Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 5/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

The Lateral Plane Delivers Higher Dose than the Frontal Plane in Biplane Cardiac Catheterization Systems

Authors: Osamah Aldoss, Sonali Patel, Kyle Harris, Abhay Divekar

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of the study is to compare radiation dose between the frontal and lateral planes in a biplane cardiac catheterization laboratory. Tube angulation progressively increases patient and operator radiation dose in single-plane cardiac catheterization laboratories. This retrospective study captured biplane radiation dose in a pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory between April 2010 and January 2014. Raw and time-indexed fluoroscopic, cineangiographic and total (fluoroscopic + cineangiographic) air kerma (AK, mGy) and kerma area product (PKA, µGym2/Kg) for each plane were compared. Data for 716 patients were analyzed: 408 (56.98 %) were male, the median age was 4.86 years, and the median weight was 17.35 kg. Although median beam-on time (minutes) was 4.2 times greater in the frontal plane, there was no difference in raw median total PKA between the two planes. However, when indexed to beam-on time, the lateral plane had a higher median-indexed fluoroscopic (0.75 vs. 1.70), cineangiographic (16.03 vs. 24.92), and total (1.43 vs. 5.15) PKA (p < 0.0001). The median time-indexed total PKA in the lateral plane is 3.6 times the frontal plane. This is the first report showing that the lateral plane delivers a higher dose than the frontal plane per unit time. Operators should consciously reduce the lateral plane beam-on time and incorporate this practice in radiation reduction protocols.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Agarwal S, Parashar A, Bajaj NS et al. (2014) Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:558–566 Agarwal S, Parashar A, Bajaj NS et al. (2014) Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:558–566
2.
go back to reference Andreassi MG (2009) Radiation risk from pediatric cardiac catheterization friendly fire on children with congenital heart disease. Circulation 120:1847–1849CrossRefPubMed Andreassi MG (2009) Radiation risk from pediatric cardiac catheterization friendly fire on children with congenital heart disease. Circulation 120:1847–1849CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bacher K, Bogaert E, Lapere R, De Wolf D, Thierens H (2005) Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Circulation 111:83–89CrossRefPubMed Bacher K, Bogaert E, Lapere R, De Wolf D, Thierens H (2005) Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Circulation 111:83–89CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bashore TM, Balter S, Barac A et al (2012) 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards update: American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on expert consensus documents Society of Thoracic Surgeons Society for Vascular Medicine. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:E37–E49CrossRefPubMed Bashore TM, Balter S, Barac A et al (2012) 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards update: American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on expert consensus documents Society of Thoracic Surgeons Society for Vascular Medicine. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:E37–E49CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Brambilla M, De Mauri A, Lizio D et al (2014) Cumulative radiation dose estimates from medical imaging in paediatric patients with non-oncologic chronic illnesses. A systematic review. Phys Med 30:403–412CrossRefPubMed Brambilla M, De Mauri A, Lizio D et al (2014) Cumulative radiation dose estimates from medical imaging in paediatric patients with non-oncologic chronic illnesses. A systematic review. Phys Med 30:403–412CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Campbell RM, Strieper MJ, Frias PA et al (2005) Quantifying and minimizing radiation exposure during pediatric cardiac catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol 26:29–33CrossRefPubMed Campbell RM, Strieper MJ, Frias PA et al (2005) Quantifying and minimizing radiation exposure during pediatric cardiac catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol 26:29–33CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chambers CE (2014) Mandatory radiation safety training for fluoroscopy imaging: a quality improvement priority or unnecessary oversight? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:391–393CrossRefPubMed Chambers CE (2014) Mandatory radiation safety training for fluoroscopy imaging: a quality improvement priority or unnecessary oversight? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:391–393CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chambers CE, Fetterly KA, Holzer R et al (2011) Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:546–556CrossRefPubMed Chambers CE, Fetterly KA, Holzer R et al (2011) Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:546–556CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference El Sayed MH, Roushdy AM, El Farghaly H, El Sherbini A (2012) Radiation exposure in children during the current era of pediatric cardiac intervention. Pediatr Cardiol 33:27–35CrossRefPubMed El Sayed MH, Roushdy AM, El Farghaly H, El Sherbini A (2012) Radiation exposure in children during the current era of pediatric cardiac intervention. Pediatr Cardiol 33:27–35CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Glatz AC, Patel A, Zhu X et al. (2014) Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory. Pediatr Cardiol 35:870–878 Glatz AC, Patel A, Zhu X et al. (2014) Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory. Pediatr Cardiol 35:870–878
11.
go back to reference Johnson JN, Hornik CP, Li JS et al (2014) Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimation in children with heart disease. Circulation 130:161–167CrossRefPubMed Johnson JN, Hornik CP, Li JS et al (2014) Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimation in children with heart disease. Circulation 130:161–167CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kuon E, Dahm JB, Empen K, Robinson DM, Reuter G, Wucherer M (2004) Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1420–1428CrossRefPubMed Kuon E, Dahm JB, Empen K, Robinson DM, Reuter G, Wucherer M (2004) Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1420–1428CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kuon E, Weitmann K, Hoffmann W et al (2014) Efficacy of a minicourse in radiation-reducing techniques in invasive cardiology: a multicenter field study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:382–390CrossRefPubMed Kuon E, Weitmann K, Hoffmann W et al (2014) Efficacy of a minicourse in radiation-reducing techniques in invasive cardiology: a multicenter field study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:382–390CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Picano E, Vano E, Rehani MM et al (2014) The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging: a position document of the ESC Associations of Cardiovascular Imaging, Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J 35:665–672CrossRefPubMed Picano E, Vano E, Rehani MM et al (2014) The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging: a position document of the ESC Associations of Cardiovascular Imaging, Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J 35:665–672CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Verghese GR, McElhinney DB, Strauss KJ, Bergersen L (2012) Characterization of radiation exposure and effect of a radiation monitoring policy in a large volume pediatric cardiac catheterization lab. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 79:294–301CrossRefPubMed Verghese GR, McElhinney DB, Strauss KJ, Bergersen L (2012) Characterization of radiation exposure and effect of a radiation monitoring policy in a large volume pediatric cardiac catheterization lab. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 79:294–301CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Watson TG, Mah E, Schoepf UJ, King L, Huda W, Hlavacek AM (2013) Effective radiation dose in computed tomographic angiography of the chest and diagnostic cardiac catheterization in pediatric patients. Pediatr Cardiol 34:518–524CrossRefPubMed Watson TG, Mah E, Schoepf UJ, King L, Huda W, Hlavacek AM (2013) Effective radiation dose in computed tomographic angiography of the chest and diagnostic cardiac catheterization in pediatric patients. Pediatr Cardiol 34:518–524CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Yakoumakis E, Kostopoulou H, Makri T, Dimitriadis A, Georgiou E, Tsalafoutas I (2013) Estimation of radiation dose and risk to children undergoing cardiac catheterization for the treatment of a congenital heart disease using Monte Carlo simulations. Pediatr Radiol 43:339–346CrossRefPubMed Yakoumakis E, Kostopoulou H, Makri T, Dimitriadis A, Georgiou E, Tsalafoutas I (2013) Estimation of radiation dose and risk to children undergoing cardiac catheterization for the treatment of a congenital heart disease using Monte Carlo simulations. Pediatr Radiol 43:339–346CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Lateral Plane Delivers Higher Dose than the Frontal Plane in Biplane Cardiac Catheterization Systems
Authors
Osamah Aldoss
Sonali Patel
Kyle Harris
Abhay Divekar
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-015-1094-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Pediatric Cardiology 5/2015 Go to the issue