Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 5/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

How Slow Can We Go? 4 Frames Per Second (fps) Versus 7.5 fps Fluoroscopy for Atrial Septal Defects (ASDs) Device Closure

Authors: Gurumurthy Hiremath, Jeffery Meadows, Phillip Moore

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Radiation exposure remains a significant concern for ASD device closure. In an effort to reduce radiation exposure, the default fluoroscopy frame rate in our Siemens biplane pediatric catheterization laboratory was reduced to 4 fps in November 2013 from an earlier 7.5 fps fluoro rate. This study aims to evaluate the components contributing to total radiation exposure and compare the procedural success and radiation exposure during ASD device closure using 4 versus 7.5 fps fluoroscopy rates. Twenty ASD device closures performed using 4 fps fluoro rate were weight-matched to 20 ASD closure procedures using 7.5 fps fluoro rate. Baseline characteristics, procedure times and case times were similar in the two groups. Device closure was successful in all but one case in the 4 fps group. The dose area product (DAP), normalized DAP to body weight, total radiation time and fluoro time were lower in the 4 fps group but not statistically different than the 7.5 fps. The number of cine images and cine times were identical in both groups. Fluoroscopy and cineangiography contributed equally to radiation exposure. Fluoroscopy at 4 fps can be safe and effective for ASD device closure in children and adults. There was no increase in procedure time, cine time, fluoro time or complications at this slow fluoro rate. There was a trend toward decreased radiation exposure as measured by indexed DAP although not statistically significant in this small study. Further study with multiple operators using 4 fps fluoroscopy for simple interventional procedures is recommended.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Agarwal S, Parashar A, Ellis SG, Heupler FA Jr, Lau E, Tuzcu EM et al (2014) Measures to reduce radiation in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7(4):447–455CrossRefPubMed Agarwal S, Parashar A, Ellis SG, Heupler FA Jr, Lau E, Tuzcu EM et al (2014) Measures to reduce radiation in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7(4):447–455CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Andreassi MG, Ait-Ali L, Botto N, Manfredi S, Mottola G, Picano E (2006) Cardiac catheterization and long-term chromosomal damage in children with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 27(22):2703–2708CrossRefPubMed Andreassi MG, Ait-Ali L, Botto N, Manfredi S, Mottola G, Picano E (2006) Cardiac catheterization and long-term chromosomal damage in children with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 27(22):2703–2708CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bashore TM, Balter S, Barac A, Byrne JG, Cavendish JJ, Chambers CE et al (2012) 2012 American college of cardiology foundation/society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards update: a report of the american college of cardiology foundation task force on expert consensus documents developed in collaboration with the society of thoracic surgeons and society for vascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(24):2221–2305CrossRefPubMed Bashore TM, Balter S, Barac A, Byrne JG, Cavendish JJ, Chambers CE et al (2012) 2012 American college of cardiology foundation/society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards update: a report of the american college of cardiology foundation task force on expert consensus documents developed in collaboration with the society of thoracic surgeons and society for vascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(24):2221–2305CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Berger F, Vogel M, Alexi-Meskishvili V, Lange PE (1999) Comparison of results and complications of surgical and amplatzer device closure of atrial septal defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118(4):674–680 (discussion 678–80)CrossRefPubMed Berger F, Vogel M, Alexi-Meskishvili V, Lange PE (1999) Comparison of results and complications of surgical and amplatzer device closure of atrial septal defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118(4):674–680 (discussion 678–80)CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W, Brent RL, American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Radiology (2007) Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 120(3):677–682CrossRefPubMed Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W, Brent RL, American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Radiology (2007) Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 120(3):677–682CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chida K, Ohno T, Kakizaki S, Takegawa M, Yuuki H, Nakada M et al (2010) Radiation dose to the pediatric cardiac catheterization and intervention patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(5):1175–1179CrossRefPubMed Chida K, Ohno T, Kakizaki S, Takegawa M, Yuuki H, Nakada M et al (2010) Radiation dose to the pediatric cardiac catheterization and intervention patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(5):1175–1179CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Everett AD, Jennings J, Sibinga E, Owada C, Lim DS, Cheatham J et al (2009) Community use of the amplatzer atrial septal defect occluder: results of the multicenter MAGIC atrial septal defect study. Pediatr Cardiol 30(3):240–247CrossRefPubMed Everett AD, Jennings J, Sibinga E, Owada C, Lim DS, Cheatham J et al (2009) Community use of the amplatzer atrial septal defect occluder: results of the multicenter MAGIC atrial septal defect study. Pediatr Cardiol 30(3):240–247CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Glatz AC, Patel A, Zhu X, Dori Y, Hanna BD, Gillespie MJ et al (2014) Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory. Pediatr Cardiol 35(5):870–878CrossRefPubMed Glatz AC, Patel A, Zhu X, Dori Y, Hanna BD, Gillespie MJ et al (2014) Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory. Pediatr Cardiol 35(5):870–878CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jenkins KJ, Beekman Iii RH, Bergersen LJ, Everett AD, Forbes TJ, Franklin RC et al (2008) Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease–the perspective of cardiology. Cardiol Young 18(Suppl 2):116–123CrossRefPubMed Jenkins KJ, Beekman Iii RH, Bergersen LJ, Everett AD, Forbes TJ, Franklin RC et al (2008) Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease–the perspective of cardiology. Cardiol Young 18(Suppl 2):116–123CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Justino H (2006) The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol 36(Suppl 2):146–153CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Justino H (2006) The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol 36(Suppl 2):146–153CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kotre CJ, Charlton S, Robson KJ, Birch IP, Willis SP, Thornley M (2004) Application of low dose rate pulsed fluoroscopy in cardiac pacing and electrophysiology: patient dose and image quality implications. Br J Radiol 77(919):597–599CrossRefPubMed Kotre CJ, Charlton S, Robson KJ, Birch IP, Willis SP, Thornley M (2004) Application of low dose rate pulsed fluoroscopy in cardiac pacing and electrophysiology: patient dose and image quality implications. Br J Radiol 77(919):597–599CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Verghese GR, McElhinney DB, Strauss KJ, Bergersen L (2012) Characterization of radiation exposure and effect of a radiation monitoring policy in a large volume pediatric cardiac catheterization lab. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 79(2):294–301CrossRefPubMed Verghese GR, McElhinney DB, Strauss KJ, Bergersen L (2012) Characterization of radiation exposure and effect of a radiation monitoring policy in a large volume pediatric cardiac catheterization lab. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 79(2):294–301CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
How Slow Can We Go? 4 Frames Per Second (fps) Versus 7.5 fps Fluoroscopy for Atrial Septal Defects (ASDs) Device Closure
Authors
Gurumurthy Hiremath
Jeffery Meadows
Phillip Moore
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-015-1122-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Pediatric Cardiology 5/2015 Go to the issue