Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2011

01-05-2011 | Pancreatic Tumors

Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Review of 285 Published Cases

Authors: Andrew A. Gumbs, MD, Angel M. Rodriguez Rivera, MD, Luca Milone, MD, PhD, John P. Hoffman, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Given the difficulty level of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD), limited data exist for a comparison to open pancreatoduodenectomies. As the technique becomes more diffuse, issues regarding the adequacy of oncologic margins and lymph node retrieval need to be addressed.

Methods

All published cases of MIPD were examined. Variables analyzed included conversion rates, operating room time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, follow-up, complications, mortality, lymph node retrieval, and margins.

Results

Twenty-seven articles describing outcomes after MIPD were found, and a total of 285 cases were described. Main malignancy treated was pancreatic adenocarcinoma, accounting for 32% of all cases. Eighty-seven percent were performed totally laparoscopically, and 13% were performed with a hand-assisted approach to facilitate the reconstruction step of the procedure. The rate of conversion to an open procedure was 9%. Estimated blood loss had a weighted average (WA) of 189 mL. Average length of stay had a WA of 12 days, and average follow-up had a WA of 14 months. The overall complication rate was 48%, and the overall mortality rate was 2%. Average lymph nodes retrieved ranged from 7 to 36 nodes, with a WA of 15 nodes, and positive margins of resection were reported to be positive in 0.4% of patients with malignant disease.

Conclusions

This review found similar outcomes with respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality rates compared to open pancreatoduodenectomies. The oncologic goals of pancreatic resection may be able to be achieved by MIPD, but longer follow-up and larger series are still needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of common bile duct: a case report and literature review. Med Sci Monit. 2006;12:CS57–60. Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of common bile duct: a case report and literature review. Med Sci Monit. 2006;12:CS57–60.
2.
go back to reference Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:323–6.PubMed Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:323–6.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kitano S, Shiraishi N. Current status of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in Japan. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:182–5.PubMedCrossRef Kitano S, Shiraishi N. Current status of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in Japan. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:182–5.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ammori BJ. Pancreatic surgery in the laparoscopic era. JOP. 2003;4:187–92.PubMed Ammori BJ. Pancreatic surgery in the laparoscopic era. JOP. 2003;4:187–92.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ammori BJ. Applications of minimally invasive surgery in the management of inflammatory and neoplastic diseases of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004;11:107–11.PubMedCrossRef Ammori BJ. Applications of minimally invasive surgery in the management of inflammatory and neoplastic diseases of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004;11:107–11.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Matsuno S, Egawa S, Arai K. Trends in treatment for pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001;8:544–8.PubMedCrossRef Matsuno S, Egawa S, Arai K. Trends in treatment for pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001;8:544–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Underwood RA, Soper NJ. Current status of laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6:154–64.PubMedCrossRef Underwood RA, Soper NJ. Current status of laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6:154–64.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:408–10.PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:408–10.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gagner M, Palermo M. Laparoscopic Whipple procedure: review of the literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:726–30.PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Palermo M. Laparoscopic Whipple procedure: review of the literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:726–30.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gumbs AA, Gayet B. The laparoscopic duodenopancreatectomy: the posterior approach. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:539–40.PubMedCrossRef Gumbs AA, Gayet B. The laparoscopic duodenopancreatectomy: the posterior approach. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:539–40.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, et al. Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:731–40.PubMedCrossRef Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, et al. Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:731–40.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kendrick ML, Cusati D. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145:19–23.PubMedCrossRef Kendrick ML, Cusati D. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145:19–23.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pawlik TM, Gleisner AL, Cameron JL, et al. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2007;141:610–8.PubMedCrossRef Pawlik TM, Gleisner AL, Cameron JL, et al. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2007;141:610–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1994;39:178–84.PubMed Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1994;39:178–84.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Uyama I, Ogiwara H, Iida S, et al. Laparoscopic minilaparotomy pancreaticoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomy using an abdominal wall-lift method. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;6:405–10.PubMedCrossRef Uyama I, Ogiwara H, Iida S, et al. Laparoscopic minilaparotomy pancreaticoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomy using an abdominal wall-lift method. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;6:405–10.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg. 1997;1:20–5.PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg. 1997;1:20–5.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Masson B, Sa-Cunha A, Laurent C, Rault A, Collet D. Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: report of 22 cases. Ann Chir. 2003;128:452–6.PubMedCrossRef Masson B, Sa-Cunha A, Laurent C, Rault A, Collet D. Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: report of 22 cases. Ann Chir. 2003;128:452–6.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vibert E, Denet C, Gayet B. Major digestive surgery using a remote-controlled robot: the next revolution. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1002–6.PubMedCrossRef Vibert E, Denet C, Gayet B. Major digestive surgery using a remote-controlled robot: the next revolution. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1002–6.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kimura Y, Hirata K, Mukaiya M, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas head disease. Am J Surg. 2005;189:734–7.PubMedCrossRef Kimura Y, Hirata K, Mukaiya M, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas head disease. Am J Surg. 2005;189:734–7.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Staudacher C, Orsenigo E, Baccari P, Di Palo S, Crippa S. Laparoscopic assisted duodenopancreatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:352–6.PubMedCrossRef Staudacher C, Orsenigo E, Baccari P, Di Palo S, Crippa S. Laparoscopic assisted duodenopancreatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:352–6.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C, et al. Are major laparoscopic pancreatic resections worthwhile? A prospective study of 32 patients in a single institution. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1028–34.PubMedCrossRef Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C, et al. Are major laparoscopic pancreatic resections worthwhile? A prospective study of 32 patients in a single institution. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1028–34.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1045–50.PubMedCrossRef Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1045–50.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lu B, Cai X, Lu W, Huang Y, Jin X. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to treat cancer of the ampulla of Vater. JSLS. 2006;10:97–100.PubMed Lu B, Cai X, Lu W, Huang Y, Jin X. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to treat cancer of the ampulla of Vater. JSLS. 2006;10:97–100.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Menon KV, Hayden JD, Prasad KR, Verbeke CS. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and reconstruction for a cholangiocarcinoma of the bile duct. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17:775–80.PubMedCrossRef Menon KV, Hayden JD, Prasad KR, Verbeke CS. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and reconstruction for a cholangiocarcinoma of the bile duct. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17:775–80.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tang C. Local experience of laparoscopic pancreatectomy. Hong Kong Med Diary. 2007;12:15–20. Tang C. Local experience of laparoscopic pancreatectomy. Hong Kong Med Diary. 2007;12:15–20.
27.
go back to reference Gumbs AA, Crovari F, Vidal C, Henri P, Gayet B. Modified robotic lightweight endoscope (ViKY) validation in vivo in a porcine model. Surg Innov. 2007;14:261–4.PubMedCrossRef Gumbs AA, Crovari F, Vidal C, Henri P, Gayet B. Modified robotic lightweight endoscope (ViKY) validation in vivo in a porcine model. Surg Innov. 2007;14:261–4.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gumbs AA, Gres P, Madureira FA, Gayet B. Laparoscopic vs. open resection of noninvasive intraductal pancreatic mucinous neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:707–12. Gumbs AA, Gres P, Madureira FA, Gayet B. Laparoscopic vs. open resection of noninvasive intraductal pancreatic mucinous neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:707–12.
29.
go back to reference Pugliese R, Scandroglio I, Sansonna F, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:13–8.PubMedCrossRef Pugliese R, Scandroglio I, Sansonna F, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:13–8.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sa Cunha A, Rault A, Beau C, et al. A single-institution prospective study of laparoscopic pancreatic resection. Arch Surg. 2008;143:289–95.PubMedCrossRef Sa Cunha A, Rault A, Beau C, et al. A single-institution prospective study of laparoscopic pancreatic resection. Arch Surg. 2008;143:289–95.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cho A, Yamamoto H, Nagata M, et al. A totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and reconstruction. Surg Today. 2009;39:359–62.PubMedCrossRef Cho A, Yamamoto H, Nagata M, et al. A totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and reconstruction. Surg Today. 2009;39:359–62.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Jarufe N. Totally laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: surgical technique and initial experience. Rev Chil Cir. 2009;6:22–8. Jarufe N. Totally laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: surgical technique and initial experience. Rev Chil Cir. 2009;6:22–8.
33.
go back to reference Casadei R, Marchegiani G, Laterza M, et al. Total pancreatectomy: doing it with a mini-invasive approach. JOP. 2009;10:328–31.PubMed Casadei R, Marchegiani G, Laterza M, et al. Total pancreatectomy: doing it with a mini-invasive approach. JOP. 2009;10:328–31.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Narula VK, Mikami DJ, Melvin WS. Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach. Pancreas. 2010;39:160–4.PubMedCrossRef Narula VK, Mikami DJ, Melvin WS. Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach. Pancreas. 2010;39:160–4.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Halloran CM, Ghaneh P, Bosonnet L, et al. Complications of pancreatic cancer resection. Dig Surg. 2002;19:138–46.PubMedCrossRef Halloran CM, Ghaneh P, Bosonnet L, et al. Complications of pancreatic cancer resection. Dig Surg. 2002;19:138–46.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Delcore R, Rodriguez FJ, Forster J, Hermreck AS, Thomas JH. Significance of lymph node metastases in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing curative resection. Am J Surg. 1996;172:463–8.PubMedCrossRef Delcore R, Rodriguez FJ, Forster J, Hermreck AS, Thomas JH. Significance of lymph node metastases in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing curative resection. Am J Surg. 1996;172:463–8.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW, et al. Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg. 2003;27:324–9.PubMedCrossRef Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW, et al. Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg. 2003;27:324–9.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, et al. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1310–4.PubMedCrossRef Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, et al. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1310–4.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg. 2000;232:786–95.PubMedCrossRef Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg. 2000;232:786–95.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226:248–57.PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226:248–57.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Whitehouse JD, Friedman ND, Kirkland KB, Richardson WJ, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23:183–9.PubMedCrossRef Whitehouse JD, Friedman ND, Kirkland KB, Richardson WJ, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23:183–9.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;245:187–200.PubMedCrossRef Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;245:187–200.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Rothlin MA, Schob O, Weber M. Laparoscopic gastro- and hepaticojejunostomy for palliation of pancreatic cancer: a case controlled study. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:1065–9.PubMedCrossRef Rothlin MA, Schob O, Weber M. Laparoscopic gastro- and hepaticojejunostomy for palliation of pancreatic cancer: a case controlled study. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:1065–9.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1646–57.PubMedCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1646–57.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic hand-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: initial UK experience. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:717–8.CrossRef Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic hand-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: initial UK experience. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:717–8.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Gumbs AA, Gres P, Madureura F, Gayet B. Laparoscopic vs open resection of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: single institution’s experience over 14 years. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007;393(3):391–5.CrossRef Gumbs AA, Gres P, Madureura F, Gayet B. Laparoscopic vs open resection of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: single institution’s experience over 14 years. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007;393(3):391–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Review of 285 Published Cases
Authors
Andrew A. Gumbs, MD
Angel M. Rodriguez Rivera, MD
Luca Milone, MD, PhD
John P. Hoffman, MD
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1503-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2011 Go to the issue