Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 2/2024

05-08-2023 | Urolithiasis | Original Article

Assessment of clinically significant urolithiasis positivity rate using CT KUB for suspected renal colic

Authors: Toni Anderson, Carla Hopper, Eoin MacCraith, Aileen McCabe, Conor P. Shortt

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 2/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Unenhanced low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys, ureter and bladder (CT KUB) is the gold standard diagnostic imaging modality in the assessment of suspected renal colic. As the radiation dose is not negligible, it is important to monitor the diagnostic yield of CT KUBs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic yield of CT KUB studies performed for suspected renal colic in patients presenting to the emergency department.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of 500 patients who underwent CT KUB for suspected renal colic over a seven month period from June 2019 to January 2020. Clinical information and imaging was reviewed for each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Forty-nine percent of patients in the series were female (248/500) and the mean age was 45. The positivity rate for obstructing ureteral calculus was 34% (169/500). Concerningly, there was a significantly lower positivity rate in females compared to males (19% versus 48%; p < 0.0001) which raises the issue of unnecessary radiation exposure to this cohort. In the 200 female patients who were negative for obstructing urolithiasis, the mean age was 43. Females also had a significantly higher rate of negative CT KUB (62% versus 37%; p < 0.0001) where no underlying alternative pathology was diagnosed.

Conclusions

Women are less likely than men to have obstructing urolithiasis on CT KUB for suspected renal colic. This difference is not accounted for by a higher rate of alternative diagnoses among female patients. The findings of this study should prompt clinicians to exercise caution when considering this imaging modality in this patient cohort.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Li JK, Teoh JY, Ng CF (2019) Updates in endourological management of urolithiasis. Int J Urol 26(2):172–183CrossRefPubMed Li JK, Teoh JY, Ng CF (2019) Updates in endourological management of urolithiasis. Int J Urol 26(2):172–183CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sorokin I et al (2017) Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 35(9):1301–1320CrossRefPubMed Sorokin I et al (2017) Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 35(9):1301–1320CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Ray AA et al (2010) Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology 76(2):295–300CrossRefPubMed Ray AA et al (2010) Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology 76(2):295–300CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Luyckx F (2015) Who wants to go further has to know the past: A comment upon: Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis-R. Smith-Bindman et al. N Engl J Med 2014 Sep 18;371(12):1100–1110. World J Urol 33(10):1371–2 Luyckx F (2015) Who wants to go further has to know the past: A comment upon: Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis-R. Smith-Bindman et al. N Engl J Med 2014 Sep 18;371(12):1100–1110. World J Urol 33(10):1371–2
6.
go back to reference Urology EAO (2020) Urolithiasis Guidelines. Accessed Dec 2021 Urology EAO (2020) Urolithiasis Guidelines. Accessed Dec 2021
7.
go back to reference Ahmad NA, Ather MH, Rees J (2003) Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Int J Urol 10(6):287–292CrossRefPubMed Ahmad NA, Ather MH, Rees J (2003) Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Int J Urol 10(6):287–292CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dalrymple NC et al (1998) The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 159(3):735–740CrossRefPubMed Dalrymple NC et al (1998) The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 159(3):735–740CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chowdhury FU et al (2007) Unenhanced multidetector CT (CT KUB) in the initial imaging of suspected acute renal colic: evaluating a new service. Clin Radiol 62(10):970–977CrossRefPubMed Chowdhury FU et al (2007) Unenhanced multidetector CT (CT KUB) in the initial imaging of suspected acute renal colic: evaluating a new service. Clin Radiol 62(10):970–977CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Spielmann AL et al (2002) Decreasing the radiation dose for renal stone CT: a feasibility study of single- and multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(5):1058–1062CrossRefPubMed Spielmann AL et al (2002) Decreasing the radiation dose for renal stone CT: a feasibility study of single- and multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(5):1058–1062CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Weinrich JM et al (2018) Low-Dose CT for Evaluation of Suspected Urolithiasis: Diagnostic Yield for Assessment of Alternative Diagnoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210(3):557–563CrossRefPubMed Weinrich JM et al (2018) Low-Dose CT for Evaluation of Suspected Urolithiasis: Diagnostic Yield for Assessment of Alternative Diagnoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210(3):557–563CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lescay HA, Jiang J, Tuma F (2021) Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis, Ureter, in StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2021, StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island (FL) Lescay HA, Jiang J, Tuma F (2021) Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis, Ureter, in StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2021, StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island (FL)
14.
go back to reference Burgher A et al (2004) Progression of nephrolithiasis: long-term outcomes with observation of asymptomatic calculi. J Endourol 18(6):534–539CrossRefPubMed Burgher A et al (2004) Progression of nephrolithiasis: long-term outcomes with observation of asymptomatic calculi. J Endourol 18(6):534–539CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Assimos D et al (2016) Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. PART I J Urol 196(4):1153–1160CrossRefPubMed Assimos D et al (2016) Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. PART I J Urol 196(4):1153–1160CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Blachar A et al (2006) Preauthorization of CT and MRI examinations: assessment of a managed care preauthorization program based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and the Royal College of Radiology guidelines. J Am Coll Radiol 3(11):851–859CrossRefPubMed Blachar A et al (2006) Preauthorization of CT and MRI examinations: assessment of a managed care preauthorization program based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and the Royal College of Radiology guidelines. J Am Coll Radiol 3(11):851–859CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Patatas K et al (2012) Emergency department imaging protocol for suspected acute renal colic: re-evaluating our service. Br J Radiol 85(1016):1118–1122CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patatas K et al (2012) Emergency department imaging protocol for suspected acute renal colic: re-evaluating our service. Br J Radiol 85(1016):1118–1122CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Sarofim M, Teo A, Wilson R (2016) Management of alternative pathology detected using CT KUB in suspected ureteric colic. Int J Surg 32:179–182CrossRefPubMed Sarofim M, Teo A, Wilson R (2016) Management of alternative pathology detected using CT KUB in suspected ureteric colic. Int J Surg 32:179–182CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Khan N et al (2012) Has the significance of incidental findings on unenhanced computed tomography for urolithiasis been overestimated? A retrospective review of over 800 patients. Arab J Urol 10(2):149–154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khan N et al (2012) Has the significance of incidental findings on unenhanced computed tomography for urolithiasis been overestimated? A retrospective review of over 800 patients. Arab J Urol 10(2):149–154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Khadra MH et al (2000) A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice. J Urol 163(2):524–527CrossRefPubMed Khadra MH et al (2000) A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice. J Urol 163(2):524–527CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Luchs JS et al (2002) Utility of hematuria testing in patients with suspected renal colic: correlation with unenhanced helical CT results. Urology 59(6):839–842CrossRefPubMed Luchs JS et al (2002) Utility of hematuria testing in patients with suspected renal colic: correlation with unenhanced helical CT results. Urology 59(6):839–842CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kobayashi T et al (2003) Impact of date of onset on the absence of hematuria in patients with acute renal colic. J Urol 170(4 Pt 1):1093–1096CrossRefPubMed Kobayashi T et al (2003) Impact of date of onset on the absence of hematuria in patients with acute renal colic. J Urol 170(4 Pt 1):1093–1096CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gómez Rivas J et al (2020) Undergraduate Education for Urology in Europe. Where Do We Stand? Eur Urol 78(3):381–384 Gómez Rivas J et al (2020) Undergraduate Education for Urology in Europe. Where Do We Stand? Eur Urol 78(3):381–384
Metadata
Title
Assessment of clinically significant urolithiasis positivity rate using CT KUB for suspected renal colic
Authors
Toni Anderson
Carla Hopper
Eoin MacCraith
Aileen McCabe
Conor P. Shortt
Publication date
05-08-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03477-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 2/2024 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.