Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 4/2021

Open Access 01-04-2021 | Breast Cancer | Review Article

Moderate hypofractionation remains the standard of care for whole-breast radiotherapy in breast cancer: Considerations regarding FAST and FAST-Forward

Authors: David Krug, René Baumann, Stephanie E. Combs, Marciana Nona Duma, Jürgen Dunst, Petra Feyer, Rainer Fietkau, Wulf Haase, Wolfgang Harms, Thomas Hehr, Marc D. Piroth, Felix Sedlmayer, Rainer Souchon, Vratislav Strnad, Wilfried Budach, Breast Cancer Expert Panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO)

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Moderate hypofractionation is the standard of care for adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Recently, 10-year results from the FAST and 5‑year results from the FAST-Forward trial evaluating adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy in 5 fractions over 5 weeks or 1 week have been published. This article summarizes recent data for moderate hypofractionation and results from the FAST and FAST-Forward trial on ultra-hypofractionation. While the FAST trial was not powered for comparison of local recurrence rates, FAST-Forward demonstrated non-inferiority for two ultra-hypofractionated regimens in terms of local control. In both trials, the higher-dose experimental arms resulted in elevated rates of late toxicity. For the lower dose experimental arms of 28.5 Gy over 5 weeks and 26 Gy over 1 week, moderate or marked late effects were similar in the majority of documented items compared to the respective standard arms, but significantly worse in some subdomains. The difference between the standard arm and the 26 Gy of the FAST-Forward trial concerning moderate or marked late effects increased with longer follow-up in disadvantage of the experimental arm for most items. For now, moderate hypofractionation with 40–42.5 Gy over 15–16 fractions remains the standard of care for the majority of patients with breast cancer who undergo whole-breast radiotherapy without regional nodal irradiation after breast-conserving surgery.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Wöckel A, Festl J, Stüber T et al (2018) Interdisciplinary screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of breast cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-level, AWMF registry number 032/045OL, December 2017)—part 2 with recommendations for the therapy of primary, recurrent and advanced breast cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 78:1056–1088. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0646-4630CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wöckel A, Festl J, Stüber T et al (2018) Interdisciplinary screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of breast cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-level, AWMF registry number 032/045OL, December 2017)—part 2 with recommendations for the therapy of primary, recurrent and advanced breast cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 78:1056–1088. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​a-0646-4630CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Whelan T, MacKenzie R, Julian J et al (2002) Randomized trial of breast irradiation schedules after lumpectomy for women with lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1143–1150CrossRef Whelan T, MacKenzie R, Julian J et al (2002) Randomized trial of breast irradiation schedules after lumpectomy for women with lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1143–1150CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Offersen BV, Alsner J, Nielsen HM, Jakobsen EH, Nielsen MH, Krause M et al (2020) Hypofractionated versus standard fractionated radiotherapy in patients with early breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ in a randomized phase III trial: the DBCG HYPO trial. J Clin Oncol 38(31):3615–3625CrossRef Offersen BV, Alsner J, Nielsen HM, Jakobsen EH, Nielsen MH, Krause M et al (2020) Hypofractionated versus standard fractionated radiotherapy in patients with early breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ in a randomized phase III trial: the DBCG HYPO trial. J Clin Oncol 38(31):3615–3625CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wang S‑L, Fang H, Hu C, Song Y‑W, Wang W‑H, Jin J et al (2020) Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in the modern treatment era: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial from China. J Clin Oncol 38(31):3604–3614CrossRef Wang S‑L, Fang H, Hu C, Song Y‑W, Wang W‑H, Jin J et al (2020) Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in the modern treatment era: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial from China. J Clin Oncol 38(31):3604–3614CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Whelan TJ, Julian JA, Berrang TS et al (2019) External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and node-negative breast cancer (RAPID): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 394:2165–2172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32515-2CrossRefPubMed Whelan TJ, Julian JA, Berrang TS et al (2019) External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and node-negative breast cancer (RAPID): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 394:2165–2172. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(19)32515-2CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Moderate hypofractionation remains the standard of care for whole-breast radiotherapy in breast cancer: Considerations regarding FAST and FAST-Forward
Authors
David Krug
René Baumann
Stephanie E. Combs
Marciana Nona Duma
Jürgen Dunst
Petra Feyer
Rainer Fietkau
Wulf Haase
Wolfgang Harms
Thomas Hehr
Marc D. Piroth
Felix Sedlmayer
Rainer Souchon
Vratislav Strnad
Wilfried Budach
Breast Cancer Expert Panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO)
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01744-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 4/2021 Go to the issue