Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology 6/2021

01-12-2021 | Computed Tomography | Case Report

A case of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm developing in the native pancreas after pancreas transplantation treated by total pancreatectomy

Authors: Hiromichi Sato, Yoshito Tomimaru, Hirofumi Akita, Shogo Kobayashi, Toshinori Ito, Kazuki Sasaki, Yoshifumi Iwagami, Daisaku Yamada, Takehiro Noda, Kunihito Gotoh, Hidenori Takahashi, Naoki Hama, Tadafumi Asaoka, Masahiro Tanemura, Yuichiro Doki, Hidetoshi Eguchi

Published in: Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Post-transplant patients reportedly have a higher risk of de novo neoplasms. However, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the native pancreas after pancreas transplantation (PTx) has not been well investigated. The choice of treatment, especially invasive treatment, for de novo neoplasms in transplant patients should consider their impaired immunity. In this context, we present a case of IPMN developing in the native pancreas of a PTx patient. A 53-year-old man underwent a follow-up abdominal computed tomography scan 6 years after a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant for type 1 diabetes mellitus with end-stage diabetic nephropathy requiring hemodialysis. The scan revealed IPMN in the pancreas head; an enhancing internal solid component suggested a high risk of malignancy, indicating surgical resection. Partial pancreatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy was anatomically indicated, but considering the insulin-secreting ability of the transplanted pancreas and the potential high risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula due to immune impairment after partial pancreatectomy, total pancreatectomy (TP) was performed. The patient is alive with good pancreas graft function, no signs of indigestion for 18 months after TP, and no evidence of IPMN recurrence. This report should help clinicians characterize de novo IPMN in the native pancreas and determine IPMN therapeutic options for transplant patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tomimaru Y, Ito T, Kenmochi T. The registry of Japanese pancreas and islet transplantation. Ishoku. 2020;2020(55):277–83. Tomimaru Y, Ito T, Kenmochi T. The registry of Japanese pancreas and islet transplantation. Ishoku. 2020;2020(55):277–83.
2.
go back to reference Tomimaru Y, Eguchi H, Doki Y, et al. Current state of pancreas transplantation in Japan based on the nationwide registry. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;00:1–8. Tomimaru Y, Eguchi H, Doki Y, et al. Current state of pancreas transplantation in Japan based on the nationwide registry. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;00:1–8.
3.
go back to reference Tomimaru Y, Ito T, Marubashi S, et al. De novo malignancy after pancreas transplantation in Japan. Transplant Proc. 2015;47:742–5.CrossRef Tomimaru Y, Ito T, Marubashi S, et al. De novo malignancy after pancreas transplantation in Japan. Transplant Proc. 2015;47:742–5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference de Mier MVP-R, Aguera ML, Navarro MD, et al. Prevalence and survival of cancer after pancreas-kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2018;50:669–72.CrossRef de Mier MVP-R, Aguera ML, Navarro MD, et al. Prevalence and survival of cancer after pancreas-kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2018;50:669–72.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Manzia TM, Angelico R, Gazia C, et al. De novo malignancies after liver transplantation: the effect of immunosuppression-personal data and review of literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:5356–75.CrossRef Manzia TM, Angelico R, Gazia C, et al. De novo malignancies after liver transplantation: the effect of immunosuppression-personal data and review of literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:5356–75.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim S, Rovgaliyev B, Lee JM, et al. Clinical significance of de novo malignancy after liver transplant: a single-center study. Transplant Proc. 2021;53:200–6.CrossRef Kim S, Rovgaliyev B, Lee JM, et al. Clinical significance of de novo malignancy after liver transplant: a single-center study. Transplant Proc. 2021;53:200–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sanaei AK, Aliakbarian M, Kazemi K, et al. De novo malignancy after liver transplant. Exp Clin Transplant. 2015;13:163–6.PubMed Sanaei AK, Aliakbarian M, Kazemi K, et al. De novo malignancy after liver transplant. Exp Clin Transplant. 2015;13:163–6.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Santangelo M, Clemente M, Spiezia S, et al. Wound complications after kidney transplantation in nondiabetic patients. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:1221–3.CrossRef Santangelo M, Clemente M, Spiezia S, et al. Wound complications after kidney transplantation in nondiabetic patients. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:1221–3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lau NS, Ahmadi N, Verran D. Abdominal wall complications following renal transplantation in adult recipients—factors associated with interventional management in one unit. BMC Surg. 2019;19:10.CrossRef Lau NS, Ahmadi N, Verran D. Abdominal wall complications following renal transplantation in adult recipients—factors associated with interventional management in one unit. BMC Surg. 2019;19:10.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ohashi K, Murakami Y, Maruyama M, et al. Four cases of mucus-secreting pancreatic cancer (in Japanese). Prog Digest Endosc. 1982;20:348–51. Ohashi K, Murakami Y, Maruyama M, et al. Four cases of mucus-secreting pancreatic cancer (in Japanese). Prog Digest Endosc. 1982;20:348–51.
11.
go back to reference Klöppel G, Solcia E, Longnecker D, et al. Histological typing of tumours of the exocrine pancreas. In: International histological classification of tumours. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1996. Klöppel G, Solcia E, Longnecker D, et al. Histological typing of tumours of the exocrine pancreas. In: International histological classification of tumours. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1996.
12.
go back to reference Hruban RH, Takaori K, Klimstra DS, et al. An illustrated consensus on the classification of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:977–87.CrossRef Hruban RH, Takaori K, Klimstra DS, et al. An illustrated consensus on the classification of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:977–87.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Oyama H, Tada M, Takagi K, et al. Long-term risk of malignancy in branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:226–37.CrossRef Oyama H, Tada M, Takagi K, et al. Long-term risk of malignancy in branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:226–37.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Al-Qaoud TM, Martinez EJ, Sollinger HW, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of cystic lesions of the transplant pancreas: The University of Wisconsin Experience. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:467–77.CrossRef Al-Qaoud TM, Martinez EJ, Sollinger HW, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of cystic lesions of the transplant pancreas: The University of Wisconsin Experience. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:467–77.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Darstein F, Konig C, Hoppe-Lotichius M, et al. Impact of pancreatic comorbidities in patients with end-stage liver disease on outcome after liver transplantation. Eur J Intern Med. 2014;25:281–5.CrossRef Darstein F, Konig C, Hoppe-Lotichius M, et al. Impact of pancreatic comorbidities in patients with end-stage liver disease on outcome after liver transplantation. Eur J Intern Med. 2014;25:281–5.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Branchi V, Lingohr P, Willinek WA, et al. Extensive multifocal branch duct IPMN of the pancreas after liver transplantation: is surgery justified? Eur J Med Res. 2015;20:26.CrossRef Branchi V, Lingohr P, Willinek WA, et al. Extensive multifocal branch duct IPMN of the pancreas after liver transplantation: is surgery justified? Eur J Med Res. 2015;20:26.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Vidhyarkorn S, Siripongsakun S, Yu J, et al. Longterm follow-up of small pancreatic cystic lesions in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2017;23:324–9.CrossRef Vidhyarkorn S, Siripongsakun S, Yu J, et al. Longterm follow-up of small pancreatic cystic lesions in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2017;23:324–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jie T, Harmon JV Jr, Gulbahce HE, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the native pancreas in a pancreas-kidney transplant recipient. Pancreas. 2004;28:446–9.CrossRef Jie T, Harmon JV Jr, Gulbahce HE, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the native pancreas in a pancreas-kidney transplant recipient. Pancreas. 2004;28:446–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tanaka M. Clinical management and surgical decision-making of IPMN of the pancreas. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1882:9–22.CrossRef Tanaka M. Clinical management and surgical decision-making of IPMN of the pancreas. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1882:9–22.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chapman JR, Webster AC, Wong G. Cancer in the transplant recipient. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3(7):a015677.CrossRef Chapman JR, Webster AC, Wong G. Cancer in the transplant recipient. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3(7):a015677.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hoshida Y, Tsukuma H, Yasunaga Y, et al. Cancer risk after renal transplantation in Japan. Int J Cancer. 1997;71:517–20.CrossRef Hoshida Y, Tsukuma H, Yasunaga Y, et al. Cancer risk after renal transplantation in Japan. Int J Cancer. 1997;71:517–20.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kasiske BL, Snyder JJ, Gilbertson DT, et al. Cancer after kidney transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:905–13.CrossRef Kasiske BL, Snyder JJ, Gilbertson DT, et al. Cancer after kidney transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:905–13.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sanchez EQ, Marubashi S, Jung G, et al. De novo tumors after liver transplantation: a single-institution experience. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:285–91.CrossRef Sanchez EQ, Marubashi S, Jung G, et al. De novo tumors after liver transplantation: a single-institution experience. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:285–91.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Miyazaki T, Sato S, Kondo T, et al. National survey of de novo malignancy after solid organ transplantation in Japan. Surg Today. 2018;48:618–24.CrossRef Miyazaki T, Sato S, Kondo T, et al. National survey of de novo malignancy after solid organ transplantation in Japan. Surg Today. 2018;48:618–24.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nasser-Ghodsi N, Mara K, Watt KD. De novo colorectal and pancreatic cancer in liver transplant recipients: identifying the higher risk populations. Hepatology. 2021;74(2):1003–13.CrossRef Nasser-Ghodsi N, Mara K, Watt KD. De novo colorectal and pancreatic cancer in liver transplant recipients: identifying the higher risk populations. Hepatology. 2021;74(2):1003–13.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zhou J, Hu Z, Zhang Q, et al. Spectrum of de novo cancers and predictors in liver transplantation: analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0155179.CrossRef Zhou J, Hu Z, Zhang Q, et al. Spectrum of de novo cancers and predictors in liver transplantation: analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0155179.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Roza AM, Johnson C, Juckett M, et al. Adenocarcinoma arising in a transplanted pancreas. Transplantation. 2001;72:1156–7.CrossRef Roza AM, Johnson C, Juckett M, et al. Adenocarcinoma arising in a transplanted pancreas. Transplantation. 2001;72:1156–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Casadei R, Ricci C, Taffurelli G, et al. Prospective validation of a preoperative risk score model based on pancreatic texture to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int J Surg. 2017;48:189–94.CrossRef Casadei R, Ricci C, Taffurelli G, et al. Prospective validation of a preoperative risk score model based on pancreatic texture to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int J Surg. 2017;48:189–94.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference van Hilst J, de Rooij T, van den Boezem PB, et al. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy with open or laparoscopic reconstruction during the learning curve: a multicenter propensity score matched study. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21:857–64.CrossRef van Hilst J, de Rooij T, van den Boezem PB, et al. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy with open or laparoscopic reconstruction during the learning curve: a multicenter propensity score matched study. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21:857–64.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Rungsakulkij N, Mingphruedhi S, Tangtawee P, et al. Risk factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a Thai tertiary center. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;9:270–80.CrossRef Rungsakulkij N, Mingphruedhi S, Tangtawee P, et al. Risk factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a Thai tertiary center. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;9:270–80.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference van Roessel S, Mackay TM, Tol J, et al. Impact of expanding indications on surgical and oncological outcome in 1434 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21:865–75.CrossRef van Roessel S, Mackay TM, Tol J, et al. Impact of expanding indications on surgical and oncological outcome in 1434 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21:865–75.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Pedrazzoli S. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): a systematic review and analysis of the POPF-related mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e6858.CrossRef Pedrazzoli S. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): a systematic review and analysis of the POPF-related mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e6858.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Chen JS, Liu G, Li TR, et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and preventive strategies. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15:857–63.CrossRef Chen JS, Liu G, Li TR, et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and preventive strategies. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15:857–63.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Barkin JA, Westermann A, Hoos W, et al. Frequency of appropriate use of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy and symptomatic response in pancreatic cancer patients. Pancreas. 2019;48:780–6.CrossRef Barkin JA, Westermann A, Hoos W, et al. Frequency of appropriate use of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy and symptomatic response in pancreatic cancer patients. Pancreas. 2019;48:780–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A case of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm developing in the native pancreas after pancreas transplantation treated by total pancreatectomy
Authors
Hiromichi Sato
Yoshito Tomimaru
Hirofumi Akita
Shogo Kobayashi
Toshinori Ito
Kazuki Sasaki
Yoshifumi Iwagami
Daisaku Yamada
Takehiro Noda
Kunihito Gotoh
Hidenori Takahashi
Naoki Hama
Tadafumi Asaoka
Masahiro Tanemura
Yuichiro Doki
Hidetoshi Eguchi
Publication date
01-12-2021

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology 6/2021 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.