Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgery Today 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Review Article

Training for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Authors: Tamotsu Kuroki, Hikaru Fujioka

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

In recent years, laparoscopic procedures have developed rapidly, and the reports of laparoscopic pancreatic resection including laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) have increased in number. Although LPD is a complex procedure with high mortality, the training system for LPD remains unestablished. Ensuring patient safety is extremely important, even in challenging surgeries such a LPD. At present, several tools have been developed for surgical education to ensure patient safety preoperatively, such as video learning, virtual reality simulators, and cadaver training. Although LPD is reported as a safe and feasible choice, LPD is still a challenging operation. An LPD training system should be established with a board-certified system.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Takaori K, Tanigawa N. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: the past, present and future. Surg Today. 2007;37:535–45.CrossRef Takaori K, Tanigawa N. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: the past, present and future. Surg Today. 2007;37:535–45.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Madhankumar MV. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:222–30.CrossRef Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Madhankumar MV. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:222–30.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barja-Cacho D, Al-Refaie WB, Vickers SM, Tuttle TM, Jensen EH. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:758–65.CrossRef Barja-Cacho D, Al-Refaie WB, Vickers SM, Tuttle TM, Jensen EH. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:758–65.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nakamura Y, Uchida E, Nomura T, Aimoto T, Matsumoto S, Tajiri T. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: some benefits of evolving surgical techniques. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:741–8.CrossRef Nakamura Y, Uchida E, Nomura T, Aimoto T, Matsumoto S, Tajiri T. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: some benefits of evolving surgical techniques. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:741–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Al-Taan OS, Stephenson JA, Briggs C, Pollard C, Metcalfe MS, Dennison AR. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: a review of present results and future prospect. HPB. 2010;12:239–43.CrossRef Al-Taan OS, Stephenson JA, Briggs C, Pollard C, Metcalfe MS, Dennison AR. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: a review of present results and future prospect. HPB. 2010;12:239–43.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kendrick ML, Cusati D. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145:19–23.CrossRef Kendrick ML, Cusati D. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145:19–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gumbs AA, Rodriguez Rivera AM, Milone L, Hoffman JP. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a review of 285 published cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1335–41.CrossRef Gumbs AA, Rodriguez Rivera AM, Milone L, Hoffman JP. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a review of 285 published cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1335–41.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ammori BJ, Ayiomamitis GD. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systemic review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2084–99.CrossRef Ammori BJ, Ayiomamitis GD. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systemic review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2084–99.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2012;255:1048–59.CrossRef Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2012;255:1048–59.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kuroki T, Adachi T, Okamoto T, Kanematsu T. A non-randomized comparative study of laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59:570–3.CrossRef Kuroki T, Adachi T, Okamoto T, Kanematsu T. A non-randomized comparative study of laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59:570–3.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Abu Hilal M, Takhar AS. Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: current concepts. Pancreatology. 2013;13:443–8.CrossRef Abu Hilal M, Takhar AS. Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: current concepts. Pancreatology. 2013;13:443–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bausch D, Keck T. Laparoscopic pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398:939–45.CrossRef Bausch D, Keck T. Laparoscopic pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398:939–45.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Correa-Gallego C, Dinkelspiel HE, Sulimanoff I, Fisher S, Vinuela EF, Kingham TP, et al. Minimally-invasive vs. open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systemic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:129–39.CrossRef Correa-Gallego C, Dinkelspiel HE, Sulimanoff I, Fisher S, Vinuela EF, Kingham TP, et al. Minimally-invasive vs. open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systemic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:129–39.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systemic literature review. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:9–23.CrossRef Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systemic literature review. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:9–23.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, et al. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg. 2014;260:633–8.CrossRef Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, et al. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg. 2014;260:633–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC, Babu NS, Srivatsan Gurumurthy S, Anand Vijai N, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1443–50.CrossRef Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC, Babu NS, Srivatsan Gurumurthy S, Anand Vijai N, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1443–50.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Villacreses D, Mody K, Johnson E, Li Z, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2233–41.CrossRef Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Villacreses D, Mody K, Johnson E, Li Z, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2233–41.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tseng JF, Pisters PW, Lee JE, Wang H, Gomez HF, Sun CC, et al. The learning curve in pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2007;141:694–701.CrossRef Tseng JF, Pisters PW, Lee JE, Wang H, Gomez HF, Sun CC, et al. The learning curve in pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2007;141:694–701.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Speicher PJ, Nussbaum DP, White RR, Zani S, Mosca PJ, Blazer DG 3rd, et al. Defining the learning curve for team-based laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4014–9.CrossRef Speicher PJ, Nussbaum DP, White RR, Zani S, Mosca PJ, Blazer DG 3rd, et al. Defining the learning curve for team-based laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4014–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang CE, Prinz RA, Roggin KK, Bentrem DJ, et al. Early national experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: a comparison of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:175–84.CrossRef Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang CE, Prinz RA, Roggin KK, Bentrem DJ, et al. Early national experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: a comparison of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:175–84.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kuroki T, Kitasato A, Adachi T, Tanaka T, Hirabaru M, Matsushima H, et al. Learning curve for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single surgeon’s experience with consecutive patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61:838–41.PubMed Kuroki T, Kitasato A, Adachi T, Tanaka T, Hirabaru M, Matsushima H, et al. Learning curve for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single surgeon’s experience with consecutive patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61:838–41.PubMed
22.
go back to reference van Det MJ, Meijerink WJ, Hoff C, Middel B, Pierie JP. The learning effect of intraoperative video-enhanced surgical procedure training. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2261–7.CrossRef van Det MJ, Meijerink WJ, Hoff C, Middel B, Pierie JP. The learning effect of intraoperative video-enhanced surgical procedure training. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2261–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chiu CJ, Lobo Prabhu K, Tan-Tam CC, Panton ON, Meneghetti A. Using three-dimensional laparoscopy as a novel training tool for novice trainees compared with two-dimensional laparoscopy. Am J Surg. 2015;209:824–7.CrossRef Chiu CJ, Lobo Prabhu K, Tan-Tam CC, Panton ON, Meneghetti A. Using three-dimensional laparoscopy as a novel training tool for novice trainees compared with two-dimensional laparoscopy. Am J Surg. 2015;209:824–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sørensen SMD, Konge L, Bjerrum F. 3D vision accelerates laparoscopic proficiency and skills are transferable to 2D conditions: a randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2017;214:63–8.CrossRef Sørensen SMD, Konge L, Bjerrum F. 3D vision accelerates laparoscopic proficiency and skills are transferable to 2D conditions: a randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2017;214:63–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sakata S, Grove PM, Hill A, Watson MO, Stevenson ARL. Impact of simulated three-dimensional perception on precision of depth judgements, technical performance and perceived workload in laparoscopy. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1097–106.CrossRef Sakata S, Grove PM, Hill A, Watson MO, Stevenson ARL. Impact of simulated three-dimensional perception on precision of depth judgements, technical performance and perceived workload in laparoscopy. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1097–106.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kinoshita T, Shibasaki H, Enomoto N, Sahara Y, Sunagawa H, Nishida T. Laparoscopic splenic hilar lymph node dissection for proximal gastric cancer using integrated three-dimensional anatomic simulation software. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:2613–9.CrossRef Kinoshita T, Shibasaki H, Enomoto N, Sahara Y, Sunagawa H, Nishida T. Laparoscopic splenic hilar lymph node dissection for proximal gastric cancer using integrated three-dimensional anatomic simulation software. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:2613–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Jung MK, Buchs NC, Azagury DE, Hagen ME, Morel P. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: a valid option? Minerva Chir. 2013;68:489–97.PubMed Jung MK, Buchs NC, Azagury DE, Hagen ME, Morel P. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: a valid option? Minerva Chir. 2013;68:489–97.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Mochizuki K, Takatsuki M, Soyama A, Hidaka M, Obatake M, Eguchi S. The usefulness of a high-speed 3D-image analysis system in pediatric living donor liver transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2012;17:31–4.CrossRef Mochizuki K, Takatsuki M, Soyama A, Hidaka M, Obatake M, Eguchi S. The usefulness of a high-speed 3D-image analysis system in pediatric living donor liver transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2012;17:31–4.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Komai Y, Sakai Y, Gotohda N, Kobayashi T, Kawakami S, Saito N. A novel 3-dimensional image analysis system for case-specific kidney anatomy and surgical simulation to facilitate clampless partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2014;83:500–6.CrossRef Komai Y, Sakai Y, Gotohda N, Kobayashi T, Kawakami S, Saito N. A novel 3-dimensional image analysis system for case-specific kidney anatomy and surgical simulation to facilitate clampless partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2014;83:500–6.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Fang CH, Kong D, Wang X, Wang H, Xiang N, Fan Y, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the peripancreatic vascular system based on computed tomographic angiography images and its clinical application in the surgical management of pancreatic tumors. Pancreas. 2014;43:389–95.CrossRef Fang CH, Kong D, Wang X, Wang H, Xiang N, Fan Y, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the peripancreatic vascular system based on computed tomographic angiography images and its clinical application in the surgical management of pancreatic tumors. Pancreas. 2014;43:389–95.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Aoki T, Murakami M, Fujimori A, Koizumi T, Enami Y, Kusano T, et al. Routes for virtually guided endoscopic liver resection of subdiaphragmatic liver tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401:263–73.CrossRef Aoki T, Murakami M, Fujimori A, Koizumi T, Enami Y, Kusano T, et al. Routes for virtually guided endoscopic liver resection of subdiaphragmatic liver tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401:263–73.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Miyamoto R, Oshiro Y, Nakayama K, Kohno K, Hashimoto S, Fukunaga K, et al. Three-dimensional simulation of pancreatic surgery showing the size and location of the main pancreatic duct. Surg Today. 2017;47:357–64.CrossRef Miyamoto R, Oshiro Y, Nakayama K, Kohno K, Hashimoto S, Fukunaga K, et al. Three-dimensional simulation of pancreatic surgery showing the size and location of the main pancreatic duct. Surg Today. 2017;47:357–64.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Torres IO, De Luccia N. A simulator for training in endovascular aneurysm repair: the use of three dimensional printers. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54:247–53.CrossRef Torres IO, De Luccia N. A simulator for training in endovascular aneurysm repair: the use of three dimensional printers. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54:247–53.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Pietrabissa A, Marconi S, Peri A, Pugliese L, Cavazzi E, Vinci A, et al. From CT scanning to 3-D printing technology for the preoperative planning in laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:366–71.CrossRef Pietrabissa A, Marconi S, Peri A, Pugliese L, Cavazzi E, Vinci A, et al. From CT scanning to 3-D printing technology for the preoperative planning in laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:366–71.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Andolfi C, Plana A, Kania P, Banerjee PP, Small S. Usefulness of three-dimensional modeling in surgical planning, resident training, and patient education. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27:512–5.CrossRef Andolfi C, Plana A, Kania P, Banerjee PP, Small S. Usefulness of three-dimensional modeling in surgical planning, resident training, and patient education. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27:512–5.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Cromeens BP, Ray WC, Hoehne B, Abayneh F, Adler B, Besner GE. Facilitating surgeon understanding of complex anatomy using a three-dimensional printed model. J Surg Res. 2017;216:18–25.CrossRef Cromeens BP, Ray WC, Hoehne B, Abayneh F, Adler B, Besner GE. Facilitating surgeon understanding of complex anatomy using a three-dimensional printed model. J Surg Res. 2017;216:18–25.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Sharma M, Macafee D, Pranesh N, Horgan AF. Construct validity of fresh frozen human cadaver as a training model in minimal access surgery. JSLS. 2012;16:345–52.CrossRef Sharma M, Macafee D, Pranesh N, Horgan AF. Construct validity of fresh frozen human cadaver as a training model in minimal access surgery. JSLS. 2012;16:345–52.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference White SA, Satchidanand RY, French JJ, Tait IZ, Manas DM. A cadaver lab training facility to facilitate laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24:357–60.CrossRef White SA, Satchidanand RY, French JJ, Tait IZ, Manas DM. A cadaver lab training facility to facilitate laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24:357–60.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Saberski ER, Orenstein SB, Matheson D, Novitsky YW. Real-time cadaveric laparoscopy and laparoscopic video demonstrations in gross anatomy: an observation of impact on learning and career choice. Am Surg. 2015;81:96–100.PubMed Saberski ER, Orenstein SB, Matheson D, Novitsky YW. Real-time cadaveric laparoscopy and laparoscopic video demonstrations in gross anatomy: an observation of impact on learning and career choice. Am Surg. 2015;81:96–100.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Britt RC, Scerbo MW, Montano M, Kennedy RA, Prytz E, Stefanidis D. Intracorporeal suturing: transfer from fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery to cadavers results in substantial increase in mental workload. Surgery. 2015;158:1428–33.CrossRef Britt RC, Scerbo MW, Montano M, Kennedy RA, Prytz E, Stefanidis D. Intracorporeal suturing: transfer from fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery to cadavers results in substantial increase in mental workload. Surgery. 2015;158:1428–33.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Sharma M, Macafee D, Horgan AF. Basic laparoscopic skills training using fresh frozen cadaver: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2013;206:23–31.CrossRef Sharma M, Macafee D, Horgan AF. Basic laparoscopic skills training using fresh frozen cadaver: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2013;206:23–31.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Poudel S, Kurashima Y, Shichinohe T, Kitashiro S, Kanehira E, Hirano S. Evaluation of hands-on seminar for reduced port surgery using fresh porcine cadaver model. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12:214–9.CrossRef Poudel S, Kurashima Y, Shichinohe T, Kitashiro S, Kanehira E, Hirano S. Evaluation of hands-on seminar for reduced port surgery using fresh porcine cadaver model. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12:214–9.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Porzionato A, Polese L, Lezoche E, Macchi V, Lezoche G, Da Dalt G, et al. On the suitability of Thiel cadavers for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): surgical training, feasibility studies, and anatomical education. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:737–46.CrossRef Porzionato A, Polese L, Lezoche E, Macchi V, Lezoche G, Da Dalt G, et al. On the suitability of Thiel cadavers for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): surgical training, feasibility studies, and anatomical education. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:737–46.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Rai BP, Stolzenburg JU, Healy S, Tang B, Jones P, Sweeney C, et al. Preliminary validation of Thiel embalmed cadavers for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2015;29:595–603.CrossRef Rai BP, Stolzenburg JU, Healy S, Tang B, Jones P, Sweeney C, et al. Preliminary validation of Thiel embalmed cadavers for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2015;29:595–603.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Imakuma ES, Ussami EY, Meyer A. Laparoscopic training model using fresh human cadavers without the establishment of penumoperitoneum. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12:190–3.CrossRef Imakuma ES, Ussami EY, Meyer A. Laparoscopic training model using fresh human cadavers without the establishment of penumoperitoneum. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12:190–3.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Yamada S, Shimada M, Imura S, Morine Y, Ikemoto T, Saito Y, et al. Effective stepwise training and procedure standardization for young surgeons to perform laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2623–9.CrossRef Yamada S, Shimada M, Imura S, Morine Y, Ikemoto T, Saito Y, et al. Effective stepwise training and procedure standardization for young surgeons to perform laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2623–9.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Hashimoto DA, Gomez ED, Danzer E, Edelson PK, Morris JB, Williams NN, et al. Intraoperative resident education for robotic laparoscopic gastric banding surgery: a pilot study on the safety of stepwise education. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:990–6.CrossRef Hashimoto DA, Gomez ED, Danzer E, Edelson PK, Morris JB, Williams NN, et al. Intraoperative resident education for robotic laparoscopic gastric banding surgery: a pilot study on the safety of stepwise education. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:990–6.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Sumida Y, Nanashima A, Abo T, Tobinaga S, Araki M, Kunizaki M, et al. Stepwise education for pancreaticoduodenectomy for young surgeons at a single Japanese institute. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57:1046–51.PubMed Sumida Y, Nanashima A, Abo T, Tobinaga S, Araki M, Kunizaki M, et al. Stepwise education for pancreaticoduodenectomy for young surgeons at a single Japanese institute. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57:1046–51.PubMed
51.
go back to reference Marangoni G, Morris-Stiff G, Deshmukh S, Hakeem A, Smith AM. A modern approach to teaching pancreatic surgery: stepwise pancreatoduodenectomy for trainees. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1597–604.CrossRef Marangoni G, Morris-Stiff G, Deshmukh S, Hakeem A, Smith AM. A modern approach to teaching pancreatic surgery: stepwise pancreatoduodenectomy for trainees. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1597–604.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Liao CH, Liu YY, Wang SY, Liu KH, Yeh CN, Yeh TS. The feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy—a stepwise procedure and learning curve. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402:853–61.CrossRef Liao CH, Liu YY, Wang SY, Liu KH, Yeh CN, Yeh TS. The feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy—a stepwise procedure and learning curve. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402:853–61.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Adam MA, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, Reed SD, Scheri RP, Blazer DG 3rd, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients. Ann Surg. 2015;262:372–7.CrossRef Adam MA, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, Reed SD, Scheri RP, Blazer DG 3rd, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients. Ann Surg. 2015;262:372–7.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference de Rooij T, Lu MZ, Steen MW, Gerhards MF, Dijkgraaf MG, Busch OR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort and registry studies. Ann Surg. 2016;264:257–67.CrossRef de Rooij T, Lu MZ, Steen MW, Gerhards MF, Dijkgraaf MG, Busch OR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort and registry studies. Ann Surg. 2016;264:257–67.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Training for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
Authors
Tamotsu Kuroki
Hikaru Fujioka
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-018-1668-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Surgery Today 2/2019 Go to the issue