Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 2/2006

Open Access 01-09-2006 | ALARA

The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose

Author: Henri Justino

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Special Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The cardiac catheterization laboratory plays an important role in the management of children with congenital heart disease by not only enabling diagnosis but, in many cases, providing definitive therapy. The goal of the ALARA (As Low as Reasonably Achievable) concept as it applies to cardiac catheterization is to provide maximal diagnostic and therapeutic benefit while requiring the lowest possible radiation dose. A number of specific challenges unique to the setting of pediatric cardiac catheterization, such as higher heart rates, smaller cardiovascular structures, smaller body size, and wider variety of unusual anatomic variants with the potential need for relatively lengthy and complex studies, result in relatively high radiation doses (to the patient and, consequently, to laboratory personnel). In addition, the improved survival of patients with complex anatomy (e.g., palliated single ventricle anatomies) implies that many such children with chronic cardiac disease require frequent catheterizations within the first few years of life. These factors, coupled with the increased radiosensitivity of children and a longer lifespan ahead of them in which to possibly develop radiation-related sequelae, converge to create potentially ominous consequences. Attention to basic rules of radiation safety is, therefore, of tremendous importance in the pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory. This review focuses on the importance of adequate planning of the study, optimizing image formation, management of fluoroscopy and cine angiography parameters, and the use of certain equipment features that might allow the cardiologist to lower the radiation dose without sacrificing image quality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Moore RJ (1985) The physics of cardiac angiography. Myrle Co. Enterprises, Riverside Moore RJ (1985) The physics of cardiac angiography. Myrle Co. Enterprises, Riverside
2.
go back to reference Wagner LK, Archer BR (2000) Minimizing risks from fluoroscopic x-rays: bioeffects, instrumentation and examination. Partners in Radiation Management, The Woodlands Wagner LK, Archer BR (2000) Minimizing risks from fluoroscopic x-rays: bioeffects, instrumentation and examination. Partners in Radiation Management, The Woodlands
3.
go back to reference Limacher MC, Douglas PS, Germano G, et al (1998) ACC expert consensus document. Radiation safety in the practice of cardiology. American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:892–13CrossRefPubMed Limacher MC, Douglas PS, Germano G, et al (1998) ACC expert consensus document. Radiation safety in the practice of cardiology. American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:892–13CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hirshfeld JW Jr, Balter S, Brinker JA, et al (2004) ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:2259–282CrossRefPubMed Hirshfeld JW Jr, Balter S, Brinker JA, et al (2004) ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:2259–282CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Strauss KJ (1998) Cardiac catheterization equipment requirements: pediatric catheterization laboratory considerations. In: Nickoloff EL, Strauss KJ (eds) Categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics: cardiac catheterization imaging. Radiological Society of North America, pp 105–19 Strauss KJ (1998) Cardiac catheterization equipment requirements: pediatric catheterization laboratory considerations. In: Nickoloff EL, Strauss KJ (eds) Categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics: cardiac catheterization imaging. Radiological Society of North America, pp 105–19
6.
go back to reference Freedom RM, Mawson JB, Yoo SJ, et al (1997) Congenital heart disease: textbook of angiocardiography. Futura, Armonk Freedom RM, Mawson JB, Yoo SJ, et al (1997) Congenital heart disease: textbook of angiocardiography. Futura, Armonk
7.
go back to reference Mullins CE (2006) Cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease: pediatric and adult. Blackwell/Futura, Malden Mullins CE (2006) Cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease: pediatric and adult. Blackwell/Futura, Malden
8.
go back to reference Lock JE, Keane JF, Perry SB (1999) Diagnostic and interventional catheterization in congenital heart disease. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Lock JE, Keane JF, Perry SB (1999) Diagnostic and interventional catheterization in congenital heart disease. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
9.
go back to reference Nihill MR (1998) Catheterization and angiography. In: Garson A, Bricker JT, Fisher DJ, Neish SR (eds) The science and practice of pediatric cardiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 995–019 Nihill MR (1998) Catheterization and angiography. In: Garson A, Bricker JT, Fisher DJ, Neish SR (eds) The science and practice of pediatric cardiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 995–019
Metadata
Title
The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose
Author
Henri Justino
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue Special Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0194-2

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2006

Pediatric Radiology 2/2006 Go to the issue

ALARA

Welcome