Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2022

01-04-2022 | Fat Grafting | Original Article

Effect of Diameter and Fenestration Area of the Liposuction Cannula on the Viability of the Adipocytes

Authors: Gabriel A. Mecott, Cynthia M. Gonzalez-Cantu, Pablo J. Moreno-Peña, Pablo P. Flores, Yanko Castro-Govea, Roberto M. de Oca-Luna, Jose Juan Perez-Trujillo, Mauricio M. Garcia-Perez

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Loss of volume is perhaps the most frustrating problem of fat grafting. The process of fat grafting depends on different variables such as harvesting, processing, and injection techniques. Results between studies that evaluate the effect of the cannula size on fat graft survival have been controversial. However, the role of the fenestration area of the cannula has not been described.

Methods

Four custom-made cannulas with a single fenestration were used for this study. Cannulas vary in diameter and area of the fenestration. Healthy patients seeking primary liposuction of the abdomen for aesthetic reasons were included. Lipoaspiration was performed in a clockwise pattern, and the order of the cannulas was rotated. Negative pressure was maintained at 0.8 atm at all times. Ten ml of fat, obtained from the suction tube, was poured into 20-ml conical centrifugal tubes for further processing. One gram of lipoaspirate was extracted from each sample, and acridine orange stain was added. Adipocytes were extracted, extended in a frotis, and observed by a histologist (masked fashion) under fluorescence microscopy. Viability was reported in percentages per sample.

Results

The overall viability was 64.75% ± 18.58. The viability of the obtained samples ranged from 66.51± 20.66 % to 62.83 ± 18.1. In further analysis, comparing the viability according to the shaft diameter and fenestration area, there was no significant difference among groups.

Conclusions

Neither the diameter of the cannula nor the size of the fenestrations are determining factors to affect the viability of the adipocytes.

No Level Assigned

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peer LA (1950) Loss of weight and volume in human fat grafts: with postulation of a “cell survival theory.” Plast Reconstr Surg 5(3):217–230CrossRef Peer LA (1950) Loss of weight and volume in human fat grafts: with postulation of a “cell survival theory.” Plast Reconstr Surg 5(3):217–230CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Peer LA (1956) The neglected “free fat graft”, its behavior and clinical use. Am J Surg 92(1):40–47CrossRef Peer LA (1956) The neglected “free fat graft”, its behavior and clinical use. Am J Surg 92(1):40–47CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chajchir A (1996) Fat injection: long-term follow-up. Aesthet Plast Surg 20(4):291–296CrossRef Chajchir A (1996) Fat injection: long-term follow-up. Aesthet Plast Surg 20(4):291–296CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mikus JL, Koufman JA, Kilpatrick SE (1995) Fate of liposuctioned and purified autologous fat injections in the canine vocal fold. Laryngoscope 105(1):17–22CrossRef Mikus JL, Koufman JA, Kilpatrick SE (1995) Fate of liposuctioned and purified autologous fat injections in the canine vocal fold. Laryngoscope 105(1):17–22CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nguyen A, Pasyk KA, Bouvier TN, Hassett CA, Argenta LC (1990) Comparative study of survival of autologous adipose tissue taken and transplanted by different techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 85(3):378–386CrossRef Nguyen A, Pasyk KA, Bouvier TN, Hassett CA, Argenta LC (1990) Comparative study of survival of autologous adipose tissue taken and transplanted by different techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 85(3):378–386CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Niechajev I, Sevćuk O (1994) Long-term results of fat transplantation: clinical and histologic studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 94(3):496–506CrossRef Niechajev I, Sevćuk O (1994) Long-term results of fat transplantation: clinical and histologic studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 94(3):496–506CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boschert MT, Beckert BW, Puckett CL, Concannon MJ (2002) Analysis of lipocyte viability after liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(2):761–765CrossRef Boschert MT, Beckert BW, Puckett CL, Concannon MJ (2002) Analysis of lipocyte viability after liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(2):761–765CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Illouz Y-G (1990) Fat injection: a four-year clinical trial. Lipoplasty theory Pract blunt suction lipectomy Bost Little Brown. 239-246 Illouz Y-G (1990) Fat injection: a four-year clinical trial. Lipoplasty theory Pract blunt suction lipectomy Bost Little Brown. 239-246
9.
go back to reference Eto H, Kato H, Suga H et al (2012) The fate of adipocytes after nonvascularized fat grafting: evidence of early death and replacement of adipocytes. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(5):1081–1092CrossRef Eto H, Kato H, Suga H et al (2012) The fate of adipocytes after nonvascularized fat grafting: evidence of early death and replacement of adipocytes. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(5):1081–1092CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fodor PB, Cimino WW, Watson JP, Tahernia A (2005) Suction-assisted lipoplasty: physics, optimization, and clinical verification. Aesthet Surg J 25(3):234–246CrossRef Fodor PB, Cimino WW, Watson JP, Tahernia A (2005) Suction-assisted lipoplasty: physics, optimization, and clinical verification. Aesthet Surg J 25(3):234–246CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Erdim M, Tezel E, Numanoglu A, Sav A (2009) The effects of the size of liposuction cannula on adipocyte survival and the optimum temperature for fat graft storage: an experimental study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62(9):1210–1214CrossRef Erdim M, Tezel E, Numanoglu A, Sav A (2009) The effects of the size of liposuction cannula on adipocyte survival and the optimum temperature for fat graft storage: an experimental study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62(9):1210–1214CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Özsoy Z, Kul Z, Bilir A (2006) The role of cannula diameter in improved adipocyte viability: a quantitative analysis. Aesthet Surg J 26(3):287–289CrossRef Özsoy Z, Kul Z, Bilir A (2006) The role of cannula diameter in improved adipocyte viability: a quantitative analysis. Aesthet Surg J 26(3):287–289CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kirkham JC, Lee JH, Medina MA III, McCormack MC, Randolph MA, Austen WG Jr (2012) The impact of liposuction cannula size on adipocyte viability. Ann Plast Surg 69(4):479–481CrossRef Kirkham JC, Lee JH, Medina MA III, McCormack MC, Randolph MA, Austen WG Jr (2012) The impact of liposuction cannula size on adipocyte viability. Ann Plast Surg 69(4):479–481CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shiffman MA, Mirrafati S (2001) Fat transfer techniques: the effect of harvest and transfer methods on adipocyte viability and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg 27(9):819–826PubMed Shiffman MA, Mirrafati S (2001) Fat transfer techniques: the effect of harvest and transfer methods on adipocyte viability and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg 27(9):819–826PubMed
15.
go back to reference Neuber F (1893) Fettransplantation. Chir Kongr Verhandl Dsch Gesellch Chir 22:66 Neuber F (1893) Fettransplantation. Chir Kongr Verhandl Dsch Gesellch Chir 22:66
16.
go back to reference Lexer E (1911) Uber freie Fettransplantation. Klin Ther Wehnschr 18:53 Lexer E (1911) Uber freie Fettransplantation. Klin Ther Wehnschr 18:53
17.
go back to reference Gurney CE (1938) Experimental study of the behavior of free fat transplants. Surgery 3(5):679–692 Gurney CE (1938) Experimental study of the behavior of free fat transplants. Surgery 3(5):679–692
18.
go back to reference Del Vecchio D, Rohrich RJ (2012) A classification of clinical fat grafting: different problems, different solutions. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(3):511–522CrossRef Del Vecchio D, Rohrich RJ (2012) A classification of clinical fat grafting: different problems, different solutions. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(3):511–522CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kato H, Mineda K, Eto H et al (2014) Degeneration, regeneration, and cicatrization after fat grafting: dynamic total tissue remodeling during the first 3 months. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3):303e–313eCrossRef Kato H, Mineda K, Eto H et al (2014) Degeneration, regeneration, and cicatrization after fat grafting: dynamic total tissue remodeling during the first 3 months. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3):303e–313eCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Marchand F (1919) Ueber die Veranderungen des Fettgewebes nach der Transplantation. Beitr Pathol Anat Allg Pathol. 66:32 Marchand F (1919) Ueber die Veranderungen des Fettgewebes nach der Transplantation. Beitr Pathol Anat Allg Pathol. 66:32
21.
go back to reference Khouri Jr RK, Khouri R-ER, Lujan-Hernandez JR, Khouri KR, Lancerotto L, Orgill DP (2014) Diffusion and perfusion: the keys to fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob open. 2(9) Khouri Jr RK, Khouri R-ER, Lujan-Hernandez JR, Khouri KR, Lancerotto L, Orgill DP (2014) Diffusion and perfusion: the keys to fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob open. 2(9)
22.
go back to reference Carpaneda CA, Ribeiro MT (1993) Study of the histologic alterations and viability of the adipose graft in humans. Aesthet Plast Surg 17(1):43–47CrossRef Carpaneda CA, Ribeiro MT (1993) Study of the histologic alterations and viability of the adipose graft in humans. Aesthet Plast Surg 17(1):43–47CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vazquez OA, Markowitz MI, Becker H (2020) Fat graft size: relationship between cannula and needle diameters. Cureus. 12(4) Vazquez OA, Markowitz MI, Becker H (2020) Fat graft size: relationship between cannula and needle diameters. Cureus. 12(4)
24.
go back to reference James IB, Bourne DA, DiBernardo G et al (2018) The architecture of fat grafting II: Impact of cannula diameter. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(5):1219–1225CrossRef James IB, Bourne DA, DiBernardo G et al (2018) The architecture of fat grafting II: Impact of cannula diameter. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(5):1219–1225CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Leong DTW, Hutmacher DW, Chew FT, Lim T-C (2005) Viability and adipogenic potential of human adipose tissue processed cell population obtained from pump-assisted and syringe-assisted liposuction. J Dermatol Sci 37(3):169–176CrossRef Leong DTW, Hutmacher DW, Chew FT, Lim T-C (2005) Viability and adipogenic potential of human adipose tissue processed cell population obtained from pump-assisted and syringe-assisted liposuction. J Dermatol Sci 37(3):169–176CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tong Y, Liu P, Wang Y, et al (2018) The effect of liposuction cannula diameter on fat retention—based on a rheological simulation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 6(11) Tong Y, Liu P, Wang Y, et al (2018) The effect of liposuction cannula diameter on fat retention—based on a rheological simulation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 6(11)
28.
go back to reference Li K, Gao J, Zhang Z et al (2013) Selection of donor site for fat grafting and cell isolation. Aesthet Plast Surg 37(1):153–158CrossRef Li K, Gao J, Zhang Z et al (2013) Selection of donor site for fat grafting and cell isolation. Aesthet Plast Surg 37(1):153–158CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lee JH, Kirkham JC, McCormack MC et al (2012) A novel approach to adipocyte analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:380CrossRef Lee JH, Kirkham JC, McCormack MC et al (2012) A novel approach to adipocyte analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:380CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of Diameter and Fenestration Area of the Liposuction Cannula on the Viability of the Adipocytes
Authors
Gabriel A. Mecott
Cynthia M. Gonzalez-Cantu
Pablo J. Moreno-Peña
Pablo P. Flores
Yanko Castro-Govea
Roberto M. de Oca-Luna
Jose Juan Perez-Trujillo
Mauricio M. Garcia-Perez
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02712-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2022 Go to the issue