Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Otology

Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use

Authors: Sébastien Schmerber, O. Deguine, M. Marx, P. Van de Heyning, O. Sterkers, I. Mosnier, P. Garin, B. Godey, C. Vincent, F. Venail, M. Mondain, A. Deveze, J. P. Lavieille, A. Karkas

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new transcutaneous bone-conduction implant (BCI BB) in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss or with single-sided deafness (SSD), 1 year after surgical implantation. The study design is multicentric prospective, intra-subject measurements. Each subject is his/her own control. The setting is nine university hospitals: 7 French and 2 Belgian. Sixteen subjects with conductive or mixed hearing loss with bone-conduction hearing thresholds under the upper limit of 45 dB HL for each frequency from 500 to 4000 Hz, and 12 subjects with SSD (contralateral hearing within normal range) were enrolled in the study. All subjects were older than 18 years. The intervention is rehabilitative. The main outcome measure is the evaluation of skin safety, audiological measurements, benefit, and satisfaction questionnaires with a 1-year follow up. Skin safety was rated as good or very good. For the mixed or conductive hearing loss groups, the average functional gain (at 500 Hz, 1, 2, 4 kHz) was 26.1 dB HL (SD 13.7), and mean percentage of speech recognition in quiet at 65 dB was 95 % (vs 74 % unaided). In 5/6 SSD subjects, values of SRT in noise were lower with BB. Questionnaires revealed patient benefit and satisfaction. The transcutaneous BCI is very well tolerated at 1-year follow up, improves audiometric thresholds and intelligibility for speech in quiet and noise, and gives satisfaction to both patients with mixed and conductive hearing loss and patients with SSD.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Proops DW, Wolfaardt JF, Hodgetts WE, Somers T, Niparko JK, Wazen JJ, Sterkers O, Cremers CW, Tjellstrom A (2005) Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 195:2–12CrossRefPubMed Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Proops DW, Wolfaardt JF, Hodgetts WE, Somers T, Niparko JK, Wazen JJ, Sterkers O, Cremers CW, Tjellstrom A (2005) Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 195:2–12CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Faber HT, Dun CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK (2015) Loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing at 3 weeks: 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3746-y Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Faber HT, Dun CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK (2015) Loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing at 3 weeks: 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. doi:10.​1007/​s00405-015-3746-y
11.
go back to reference Nelissen RC, Mylanus EA, Kunst HP, Pennings RJ, Snik AF, Hol MK (2013) A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(12):3019–3025. doi:10.1007/s00405-013-2346-y CrossRefPubMed Nelissen RC, Mylanus EA, Kunst HP, Pennings RJ, Snik AF, Hol MK (2013) A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(12):3019–3025. doi:10.​1007/​s00405-013-2346-y CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hakansson B, Reinfeldt S, Eeg-Olofsson M, Ostli P, Taghavi H, Adler J, Gabrielsson J, Stenfelt S, Granstrom G (2010) A novel bone conduction implant (BCI): engineering aspects and pre-clinical studies. Int J Audiol 49(3):203–215. doi:10.3109/14992020903264462 CrossRefPubMed Hakansson B, Reinfeldt S, Eeg-Olofsson M, Ostli P, Taghavi H, Adler J, Gabrielsson J, Stenfelt S, Granstrom G (2010) A novel bone conduction implant (BCI): engineering aspects and pre-clinical studies. Int J Audiol 49(3):203–215. doi:10.​3109/​1499202090326446​2 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sprinzl G, Lenarz T, Ernst A, Hagen R, Wolf-Magele A, Mojallal H, Todt I, Mlynski R, Wolframm MD (2013) First European multicenter results with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant system: short-term safety and efficacy. Otol Neurotol 34(6):1076–1083. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828bb541 CrossRefPubMed Sprinzl G, Lenarz T, Ernst A, Hagen R, Wolf-Magele A, Mojallal H, Todt I, Mlynski R, Wolframm MD (2013) First European multicenter results with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant system: short-term safety and efficacy. Otol Neurotol 34(6):1076–1083. doi:10.​1097/​MAO.​0b013e31828bb541​ CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ihler F, Volbers L, Blum J, Matthias C, Canis M (2014) Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 35(2):211–215. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000208 CrossRefPubMed Ihler F, Volbers L, Blum J, Matthias C, Canis M (2014) Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 35(2):211–215. doi:10.​1097/​MAO.​0000000000000208​ CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Barbara M, Perotti M, Gioia B, Volpini L, Monini S (2013) Transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 133(10):1058–1064. doi:10.3109/00016489.2013.799293 CrossRefPubMed Barbara M, Perotti M, Gioia B, Volpini L, Monini S (2013) Transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 133(10):1058–1064. doi:10.​3109/​00016489.​2013.​799293 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bianchin G, Bonali M, Russo M, Tribi L (2015) Active bone conduction system: outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous device. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 77(1):17–26. doi:10.1159/000371425 CrossRefPubMed Bianchin G, Bonali M, Russo M, Tribi L (2015) Active bone conduction system: outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous device. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 77(1):17–26. doi:10.​1159/​000371425 CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hassepass F, Bulla S, Aschendorff A, Maier W, Traser L, Steinmetz C, Wesarg T, Arndt S (2015) The bonebridge as a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system: preliminary surgical and audiological results in children and adolescents. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(9):2235–2241. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3137-9 CrossRefPubMed Hassepass F, Bulla S, Aschendorff A, Maier W, Traser L, Steinmetz C, Wesarg T, Arndt S (2015) The bonebridge as a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system: preliminary surgical and audiological results in children and adolescents. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(9):2235–2241. doi:10.​1007/​s00405-014-3137-9 CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rahne T, Seiwerth I, Gotze G, Heider C, Radetzki F, Herzog M, Plontke SK (2015) Functional results after Bonebridge implantation in adults and children with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(11):3263–3269. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3403-x CrossRefPubMed Rahne T, Seiwerth I, Gotze G, Heider C, Radetzki F, Herzog M, Plontke SK (2015) Functional results after Bonebridge implantation in adults and children with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(11):3263–3269. doi:10.​1007/​s00405-014-3403-x CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Riss D, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WD, Blineder M, Flak S, Bachner A, Gstoettner W, Hamzavi JS (2014) Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant. Laryngoscope 124(12):2802–2806. doi:10.1002/lary.24832 CrossRefPubMed Riss D, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WD, Blineder M, Flak S, Bachner A, Gstoettner W, Hamzavi JS (2014) Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant. Laryngoscope 124(12):2802–2806. doi:10.​1002/​lary.​24832 CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Matsumoto N, Takumi Y, Cho B, Mori K, Usami S, Yamashita M, Hashizume M, Komune S (2014) Template-guided implantation of the Bonebridge: clinical experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3452-1 Matsumoto N, Takumi Y, Cho B, Mori K, Usami S, Yamashita M, Hashizume M, Komune S (2014) Template-guided implantation of the Bonebridge: clinical experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. doi:10.​1007/​s00405-014-3452-1
29.
go back to reference Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA (1994) Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95(2):1085–1099CrossRefPubMed Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA (1994) Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95(2):1085–1099CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Cox RM, Alexander GC (1995) The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 16(2):176–186CrossRefPubMed Cox RM, Alexander GC (1995) The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 16(2):176–186CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(6):415–422CrossRefPubMed Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(6):415–422CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Cox RM, Alexander GC (2002) The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol 41(1):30–35CrossRefPubMed Cox RM, Alexander GC (2002) The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol 41(1):30–35CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Sprinzl GM, Wolf-Magele A (2015) The Bonebridge Bone Conduction Hearing Implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature. Clin Otolaryngol. doi:10.1111/coa.12484 PubMed Sprinzl GM, Wolf-Magele A (2015) The Bonebridge Bone Conduction Hearing Implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature. Clin Otolaryngol. doi:10.​1111/​coa.​12484 PubMed
34.
go back to reference Rahne T, Seiwerth I, Gotze G, Heider C, Radetzki F, Herzog M, Plontke SK (2014) Functional results after Bonebridge implantation in adults and children with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3403-x Rahne T, Seiwerth I, Gotze G, Heider C, Radetzki F, Herzog M, Plontke SK (2014) Functional results after Bonebridge implantation in adults and children with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. doi:10.​1007/​s00405-014-3403-x
35.
go back to reference Desmet J, Wouters K, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P (2014) Long-term subjective benefit with a bone conduction implant sound processor in 44 patients with single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 35(6):1017–1025CrossRefPubMed Desmet J, Wouters K, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P (2014) Long-term subjective benefit with a bone conduction implant sound processor in 44 patients with single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 35(6):1017–1025CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Reinfeldt S, Hakansson B, Taghavi H, Eeg-Olofsson M (2015) New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review. Med Devices Evidence Res 8:79–93CrossRef Reinfeldt S, Hakansson B, Taghavi H, Eeg-Olofsson M (2015) New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review. Med Devices Evidence Res 8:79–93CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Huber AM, Sim JH, Xie YZ, Chatzimichalis M, Ullrich O, Röösli C (2013) The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneaously-activated bone anchored hearing device. Hear Res 301:93–99CrossRefPubMed Huber AM, Sim JH, Xie YZ, Chatzimichalis M, Ullrich O, Röösli C (2013) The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneaously-activated bone anchored hearing device. Hear Res 301:93–99CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Stenfelt S (2012) Transcranial attenuation of bone-conducted sound when stimulation is at the mastoid and at the bone conduction hearing aid position. Otol Neurotol 33(2):105–114CrossRefPubMed Stenfelt S (2012) Transcranial attenuation of bone-conducted sound when stimulation is at the mastoid and at the bone conduction hearing aid position. Otol Neurotol 33(2):105–114CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Rosen LF, Dragonette JE (2004) Functional impairments due to unilateral deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 113(12):987–993CrossRefPubMed Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Rosen LF, Dragonette JE (2004) Functional impairments due to unilateral deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 113(12):987–993CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Laske RD, Röösli C, Pfiffner F, Veraguth D, Huber AM (2015) Functional results and subjective benefit of a transcutaneous bone conduction device in patients with single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 36(36):1151–1156CrossRefPubMed Laske RD, Röösli C, Pfiffner F, Veraguth D, Huber AM (2015) Functional results and subjective benefit of a transcutaneous bone conduction device in patients with single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 36(36):1151–1156CrossRefPubMed
48.
49.
go back to reference Hol MK, Kunst SJ, Snik AF, Cremers CW (2010) Pilot study on the effectiveness of the conventional CROS, the transcranial CROS and the BAHA transcranial CROS in adults with unilateral inner ear deafness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(6):889–896. doi:10.1007/s00405-009-1147-9 CrossRefPubMed Hol MK, Kunst SJ, Snik AF, Cremers CW (2010) Pilot study on the effectiveness of the conventional CROS, the transcranial CROS and the BAHA transcranial CROS in adults with unilateral inner ear deafness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(6):889–896. doi:10.​1007/​s00405-009-1147-9 CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Hol MK, Kunst SJ, Snik AF, Bosman AJ, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2010) Bone-anchored hearing aids in patients with acquired and congenital unilateral inner ear deafness (Baha CROS): clinical evaluation of 56 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119(7):447–454CrossRefPubMed Hol MK, Kunst SJ, Snik AF, Bosman AJ, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2010) Bone-anchored hearing aids in patients with acquired and congenital unilateral inner ear deafness (Baha CROS): clinical evaluation of 56 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119(7):447–454CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Lin LM, Bowditch S, Anderson MJ, May B, Cox KM, Niparko JK (2006) Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification. Otol Neurotol 27(2):172–182. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000196421.30275.73 CrossRefPubMed Lin LM, Bowditch S, Anderson MJ, May B, Cox KM, Niparko JK (2006) Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification. Otol Neurotol 27(2):172–182. doi:10.​1097/​01.​mao.​0000196421.​30275.​73 CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Wazen JJ, Spitzer JB, Ghossaini SN, Fayad JN, Niparko JK, Cox K, Brackmann DE, Soli SD (2003) Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(3):248–254CrossRefPubMed Wazen JJ, Spitzer JB, Ghossaini SN, Fayad JN, Niparko JK, Cox K, Brackmann DE, Soli SD (2003) Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(3):248–254CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T (2011) Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 32(1):39–47. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181fcf271 CrossRefPubMed Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T (2011) Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 32(1):39–47. doi:10.​1097/​MAO.​0b013e3181fcf271​ CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Leterme G, Bernardeschi D, Bensemman A, Coudert C, Portal JJ, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, Vicaut E, Frachet B, Bozorg Grayeli A (2015) Contralateral routing of signal hearing aid versus transcutaneous bone conduction in single-sided deafness. Audiol Neurootol 20(4):251–260. doi:10.1159/000381329 (Epub 2015 May 22) CrossRefPubMed Leterme G, Bernardeschi D, Bensemman A, Coudert C, Portal JJ, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, Vicaut E, Frachet B, Bozorg Grayeli A (2015) Contralateral routing of signal hearing aid versus transcutaneous bone conduction in single-sided deafness. Audiol Neurootol 20(4):251–260. doi:10.​1159/​000381329 (Epub 2015 May 22) CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use
Authors
Sébastien Schmerber
O. Deguine
M. Marx
P. Van de Heyning
O. Sterkers
I. Mosnier
P. Garin
B. Godey
C. Vincent
F. Venail
M. Mondain
A. Deveze
J. P. Lavieille
A. Karkas
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4228-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 4/2017 Go to the issue