Top

International Orthopaedics

Published in:

Open Access 01-03-2017 | Original Paper

Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Authors: Maziar Mohaddes, Peter Cnudde, Ola Rolfson, Alexander Wall, Johan Kärrholm

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2017

Abstract

Purpose

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common reason for revision. The last decade fostered a significant increase in the use of dual-mobility cups (DMCs). Here we report our study on the short-term survival rate of a cemented DMC reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) compared with other cemented designs used in first-time revision due to dislocation.

Methods

During 2005–2015, 984 first-time revisions for dislocation were reported to SHAR. In 436 of these cases a cemented dual articular cup was used. During the same time period, 355 revisions performed with a standard cemented cup (femoral head size 28–36 mm) were reported to the SHAR. Patients receiving a DMC were slightly older (75 years, p = 0.005). Re-revision for all reasons was used as primary endpoint. We also anlaysed risk for re-revision of the acetabular component and re-revision due to dislocation. Kaplan–Meier implant survival and a Cox regression analyses adjusted for age and gender were performed.

Results

Implant survival at 4 years for all reasons (91% ± 3.7% vs 86% ± 4.1%, p = 0.02), and especially for re-operation because of dislocation, favours the DMC group (96% ± 3.0% vs 92% ± 3.3%, p = 0.001).

Discussion

Our findings indicate that use of a cemented DMC reduces the short- to mid-term risk of a second revision in first-time revisions compared with classic cup designs. Longer follow-up is needed to establish any long-term clinical advantages when DMCs are used in revisions performed due to dislocation.

Available only for authorised users

Khatod M, Cafri G, Namba RS, Inacio MC, Paxton EW (2014) Risk factors for total hip arthroplasty aseptic revision. J Arthroplasty 29(7):1412–7CrossRefPubMed

Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):128–33CrossRefPubMed

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide:AOA; 2015. 2015 [cited 2016 31 October 2016].

Garellick, G., Kärrholm, J., Lindahl, H., Malchau, H., Rogmark, C., Rolfson, O. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report 2014. 2015 [cited 2016 31 October 2016].

Andersen AV, Kjersgaard AG, Solgaard S (2013) Trilogy-constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation. ISRN Orthop, 2013: 629201

Guyen O, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME (2008) Modes of failure of Osteonics constrained tripolar implants: a retrospective analysis of forty-three failed implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(7):1553–60CrossRefPubMed

Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Adams JB, Russell JH, Groseth KL (2005) The long-term outcome of 755 consecutive constrained acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty examining the successes and failures. J Arthroplasty 20(7 Suppl 3):93–102CrossRefPubMed

Cooper HJ, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Tetreault M, Paprosky WG, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ (2012) Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(18):1655–61CrossRefPubMed

Duffy GP, Wannomae KK, Rowell SL, Muratoglu OK (2009) Fracture of a cross-linked polyethylene liner due to impingement. J Arthroplasty 24(1):158 e15–9CrossRef

10.

Burroughs BR, Hallstrom B, Golladay GJ, Hoeffel D, Harris WH (2005) Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 20(1):11–9CrossRefPubMed

11.

Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2005) Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(11):2456–63PubMed

12.

Jameson SS, Lees D, James P, Serrano-Pedraza I, Partington PF, Muller SD, Meek RM, Reed MR (2011) Lower rates of dislocation with increased femoral head size after primary total hip replacement: a five-year analysis of NHS patients in England. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93(7):876–80CrossRef

13.

Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Greidanus NV, Bohm ER, Petrak MJ, Della Valle CJ, Gross AE (2012) The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):351–6CrossRefPubMed

14.

Farizon F, de Lavison R, Azoulai JJ, Bousquet G (1998) Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility - A twelve-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 22(4):219–224CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Langlais FL, Gaucher F, Musset T, Chaix O (2008) Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:389–395CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Leiber-Wackenheim F, Brunschweiler B, Ehlinger M, Gabriona A, Mertla P (2011) Treatment of recurrent THR dislocation using of a cementless dual-mobility cup: A 59 cases series with a mean 8 years’ follow-up. Elsevier, 97: 8–13

17.

Hamadouche M, Biau DJ, Huten D, Musset T, Gaucher F (2010) The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3248–3254CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Béjui-Hugues J (2009) Use of a Dual Mobility Socket to Manage Total Hip Arthroplasty Instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:465–472CrossRefPubMed

19.

Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Aslanian T, Verdier R (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess wether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38(6):1125–1129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Leiber-Wackenheim F, Brunschweiler B, Ehlinger M, Gabrion A, Mertl P (2011) Treatment of recurrent THR dislocation using of a cementless dual-mobility cup: a 59 cases series with a mean 8 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(1):8–13CrossRefPubMed

21.

van Heumen M, Heesterbeek PJ, Swierstra BA, Van Hellemondt GG, Goosen JH (2015) Dual mobility acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty for persistent dislocation: no dislocations in 50 hips after 1–5 years. J Orthop Traumatol 16(1):15–20CrossRefPubMed

22.

Jakobsen T, Kappel A, Hansen F, Krarup N (2014) The dislocating hip replacement - revision with a dual mobility cup in 56 consecutive patients. Open Orthop J 8:268–71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Philippot R, Adam P, Reckhaus M, Delangle F, Verdot F-X, Curvale G, Farizon F (2009) Prevention of dislocation in total hip revision surgery using a dual mobility design. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(6):407–413CrossRefPubMed

24.

Prudhon JL, Steffann F, Ferreira A, Verdier R, Aslanian T, Caton J (2014) Cementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision. Int Orthop 38(12):2463–2468CrossRefPubMed

25.

Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J (2012) Dual-mobility cups for revision due to instability are associated with a low rate of re-revisions due to dislocation: 228 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 83(6):566–571CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Leclercq S, El Blidi S, Aubriot J (1995) Traitement de la luxation récidivante de prothèse totale de hanche par le cotyle de Bousquet. A propos de 13 cas. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 81(5):389–394PubMed

27.

Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P, Zügner R, Regnér H, Garellick G (2001) Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 72(2):113–119CrossRef

28.

Timperley AJ, Biau D, Chew D, Whitehouse SL (2016) Dislocation after total hip replacement: there is no such thing as a safe zone for socket placement with the posterior approach. Hip Int

29.

Grazioli A, Ek ETH, Rüdiger HA (2012) Biomechanical concept and clinical outcome of dual mobility cups. Int Orthop 36(12):2411–2418CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Ritter MA (1995) The Cemented Acetabular Component of a Total Hip Replacement: All Polyethylene Versus Metal Backing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 311:69–75

31.

Peraldi P, Vandenbussche E, Augereau B (1996) Bad clinical results of cemented caps with metal-backed acetabular components. 124 cases with 21 months follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 83(6):561–565

32.

Saragaglia D, Ruatti S, Refaie R (2013) Relevance of a press-fit dual mobility cup to deal with recurrent dislocation of conventional total hip arthroplasty: a 29-case series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23(4):431–436CrossRefPubMed

Title: Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
Authors: Maziar Mohaddes
Peter Cnudde
Ola Rolfson
Alexander Wall
Johan Kärrholm
Publication date: 01-03-2017
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: International Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3381-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Discussion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Discussion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Dual-mobility cup: a new French revolution

Equivalent wear performance of dual mobility bearing compared with standard bearing in total hip arthroplasty: in vitro study

Total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: safe and efficient strategy against post-operative dislocation

Dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty five years and over ten years of follow-up

Dual mobility cups provide biomechanical advantages in situations at risk for dislocation: a finite element analysis

Contemporary dual-mobility cup regional and private register: methodology and results