Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Cancer Biomarker | Research

Relevance of blood tumor markers in inpatients with significant involuntary weight loss and elevated levels of inflammation biomarkers

Authors: Morgane Gronnier, Kaies Hedhli, Chloé Sauzay, Valéry Salle, Pierre Duhaut, Jean Schmidt, Amandine Dernoncourt

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the diagnostic performance of a panel of standard tumor markers (TMs) in patients hospitalized with significant involuntary weight loss (IWL) and elevated levels of inflammation biomarkers, and a combination of the TM panel and the finding of the computed tomography (CT) scan.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study in the internal medicine department at Amiens-Picardie University Medical Center (Amiens, France) between January 1st, 2015, and November 1st, 2021. The inclusion criteria were age 18 or over, significant IWL (≥ 5 kg over 6 months), elevated inflammation biomarkers (e.g. C-reactive protein), and assay data on two or more standard TMs (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19 − 9, CA 15 − 3, CA 125, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), calcitonin, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)). The result of each TM assay was interpreted qualitatively (as positive or negative), according to our central laboratory’s usual thresholds.

Results

Cancer was diagnosed in 50 (37.0%) of the 135 patients included. Positivity for one or more TMs had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.55 [0.43–0.66], and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.84 [0.75–0.93] for cancer diagnosis. When combined with the presence of suspicious CT findings (e.g. a mass, enlarged lymph nodes and/or effusion), positivity for one or more TMs had a PPV of 0.92 [0.08–0.30]. In the absence of suspicious CT findings, a fully negative TM panel had an NPV of 0.96 [0.89-1.00].

Conclusion

A negative TM panel argues against the presence of a cancer, especially in the absence of suspicious CT findings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Koo MM, Swann R, McPhail S, Abel GA, Elliss-Brookes L, Rubin GP, et al. Presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis: evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:73–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Koo MM, Swann R, McPhail S, Abel GA, Elliss-Brookes L, Rubin GP, et al. Presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis: evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:73–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Aligué J, Vicente M, Arnau A, Trapé J, Martínez E, Bonet M, et al. Etiologies and 12-month mortality in patients with isolated involuntary weight loss at a rapid diagnostic unit. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0257752.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aligué J, Vicente M, Arnau A, Trapé J, Martínez E, Bonet M, et al. Etiologies and 12-month mortality in patients with isolated involuntary weight loss at a rapid diagnostic unit. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0257752.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Bosch X, Monclús E, Escoda O, Guerra-García M, Moreno P, Guasch N, et al. Unintentional weight loss: clinical characteristics and outcomes in a prospective cohort of 2677 patients. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0175125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bosch X, Monclús E, Escoda O, Guerra-García M, Moreno P, Guasch N, et al. Unintentional weight loss: clinical characteristics and outcomes in a prospective cohort of 2677 patients. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0175125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Metalidis C, Knockaert DC, Bobbaers H, Vanderschueren S. Involuntary weight loss. Does a negative baseline evaluation provide adequate reassurance? Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19:345–9.CrossRefPubMed Metalidis C, Knockaert DC, Bobbaers H, Vanderschueren S. Involuntary weight loss. Does a negative baseline evaluation provide adequate reassurance? Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19:345–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lankisch P, Gerzmann M, Gerzmann JF, Lehnick D. Unintentional weight loss: diagnosis and prognosis. The first prospective follow-up study from a secondary referral centre. J Intern Med. 2001;249:41–6.CrossRefPubMed Lankisch P, Gerzmann M, Gerzmann JF, Lehnick D. Unintentional weight loss: diagnosis and prognosis. The first prospective follow-up study from a secondary referral centre. J Intern Med. 2001;249:41–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Baicus C, Rimbas M, Baicus A, Caraiola S. Grupul De Studiu Al Scaderii Ponderale Involuntare. Cancer and involuntary weight loss: failure to validate a prediction score. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e95286.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Baicus C, Rimbas M, Baicus A, Caraiola S. Grupul De Studiu Al Scaderii Ponderale Involuntare. Cancer and involuntary weight loss: failure to validate a prediction score. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e95286.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC, Clarke SJ. Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e493–503.CrossRefPubMed Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC, Clarke SJ. Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e493–503.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference McGovern J, Dolan RD, Skipworth RJ, Laird BJ, McMillan DC. Cancer cachexia: a nutritional or a systemic inflammatory syndrome? Br J Cancer. 2022;1–4. McGovern J, Dolan RD, Skipworth RJ, Laird BJ, McMillan DC. Cancer cachexia: a nutritional or a systemic inflammatory syndrome? Br J Cancer. 2022;1–4.
10.
go back to reference Watson J, Salisbury C, Banks J, Whiting P, Hamilton W. Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records. Br J Cancer. 2019;120:1045–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Watson J, Salisbury C, Banks J, Whiting P, Hamilton W. Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records. Br J Cancer. 2019;120:1045–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Molina R, Bosch X, Auge JM, Filella X, Escudero JM, Molina V, et al. Utility of serum tumor markers as an aid in the differential diagnosis of patients with clinical suspicion of cancer and in patients with cancer of unknown primary site. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:463–74.CrossRefPubMed Molina R, Bosch X, Auge JM, Filella X, Escudero JM, Molina V, et al. Utility of serum tumor markers as an aid in the differential diagnosis of patients with clinical suspicion of cancer and in patients with cancer of unknown primary site. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:463–74.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bosch X, Molina R, Marrades R, Augé JM, Pellicé M, López-Soto A. Tumour markers with clinically controlled cut-offs for suspected cancer. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021;51:e13523.CrossRefPubMed Bosch X, Molina R, Marrades R, Augé JM, Pellicé M, López-Soto A. Tumour markers with clinically controlled cut-offs for suspected cancer. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021;51:e13523.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Trapé J, Aligue J, Vicente M, Arnau A, San-Jose A, Ordeig J, et al. Tumour markers in the Differential diagnosis of patients with isolated Involuntary Weight loss. Vivo. 2021;35:3361–7.CrossRef Trapé J, Aligue J, Vicente M, Arnau A, San-Jose A, Ordeig J, et al. Tumour markers in the Differential diagnosis of patients with isolated Involuntary Weight loss. Vivo. 2021;35:3361–7.CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Duffy MJ. Role of tumor markers in patients with solid cancers: a critical review. Eur J Intern Med. 2007;18:175–84.CrossRefPubMed Duffy MJ. Role of tumor markers in patients with solid cancers: a critical review. Eur J Intern Med. 2007;18:175–84.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Gion M, Trevisiol C, Rutjes AWS, Rainato G, Fabricio ASC. Circulating tumor markers: a guide to their appropriate clinical use| comparative summary of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines (PART 1). Int J Biol Markers. 2016;31:e332–67.CrossRefPubMed Gion M, Trevisiol C, Rutjes AWS, Rainato G, Fabricio ASC. Circulating tumor markers: a guide to their appropriate clinical use| comparative summary of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines (PART 1). Int J Biol Markers. 2016;31:e332–67.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Trapé J, Filella X, Alsina-Donadeu M, Juan-Pereira L, Bosch-Ferrer Á, Rigo-Bonnin R, et al. Increased plasma concentrations of tumour markers in the absence of neoplasia. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:1605–20.CrossRefPubMed Trapé J, Filella X, Alsina-Donadeu M, Juan-Pereira L, Bosch-Ferrer Á, Rigo-Bonnin R, et al. Increased plasma concentrations of tumour markers in the absence of neoplasia. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:1605–20.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gion M, Trevisiol C, Rutjes AWS, Rainato G, Fabricio ASC. Circulating tumor markers: a guide to their appropriate clinical use| comparative summary of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines (PART 3). Int J Biol Markers. 2017;32:e147–81.CrossRefPubMed Gion M, Trevisiol C, Rutjes AWS, Rainato G, Fabricio ASC. Circulating tumor markers: a guide to their appropriate clinical use| comparative summary of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines (PART 3). Int J Biol Markers. 2017;32:e147–81.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gion M, Trevisiol C, Rutjes AWS, Rainato G, Fabricio ASC. Circulating tumor markers: a guide to their appropriate clinical use: comparative summary of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines (PART 2). Int J Biol Markers. 2017;32:1–52.CrossRef Gion M, Trevisiol C, Rutjes AWS, Rainato G, Fabricio ASC. Circulating tumor markers: a guide to their appropriate clinical use: comparative summary of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines (PART 2). Int J Biol Markers. 2017;32:1–52.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chandarana M, Shrestha K, Parmeshwar R. Principles of cancer screening. Surg (Oxford). 2021;39:221–7.CrossRef Chandarana M, Shrestha K, Parmeshwar R. Principles of cancer screening. Surg (Oxford). 2021;39:221–7.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sox HC, Liang MH. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Guidelines for rational use. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:515–23.CrossRefPubMed Sox HC, Liang MH. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Guidelines for rational use. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:515–23.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Evans WJ, Morley JE, Argilés J, Bales C, Baracos V, Guttridge D, et al. Cachexia: a new definition. Clin Nutr. 2008;27:793–9.CrossRefPubMed Evans WJ, Morley JE, Argilés J, Bales C, Baracos V, Guttridge D, et al. Cachexia: a new definition. Clin Nutr. 2008;27:793–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Zhi M, Ding EL, Theisen-Toupal J, Whelan J, Arnaout R. The Landscape of Inappropriate Laboratory Testing: a 15-Year Meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78962.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhi M, Ding EL, Theisen-Toupal J, Whelan J, Arnaout R. The Landscape of Inappropriate Laboratory Testing: a 15-Year Meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78962.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Rozet F, Hennequin C, Beauval JB, Beuzeboc P, Cormier L, Fromont-Hankard G, et al. [French ccAFU guidelines - update 2018–2020: prostate cancer]. Prog Urol. 2018;28(Suppl 1):R81–132.CrossRefPubMed Rozet F, Hennequin C, Beauval JB, Beuzeboc P, Cormier L, Fromont-Hankard G, et al. [French ccAFU guidelines - update 2018–2020: prostate cancer]. Prog Urol. 2018;28(Suppl 1):R81–132.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Buttgereit F, Matteson EL, Dejaco C. Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis. JAMA. 2020;324:993–4.CrossRefPubMed Buttgereit F, Matteson EL, Dejaco C. Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis. JAMA. 2020;324:993–4.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Geetha D, Jefferson JA, ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. Core Curriculum 2020. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75:124–37.CrossRefPubMed Geetha D, Jefferson JA, ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. Core Curriculum 2020. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75:124–37.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Rezac J, Honsova E, Masek M, Rysava R, Neprasova M, Jancova E, et al. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis mimicking cancer: a diagnostic dilemma. J Nephrol. 2022;35:675–8.CrossRefPubMed Rezac J, Honsova E, Masek M, Rysava R, Neprasova M, Jancova E, et al. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis mimicking cancer: a diagnostic dilemma. J Nephrol. 2022;35:675–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Giat E, Ehrenfeld M, Shoenfeld Y. Cancer and autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun rev. 2017;16:1049–57.CrossRefPubMed Giat E, Ehrenfeld M, Shoenfeld Y. Cancer and autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun rev. 2017;16:1049–57.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Goh Y, Dan YY, Chua W, Jagmohan P, Lee JKT, Thian YL. Diagnostic utility of whole body CT scanning in patients with unexplained weight loss. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0200686.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goh Y, Dan YY, Chua W, Jagmohan P, Lee JKT, Thian YL. Diagnostic utility of whole body CT scanning in patients with unexplained weight loss. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0200686.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Ponzoni M, Campo E, Nakamura S. Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma: a chameleon with multiple faces and many masks. Blood. 2018;132:1561–7.CrossRefPubMed Ponzoni M, Campo E, Nakamura S. Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma: a chameleon with multiple faces and many masks. Blood. 2018;132:1561–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Banerjee T, Calvi LM, Becker MW, Liesveld JL. Flaming and fanning: the Spectrum of inflammatory influences in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood Rev. 2019;36:57–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Banerjee T, Calvi LM, Becker MW, Liesveld JL. Flaming and fanning: the Spectrum of inflammatory influences in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood Rev. 2019;36:57–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Nair M, Sandhu SS, Sharma AK. Cancer molecular markers: a guide to cancer detection and management. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;52:39–55.CrossRefPubMed Nair M, Sandhu SS, Sharma AK. Cancer molecular markers: a guide to cancer detection and management. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;52:39–55.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Delgado-Bolton RC, Fernández-Pérez C, González-Maté A, Carreras JL. Meta-analysis of the performance of 18F-FDG PET in primary tumor detection in unknown primary tumors. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1301–14.PubMed Delgado-Bolton RC, Fernández-Pérez C, González-Maté A, Carreras JL. Meta-analysis of the performance of 18F-FDG PET in primary tumor detection in unknown primary tumors. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1301–14.PubMed
35.
go back to reference García Vicente AM, Delgado-Bolton RC, Amo-Salas M, López-Fidalgo J, Caresia Aróztegui AP, García Garzón JR, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of malignancy in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1575–87.CrossRefPubMed García Vicente AM, Delgado-Bolton RC, Amo-Salas M, López-Fidalgo J, Caresia Aróztegui AP, García Garzón JR, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of malignancy in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1575–87.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Slart RHJA, Writing group et al. Reviewer group, Members of EANM Cardiovascular, Members of EANM Infection & Inflammation, Members of Committees, SNMMI Cardiovascular,. FDG-PET/CT(A) imaging in large vessel vasculitis and polymyalgia rheumatica: joint procedural recommendation of the EANM, SNMMI, and the PET Interest Group (PIG), and endorsed by the ASNC. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1250–69. Slart RHJA, Writing group et al. Reviewer group, Members of EANM Cardiovascular, Members of EANM Infection & Inflammation, Members of Committees, SNMMI Cardiovascular,. FDG-PET/CT(A) imaging in large vessel vasculitis and polymyalgia rheumatica: joint procedural recommendation of the EANM, SNMMI, and the PET Interest Group (PIG), and endorsed by the ASNC. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1250–69.
Metadata
Title
Relevance of blood tumor markers in inpatients with significant involuntary weight loss and elevated levels of inflammation biomarkers
Authors
Morgane Gronnier
Kaies Hedhli
Chloé Sauzay
Valéry Salle
Pierre Duhaut
Jean Schmidt
Amandine Dernoncourt
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12201-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Cancer 1/2024 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine