004) Emergency department crowding and thrombolysis delays in acute myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 44(6):577–585CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System (2006) Hospital-based emergency care: at the breaking point. Institute of Medicine, Washington D.C Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System (2006) Hospital-based emergency care: at the breaking point. Institute of Medicine, Washington D.C
15.
16.
go back to reference Williams JC Jr, Kim SC, Zarse CA et al (2004) Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi. J Endourology 18:937–941CrossRef Williams JC Jr, Kim SC, Zarse CA et al (2004) Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi. J Endourology 18:937–941CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Miller LA, Shanmuganathan K (2005) Multidetector CT evaluation of abdominal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 43:1079–1095CrossRefPubMed Miller LA, Shanmuganathan K (2005) Multidetector CT evaluation of abdominal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 43:1079–1095CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lee S, Coughlin B, Wolfe J et al (2006) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult Emergency Department patients. Emerg Rad 12:150–157CrossRef Lee S, Coughlin B, Wolfe J et al (2006) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult Emergency Department patients. Emerg Rad 12:150–157CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mun S, Ernst R, Chen K et al (2006) Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Rad 12:99–102CrossRef Mun S, Ernst R, Chen K et al (2006) Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Rad 12:99–102CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Huynh LN, Coughlin BF, Wolfe J et al (2004) Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast. Emerg Rad 10:310–313 Huynh LN, Coughlin BF, Wolfe J et al (2004) Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast. Emerg Rad 10:310–313
21.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Statistics notes: the use of transformation when comparing two means. BMJ 312:1153PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Statistics notes: the use of transformation when comparing two means. BMJ 312:1153PubMed
22.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Statistics notes: transformations, means, and confidence intervals. BMJ 312:1079PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Statistics notes: transformations, means, and confidence intervals. BMJ 312:1079PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick RH, Wittenberg J, Schaffer DL et al (1978) Scanning techniques in computed body tomography. Am J Roentgenol 130:1069–1075 Kirkpatrick RH, Wittenberg J, Schaffer DL et al (1978) Scanning techniques in computed body tomography. Am J Roentgenol 130:1069–1075
24.
go back to reference Hamlin DJ, Burgener FA (1981) Positive and negative contrast agents in CT evaluation of the abdomen and pelvis. J Comput Tomogr 5:82–90CrossRefPubMed Hamlin DJ, Burgener FA (1981) Positive and negative contrast agents in CT evaluation of the abdomen and pelvis. J Comput Tomogr 5:82–90CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Novelline RA, Rhea JT, Rao PM, Stuk JL (1999) Helical CT in emergency radiology. Radiology 213:321–339PubMed Novelline RA, Rhea JT, Rao PM, Stuk JL (1999) Helical CT in emergency radiology. Radiology 213:321–339PubMed
26.
go back to reference Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR (2005) A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am J Surgery 190:474–478CrossRef Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR (2005) A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am J Surgery 190:474–478CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Robinson WS (1950) Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Am Sociological Rvw 15:351–357CrossRef Robinson WS (1950) Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Am Sociological Rvw 15:351–357CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Fuson K (2006) ‘Patient’ says it all. USA Today, May 31, 2006 Fuson K (2006) ‘Patient’ says it all. USA Today, May 31, 2006
Metadata
Title
Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay
Authors
Jeremiah D. Schuur
Grant Chu
Andrew Sucov
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-009-0847-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Emergency Radiology 4/2010 Go to the issue