Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Computed Tomography | Research

Influence of bone anatomical morphology of mandibular molars on dental implant based on CBCT

Authors: Zhuo-lin Kong, Ge-ge Wang, Xue-ying Liu, Zhang-yan Ye, Dong-qian Xu, Xi Ding

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To apply CBCT to investigate the anatomical relationship between the mandibular molar and alveolar bone, aimed to provide clinical guidelines for the design of implant restoration.

Methods

201 CBCT data were reevaluated to measure height of the alveolar process (EF), width of the alveolar process (GH), width of the basal bone (IJ), the angle between the long axis of the first molar and the alveolar bone (∠a) and the angle between the long axis of the alveolar bone and basal bone (∠b). The angle and width were measured to determine the implant-prosthodontic classification of the morphology in the left lower first molar (36) and right lower first molar (46). All measurements were performed on the improved cross-sectional images.

Results

EF, GH and IJ were measured as (10.83 ± 1.31) mm, (13.93 ± 2.00) mm and (12.68 ± 1.96) mm for 36, respectively; and (10.87 ± 1.24) mm, (13.86 ± 1.93) mm and (12.60 ± 1.90) mm for 46, respectively. No statistical significance was observed in EF, GH, IJ, ∠a and ∠b between 36 and 46 (all P > 0.05). The morphology was divided into three categories including the straight (68.7–69.2%), oblique (19.9–20.4%) and concave types (11%). Each type was consisted of two subcategories.

Conclusions

The proposed classification could provide evidence for appropriate selection and direction design of the mandibular molar implant in clinical. The concave type was the most difficult to implant with the highest risk of lingual perforation. The implant length, width, direction required more attention.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chan HL, Benavides E, Yeh CY, et al. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography. J Periodontol. 2011;82:129–35.CrossRef Chan HL, Benavides E, Yeh CY, et al. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography. J Periodontol. 2011;82:129–35.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Surgical guide for dental implant placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:248–51.CrossRef Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Surgical guide for dental implant placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:248–51.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Misch CE. Occlusal considerations for implant-supported prostheses: implant-protective occlusion. In: Misch CE, editor. Dental implant prosthetics. 2nd ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2015. p. 874–912.CrossRef Misch CE. Occlusal considerations for implant-supported prostheses: implant-protective occlusion. In: Misch CE, editor. Dental implant prosthetics. 2nd ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2015. p. 874–912.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Herranz-Aparicio J, Marques J, Almendros-Marqués N, et al. Retrospective study of the bone morphology in the posterior mandibular region. Evaluation of the prevalence and the degree of lingual concavity and their possible complications. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21:e731–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Herranz-Aparicio J, Marques J, Almendros-Marqués N, et al. Retrospective study of the bone morphology in the posterior mandibular region. Evaluation of the prevalence and the degree of lingual concavity and their possible complications. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21:e731–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Yildiz S, Bayar GR, Guvenc I, et al. Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:167–73.CrossRef Yildiz S, Bayar GR, Guvenc I, et al. Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:167–73.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Loney WW Jr, Termini S, Sisto J. Plunging ranula formation as a complication of dental implant surgery: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1204–8.CrossRef Loney WW Jr, Termini S, Sisto J. Plunging ranula formation as a complication of dental implant surgery: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1204–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, et al. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:1–21.CrossRef Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, et al. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:1–21.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kingsmill VJ. Post-extraction remodeling of the adult mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999;10:384–404.CrossRef Kingsmill VJ. Post-extraction remodeling of the adult mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999;10:384–404.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gallucci GO, Khoynezhad S, Yansane AI, et al. Influence of the posterior mandible ridge morphology on virtual implant planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:801–6.CrossRef Gallucci GO, Khoynezhad S, Yansane AI, et al. Influence of the posterior mandible ridge morphology on virtual implant planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:801–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Quirynen M, Mraiwa N, Van Steenberghe D, et al. Morphology and dimensions of the mandibular jaw bone in the interforaminal region in patients requiring implants in the distal areas. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:280–5.CrossRef Quirynen M, Mraiwa N, Van Steenberghe D, et al. Morphology and dimensions of the mandibular jaw bone in the interforaminal region in patients requiring implants in the distal areas. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:280–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kamburoğlu K, Acar B, Yüksel S, et al. CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:1209–15.CrossRef Kamburoğlu K, Acar B, Yüksel S, et al. CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:1209–15.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Romanos G, et al. Clinical recommendations for avoiding and managing surgical complications associated with implant dentistry: a review. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1317–29.CrossRef Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Romanos G, et al. Clinical recommendations for avoiding and managing surgical complications associated with implant dentistry: a review. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1317–29.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, et al. Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32:343–9.CrossRef Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, et al. Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32:343–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chan HL, Brooks SL, Fu JH, et al. Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:201–6.CrossRef Chan HL, Brooks SL, Fu JH, et al. Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:201–6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, et al. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:245–8.CrossRef Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, et al. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:245–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72:75–80.PubMed Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72:75–80.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:559–65.CrossRef Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:559–65.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Parnia F, Fard EM, Mahboub F, et al. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:e32–6.CrossRef Parnia F, Fard EM, Mahboub F, et al. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:e32–6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Alkhatib R, Chung CH. Buccolingual inclination of first molars in untreated adults: a CBCT study. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:598–602.CrossRef Alkhatib R, Chung CH. Buccolingual inclination of first molars in untreated adults: a CBCT study. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:598–602.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lau SL, Chow J, Li W, et al. Classification of maxillary central incisors-implications for immediate implant in the esthetic zone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:142–53.CrossRef Lau SL, Chow J, Li W, et al. Classification of maxillary central incisors-implications for immediate implant in the esthetic zone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:142–53.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yoshimine S, Nishihara K, Nozoe E, et al. Topographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars and maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography. Implant Dent. 2012;21:528–35.CrossRef Yoshimine S, Nishihara K, Nozoe E, et al. Topographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars and maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography. Implant Dent. 2012;21:528–35.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nishihara K, Yoshimine SI, Goto T, et al. Topographic analysis of the maxillary premolars relative to the maxillary sinus and the alveolar bone using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123:606–12.CrossRef Nishihara K, Yoshimine SI, Goto T, et al. Topographic analysis of the maxillary premolars relative to the maxillary sinus and the alveolar bone using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123:606–12.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Baveewo S, Ssali F, Karamagi C, et al. Validation of world health organisation HIV/AIDS clinical staging in predicting initiation of antiretroviral therapy and clinical predictors of low CD4 cell count in Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19089.CrossRef Baveewo S, Ssali F, Karamagi C, et al. Validation of world health organisation HIV/AIDS clinical staging in predicting initiation of antiretroviral therapy and clinical predictors of low CD4 cell count in Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19089.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Baurmash HD. Implant surgery and a plunging ranula. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1901–2.CrossRef Baurmash HD. Implant surgery and a plunging ranula. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1901–2.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Boyes-Varley JG, Lownie JF. Haematoma of the floor of the mouth following implant placement. SADJ. 2002;57:64–5.PubMed Boyes-Varley JG, Lownie JF. Haematoma of the floor of the mouth following implant placement. SADJ. 2002;57:64–5.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Isaacson TJ. Sublingual hematoma formation during immediate placement of mandibular endosseous implants. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:168–72.CrossRef Isaacson TJ. Sublingual hematoma formation during immediate placement of mandibular endosseous implants. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:168–72.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Leong DJ, Chan HL, Yeh CY, et al. Risk of lingual plate perforation during implant placement in the posterior mandible: a human cadaver study. Implant Dent. 2011;20:360–3.CrossRef Leong DJ, Chan HL, Yeh CY, et al. Risk of lingual plate perforation during implant placement in the posterior mandible: a human cadaver study. Implant Dent. 2011;20:360–3.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Eitner S, et al. Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:254–9.CrossRef Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Eitner S, et al. Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:254–9.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Alikhani M, Lopez JA, Alabdullah H, et al. High-frequency acceleration: therapeutic tool to preserve bone following tooth extractions. J Dent Res. 2016;95:311–8.CrossRef Alikhani M, Lopez JA, Alabdullah H, et al. High-frequency acceleration: therapeutic tool to preserve bone following tooth extractions. J Dent Res. 2016;95:311–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of bone anatomical morphology of mandibular molars on dental implant based on CBCT
Authors
Zhuo-lin Kong
Ge-ge Wang
Xue-ying Liu
Zhang-yan Ye
Dong-qian Xu
Xi Ding
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01888-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Oral Health 1/2021 Go to the issue