Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 12/2013

01-11-2013 | Otology

A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit

Authors: Rik C. Nelissen, Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus, Henricus P. M. Kunst, Ronald J. E. Pennings, Ad F. M. Snik, Myrthe K. S. Hol

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

This report provides the first short-term follow-up data on the Ponto bone-anchored hearing implant from our tertiary referral centre. Thirty-one consecutive patients with a mean age of 51 years who received the implant between October 2010 and December 2011 were included retrospectively in this study. Implant loss, skin reactions around the implant (according to Holgers’ grading system), revision surgery, and abutment replacements were retrospectively gathered from the patients’ files as objective outcome measures. To obtain information on subjective patient satisfaction, the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) was used. The mean follow-up period was 16.9 months (range 12.1–25.2 months). One implant was lost. Over a total of 94 follow-up visits, 21 skin reactions were observed in 16 patients: Holgers grade 1 (slight redness, no need for treatment) in 18.1 % of the visits,and grade 2 (redness and moist, needing conservative treatment) in 4.3 % of the visits. Four 6-mm abutments (12.9 %) were replaced for a 9-mm abutment during the follow-up period, of which one (3.2 %) was in combination with revision surgery. In one patient keloid formation around the implant was observed. The GBI revealed a moderate subjective benefit. The short-term results with these percutaneous implants demonstrate a clinically stable implant with a low percentage of skin reactions that require treatment. Long-term, prospective follow-up data are needed to draw firmer conclusions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tjellström A, Lindström J, Hallén O, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 2(4):304–310PubMed Tjellström A, Lindström J, Hallén O, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 2(4):304–310PubMed
2.
go back to reference Snik AFM, Mylanus EAM, Proops DW, Wolfaardt JF, Hodgetts WE, Somers T, Niparko JK, Wazen JJ, Sterkers O, Cremers CWRJ, Tjellström A (2005) Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 195:2–12PubMed Snik AFM, Mylanus EAM, Proops DW, Wolfaardt JF, Hodgetts WE, Somers T, Niparko JK, Wazen JJ, Sterkers O, Cremers CWRJ, Tjellström A (2005) Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 195:2–12PubMed
3.
go back to reference Dun CAJ, Faber HT, de Wolf MJF, Cremers CWRJ, Hol MKS (2011) An overview of different systems: the bone-anchored hearing aid. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 71:22–31. doi:10.1159/000323577 PubMed Dun CAJ, Faber HT, de Wolf MJF, Cremers CWRJ, Hol MKS (2011) An overview of different systems: the bone-anchored hearing aid. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 71:22–31. doi:10.​1159/​000323577 PubMed
8.
go back to reference Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(6):415–422PubMed Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(6):415–422PubMed
11.
go back to reference Dutt SN, McDermott A-L, Jelbert A, Reid AP, Proops DW (2002) The Glasgow benefit inventory in the evaluation of patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: quality of life issues. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 28:7–14PubMed Dutt SN, McDermott A-L, Jelbert A, Reid AP, Proops DW (2002) The Glasgow benefit inventory in the evaluation of patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: quality of life issues. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 28:7–14PubMed
12.
go back to reference Faber HT, Dun CAJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ, Hol MKS (2013) Bone-anchored hearing implant loading at 3 weeks: stability and tolerability after 6 months. Otol Neurotol 34(1):104–110. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318277a282 Faber HT, Dun CAJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ, Hol MKS (2013) Bone-anchored hearing implant loading at 3 weeks: stability and tolerability after 6 months. Otol Neurotol 34(1):104–110. doi:10.​1097/​MAO.​0b013e318277a282​
13.
go back to reference Gillett D, Fairley JW, Chandrashaker TS, Bean A, Gonzalez J (2006) Bone-anchored hearing aids: results of the first eight years of a programme in a district general hospital, assessed by the Glasgow benefit inventory. J Laryngol Otol 120(07):537–542. doi:10.1017/S0022215106001277 PubMedCrossRef Gillett D, Fairley JW, Chandrashaker TS, Bean A, Gonzalez J (2006) Bone-anchored hearing aids: results of the first eight years of a programme in a district general hospital, assessed by the Glasgow benefit inventory. J Laryngol Otol 120(07):537–542. doi:10.​1017/​S002221510600127​7 PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Holgers KM, Tjellström A, Bjursten LM, Erlandsson BE (1988) Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 9(1):56–59PubMed Holgers KM, Tjellström A, Bjursten LM, Erlandsson BE (1988) Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 9(1):56–59PubMed
19.
go back to reference Dun CAJ, de Wolf MJF, Hol MKS, Wigren S, Eeg-Olofsson M, Green K, Karlsmo A, Flynn MC, Stalfors J, Rothera M, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ (2011) Stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel baha implant system: six-month data from a multicenter clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol 32(6):1001–1007. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182267e9c PubMedCrossRef Dun CAJ, de Wolf MJF, Hol MKS, Wigren S, Eeg-Olofsson M, Green K, Karlsmo A, Flynn MC, Stalfors J, Rothera M, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ (2011) Stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel baha implant system: six-month data from a multicenter clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol 32(6):1001–1007. doi:10.​1097/​MAO.​0b013e3182267e9c​ PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zeitler DM, Herman BS, Snapp HA, Telischi FF, Angeli SI (2012) Ethnic disparity in skin complications following bone-anchored hearing aid implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 121(8):549–554PubMed Zeitler DM, Herman BS, Snapp HA, Telischi FF, Angeli SI (2012) Ethnic disparity in skin complications following bone-anchored hearing aid implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 121(8):549–554PubMed
21.
go back to reference Horstink L, Faber HT, de Wolf MJF, Dun CAJ, Cremers CWRJ, Hol MKS (2012) Titanium fixtures for bone-conduction devices and the influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Otol Neurotol 33(6):1013–1017. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318259b36c PubMed Horstink L, Faber HT, de Wolf MJF, Dun CAJ, Cremers CWRJ, Hol MKS (2012) Titanium fixtures for bone-conduction devices and the influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Otol Neurotol 33(6):1013–1017. doi:10.​1097/​MAO.​0b013e318259b36c​ PubMed
24.
go back to reference van der Pouw CTM, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ (1999) Percutaneous implants in the temporal bone for securing a bone conductor: surgical methods and results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108(6):532–536PubMed van der Pouw CTM, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ (1999) Percutaneous implants in the temporal bone for securing a bone conductor: surgical methods and results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108(6):532–536PubMed
27.
go back to reference Dun CAJ, Hol MKS, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ (2011) Fitting of an 8.5-millimeter abutment for bone conduction devices: indications and postintervention course. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 120(6):386–390PubMed Dun CAJ, Hol MKS, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ (2011) Fitting of an 8.5-millimeter abutment for bone conduction devices: indications and postintervention course. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 120(6):386–390PubMed
28.
go back to reference Bosman AJ, Snik AFM, Hol MKS, Mylanus EAM (In press) Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system—a comparison study. J Am Acad Audiol Bosman AJ, Snik AFM, Hol MKS, Mylanus EAM (In press) Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system—a comparison study. J Am Acad Audiol
29.
go back to reference Bosman AJ, Snik AFM, Hol MKS, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ (2011) Evaluation of Cochlear BP-100 and Oticon Ponto Pro Sound Processors. In: Poster session presented at: 3rd International Symposium on Bone Conduction Hearing-Craniofacial Osseointegration, Sarasota, 23–26 Mar 2011 Bosman AJ, Snik AFM, Hol MKS, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ (2011) Evaluation of Cochlear BP-100 and Oticon Ponto Pro Sound Processors. In: Poster session presented at: 3rd International Symposium on Bone Conduction Hearing-Craniofacial Osseointegration, Sarasota, 23–26 Mar 2011
Metadata
Title
A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit
Authors
Rik C. Nelissen
Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus
Henricus P. M. Kunst
Ronald J. E. Pennings
Ad F. M. Snik
Myrthe K. S. Hol
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2346-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 12/2013 Go to the issue