Top

International Orthopaedics

Published in:

01-03-2017 | Original Paper

Total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: safe and efficient strategy against post-operative dislocation

Authors: Cécile Batailler, Camdon Fary, Pierre Batailler, Elvire Servien, Philippe Neyret, Sébastien Lustig

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2017

Abstract

Aim

We hypothesize that a dual mobility cup can be safely used via the direct anterior approach, without increasing the risk of complications or incorrect positioning.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study compared 201 primary total hip arthroplasties using a dual mobility cup performed via direct anterior approach without a traction table, to 101 arthroplasties performed via posterolateral approach. Implant positioning, function scores, and early complications were recorded.

Results

Implant positioning was appropriate in both groups, with a higher cup anteversion in direct anterior approach. The complications rates were similar in both groups, with no dislocation or infection.

Conclusion

The direct anterior approach without traction table associated with a dual mobility cup does not increase the risk of complications or non-optimal positioning of implants. This strategy is interesting for patients with high risk of post-operative dislocation.

Patel PD, Potts A, Froimson MI (2007) The dislocating hip arthroplasty: prevention and treatment. J Arthroplasty 22(4 Suppl 1):86–90. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.111 CrossRefPubMed

Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2004) The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(1):9–14CrossRefPubMed

Caton J, Aslanian T, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Descamps L, Derhi G, Puch JM (2016) Dual mobility cup: a new THA revolution. E-mémoires de l’académie nationale de chirurgie 15(1):4–10

Tsukada S, Wakui M (2015) Lower dislocation rate following total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach than via posterior approach: five-year-average follow-up results. Open Orthop J 9:157–162. doi:10.2174/1874325001509010157

Judet J, Judet R (1950) The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 32-B(2):166–173PubMed

Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B (2004) Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:164–173CrossRef

Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T (2005) Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:115–124CrossRefPubMed

Poehling-Monaghan KL, Kamath AF, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW (2015) Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):623–631. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3827-z CrossRefPubMed

Farizon F, de Lavison R, Azoulai JJ, Bousquet G (1998) Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility. A twelve-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 22(4):219–224CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME, Berry DJ (1995) Anterior iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10(4):546–549CrossRefPubMed

11.

Tracol P, Beracassat R, Pagazani G, Vandenbussche E (2011) Intérêt d’une cupule anatomique à double mobilité dans la prévention du syndrome du psoas : à propos d’une série de 259 cas. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 97(suppl 7):350CrossRef

12.

Vermersch T, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy MH (2015) Prospective longitudinal study of one hundred patients with total hip arthroplasty using a second-generation cementless dual-mobility cup. Int Orthop 39(11):2097–2101. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2985-2 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Hanna SA, Somerville L, McCalden RW, Naudie DD, MacDonald SJ (2016) Highly cross-linked polyethylene decreases the rate of revision of total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene at 13 years’ follow-up. Bone Joint J 98-B(1):28–32. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36527 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Muller DA, Zingg PO, Dora C (2014) Anterior minimally invasive approach for total hip replacement: five-year survivorship and learning curve. Hip Int 24(3):277–283. doi:10.5301/hipint.5000108 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Adam P, Philippe R, Ehlinger M, Roche O, Bonnomet F, Mole D, Fessy MH, French Society of Orthopaedic S, Traumatology (2012) Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(3):296–300. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2012.01.005 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Hueter C (1883) Funfte Abteilung: die Verletzung und Krankheiten des Hüftgelenkes, neun und zwanzigstes capitel. In: Hueter (ed) Grundriss der Chirurgie. FCW Vogel, Leipzig, pp 129–200

17.

Judet J, Judet H (1985) Anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Presse Med 14(18):1031–1033PubMed

18.

Lustig S (2015) Anterior approach (without specific table) and dual mobility acetabular component. Maîtrise orthopédique 243:1–5

19.

Ait Si Selmi T, Lustig S, Dojcinovic S, Neyret P (2006) Morbidity and reliability of total hip implants positioning using the posterior minimally invasive approach: a consecutive series of 100 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92(8):752–759CrossRefPubMed

20.

Widmer KH (2004) A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 19(3):387–390CrossRefPubMed

21.

Bonin N, Jacquot L, Boulard L, Reynaud P, Saffarini M, Lustig S (2016) How to best measure femoral length and lateralisation after total hip arthroplasty on antero-posterior pelvic radiographs. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-016-3145-z PubMed

22.

Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(2):217–220CrossRefPubMed

23.

Homma Y, Baba T, Sano K, Ochi H, Matsumoto M, Kobayashi H, Yuasa T, Maruyama Y, Kaneko K (2016) Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 40(8):1587–1593. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2942-0 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Lee GC, Marconi D (2015) Complications following direct anterior hip procedures: costs to both patients and surgeons. J Arthroplasty 30(9 Suppl):98–101. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.043

25.

Sariali E, Leonard P, Mamoudy P (2008) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using Hueter anterior approach. J Arthroplasty 23(2):266–272. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.003 CrossRefPubMed

26.

de Steiger RN, Lorimer M, Solomon M (2015) What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(12):3860–3866. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4565-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Maratt JD, Gagnier JJ, Butler PD, Hallstrom BR, Urquhart AG, Roberts KC (2016) No difference in dislocation seen in anterior vs posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.071

28.

Kwon MS, Kuskowski M, Mulhall KJ, Macaulay W, Brown TE, Saleh KJ (2006) Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:34–38. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000218746.84494.df CrossRefPubMed

29.

Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, Burdin G, Lautridou C (2011) The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop 35(2):225–230. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1156-8 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Aslanian T, Verdier R (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38(6):1125–1129. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2313-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Verdier R (2013) Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop 37(12):2345–2350. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2067-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP, Tallier E, Leteurtre C, Girardin PH (2013) Evora(R) chromium-cobalt dual mobility socket: results at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(8):923–928. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2013.07.017 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Collaborative I, Bhandari M, Matta JM, Dodgin D, Clark C, Kregor P, Bradley G, Little L (2009) Outcomes following the single-incision anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter observational study. Orthop Clin North Am 40(3):329–342. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2009.03.001 CrossRef

34.

Slotkin EM, Patel PD, Suarez JC (2015) Accuracy of fluoroscopic guided acetabular component positioning during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30(9 Suppl):102–106. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.046

Title: Total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: safe and efficient strategy against post-operative dislocation
Authors: Cécile Batailler
Camdon Fary
Pierre Batailler
Elvire Servien
Philippe Neyret
Sébastien Lustig
Publication date: 01-03-2017
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: International Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3333-x

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: safe and efficient strategy against post-operative dislocation

Abstract

Aim

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Aim

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

All dual mobility cups are not the same

Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation

Once upon a time.... Dual mobility: history

Total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cup in osteonecrosis of the femoral head in young patients: over ten years of follow-up

The linear penetration rate is not relevant for evaluating wear of dual mobility cups: an explant study

Contemporary dual-mobility cup regional and private register: methodology and results