Published in:
01-12-2020 | Frontotemporal Dementia | Research article
Identification of novel cerebrospinal fluid biomarker candidates for dementia with Lewy bodies: a proteomic approach
Authors:
Inger van Steenoven, Marleen J. A. Koel-Simmelink, Leonie J. M. Vergouw, Betty M. Tijms, Sander R. Piersma, Thang V. Pham, Claire Bridel, Gian-Luca Ferri, Cristina Cocco, Barbara Noli, Paul F. Worley, Mei-Fang Xiao, Desheng Xu, Patrick Oeckl, Markus Otto, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Frank Jan de Jong, Connie R. Jimenez, Afina W. Lemstra, Charlotte E. Teunissen
Published in:
Molecular Neurodegeneration
|
Issue 1/2020
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
Diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is challenging, largely due to a lack of diagnostic tools. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have been proven useful in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis. Here, we aimed to identify novel CSF biomarkers for DLB using a high-throughput proteomic approach.
Methods
We applied liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry with label-free quantification to identify biomarker candidates to individual CSF samples from a well-characterized cohort comprising patients with DLB (n = 20) and controls (n = 20). Validation was performed using (1) the identical proteomic workflow in an independent cohort (n = 30), (2) proteomic data from patients with related neurodegenerative diseases (n = 149) and (3) orthogonal techniques in an extended cohort consisting of DLB patients and controls (n = 76). Additionally, we utilized random forest analysis to identify the subset of candidate markers that best distinguished DLB from all other groups.
Results
In total, we identified 1995 proteins. In the discovery cohort, 69 proteins were differentially expressed in DLB compared to controls (p < 0.05). Independent cohort replication confirmed VGF, SCG2, NPTX2, NPTXR, PDYN and PCSK1N as candidate biomarkers for DLB. The downregulation of the candidate biomarkers was somewhat more pronounced in DLB in comparison with related neurodegenerative diseases. Using random forest analysis, we identified a panel of VGF, SCG2 and PDYN to best differentiate between DLB and other clinical groups (accuracy: 0.82 (95%CI: 0.75–0.89)). Moreover, we confirmed the decrease of VGF and NPTX2 in DLB by ELISA and SRM methods. Low CSF levels of all biomarker candidates, except PCSK1N, were associated with more pronounced cognitive decline (0.37 < r < 0.56, all p < 0.01).
Conclusion
We identified and validated six novel CSF biomarkers for DLB. These biomarkers, particularly when used as a panel, show promise to improve diagnostic accuracy and strengthen the importance of synaptic dysfunction in the pathophysiology of DLB.