Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2022

01-04-2022 | Mastectomy | Original Article

Use of Inguinal Hernia Mesh (DynaMesh-ENDOLAP) in Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Authors: Ramesh Omranipour, Marzieh Mohammadizavieh, Sadaf Alipour

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The rate of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy is increasing, and providing enough coverage for the implant is mandatory; however the choice of appropriate mesh for implant coverage is controversial. Considering the high cost and the limited availability of breast-dedicated meshes in our country, we conducted this study to investigate the consequences of using a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh designed for endoscopic and laparoscopic hernia repair (ENDOLAP) as a coverage for breast prostheses in breast reconstruction.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on data of patients who had underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2019. After skin sparing mastectomy and subpectoral implant insertion, the exposed lower and lateral parts were covered with the mesh.

Results

Seventy-nine reconstructions were performed on 62 patients. The average follow-up was 31.9 months (ranges 6–102 months). Postoperative complications including small flap necrosis (3.8%), seroma (8.9%), infection (5.1%), hematoma (3.8%), malposition (1.3%), rippling (1.3%), grade two and three capsular contracture (2.5%), and chronic pain (1.3%) occurred in 19% of the operated breasts. The complication rate requiring intervention was 5.3%, and no implant loss was observed. None of the patients who received radiation developed complications.

Conclusion

ENDOLAP mesh is a cost-effective and safe option for implant coverage in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction, with an acceptable complication rate.

Level of evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay, J., Ervik, M., Lam, F., Colombet, M., Mery, L., Piñeros, M., Znaor, A., Soerjomataram, I. and Bray, F., (2020). Global cancer observatory: cancer today. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon. (https://gco.iarc.fr/today, accessed February 2021). Ferlay, J., Ervik, M., Lam, F., Colombet, M., Mery, L., Piñeros, M., Znaor, A., Soerjomataram, I. and Bray, F., (2020). Global cancer observatory: cancer today. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon. (https://​gco.​iarc.​fr/​today, accessed February 2021).
2.
go back to reference Dieterich M, Angres J, Stachs A, Glass A, Reimer T, Gerber B, Stubert J (2015) Patient-report satisfaction and health-related quality of life in TiLOOP® Bra-assisted or implant-based breast reconstruction alone. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39(4):523–533CrossRef Dieterich M, Angres J, Stachs A, Glass A, Reimer T, Gerber B, Stubert J (2015) Patient-report satisfaction and health-related quality of life in TiLOOP® Bra-assisted or implant-based breast reconstruction alone. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39(4):523–533CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gómez-Modet, S. and Tejedor, L.,( 2020). Synthetic Mesh in Immediate Breast Reconstruction. In: Gómez-Modet, S. and Tejedor, L. Manchev L., Parikesit AA., Breast Cancer and Breast Reconstruction. Intechopen: London. pp 141-159. Gómez-Modet, S. and Tejedor, L.,( 2020). Synthetic Mesh in Immediate Breast Reconstruction. In: Gómez-Modet, S. and Tejedor, L. Manchev L., Parikesit AA., Breast Cancer and Breast Reconstruction. Intechopen: London. pp 141-159.
4.
go back to reference Gabriel A, Nahabedian MY, Maxwell GP, Storm T (2020) Spear’s surgery of the breast: Principles and Art. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 4th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, PA Gabriel A, Nahabedian MY, Maxwell GP, Storm T (2020) Spear’s surgery of the breast: Principles and Art. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 4th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, PA
5.
go back to reference Paepke S, Ohlinger R, Klein E, Thill M (2018) Prepectoral implant placement in plastic-reconstructive breast surgery–a contribution to the discussion. Senologie-Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und-therapie 15(02):115–119CrossRef Paepke S, Ohlinger R, Klein E, Thill M (2018) Prepectoral implant placement in plastic-reconstructive breast surgery–a contribution to the discussion. Senologie-Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und-therapie 15(02):115–119CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Öttinger AP, Junge K, Schumpelick V (2002) PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes. Biomaterials 23(16):3487–3493CrossRef Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Öttinger AP, Junge K, Schumpelick V (2002) PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes. Biomaterials 23(16):3487–3493CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bilsel Y, Abci I (2012) The search for ideal hernia repair; mesh materials and types. Int J Surg 10(6):317–321CrossRef Bilsel Y, Abci I (2012) The search for ideal hernia repair; mesh materials and types. Int J Surg 10(6):317–321CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brooke S, Mesa J, Uluer M, Michelotti B, Moyer K, Neves RI, Potochny J (2012) Complications in tissue expander breast reconstruction: a comparison of AlloDerm, DermaMatrix, and FlexHD acellular inferior pole dermal slings. Ann Plast Surg 69(4):347–349CrossRef Brooke S, Mesa J, Uluer M, Michelotti B, Moyer K, Neves RI, Potochny J (2012) Complications in tissue expander breast reconstruction: a comparison of AlloDerm, DermaMatrix, and FlexHD acellular inferior pole dermal slings. Ann Plast Surg 69(4):347–349CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pompei S, Evangelidou D, Arelli F, Ferrante G (2017) The use of TIGR matrix in breast aesthetic and reconstructive surgery: is a resorbable synthetic mesh a viable alternative to acellular dermal matrices? Clin Plast Surg 45(1):65–73CrossRef Pompei S, Evangelidou D, Arelli F, Ferrante G (2017) The use of TIGR matrix in breast aesthetic and reconstructive surgery: is a resorbable synthetic mesh a viable alternative to acellular dermal matrices? Clin Plast Surg 45(1):65–73CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Machleidt A, Schmidt-Feuerheerd N, Blohmer JU, Ohlinger R, Kueper J, von Waldenfels G, Dittmer S, Paepke S, Klein E (2018) Reconstructive breast surgery with partially absorbable bi-component Seragyn® BR soft mesh: an outcome analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298(4):755–761CrossRef Machleidt A, Schmidt-Feuerheerd N, Blohmer JU, Ohlinger R, Kueper J, von Waldenfels G, Dittmer S, Paepke S, Klein E (2018) Reconstructive breast surgery with partially absorbable bi-component Seragyn® BR soft mesh: an outcome analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298(4):755–761CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E (2010) Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(2):429–436CrossRef Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E (2010) Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(2):429–436CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dieterich M, Paepke S, Zwiefel K, Dieterich H, Blohmer J, Faridi A, Klein E, Gerber B, Nestle-Kraemling C (2013) Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(1):8e–19eCrossRef Dieterich M, Paepke S, Zwiefel K, Dieterich H, Blohmer J, Faridi A, Klein E, Gerber B, Nestle-Kraemling C (2013) Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(1):8e–19eCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tessler O, Reish RG, Maman DY, Smith BL, Austen WG Jr (2014) Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(2):90e–99eCrossRef Tessler O, Reish RG, Maman DY, Smith BL, Austen WG Jr (2014) Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(2):90e–99eCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rietjens M, De Lorenzi F, Venturino M, Petit JY (2005) The suspension technique to avoid the use of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):467–470CrossRef Rietjens M, De Lorenzi F, Venturino M, Petit JY (2005) The suspension technique to avoid the use of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):467–470CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hallberg H, Lewin R, Elander A, Hansson E (2018) TIGR® matrix surgical mesh–a two-year follow-up study and complication analysis in 65 immediate breast reconstructions. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 52(4):253–258CrossRef Hallberg H, Lewin R, Elander A, Hansson E (2018) TIGR® matrix surgical mesh–a two-year follow-up study and complication analysis in 65 immediate breast reconstructions. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 52(4):253–258CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chowbey PK, Garg N, Sharma A, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M, Mittal T (2010) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair. Surg Endosc 24(12):3073–3079CrossRef Chowbey PK, Garg N, Sharma A, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M, Mittal T (2010) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair. Surg Endosc 24(12):3073–3079CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Potter S, Conroy EJ, Cutress RI, Williamson PR, Whisker L, Thrush S, Skillman J, Barnes NL, Mylvaganam S, Teasdale E, Jain A (2019) Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. The Lancet Oncol 20(2):254–266CrossRef Potter S, Conroy EJ, Cutress RI, Williamson PR, Whisker L, Thrush S, Skillman J, Barnes NL, Mylvaganam S, Teasdale E, Jain A (2019) Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. The Lancet Oncol 20(2):254–266CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chen G, Zhang Y, Xue J, Zhu X, Liu C, Sun L, Gu X, Zhang H, Liu C (2019) Surgical outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction using TiLoop Bra mesh combined with pectoralis major disconnection. Ann Plast Surg 83(4):396–400CrossRef Chen G, Zhang Y, Xue J, Zhu X, Liu C, Sun L, Gu X, Zhang H, Liu C (2019) Surgical outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction using TiLoop Bra mesh combined with pectoralis major disconnection. Ann Plast Surg 83(4):396–400CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Momoh AO, Ahmed R, Kelley BP, Aliu O, Kidwell KM, Kozlow JH, Chung KC (2014) A systematic review of complications of implant-based breast reconstruction with prereconstruction and postreconstruction radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 21(1):118–124CrossRef Momoh AO, Ahmed R, Kelley BP, Aliu O, Kidwell KM, Kozlow JH, Chung KC (2014) A systematic review of complications of implant-based breast reconstruction with prereconstruction and postreconstruction radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 21(1):118–124CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Varghese J, Gohari SS, Rizki H, Langridge B, Kümmel S, Johnson L, Schmid P (2020) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on complications following immediate breast reconstruction. Breast 55:55–62CrossRef Varghese J, Gohari SS, Rizki H, Langridge B, Kümmel S, Johnson L, Schmid P (2020) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on complications following immediate breast reconstruction. Breast 55:55–62CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Use of Inguinal Hernia Mesh (DynaMesh-ENDOLAP) in Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Authors
Ramesh Omranipour
Marzieh Mohammadizavieh
Sadaf Alipour
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02581-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2022 Go to the issue